ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Aerodynamic shape design optimization method based on novel high⁃dimensional surrogate model
Received date: 2022-01-10
Revised date: 2022-01-27
Accepted date: 2022-02-21
Online published: 2023-03-15
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(12102489);Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aerodynamic Design and Research(614220121010126)
With the ever-increasing demands for the performance of modern aircraft，the refined aerodynamic shape design optimization of aircraft requires higher-fidelity CFD numerical analysis and more independent design variables，thus significantly reducing the efficiency of surrogate-based global optimization algorithm，particularly with an excessive number of design variables，Therefore，meeting the advanced demands for complex engineering problems becomes challenging. Furthermore，with complex modeling process and prohibitive computational costs，popular high-dimensional surrogate models，lack good adaptability to a wide range of engineering problems，This paper proposes a Supervised Nonlinear Dimension-Reduction Surrogate Modeling（SN-DRSM）method to alleviate the problem of high-dimensional variables in the process of surrogate-based design optimization. This method， integrates and trains the Kernel Principal Component Analysis（KPCA）nonlinear dimension-reduction model and the Gaussian regression process model as a whole，A new high-dimensional surrogate model is adaptively constructed，continuously studied in depth and improved during the optimization process，to establish an accurate mapping from high-dimensional inputs to outputs，thereby effectively solving the problems of high training cost and poor adaptability of traditional high-dimensional surrogate models. Then，an efficient high-dimensional global design optimization platform for complex aerodynamic configuration of aircraft is developed based on this novel surrogate model，and applied to two standard transonic optimization cases defined by AIAA aerodynamic optimization group. A comprehensive comparison with the traditional surrogate optimization methods， proves that the new method can significantly improve the global optimization efficiency and ability of high-dimensional aircraft variables.
Huan ZHAO , Zhenghong GAO , Lu XIA . Aerodynamic shape design optimization method based on novel high⁃dimensional surrogate model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023 , 44(5) : 126924 -126924 . DOI: 10.7527/S10006893.2022.26924
| 1 | 赵欢. 基于代理模型的高效气动优化与气动稳健设计方法研究［D］. 西安： 西北工业大学， 2020. |
| ZHAO H. Research on efficient surrogate-based aerodynamic optimization and robust aerodynamic design methods［D］. Xi’an ：Northwestern Polytechnical， 2020 （in Chinese）. | |
| 2 | 韩忠华， 许晨舟， 乔建领， 等. 基于代理模型的高效全局气动优化设计方法研究进展［J］． 航空学报，2020， 41（3）： 623344. |
| HAN Z H， XU C Z， QIAO J L，et al. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（3）： 623344 （in Chinese）. | |
| 3 | HUANG J， GAO Z， ZHAO K，et al. Robust design of supercritical wing aerodynamic optimization considering fuselage interfering［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2010， 23（5）： 523-528. |
| 4 | CHERNUKHIN O， ZINGG D W. Multimodality and global optimization in aerodynamic design［J］. AIAA Journal， 2013， 51（6）： 1342-1354. |
| 5 | BONS N P， HE X L， MADER C A，et al. Multimodality in aerodynamic wing design optimization［J］. AIAA Journal， 2019， 57（3）： 1004-1018. |
| 6 | POOLE D， ALLEN C， RENDALL T. Global optimization of wing aerodynamic optimization case exhibiting multimodality［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2018， 55 （4）： 1576-1591. |
| 7 | ZHAO H， GAO Z， GAO Y， et al. Effective robust design of high lift NLF airfoil under multi-parameter uncertainty［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2017， 68：530-542. |
| 8 | 赵欢，高 正红， 夏露. 高速自然层流翼型高效气动稳健优化设计方法研究［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（7）： 124894. |
| ZHAO H， GAO Z H， XIA L. Research on efficient robust aerodynamic design optimization method of high-speed and high-lift NLF airfoil［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（7）： 124894 （in Chinese）. | |
| 9 | ZHAO H， GAO Z. Uncertainty-based design optimization of NLF airfoil for high altitude long endurance unmanned air vehicles［J］. Engineering Computations， 2019， 36（3）：971-996. |
| 10 | ZHAO H， GAO Z， XU F，et al. Review of robust aerodynamic design optimization for air vehicles［J］. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering，2019，26（3）：685-732. |
| 11 | ZHAO K， GAO Z， HUANG J，et al. Aerodynamic optimization of rotor airfoil based on multi-layer hierarchical constraint method［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2016，29（6）： 1541-1552. |
| 12 | QUEIPO N V， HAFTKA R T， SHYY W， et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences，2005， 41（1）： 1-28. |
| 13 | ZHAO H， GAO Z， XU F， et al. An efficient adaptive forward?backward selection method for sparse polynomial chaos expansion［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering， 2019， 355： 456-491. |
| 14 | ZHAO H， GAO Z， XU F， et al. Adaptive multi-fidelity sparse polynomial chaos-Kriging metamodeling for global approximation of aerodynamic data［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2021， 64（2）： 829-858. |
| 15 | LAURENCEAU J， SAGAUT P. Building efficient response surfaces of aerodynamic functions with kriging and cokriging［J］. AIAA Journal， 2008， 46（2）： 498-507. |
| 16 | HAN Z H， ZHANG Y， SONG C X，et al. Weighted gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and design optimization［J］. AIAA Journal， 2017， 55（12）： 4330-4346. |
| 17 | GUO L， NARAYAN A， ZHOU T. A gradient enhanced ?1-minimization for sparse approximation of polynomial chaos expansions［J］. Journal of Computational Physics，2018， 367： 49-64. |
| 18 | SOBOL I M. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models［J］. Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiments， 1993， 1（4）： 407-414. |
| 19 | SHAN S， WANG G G. Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2010， 41（2）： 219-241. |
| 20 | LI G， WANG S W， RABITZ H，et al.Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations（HDMR）［J］. Chemical Engineering Science， 2002， 57（21）： 4445-4460. |
| 21 | ROY P C， DEB K. High dimensional model representation for solving expensive multi-objective optimization problems［C］∥ 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway： IEEE， 2016. |
| 22 | DIEZ M， CAMPANA E F， STERN F. Design-space dimensionality reduction in shape optimization by Karhunen?Loève expansion［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering， 2015， 283： 1525-1544. |
| 23 | BERKOOZ G， HOLMES P， LUMLEY J L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows［J］. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 1993， 25（1）：539-575. |
| 24 | MOHAMMADI A， RAISEE M. Efficient uncertainty quantification of stochastic heat transfer problems by combination of proper orthogonal decomposition and sparse polynomial chaos expansion［J］. International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer， 2019， 128： 581-600. |
| 25 | MOHAMMADI A， RAISEE M. Stochastic field representation using bi-fidelity combination of proper orthogonal decomposition and Kriging［J］. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering，2019，357：112589. |
| 26 | MAATEN V D L， POSTMA E， HERIK V D J. Dimensionality reduction：A comparative［J］. Journal of Machine Learning Research， 2009， 10 （66-71）： 13. |
| 27 | CONSTANTINE P G， DOW E， WANG Q. Active subspace methods in theory and practice：Applications to kriging surfaces［J］. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing，2014， 36（4）： A1500-A1524. |
| 28 | GENG X， ZHAN D C， ZHOU Z H. Supervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction for visualization and classification［J］. IEEE Transactions on Systems， Man， and Cybernetics， Part B （Cybernetics）， 2005， 35（6）： 1098-1107. |
| 29 | LI J C， CAI J S， QU K. Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization with the active subspace method［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2019， 59（2）： 403-419. |
| 31 | TRIPATHY R K， BILIONIS I. Deep UQ：Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2018， 375： 565-588. |
| 32 | GENEVA N， ZABARAS N. Quantifying model form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged turbulence models with Bayesian deep neural networks［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2019，383： 125-147. |
| 33 | QIN T， WU K L， XIU D B. Data driven governing equations approximation using deep neural networks［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2019， 395： 620-635. |
| 34 | LYU Z， KENWAY G K W， MARTINS J R R A. Aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the common research model wing benchmark［J］. AIAA Journal， 2015， 53（4）： 968-985. |
| 35 | LIANG H Q， ZHU M， WU Z. Using cross-validation to design trend function in kriging surrogate modeling［J］. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52（10）： 2313-2327. |
| 36 | LEDOUX S T， VASSBERG J C， YOUNG D P，et al. Study based on the AIAA aerodynamic design optimization discussion group test cases［J］. AIAA Journal， 2015，53（7）： 1910-1935. |
| 37 | 赵欢， 高正红， 王超， 等. 适用于高速层流翼型的计算网格研究［J］. 应用力学学报， 2018， 35（2）： 351-357， 454. |
| ZHAO H， GAO Z H， WANG C，et al. Research on the computing grid of high speed laminar airfoil［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics，2018， 35（2）： 351-357，454 （in Chinese）. | |
| 38 | HAN Z， XU C， ZHANG L， et al. Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization using variable-fidelity surrogate models and multilevel computational grids［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2020， 33（1）： 31-47. |
| 39 | ZHANG Y， HAN Z H， SHI L X，et al. Multi-round surrogate-based optimization for benchmark aerodynamic design problems［C］∥ 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2016. |
| 40 | ZHAO H， GUO Z H， XIA L. Efficient aerodynamic analysis and optimation under uncertainty using multi-fidelity polynomial chaos-Kriging surrogate model ［J］. Computers ＆ Fluids， 2022， 246： 105643. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA