Large-area display have been widely used in the cockpit of a new generation of civil aircraft. Although improving the information integration can improve the pilot's user experience, the high requirement of system integration is likely to cause the common mode failure of integrated display information in local failure. Since the information layout has an important influence on the performance of operation task management, if the increase of workload is induced, the flight crew may lose the necessary situational awareness in specific scenarios. Information reconfiguration technology is an important means to deal with such problems. Based on the management of crew resource in civil aircraft, the duty allocation of the flight crew, and the requirement of ergonomics, a 15 inch square-screen display on the main instrument panel is proposed as a layout scheme with comparative advantages. Starting from the flight crew operation task requirement under the critical scenario and based on the consistency of normal operation flow, compact format, reconfiguration function operation, and consistency of duty allocation, It proves that the display management strategy of this paper show a better information reconfiguration performance than the advanced reference aircraft through comparative analysis. At present, few articles have systematically analyzed and summarized this topic.
XU Jian
,
WU Lei
,
CHU Jiangping
,
HE Ke
. Performance analysis of information reconfiguration technology on civil aircraft[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019
, 40(2)
: 522442
-522442
.
DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22442
[1] 中国民用航空局飞行标准司. 机组资源管理训练:AC-121-FS-2011-41[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局, 2011. CAAC Flight Standard Division. Crew resource management training:AC-121-FS-2011-41[S]. Beijing:CAAC, 2011(in Chinese).
[2] ROGER W S, DENNIS B B, JOHN L, et al. Priorities, organization, and sources of information accessed by pilots in various phases of flight:DOT/FAA/AM-00/26[R]. Washington, D.C.:Office of Aviation Medicine, 2000.
[3] PAUL C S, ANNA C T. Flight crew task management in non-normal situations[J/OL]. NASA Langley Research Center, (2004-11-04)[2018-05-17]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20020040110.pdf.
[4] LOUKIA D L, KEY D, IMMANUEL B. Cockpit interruptions and distractions:A line observation study[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2001:1-6.
[5] EDWIN H. The cognitive consequences of patterns of information flow[J]. Intellectica, 1999, 30:53-74.
[6] KEN F, ROLF B. The agenda manager:A knowledge-based system to facilitate the management of flight deck activities[C]//1999 World Aviation Conference. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 1999:922-936.
[7] 中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空规章第25部运输类飞机适航标准:CCAR-25-R4[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局, 2011. CAAC. Airworthiness standards for transport aircraft of CCAR part25:CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing:CAAC, 2011(in Chinese).
[8] FAA. Airworthiness standards:Transport category airplanes:FAR Part25[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 2018.
[9] EASA. Certification specifications for large aeroplanes:CS-25[S]. Cologne:EASA, 2018.
[10] Committee S-7. Flight crew interface considerations in the flight deck design process for Part 25 aircraft:SAE ARP5056[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2006.
[11] FAA. Electronic flight displays:AC25-11B[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 2014.
[12] Committee S-7. Appendix A electronic display symbology for EADI/PFD:SAE ARP4102-7[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 1999.
[13] FAA. Criteria for approval of category Ⅲ weather minima for takeoff, landing, and rollout:AC120-28D[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 1999.
[14] FAA. Criteria for approval of category Ⅲ weather minima for takeoff, landing, and rollout:AC120-29A[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 1999.
[15] FAA. Criteria for approval of category I and category Ⅱ weather minima for approach:AC120-29A[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 2002
[16] FAA. Approval guidance for Required Navigation Performance (RNP) procedures with Authorization Required (AR):AC90-101A[S]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 2011.
[17] RTCA. Minimum aviation system performance standards:Required navigation performance for area navigation:DO-236C[S]. Washington D.C.:RTCA Inc., 2013.
[18] Committee S-7. Appendix C electronic display symbology for engine displays:SAE ARP4102-7[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 1999.
[19] Committee S-7. Appendix B electronic display symbology for EHSI/ND:SAE ARP4102-7[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 1999.
[20] Committee S-7. Flight deck layout and facilities:SAE ARP4101[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2003.
[21] ISO. Basic human body measurements for technological design-Part 2:Statistical summaries of body measurements from national populations:ISO/TR 7250-2[S]. Geneva:ISO, 2010.
[22] Committee S-7. Pilot visibility from the flight deck:SAE ARP4101-2[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2003.
[23] Committee S-7. Numeral, letter and symbol dimensions for aircraft instrument displays:SAE AIR1093A[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2003
[24] Committee S-7. Flight deck display panels, controls, and displays:SAE ARP4102[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2007.
[25] AEEC. Cockpit display system interfaces to user systems:ARINC661-6[S]. Annapolis, MD:Aeronautical Radio Inc., 2016.