ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Numerical simulation of heat reduction on blunt-headed bodies by combined scheme of drag reduction spike and annular jets
Received date: 2022-12-19
Revised date: 2023-01-27
Accepted date: 2023-02-21
Online published: 2023-03-03
Supported by
Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST(2022QNRC001)
Drag reduction spikes can reduce the heat flow of the supersonic aircraft head at 0-degree angle of attack. However， the heat reduction effect sharply drops with the increasing angle of attack. To solve this problem， we propose the heat reduction scheme of the combination of annular jet and drag-reduction spike. Numerical simulations of this scheme under different inflow and jet conditions are carried out to obtain the flow filed and the wall heat flow distribution. The conclusions are as follows： in the flow field of the combined scheme， affected by the low-pressure area behind the drag-reduction spike， the jet does not directly interact with the free stream， and there is no transition between the long and short penetration modes， with the jet pressure ratios ranging from 0.05 to 0.40. Thus， the flow field structure of the reverse jet is more stable. Furthermore， the drag-reduction spike and the blunt body are coated by the reverse jet. The attached shock wave and separated shock wave are pushed away from the wall. The numerical results show that under the condition of 0° angle of attack， a small jet pressure ratio also has a good heat reduction effect. When the jet pressure ratio is 0.05， the peak heat flow on the blunt body wall can be reduced to smaller than half of the original value. The attached shock wave and separated shock wave generated by a single drag reduction spike at an angle of attack act directly on the blunt head wall， resulting in a sharp rise in the heat flow through the wall. The combined scheme has clear heat reduction effect with an angle of attack. With the increase of the angle of attack， the back pressure at the nozzle increases， while the interference effect of the jet on the flow field decreases. To achieve the same heat reduction effect， a larger jet pressure ratio is required. At the same jet pressure ratio， the jet flow before the reattachment point can make the jet flow expand more completely and reduce heat more effectively. At small jet pressure ratios， the drag reduction effect of the combined configuration of the drag reducing rod and the annular jet is enhanced compared to the single drag reducing rod.
Pinpeng ZENG , Shusheng CHEN , Jinping LI , Muliang JIA , Zhenghong GAO . Numerical simulation of heat reduction on blunt-headed bodies by combined scheme of drag reduction spike and annular jets[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023 , 44(22) : 128407 -128407 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28407
| 1 | ALBERTI A， MUNAFò A， PANTANO C， et al. Self-consistent computational fluid dynamics of supersonic drag reduction via upstream-focused laser-energy deposition［J］. AIAA Journal， 2020， 59（10）： 1-11. |
| 2 | JOHNSON R. Instability in hypersonic flow about blunt bodies［J］. The Physics of Fluids， 1959， 2（5）： 526-532. |
| 3 | HUANG W， QUAN L， YAN L， et al. Drag and heat flux reduction mechanism of blunted cone with aerodisks［J］. Acta Astronautica， 2017， 138： 168-175. |
| 4 | YAMAUCHI M， FUJII K， HIGASHINO F. Numerical investigation of supersonic flows around a spiked blunt body［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 1995， 32（1）： 32-42. |
| 5 | MOTOYAMA N， MIHARA K， MIYAJIMA R， et al. Thermal protection and drag reduction with use of spike in hypersonic flow［C］∥ 10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2001. |
| 6 | SCHNEPF C， WYSOCKI O， SCHüLEIN E. Wave drag reduction due to a self aligning aerodisk［J］. Progress in Flight Physics， 2015， 7： 475-488. |
| 7 | HAYASHI K， ASO S， TANI Y. Numerical study of thermal protection system by opposing jet［C］∥ 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2005. |
| 8 | HUANG J， YAO W X， JIANG Z P. Penetration mode effect on thermal protection system by opposing jet［J］. Acta Astronautica， 2019， 160（1）： 206-215. |
| 9 | 周超英， 纪文英， 张兴伟， 等. 球头体逆向喷流减阻的数值模拟研究［J］. 工程力学， 2013， 30（1）： 441-447. |
| ZHOU C Y， JI W Y， ZHANG X W， et al. Numerical investigation on counter-flow jet drag reduction of a spherical body［J］. Engineering Mechanics， 2013， 30（1）： 441-447 （in Chinese）. | |
| 10 | 张道毅， 周超英. 环形及其组合体喷流的减阻防热机理［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（12）： 168-181. |
| ZHANG D Y， ZHOU C Y. Drag reduction and heat protection mechanism of annular jet and combined jet［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（12）： 168-181 （in Chinese）. | |
| 11 | 张旭东， 李铮， 董昊， 等. 高超声速流场等离子体逆向喷流减阻特性［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（）： 118-126. |
| ZHANG X D， LI Z， DONG H， et al. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（S2）： 118-126 （in Chinese）. | |
| 12 | 马正雪， 罗振兵， 赵爱红， 等. 高超声速流场等离子体合成射流逆向喷流特性［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（）： 195-206. |
| MA Z X， LUO Z B， ZHAO A H， et al. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（S2）： 195-206 （in Chinese）. | |
| 13 | 吴忧， 徐旭， 陈兵， 等. 高马赫数下横/逆向喷流干扰流场数值研究［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（）： 28-41. |
| WU Y， XU X， CHEN B， et al. Numerical study on transverse/opposing jet interaction flowfield under high Mach number［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（S1）： 28-41 （in Chinese）. | |
| 14 | ZHU L， CHEN X， LI Y K， et al. Investigation of drag and heat reduction induced by a novel combinational lateral jet and spike concept in supersonic flows based on conjugate heat transfer approach［J］. Acta Astronautica， 2018， 142： 300-313. |
| 15 | ZHU L， LI Y K， CHEN X， et al. Hypersonic flow characteristics and relevant structure thermal response induced by the novel combined spike-aerodome and lateral jet strategy［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2019， 95（1）： 105459. |
| 16 | 刘衍旭， 陈树生， 冯聪， 等. 高超声速滑翔飞行器锐边化气动隐身一体化设计［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（20）： 128093. |
| LIU Y X， CHEN S S， FENG C， et al. Sharp edge integrated aerodynamic-stealth design for hypersonic glide vehicle［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（20）： 128093 （in Chinese）. | |
| 17 | CHEN S S， LI J P， LI Z . et al. Anti-dissipation pressure correction under low Mach numbers for Godunov-type schemes［J］. Journal of Computational Physics，2022，456： 111027. |
| 18 | SPALART P R. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations［J］. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow， 2000， 21（3）： 252-263. |
| 19 | 王圣业， 王光学， 董义道， 等. 基于雷诺应力模型的高精度分离涡模拟方法［J］. 物理学报， 2017， 66（18）： 113-129. |
| WANG S Y， WANG G X， DONG Y D， et al. High-order detached-eddy simulation method based on a Reynolds-stress background model［J］. Acta Physica Sinica， 2017， 66（18）： 113-129 （in Chinese）. | |
| 20 | ZHU L， LI Y K， CHEN X， et al. Novel cominational aerodisk and lateral jet concept for drag and heat reduction in hypersonic flows［J］. Journal of Aerospace Engineering，2019，32（1）： 1-14. |
| 21 | 曾品棚， 陈树生， 冯聪， 等. 侧向喷流对导弹方向舵局部气动热特性的影响［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2023， 41（9）： 70-81. |
| ZENG P P， CHEN S S， FENG C， et al. Effect of lateral jet on local aerodynamic heating characteristics of missile rudders［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2023， 41（9）： 70-81 （in Chinese）. | |
| 22 | PACIORRI R， DIEUDONN W， DEGREZ G， et al. Validation of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for application in hypersonic flows［C］∥ 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 1997. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA