Articles

3D grain reverse design and shape optimization for solid rocket motor

  • Wentao LI ,
  • Yunqin HE ,
  • Wenbo LI ,
  • Yiyi ZHANG ,
  • Guozhu LIANG
Expand
  • 1.School of Astronautics,Beihang University,Beijing 102206,China
    2.School of Aerospace Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
E-mail: lgz@buaa.edu.cn

Received date: 2023-05-31

  Revised date: 2023-06-29

  Accepted date: 2023-08-16

  Online published: 2023-09-06

Supported by

National Level Project

Abstract

The solid rocket motor grain reverse design, an effort to seek the optimal grain shape to match a given internal ballistic curve, can be used to guide the conceptual design of brand-new grains. Grain reverse design is now progressing from the size optimization level towards the shape optimization and even topology optimization level. Shape optimization problems tend to have large degrees of freedom and high nonlinearity, placing extremely high demands on the computational efficiency of burn-back analysis. However, existing elliptic algorithms for burn-back analysis fail to meet the requirement. It is necessary to develop an efficient elliptic algorithm for burn-back analysis and apply it to the 3-dimensional (3D) grain reverse design. Firstly, the eikonal equation is linearized to a Helmholtz equation and a Poisson equation, forming a series of Fast Heat Conduction (FHC) methods for burn-back analysis. Among them, the f-FHC method, describing the grain geometry by cavity fraction distribution, uses the LDL decomposition method to solve the linear equations. With the principle of “once decomposition, back substitution everywhere”, the computational efficiency can be significantly improved. Secondly, the key issues of 3D grain reverse design are systematically analyzed, including the selection of objective function, the range of independent variables that need to be optimized, isolated holes identification, and casting requirements. With the aid of the evolutionary neural network, the Grain Reverse and Intelligent Design (GRID) system is developed. The calculation results show that the f-FHC method can reduce the calculation time of 3D grain burn-back analysis into less than 1 s. Targeting at the burning surface curve or internal ballistic curve of the dual-thrust grain, the GRID system successfully designs a series of new grains containing complex 3D internal cavities. The resulting grains meet the casting requirements, and their mandrels can be manufactured by 3D-print. The proposed algorithm and the developed software can provide support for the conceptual design of brand-new grains.

Cite this article

Wentao LI , Yunqin HE , Wenbo LI , Yiyi ZHANG , Guozhu LIANG . 3D grain reverse design and shape optimization for solid rocket motor[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(11) : 529089 -529089 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29089

References

1 蒋雨晴. 固体装药型面通用设计方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2018.
  JIANG Y Q. Study on general design method of solid grain internal surface[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2018 (in Chinese).
2 VANDENBRANDE J. DARPA TRADES challenge problems[EB/OL]. (2020-06-03)[2023-05-31]. .
3 WU Z P, WANG D H, ZHANG W H, et al. Solid-rocket-motor performance-matching design framework[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets201754(3): 698-707.
4 MESGARI S, BAZAZZADEH M, MOSTOFIZADEH A. Finocyl grain design using the genetic algorithm in combination with adaptive basis function construction[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering20192019: 3060173.
5 HASHISH A, AHMED M Y, ABDALLAH H, et al. Design of solid propellant grain for predefined performance criteria: AIAA-2019-2014[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2019.
6 ALBARADO K, HARTFIELD R, HURSTON B, et al. Solid rocket motor performance matching using pattern search/particle swarm optimization: AIAA-2011-5798[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
7 LI W T, LI W B, HE Y Q, et al. Reverse design of solid propellant grain for a performance-matching goal: Shape optimization via evolutionary neural network[J]. Aerospace20229(10): 552.
8 MAUTE K, DE S. Shape and material optimization of problems with dynamically evolving interfaces applied to solid rocket motors[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization202265(8): 218.
9 YOSHIMURA M, SHIMOYAMA K, MISAKA T, et al. Topology optimization of fluid problems using genetic algorithm assisted by the Kriging model[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2017109(4): 514-532.
10 BENDS?E M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem[J]. Structural Optimization19891(4): 193-202.
11 BENDS?E M P, KIKUCHI N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering198871(2): 197-224.
12 SFORZINI R H. Automated approach to design of solid rockets[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets198118(3): 200-205.
13 GREFEN B, BECKER J, LINKE S, et al. Design, production and evaluation of 3D-printed mold geometries for a hybrid rocket engine[J]. Aerospace20218(8): 220.
14 CHANDRU R A, BALASUBRAMANIAN N, OOMMEN C, et al. Additive manufacturing of solid rocket propellant grains[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power201834(4): 1090-1093.
15 王璐, 赵永超, 苗楠, 等. 复合固体推进剂直写式3D打印工艺及其性能[J]. 固体火箭技术202144(5): 650-655.
  WANG L, ZHAO Y C, MIAO N, et al. Direct-writing 3D printing technology and characteristics of composite solid propellant[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology202144(5): 650-655 (in Chinese).
16 GUIRGUIS D, AULIG N, PICELLI R, et al. Evolutionary black-box topology optimization: Challenges and promises[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation202024(4): 613-633.
17 SETHIAN J A. Curvature and the evolution of fronts[J]. Communications in Mathematical Physics1985101(4): 487-499.
18 LIU Y Q, YIN K X, BAO F T, et al. Efficient simulation of grain burning surface regression[J]. Advanced Materials Research2012466/467: 314-318.
19 CAPOZZOLI A, CURCIO C, LISENO A, et al. A comparison of Fast Marching, Fast Sweeping and Fast Iterative Methods for the solution of the eikonal equation[C]∥ 2013 21st Telecommunications Forum Telfor. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2013: 685-688.
20 李文韬,何允钦,张艺仪,等.非均匀装药的复杂燃面退移与内弹道性能预示[J/OL].北京航空航天大学学报,(2022-11-17)[2023-05-31]. .
  LI W T, HE Y Q, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Complex burning surface burn-back analysis and internal ballistic performance prediction of non-uniform grain[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2022-11-17)[2023-05-31]. (in Chinese).
21 MOKRY P. Iterative method for solving the eikonal equation[C]∥ Optics and Measurement International Conference. 2016: 263-268.
22 CHURBANOV A G, VABISHCHEVICH P N. Numerical solving a boundary value problem for the eikonal equation[C]∥ International Conference on Finite Difference Methods. Cham: Springer, 2019: 28-34.
23 CRANE K, WEISCHEDEL C, WARDETZKY M. Geodesics in heat: A new approach to computing distance based on heat flow[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics201332(5): 152.
24 PATANKAR S V. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow[M]. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980.
25 WANG M Y, WANG X M, GUO D M. A level set method for structural topology optimization[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2003192(1/2): 227-246.
26 WANG M Y, ZHOU S W. Phase field: A variational method for structural topology optimization[J]. CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences20046(6): 547-566.
27 DE RUITER M J, VAN KEULEN F. Topology optimization using a topology description function[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization200426(6): 406-416.
28 RENNICH S C, STOSIC D, DAVIS T A. Accelerating sparse Cholesky factorization on GPUs[J]. Parallel Computing201659: 140-150.
29 WILLCOX M A, BREWSTER M Q, TANG K C, et al. Solid propellant grain design and burnback simulation using a minimum distance function[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power200723(2): 465-475.
30 LI W B, LI W T, CHENG L, et al. Trajectory optimization with complex obstacle avoidance constraints via homotopy network sequential convex programming[J]. Aerospace20229(11): 720.
31 WALL M. GAlib: A C++ library of genetic algorithm components[EB/OL]. [2023-05-31]. .
32 JACOB B, GUENNEBAUD G. Eigen[EB/OL]. (2021-08-18)[2023-05-31]. .
33 DAVIS T. Suitesparse:A suite of sparse matrix software[EB/OL]. (2022-11-12)[2023-05-31]. .
34 WELLER H, GREENSHIELDS C, DE ROUVRAY C. OpenFOAM[EB/OL]. (2022-07-28)[2023-05-31]. .
35 MARTIN P, BARRANQUERO C, SANCHEZ J, et al. OpenNN: Open neural networks library[EB/OL]. (2022-11-11)[2023-05-31]. .
Outlines

/