ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Optimization design method of three⁃dimensional wave cancellation biplane derived by shock⁃wave morphology
Received date: 2023-04-28
Revised date: 2023-05-24
Accepted date: 2023-07-03
Online published: 2023-07-07
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(92052203)
To improve the lift-to-drag ratio of hypersonic vehicles, an important idea is to construct favorable interactions between shock waves and expansion waves forming on different parts of the vehicle. In the existing design methods based on this idea, the geometric parameters are calculated by the shock-wave and expansion-wave relationships of two-dimensional or axisymmetric inviscid flow fields. Due to the influence of three-dimensional effect and viscosity, the high lift-to-drag ratio configurations designed by existing methods shows significant performance degradation compared with ideal design performance. To solve this problem, an optimization design method derived by shock-wave morphology is proposed. This method takes the target shock-wave morphology instead of the aerodynamic performance as the objective to guide the optimization direction of geometric parameters. The method is applied to a three-dimensional wave cancellation biplane where the main wing and the upper wing have favorable interference. The optimized configuration outperforms the initial configuration designed by the two-dimensional inviscid method in terms of both shock-wave morphology and aerodynamic performance, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed optimization design method. Compared with the diamond wing, the wave cancellation biplane has the advantage in the lift-to-drag ratio under the design condition.
Jinzhao DAI , Haixin CHEN . Optimization design method of three⁃dimensional wave cancellation biplane derived by shock⁃wave morphology[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(6) : 628942 -628942 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28942
1 | KüCHEMANN D. The aerodynamic design of aircraft: a detailed introduction to the current aerodynamic knowledge and practical guide to the solution of aircraft design problems[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978 |
2 | CORDA S, ANDERSON J. Viscous optimized hypersonic waveriders designed from axisymmetric flow fields[C]∥ Proceedings of the 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1988. |
3 | 吴子牛, 白晨媛, 李娟, 等. 高超声速飞行器流动特征分析[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(1): 58-85. |
WU Z N, BAI C Y, LI J, et al. Analysis of flow characteristics for hypersonic vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 58-85 (in Chinese). | |
4 | 刘荣健, 白鹏. 基于超声速有益干扰原理的气动构型概念综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 023784. |
LIU R J, BAI P. Concept of aerodynamic configuration based on supersonic favorable interference principle: review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 023784 (in Chinese). | |
5 | KUSUNOSE K, MATSUSHIMA K, MARUYAMA D. Supersonic biplane—A review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(1): 53-87. |
6 | MORRIS O A, STATES U. Aerodynamic characteristics in pitch of several ring-wing-body configurations at a Mach number of 2.2[M]. Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1962. |
7 | LAMB M, MORRIS O A. Aerodynamic characteristics in pitch of a modified half ring wing body combination and a swept wing body combination at Mach 2.16 to 3.70[R]. Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1968. |
8 | Mack R J, Morris O A. Aerodynamic characteristics of a parasol-wing-body combination utilizing favorable lift interference at Mach numbers from 3.00 to 4.63[R]. Washington, D. C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1968. |
9 | KULFAN R. Application of hypersonic favorable aerodynamic interference concepts to supersonic aircraft[C]∥Proceedings of the Aircraft Systems and Technology Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1978. |
10 | 崔凯, 李广利, 胡守超, 等. 高速飞行器高压捕获翼气动布局概念研究[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2013, 43(5): 652-661. |
CUI K, LI G L, HU S C, et al. Conceptual studies of the high pressure zone capture wing configuration for high speed air vehicles[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 2013, 43(5): 652-661 (in Chinese). | |
11 | CUI K, LI G L, XIAO Y, et al. High-pressure capturing wing configurations[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(6): 1909-1919. |
12 | ZHAI J, ZHANG C N, WANG F M, et al. Design of a new supersonic biplane[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 175: 216-233. |
13 | HOOD R, KRIEGER R, GREGOIRE J. The impact of constraints on advanced supersonic cruise and maneuvering missile concepts[C]∥ Proceedings of the 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1980. |
14 | XU Y Z, XU Z Q, LI S G, et al. A hypersonic lift mechanism with decoupled lift and drag surfaces[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2013, 56(5): 981-988. |
15 | MARUYAMA D, MATSUSHIMA K, KUSUNOSE K, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic design of low-wave-drag supersonic biplane using inverse problem method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(6): 1906-1918. |
16 | DING F, LIU J, HUANG W, et al. Boundary-layer viscous correction method for hypersonic forebody/inlet integration[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 189: 638-657. |
17 | MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605. |
18 | HERRMANN C, KOSCHEL W. Experimental investigation of the internal compression inside a hypersonic intake[C]∥ Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2002. |
19 | REINARTZ B U, HERRMANN C D, BALLMANN J, et al. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19(5): 868-875. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |