ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Gust alleviation and aeroacoustic characteristics of flexible morphing trailing edge airfoil
Received date: 2023-06-26
Revised date: 2023-07-16
Accepted date: 2023-09-28
Online published: 2023-08-24
Supported by
Open Project of the Laboratory of Aerodynamic Noise Control(ANCL20230106)
The seamless and smooth aerodynamic shape of the flexible morphing trailing edge not only offers significant improvements over traditional hinged rudders in aerodynamic performance， but also has the potential to enhance noise reduction capabilities. Using the large eddy simulation model and the acoustic analogy method based on the FW-H equation， the aeroacoustic characteristics of the stitched and seamless trailing edges are investigated through CFD numerical simulation. Furthermore， the study explores the aeroacoustic characteristics of the aircraft when it encounters gusts， with a particular focus on the flexible morphing of the seamless trailing edge. The load alleviation efficiency and aeroacoustic characteristics of the flexible morphing of seamless trailing edge are compared with those of rigid deflection of the seamless trailing edge. The results show that at 4° angle of attack， the tonal noise peak of seamless trailing edge decreases by 20.2 dB compared with that of slotted trailing edge With the sine wind gust of 4°-20° equivalent angle of attack， the load alleviation efficiency of flexible morphing trailing edge is more than 60%， which is 10%-30% higher than that in the rigid deflection. In addition， the tonal noise peak value of flexible morphing trailing edge can be reduced by 7.2 dB compared with that of the rigid deflection at 12° equivalent angle sine gust. Finally， the effects of the two deflection modes of the seamless trailing edge on wind load alleviation efficiency and aeroacoustic characteristics are analyzed from the perspective of dynamic characteristics and flow evolution.
Yuming ZHANG , Yuting DAI , Guangjing HUANG , Chao YANG , Shujie JIANG . Gust alleviation and aeroacoustic characteristics of flexible morphing trailing edge airfoil[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(10) : 129219 -129219 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29219
| 1 | KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H， ALIHAN SHOWKAT ALI S， AZARPEYVAND M， et al. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of high-lift airfoil fitted with slat cove fillers［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration， 2020， 479： 115347. |
| 2 | 乔渭阳， 仝帆， 陈伟杰， 等. 仿生学气动噪声控制研究的历史、现状和进展［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2018， 36（1）： 98-121. |
| QIAO W Y， TONG F， CHEN W J， et al. Review on aerodynamic noise reduction with bionic configuration［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2018， 36（1）： 98-121 （in Chinese）. | |
| 3 | 朱自强， 兰世隆. 民机机体噪声及其降噪研究［J］. 航空学报， 2015， 36（2）： 406-421. |
| ZHU Z Q， LAN S L. Study of airframe noise and its reduction for commercial aircraft［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2015， 36（2）： 406-421 （in Chinese）. | |
| 4 | DOBRZYNSKI W. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research： What did we achieve？［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2010， 47（2）： 353-367. |
| 5 | RIVERO A E， FOURNIER S， MANOLESOS M， et al. Wind tunnel comparison of flapped and FishBAC camber variation for lift control： AIAA-2020-1300 ［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2020. |
| 6 | VARTIO E， SHAW E， VETTER T. Gust load alleviation flight control system design for a SensorCraft vehicle： AIAA-2008-7192 ［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2008. |
| 7 | WONG A， BIL C， MARINO M. Design and aerodynamic performance of a FishBAC morphing wing： AIAA-2022-1298 ［R］.Reston： AIAA， 2022. |
| 8 | NGUYEN N， LEBOFSKY S， TING E， et al. Development of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap for performance adaptive aeroelastic wing［C］∥ SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition. 2015. |
| 9 | NGUYEN N T， CRAMER N B， HASHEMI K E， et al. Progress on gust load alleviation wind tunnel experiment and aeroservoelastic model validation for a flexible wing with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap system： AIAA-2020-0214 ［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2020. |
| 10 | BROOKS T F， POPE D S， MARCOLINI M A. Airfoil self-noise and prediction［R］.Washington，D.C.： NASA， 1989. |
| 11 | WOLF W R， LELE S K. Trailing-edge noise predictions using compressible large-eddy simulation and acoustic analogy［J］. AIAA Journal， 2012， 50（11）： 2423-2434. |
| 12 | IKEDA T， ATOBE T， TAKAGI S. Direct simulations of trailing-edge noise generation from two-dimensional airfoils at low Reynolds numbers［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration， 2012， 331（3）： 556-574. |
| 13 | JONES L E， SANDBERG R D. Numerical analysis of tonal airfoil self-noise and acoustic feedback-loops［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration， 2011， 330（25）： 6137-6152. |
| 14 | CHONG T P， JOSEPH P F， KINGAN M J. An investigation of airfoil tonal noise at different Reynolds numbers and angles of attack［J］. Applied Acoustics， 2013， 74（1）： 38-48. |
| 15 | ARCONDOULIS E， DOOLAN C J， ZANDER A C， et al. An investigation of airfoil dual acoustic feedback mechanisms at low-to-moderate Reynolds number［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration， 2019， 460： 114887. |
| 16 | 游亚飞. 机翼后缘噪声预测研究［D］. 西安： 西北工业大学， 2007. |
| YOU Y F. Study on noise prediction of wing trailing edge［D］.Xi’an： Northwestern Polytechnical University， 2007 （in Chinese）. | |
| 17 | KAN Z， LI D C， ZHAO S W， et al. Aeroacoustic and aerodynamic characteristics of a morphing airfoil［J］. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology， 2021， 93（5）： 888-899. |
| 18 | WATKINS J， BOUFERROUK A. The effects of a morphed trailing-edge flap on the aeroacoustic and aerodynamic performance of a 30P30N aerofoil［J］. Acoustics， 2022， 4（1）： 248-267. |
| 19 | 魏人可，刘宇，李辰昭. 30P30N三段式增升翼型缝翼噪声特征与降噪研究［C］∥第十一届全国流体力学学术会， 2020. |
| WEI R K， LIU Y， LI C Z. Study on noise characteristics and noise reduction of 30P30 N three-stage increased lift airfoil slats［C］∥ Abstracts of the 11th National Fluid Mechanics Academic Conference， 2020 （in Chinese）. | |
| 20 | KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H， AZARPEYVAND M， ILáRIO DA SILVA C R. Acoustic and flow characteristics of an airfoil fitted with morphed trailing edges［J］. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science， 2021， 123： 110287. |
| 21 | KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H， VEMURI S S， AZARPEYVAND M. Aerodynamic noise characteristics of airfoils with morphed trailing edges［J］. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow， 2022， 93： 108892. |
| 22 | CHAWKI A. Dynamic mesh framework for morphing wings CFD［D］. Bristol： University of the West of England， 2019. |
| 23 | ABDESSEMED C， BOUFERROUK A， YAO Y F. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of a harmonically morphing airfoil using dynamic meshing［J］. Acoustics， 2021， 3（1）： 177-199. |
| 24 | LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences， 1952， 211（1107）： 564-587. |
| 25 | NICOUD F， DUCROS F. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor［J］. Flow， Turbulence and Combustion， 1999， 62（3）： 183-200. |
| 26 | PIOMELLI U. Large-eddy simulation： Achievements and challenges［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 1999， 35（4）： 335-362. |
| 27 | WILLIAMS J E F， HAWKINGS D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A， Mathematical and Physical Sciences， 1969， 264（1151）： 321-342. |
| 28 | KATO C， IIDA A， TAKANO Y， et al. Numerical prediction of aerodynamic noise radiated from low Mach number turbulent wake［C］∥ 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 1993. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA