Electronics and Electrical Engineering and Control

Aircraft takeoff mass estimation method based on improved simulated annealing algorithm

  • Bing WANG ,
  • Runyuan ZOU ,
  • Zhening CHANG
Expand
  • 1.College of General Aviation and Flight,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing  210016,China
    2.National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management,Nanjing  210016,China
    3.College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing  210016,China
E-mail: evanwb@163.com

Received date: 2022-10-08

  Revised date: 2022-11-04

  Accepted date: 2022-12-14

  Online published: 2022-12-22

Supported by

China-EU Aviation Science and Technology Cooperation Project of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology(MJ-2020-S-03)

Abstract

Aircraft takeoff mass, an important parameter of aircraft performance, has significant effect on the accuracy of departure trajectory prediction. Aircraft mass is airline commercial operation data, and is difficult to obtain through public accesses. In this paper, a method for aircraft takeoff mass estimation is proposed based on historical trajectory data. Using the total energy model and considering the effect of wind, an iterative model of aircraft takeoff mass is established based on the Base of Aircraft Data(BADA) performance model. Combining the taboo table function in the taboo search algorithm and the simulated annealing algorithm, the improved algorithm is applied to solve the model efficiently. The result of a typical sample flight shows that the relative error between the estimated takeoff mass and the real mass is 2.91%. Compared with the BADA reference mass, the accuracy of trajectory prediction using estimated takeoff mass is effectively improved. Takeoff mass estimation of 15 types of aircraft and 26 724 flights is conducted. The average relative error value of the estimated mass of all flights is 3.45%. The absolute value of relative error of 97.67% of all flights is within 10%, demonstrating accurate estimation results. The proposed method for aircraft takeoff mass estimation can be applied to batch flights and can provide technical support for high-precision trajectory simulation and prediction.

Cite this article

Bing WANG , Runyuan ZOU , Zhening CHANG . Aircraft takeoff mass estimation method based on improved simulated annealing algorithm[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023 , 44(16) : 328090 -328090 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.28090

References

1 BENAVIDES J V, KANESHIGE J, SHARMA S, et al. Implementation of a trajectory prediction function for trajectory based operations: AIAA-2014-2198[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2014.
2 张洪海, 汤一文, 许炎. TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析[J]. 航空学报202041(7): 323844.
  ZHANG H H, TANG Y W, XU Y. Optimizing arrival traffic flow in airport terminal airspace under trajectory based operations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202041(7): 323844 (in Chinese).
3 杨磊, 李文博, 刘芳子, 等. 柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化[J]. 航空学报202142(2): 324157.
  YANG L, LI W B, LIU F Z, et al. Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202142(2): 324157 (in Chinese).
4 张军峰, 蒋海行, 武晓光, 等. 基于BADA及航空器意图的四维航迹预测[J]. 西南交通大学学报201449(3): 553-558.
  ZHANG J F, JIANG H H, WU X G, et al. 4D trajectory prediction based on BADA and aircraft intent[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University201449(3): 553-558 (in Chinese).
5 Coppenbarger R A, Kanning G, Salcido R. Real-time data link of aircraft parameters to the center-TRACON automation system (CTAS)[C]∥4th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar. Stamford: ATM, 2001: 1-11.
6 WICKRAMASINGHE N K, BROWN M, MIYAMOTO Y, et al. Effects of aircraft mass and weather data errors on trajectory optimization and benefits estimation: AIAA-2016-0166[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
7 THIPPHAVONG D P, SCHULTZ C A, LEE A, et al. Adaptive algorithm to improve trajectory prediction accuracy of climbing aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201236(1): 15-24.
8 吕波, 王超. 改进的扩展卡尔曼滤波在航空器4D航迹预测算法中的应用[J]. 计算机应用202141(S1): 277-282.
  LYU B, WANG C. Application of improved extended Kalman filtering in aircraft 4D trajectory prediction algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Applications202141(S1): 277-282 (in Chinese).
9 康南, 韩孝兰, 胡杨, 等. 基于质量估算策略的离场飞机高度剖面预测[J]. 中国民航大学学报201937(3): 11-16.
  KANG N, HAN X L, HU Y, et al. Departure aircraft altitude profile prediction based on aircraft mass estimation strategy[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China201937(3): 11-16 (in Chinese).
10 SCHULTZ C, THIPPHAVONG D, ERZBERGER H, et al. Adaptive trajectory prediction algorithm for climbing flights: AIAA-2012-4931[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2012.
11 ALLIGIER R, GIANAZZA D, HAMED M G, et al. Comparison of two ground-based mass estimation methods on real data (regular paper): hal-0100240[R]. Stamford: ATM, 2014.
12 SUN J Z, ELLERBROEK J, HOEKSTRA J M. Aircraft initial mass estimation using Bayesian inference method[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies201890: 59-73.
13 CHATI Y S, BALAKRISHNAN H. Modeling of aircraft takeoff weight using Gaussian processes[J]. Journal of Air Transportation201826(2): 70-79.
14 ALLIGIER R, GIANAZZA D, DURAND N. Machine learning and mass estimation methods for ground-based aircraft climb prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems201516(6): 3138-3149.
15 ALLIGIER R, GIANAZZA D. Learning aircraft operational factors to improve aircraft climb prediction: A large scale multi-airport study[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies201896: 72-95.
16 SEMKE W, ALLEN N, TABASSUM A, et al. Analysis of radar and ADS-B influences on aircraft detect and avoid (DAA) systems[J]. Aerospace20174(3): 49.
17 ALI B S, TAIB N A. A study on geometric and barometric altitude data in automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B) messages[J]. Journal of Navigation201972(5): 1140-1158.
18 Zhang M, Huang Q W, Liu S H, et al. Fuel consumption model of the climbing phase of departure aircraft based on flight data analysis[J]. Sustainability201911(16): 4362.
19 赵军, 唐弋棣. 基于QAR数据的民航发动机性能分析[J]. 计算机仿真202037(7): 107-112.
  ZHAO J, TANG Y D. Performance analysis of civil aviation engine based on QAR data[J]. Computer Simulation202037(7): 107-112 (in Chinese).
20 王兵, 张颖, 谢华, 等. 一种基于机载数据的民用航空器飞行阶段划分方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报202222(1): 216-228.
  WANG B, ZHANG Y, XIE H, et al. A flight phase identification method based on airborne data of civil aircraft[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering202222(1): 216-228 (in Chinese).
21 王兵. ADS-B历史飞行轨迹数据清洗方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报202020(4): 217-226.
  WANG B. Data cleaning method of ADS-B historical flight trajectories[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering202020(4): 217-226 (in Chinese).
22 COURCHELLE V, SOLER M, GONZáLEZ-ARRIBAS D, et al. A simulated annealing approach to 3D strategic aircraft deconfliction based on en-route speed changes under wind and temperature uncertainties[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies2019103: 194-210.
23 BAKLACIOGLU T. Modeling the fuel flow-rate of transport aircraft during flight phases using genetic algorithm-optimized neural networks[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201649: 52-62.
24 MURRIETA-MENDOZA A, HAMY A, BOTEZ R M. Four- and three-dimensional aircraft reference trajectory optimization inspired by ant colony optimization[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems201714(11): 597-616.
25 BI J, WU Z, WANG L, et al. A tabu search-based algorithm for airport gate assignment: A case study in Kunming, China[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation20202020: 1-13.
26 温瑞英, 李璐, 魏志强. 基于遗传算法的分段多参气动阻力研究[J]. 飞行力学202139(2): 27-32, 44.
  WEN R Y, LI L, WEI Z Q. Research on piecewise multi-parameter aerodynamic resistance based on genetic algorithm[J]. Flight Dynamics202139(2): 27-32, 44 (in Chinese).
Outlines

/