ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Parameter effects analysis on aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of coaxial rigid rotor
Received date: 2023-04-11
Revised date: 2023-05-15
Accepted date: 2023-07-03
Online published: 2023-07-07
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(11972190)
The coaxial rigid rotor helicopter is an essential direction for the development of high-speed helicopters in the future. This paper studies the flow field of Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) and aeroacoustics characteristics of the coaxial rigid rotor helicopter during forward flight and explores the influence of parameter variations on its aerodynamic and aeroacoustics characteristics. To capture the rotor wake flow field accurately, a high-precision calculation method for the flow field of a coaxial rigid rotor helicopter is proposed. The method employs the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation as the governing equation, adopts the fifth-order WENO-Z scheme to reconstruct the state variables, and simulates the motion of rotor blades using a moving overset grid system. Furthermore, a rotor noise calculation method based on Farassat 1A formula, which has high precision in capturing rotor BVI noise, is also utilized. By using those methods, the flow field of single isolated rotor, coaxial rotor without fuselage and coaxial rotor with fuselage are calculated and compared, and the effects of rotor self-BVIs, interference between rotors, and fuselage interference on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustics characteristics of the coaxial rigid rotor are studied. Additionally, the influence of different geometric parameters on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustics characteristics of the coaxial rigid rotor are calculated and analyzed, and new conclusions are obtained.
Qi LIU , Yongjie SHI , Zhiyuan HU , Guohua XU . Parameter effects analysis on aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of coaxial rigid rotor[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(9) : 528856 -528856 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28856
1 | CHENEY M C. The ABC helicopter[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1969, 14(4): 10-19. |
2 | JIA Z Q, LEE S. Impulsive loading noise of a lift-offset coaxial rotor in high-speed forward flight[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 58(2): 687-701. |
3 | PAGLINO V M, BENO E. Full-scale wind tunnel investigation of the advancing blade concept rotor system: AD734338[R]. Fort Eustis: U.S. Army Air Mobility Research and Development Laboratory, 1971. |
4 | BAGAI A, LEISHMAN J G. Free-wake analysis of tandem, tilt-rotor and coaxial rotor configurations[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1996, 41(3): 196-207. |
5 | KIM H W, DURAISAMY K, BROWN R. Aeroacoustics of a coaxial rotor in level flight[C]∥The 64th AHS Annual Forum. West Palm Beach: AHS, 2008: 558-578 |
6 | KIM H W, KENYON A R, BROWN R E, et al. Interactional aerodynamics and acoustics of a hingeless coaxial helicopter with an auxiliary propeller in forward flight[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2009, 113(1140): 65-78. |
7 | LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, BAEDER J D. High-resolution computational investigation of trimmed coaxial rotor aerodynamics in hover[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2009, 54(4): 042008. |
8 | QI H T, XU G H, LU C L, et al. A study of coaxial rotor aerodynamic interaction mechanism in hover with high-efficient trim model[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 84: 1116-1130. |
9 | WALSH G D. A preliminary acoustic investigation of a coaxial helicopter in high-speed flight[D]. Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2016. |
10 | 招启军, 朱正, 原昕. 桨叶外形对共轴刚性旋翼悬停性能影响的CFD分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 49(5): 653-661. |
ZHAO Q J, ZHU Z, YUAN X. CFD analyses on effects of blade shape on hover performance of coaxial rigid rotors[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2017, 49(5): 653-661 (in Chinese). | |
11 | JIA Z, LEE S, SHARMA K, et al. Aeroacoustic analysis of a lift-offset coaxial rotor using high-fidelity CFD/CSD loose coupling simulation[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2020, 65(1): 1-15. |
12 | DENG J H, FAN F, LIU P A, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor by wind tunnel test and numerical calculation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(3): 568-576. |
13 | BROCKLEHURST A, BARAKOS G N. A review of helicopter rotor blade tip shapes[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 56: 35-74. |
14 | SUN Y, XU G H, SHI Y J. Parametric effect of blade surface blowing on the reduction of rotor blade–vortex interaction noise[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 35(1): 04021110. |
15 | BORGES R, CARMONA M, COSTA B, et al. An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(6): 3191-3211. |
16 | FARASSAT F. Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise[J]. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19(9): 1122-1130. |
17 | YU Y H. Rotor blade–vortex interaction noise[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, 36(2): 97-115. |
18 | HARRINGTON R D. Full-scale-tunnel investigation of the static-thrust performance of a coaxial helicopter rotor: NACA-TN-2318[R]. Washington D.C.: NACA, 1951 |
19 | SCHULTZ K J, SPLETTSTOESSER W, JUNKER B, et al. A parametric windtunnel test on rotorcraft aerodynamics and aeroacoustics (Helishape)—Test procedures and representative results[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 1997, 101(1004): 143-154. |
20 | BIAVA M, BINDOLINO G, VIGEVANO L. Single blade computations of helicopter rotors in forward flight: AIAA-2003-0052[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003. |
21 | BOXWELL D A, SCHMITZ F H, SPLETTSTOESSER W R, et al. Helicopter model rotor-blade vortex interaction impulsive noise: Scalability and parametric variations[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1987, 32(1): 3-12. |
22 | YU Y H, TUNG C, GALLMAN J, et al. Aerodynamics and acoustics of rotor blade-vortex interactions[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1995, 32(5): 970-977. |
23 | STRAWN R C, DUQUE E P N, AHMAD J. Rotorcraft aeroacoustics computations with overset-grid CFD methods[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1999, 44(2): 132-140. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |