ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Multistage optimization design method of hypersonic inward turning inlet
Received date: 2014-12-30
Revised date: 2015-04-02
Online published: 2015-04-13
Supported by
Provincial/Ministerial Level Project
Hypersonic inward turning inlet is optimized by a multistage method of separating the base flow and lip shape. Multi-objective optimization is imposed on the base flow with the target of minimizing the flow non-uniformity after the reflected shock and maximizing the total pressure recovery. The flow field has been solved by the method of characteristic (MOC) integrated with the Tayler-Maccoll equations. Base flow optimization obtains a dual-infection point internal cone's element. Inlet lip shape is optimized by the target of minimizing the inviscid drag obtained by streamline integral method (SIM) and a semi-oval two-dimensional lip shape is obtained. Compared with the traditional straight element base flow, dual-infection point internal cone flow's non-uniformity is decreased by about 40% and the total pressure loss is decreased by 35%, and thus the overall performance is enhanced significantly. Semi-oval inlet's inviscid drag per unit mass flow is decreased by 6% compared with the circle lip shape inlet at the design point, and its good compress characteristics and aerodynamic efficiency can partially get over the inlet system's adverse influence on the aerodynamic performance of vehicle. Research proves the design method of hypersonic inward turning inlet proposed in this paper is efficient and functional.
WANG Jifei , CAI Jinsheng , DUAN Yanhui . Multistage optimization design method of hypersonic inward turning inlet[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015 , 36(12) : 3759 -3773 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0095
[1] van Wie D M. Scramjet propulsion[M]. Reston:AIAA Press, 2000:447-511.
[2] Engelund W C, Holland S D, Cockrell C E, et al. Aerodynamic database development for the Hyper-X airframe-integrated scramjet propulsion experiments[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(6):803-810.
[3] Hank J M, Murphy J S, Mutzman R C. The X-51A scramjet engine flight demonstration program, AIAA-2008-2540[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[4] Mölder S, Szpiro E J. Busemann inlet for hypersonic speeds[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1966, 3(8):1303-1304.
[5] van Wie D M, Molder S. Applications of Busemann inlet designs for flight at hypersonic speeds[C]//AIAA Aerospace Design Conference. Reston:AIAA, 1992:AIAA-1992-1210.
[6] Yue L J, Xiao Y B, Chen L H, et al. Design of base flow for streamline-traced hypersonic inlet[C]//16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reson:AIAA, 2009:AIAA-2009-7422.
[7] Smart M K. Design of three-dimensional hypersonic inlets with rectangular-to-elliptical shape transition[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1999, 15(3):408-416.
[8] You Y C, Liang D W. Design concept of three-dimensional section controllable internal waverider hypersonic inlet[J]. Science in China Series E:Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(7):2017-2028.
[9] You Y C. An overview of the advantages and concerns of hypersonic inward turning inlets[C]//17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2011:AIAA-2011-2269.
[10] Nan X J, Zhang K Y, Jin Z G. Integrated design of waverider forebody and lateral hypersonic inward turning inlets[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(8):1417-1426(in Chinese).南向军,张堃元,金志光.乘波前体两侧高超声速内收缩进气道一体化设计[J].航空学报, 2012, 33(8):1417-1426.
[11] Li Y Z, Zhang K Y, Wang L, et al. Sensitivity analysis and optimization design of the basic flowfield with controllable Mach number distribution[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(4):765-774(in Chinese).李永洲,张堃元,王磊,等. Ma数分布可控的基准流场灵敏度分析与优化设计[J].航空动力学报, 2013, 28(4):765-774.
[12] He X Z, Qin S, Zhou Z, et al. Integrated design and performance analysis of waverider forebody and inlet[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(6):1270-1276(in Chinese).贺旭照,秦思,周正,等.一种乘波前体进气道的一体化设计及性能分析[J].航空动力学报, 2013, 28(6):1270-1276.
[13] Heiser W H, Pratt D T. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion[M]. Reston:AIAA Press, 1994:365-372.
[14] Lewis M J. A hypersonic propulsion airframe integration overview[C]//39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2003:AIAA-2003-4405.
[15] Zucrow M J, Hoffman J D. Gas dynamics[M]. New York:Wiley, 1976:186-192.
[16] Mölder S. Internal, axisymmetric, conical flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1967, 5(7):1252-1255.
[17] Hornung H G. Oblique shock reflection from an axis of symmetry[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000, 409:1-12.
[18] Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS book[M]. 2nd ed. New York:Springer, 1997:60-73.
[19] Wang X P, Cao L M. Genetic algorithm:theory, applications and software[M]. Xi'an:Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 2002:23-31(in Chinese).王小平,曹立明.遗传算法:理论,应用及软件实现[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社, 2002:23-31.
[20] Horn J, Nafpliotis N, Goldberg D E. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization[C]//Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE, 1994:82-87.
[21] Kulfan B M. Recent extensions and applications of the 'CST' universal parametric geometry representation method[C]//7th AIAA Aviation Technology Integration and Operations Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2007:AIAA-2007-7709.
[22] Drayna T W, Nompelis I, Candler G V. Hypersonic inward turning inlets:design and optimization[C]//44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2006:AIAA-2006-0297.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA