ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Wall Temperature Effect on Transition Flow and Separated Flow in Hypersonic Flow Around a Blunt Double Wedge
Received date: 2013-09-16
Revised date: 2014-07-16
Online published: 2014-08-08
To study the effect of different wall temperatures on the engine inlet transition flow for an air breathing hypersonic vehicle, a typical model of blunt double wedge is chosen in this paper. Based on the tunnel experiments carried by Thomas and Herbert from Aachen University in Germany, some existing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results are analyzed and compared with the numerical simulation results obtained by different methods in the paper. So the effect of different wall temperatures on the transition flow and separated flow in hypersonic flow around a double wedge is discussed. About the flow around the double wedge the separated flow generally occurs around the corner, and the stress of the separated vortex induces the transition, so the intensity and the size of separated flow change, finally the complicated interaction of non-stationary vortex movement and flow transition occurs. The calculation results show that the numerical simulations carried out considering transition simulation accord with the tunnel experiments. Also the comparing results between the calculation and the experiments show that in the literature, the results obtained by using laminar flow solver on the first ramp and turbulent flow solver on the second ramp are consistent with the experimental data, and in the paper the results obtained from the simulation only using the combined method of MUSCL, shear stress transport (SST) model and γ-Reθ model accord with the experimental data and reproduce rightly the status of the tunnel experiment. The analysis shows that in the region before the separated flow the wall heat flux decreases and the viscosity coefficient near wall increases with the wall temperature increasing; in the boundary layer the velocity profile is not in full and the velocity boundary layer is thicker, so the separated flow occurs even easier.
Key words： hypersonic; blunt double wedge; transition; separated flow; wall temperature
SHANG Qing , CHEN Lin , LI Xue , YUAN Xiangjiang . Wall Temperature Effect on Transition Flow and Separated Flow in Hypersonic Flow Around a Blunt Double Wedge[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014 , 35(11) : 2958 -2969 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0162
[1] Hank J M, Murphy J S, Mutzman R C. The X-51A scramjet engine flight demonstration program, AIAA-2008-2540[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[2] Thomas N, Herbert O. Influence of the wall temperature and the entropy layer effects on double wedge shock boundary layer interactions, AIAA-2006-8136[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.
[3] Reinartz B U, Ballmann J, Boyce R. Numberical investigation of wall temperature and entropy layer effects on double wedge shock/boundaty layer interactions, AIAA-2006-8137[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.
[4] Reinartz B U, Ballmann J. Computation of hypersonic double wedge shock/boundary layer interaction[C]//26th International Symposium on Shock Waves (ISSW26), 2007.
[5] Krause M, Behr M, Ballmann J. Modeling of transition effects in hypersonic intake flows using a correlation-based intermittency model, AIAA-2008-2598[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[6] Langtry R. A correlation-based transition model using local variables for unstructured parallelized CFD codes[D]. Stuttgart: Stuttgart University, 2006.
[7] Zhang H X. Non-oscillatory, non-free-parameter dissipation difference scheme[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1988, 6(2): 143-164. (in Chinese) 张涵信. 无波动、无自由参数的耗散差分格式[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1988, 6(2): 143-164.
[8] van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V: a second order sequel to Godunov's method[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1979, 32(1): 101-136.
[9] Liu X D, Osher S. Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered girds[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 142(2): 304-338.
[10] Roe P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and different schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2): 357-372.
[11] Wilcox D C. Turbulence modeling for CFD[M]. 2nd ed. California: DCW Industries, Inc., 1998.
[12] Menter F. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
[13] Langtry R, Menter F. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(12): 2894-2906.
[14] Seyfert C, Krumbein A. Correlation-based transition transport modeling for three-dimensional aerodynamic configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(5): 1533-1539.
[15] Wang G, Mian H, Ye Z, et al. Numerical study of transitional flow around NLR-7301 airfoil using correlation-based transition model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(1): 342-349.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA