Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Effect of individual blade pitch control on flight performance of helicopters

  • DONG Chen ,
  • HAN Dong ,
  • YANG Kelong
Expand
  • National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2018-02-01

  Revised date: 2018-04-09

  Online published: 2018-04-17

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11472129); National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aeromechanics Laboratory (6142220050416220002); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20165752048); Foundation of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA (KFJJ20170102); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Abstract

A verified model for prediction of helicopter performance is used to investigate the effect of individual blade pitch control on the flight performance of helicopters. The influence of the harmonic number, amplitude, and phase angle of the pitch control on the rotor power required and lift to drag ratio of the UH-60A helicopter is analyzed. The distribution of the angle of attack and drag coefficient over the rotor disk are shown to analyze the physical mechanism of performance improvement by individual blade pitch control. The results indicate that the second-and third-order harmonic individual blade pitch control can reduce the power required and increase the helicopter lift to drag ratio in high speed flight, but the effect is relatively limited. For the helicopter with larger take-off weight, the effect can be enhanced. The performance improvement achieved by the second-order harmonic coupled with the third-order harmonic individual blade pitch control is better than that by a single harmonic input, and the maximum power reduction is 4.5%. The fourth-order harmonic individual blade pitch control does not exhibit the potential in performance improvement. In high speed flight, the blade pitch control can reduce the angle of attack in the retreating side and delay the stall, and then the drag coefficient and rotor power required can be reduced to improve the flight performance of the helicopter.

Cite this article

DONG Chen , HAN Dong , YANG Kelong . Effect of individual blade pitch control on flight performance of helicopters[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018 , 39(10) : 222075 -222075 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22075

References

[1] SWANSON S M, JACKLIN A, BLAAS A, et al. Individual blade control effects on blade-vortex interaction noise[C]//The American Helicopter Society 50th Annual Forum. Fairfax, VA:American Helicopter Society, 1994.
[2] SPLETTSTOESSER W R, SCHULTZ K J, VAN DER-WALL B, et al. Helicopter noise reduction by individual blade control (IBC)-Selected flight test and simulation results[C]//The RTA-AVT Symposium, 2000.
[3] 倪同兵, 招启军, 马砾. 基于IBC方法的旋翼BVI噪声主动控制机理[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7):120744. NI T B, ZHAO Q J, MA L. Active control mechanism of rotor BVI noise based on IBC method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7):120744(in Chinese).
[4] FÜRST D, KEBLER C, AUSPITZER T, et al. Closed loop IBC-system and flight test results on the CH-53G helicopter[C]//The American Helicopter Society 60th Annual Forum, 2004.
[5] ROGET B, CHOPRA I. Individual blade control methodology for a rotor with dissimilar blades[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2003, 48(3):176-185.
[6] 孙超, 陆洋, 马锦超. 基于独立桨距控制的电控旋翼主动振动控制[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 48(2):251-255. SUN C, LU Y, MA J C. Active vibration control through individual blade control on electrically controlled rotor[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2016, 48(2):251-255(in Chinese).
[7] PAYNE P R. Higher harmonic rotor control:The possibilities of third and higher harmonic feathering for delaying the stall limit in helicopter[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 1958, 2(8):222-226.
[8] KEBLER C. Active rotor control for helicopters:Individual blade control and swashplateless rotor designs[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2011(1):23-54.
[9] FRIEDMANN P P. On-blade control of rotor vibration, noise, and performance:Just around the corner?[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2014, 59(4):041001.
[10] 韩东, 董晨, 魏武雷, 等. 自适应旋翼研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4):221603. HAN D, DONG C, WEI W L, et al. Research progress in adaptive rotor to improve rotor performance[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(4):221603(in Chinese).
[11] ARCIDIACONO P J. Theoretical performance of helicopters having second and higher harmonic feathering control[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1961, 5(2):8-19.
[12] SHAW J, ALBION N, HANKER E J, Jr, et al. Higher harmonic control:Wind tunnel demonstration of fully effective vibratory hub force suppression[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1989, 34(1):14-25.
[13] NORMAN T R, THEODORE C, SHINODA P, et al. Full-scale wind tunnel test of a UH-60 individual blade control system for performance improvement and vibration, loads, and noise control[C]//The American Helicopter Society 65th Annual Forum. Fairfax, VA:American Helicopter Society, 2009.
[14] JACKLIN S A, LEYLAND J A, BLAAS A. Full-scale wind tunnel investigation of a helicopter individual blade control system[C]//34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1993:576-586.
[15] JACKLIN S A, BLASS A, TEVES D, et al. Reduction of helicopter BVI noise, vibration, and power consumption through individual blade control[C]//The American Helicopter Society 51st Annual Forum. Fairfax, VA:American Helicopter Society, 1995:662-680.
[16] CHENG R P, THEODORE C R, CELI R. Effects of two/rev higher harmonic control on rotor performance[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2003, 48(1):18-27.
[17] CHENG R P, CELI R. Optimum two-per-revolution inputs for improved rotor performance[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(6):1409-1417.
[18] YEO H, ROMANDER E A, NORMAN T R. Investigation of rotor performance and loads of a UH-60A individual blade control system[C]//The American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum, 2010.
[19] KÜFAMANN P, BARTELS R, WALL B G. Rotor performance enhancement via localized pitch control and its effects on hub vibration and pitch link loads[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2017(8):181-196.
[20] 王超, 陆洋, 陈仁良. 直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(8):1922-1929. WANG C, LU Y, CHEN R L. Effect of active blade pitch control on helicopter rotor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(8):1922-1929(in Chinese)
[21] 张勇刚, 崔钊, 韩东, 等. 加装格尼襟翼旋翼的直升机飞行性能[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(7):2208-2217. ZHANG Y G, CUI Z, HAN D, et al. Flight performance of helicopter rotors with Gurney flaps[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(7):2208-2217(in Chinese).
[22] PETERS D A, HAQUANG N. Dynamic inflow for practical applications[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1988, 33(4):64-68.
[23] JOHNSON W. Helicopter theory[M]. New York:Dover Publications, Inc., 1994:222-238
[24] LEISHMAN J G. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2006:228-231
[25] YEO H, BOUSMAN W G, JOHNSON W. Performance analysis of a utility helicopter with standard and advanced rotors[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2004, 49(3):250-270.
[26] HILBERT K B. A mathematical model of the UH-60 helicopter:NASA-TM-85890[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1984.
[27] DAVIS S J. Predesign study for a modern 4-bladed rotor for the RSRA:NASA-TM-CR-166155[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1981.
[28] ANDERSON J D, Jr. Fundamentals of aerodynamics[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill Education, 2001:93-98.
Outlines

/