薄层碳纤维/不锈钢极薄带纤维金属层板的高速冲击性能

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29420

Abstract

Abstract:

To increase the toughness and high-velocity impact performance of carbon fiber composites， a new type of fiber metal laminates—thin-ply Carbon fiber/Ultra-thin Stainless-steel strips Fiber Metal Laminates （CUSFML） was proposed， which consisted of 30 μm thick thin-ply carbon fiber prepreg and 50 μm thick ultra-thin stainless-steel strips. Three types of thin-ply CUSFML were prepared in the range of Metal Volume Fraction （MVF） from 0.250 to 0.625. The high-velocity impact experiments of the pure carbon fiber laminates and three types of thin-ply CUSFML were carried out in the velocity range of 45–120 m/s by using an air gun. Moreover， the high-velocity impact responses of thin-ply CUSFML were also numerically simulated in ABAQUS/Explicit combined with the modified 3D Hashin failure criteria. The influence of MVF values on the dynamic response characteristics and energy absorption of thin-ply CUSFML under high-velocity impact was systematically analyzed. The results show that the high-velocity impact performance of thin-ply CUSFML can be significantly improved compared with that of traditional carbon fiber laminates. Through experimental data analysis and numerical calculation， the maximum specific absorption energy of prepared thin-ply CUSFML can reach 8.51 J·m²/kg， which is 19.2% higher than that of pure carbon fiber laminates. The impact load can reach up to 6 713 N， about 2.5 times that of pure carbon fiber laminates.Results also show that increasing the volume content of ultra-thin stainless-steel strips in the thin-ply CUSFML in a certain range could enhance the leading role of plastic deformation of the metal layer and fracture in the energy absorption mechanism， and improve the high-velocity impact performance of the laminates. However， with the continuous increase of MVF value， the specific energy absorption of thin-ply CUSFML would decrease slightly. After comparing the dynamic response characteristics of various laminates， it is found that the thin-ply CUSFML have the best impact resistance and energy absorption performance near MVF of 0.455.

Key words: fiber metal laminates, thin-ply carbon fiber, ultra-thin stainless-steel strips, high-velocity impact, energy absorption

CLC Number:

V257

Shibo WEI, Hongji SHU, Xiaoqiong ZHANG, Tingting ZHAO, Tao WANG, Zhihua WANG, Qingxue HUANG. High⁃velocity impact performance of thin⁃ply carbon fiber/ ultra⁃thin stainless⁃steel strips fiber metal laminates[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(14): 429420-429420.

Figures/Tables 26

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Table 4

Fig.2

Table 5

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 6

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Fig.9

Table 10

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Table 11

Fig.13

Table 12

Fig.14

References 38

1	CHAI G B， MANIKANDAN P. Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates—A review［J］. Composite Structures， 2014， 107： 363-381.
2	佟安时，谢里阳，白恩军，等. 纤维金属层板的静力学性能测试与预测模型［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（11）： 221193.
	TONG A S， XIE L Y， BAI E J， et al. Test and prediction model of statics property of fiber metal laminates［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（11）： 221193 （in Chinese）.
3	VLOT A， ALDERLIESTEN R C， HOOIJMEIJER P A， et al. Fibre metal laminates： A state of the art［J］. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology， 2002， 17（1-2）： 79-98.
4	陈勇，廖高健，任立海，等. 玻璃纤维增强铝合金层板高速冲击损伤容限［J］. 航空学报， 2018， 39（7）： 221733.
	CHEN Y， LIAO G J， REN L H， et al. Damage tolerance of GLARE laminates subjected to high-velocity impact［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2018， 39（7）： 221733 （in Chinese）.
5	BANAT D， MANIA R J. Damage analysis of thin-walled GLARE members under axial compression-Numerical and experiment investigations［J］. Composite Structures， 2020， 241： 112102.
6	KHAN S H， SHARMA A P， KITEY R， et al. Effect of metal layer placement on the damage and energy absorption mechanisms in aluminium/glass fibre laminates［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2018， 119： 14-25.
7	HU C Z， SANG L， JIANG K， et al. Experimental and numerical characterization of flexural properties and failure behavior of CFRP/Al laminates［J］. Composite Structures， 2022， 281： 115036.
8	NAKATANI H， KOSAKA T， OSAKA K， et al. Damage characterization of titanium/GFRP hybrid laminates subjected to low-velocity impact［J］. Composites Part A： Applied Science and Manufacturing， 2011， 42（7）： 772-781.
9	陈园方，李玉龙，刘军，等. 典型前缘结构抗鸟撞性能改进研究［J］. 航空学报， 2010， 31（9）： 1781-1787.
	CHEN Y F， LI Y L， LIU J， et al. Study of bird strike on an improved leading edge structure［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2010， 31（9）： 1781-1787 （in Chinese）.
10	LEE D W， PARK B J， PARK S Y， et al. Fabrication of high-stiffness fiber-metal laminates and study of their behavior under low-velocity impact loadings［J］. Composite Structures， 2018， 189： 61-69.
11	KÖTTER B， YAMADA K， KÖRBELIN J， et al. Steel foil reinforcement for high performance bearing strength inThin-Ply composites ［J］. Composites Part C： Open Access， 2021， 4： 085-100.
12	PÄRNÄNEN T， KANERVA M， SARLIN E， et al. Debonding and impact damage in stainless steel fibre metal laminates prior to metal fracture［J］. Composite Structures， 2015， 119： 777-786.
13	LIU C， YANG G L， XIAO Y， et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the impact resistance of fiber metal laminates［J］. Vibroengineering Procedia， 2021， 36： 78-82.
14	PATELM， PATELS， AHMADS. Blast analysis of efficient honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP/Steel FML skins［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2023， 178： 104609.
15	LU F， ZHONG Q P， CAO C X， et al. Galvanic corrosion and protection of GECM/LY12CZ couples under different atmospheric exposure conditions［J］. Acta Metallurgica Sinica （English Letters）， 2003， 16（1）： 41-45.
16	吴国清，潘英才，张宗科，等. 超轻纤维金属层合板的研究进展［J］. 航空制造技术， 2016， 59（S2）： 133-136.
	WU G Q， PAN Y C， ZHANG Z K， et al. Research progress of ultra-light fiber metal laminates［J］. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology， 2016， 59（S2）： 133-136 （in Chinese）.
17	曹勇，张超. 薄层复合材料冲击损伤行为研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（6）： 525323.
	CAO Y， ZHANG C. Impact damage behavior of thin-ply composites： A review［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（6）： 525323 （in Chinese）.
18	JAKUBCZAK P， BIENIAŚ J， DADEJ K. Experimental and numerical investigation into the impact resistance of aluminium carbon laminates［J］. Composite Structures， 2020， 244： 112319.
19	赵天，李营，张超，等. 高性能航空复合材料结构的关键力学问题研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（6）： 526851.
	ZHAO T， LI Y， ZHANG C， et al. Fundamental mechanical problems in high-performance aerospace composite structures： State-of-art review［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（6）： 526851 （in Chinese）.
20	SHARMA A P， VELMURUGAN R， SHANKAR K， et al. High-velocity impact response of titanium-based fiber metal laminates. Part I： Experimental investigations［J］. International Journal of Impact Engineering， 2021， 152： 103845.
21	SHARMA A P， KHAN S H. Influence of metal layer distribution on the projectiles impact response of glass fiber reinforced aluminum laminates［J］. Polymer Testing， 2018， 70： 320-347.
22	DECICCOD， TAHERIF. Performances of magnesium- and steel-based 3D fiber-metal laminates under various loading conditions［J］. Composite Structures， 2019， 229： 111390.
23	SEYED YAGHOUBI A， LIAW B. Thickness influence on ballistic impact behaviors of GLARE 5 fiber-metal laminated beams： Experimental and numerical studies［J］. Composite Structures， 2012， 94（8）： 2585-2598.
24	KUBITA， TRZEPIECIŃSKI T， KICIŃSKI R， et al. Three-dimensional smooth particle hydrodynamics modeling and experimental analysis of the ballistic performance of steel-based FML targets［J］. Materials， 2022， 15（10）： 3711.
25	唐小军，回天力，王振清，等. 碳纤维-不锈钢层板热载条件下冲击动态响应及层间损伤仿真研究［J］. 应用数学和力学， 2016， 37（10）： 1026-1038.
	TANG X J， HUI T L， WANG Z Q， et al. Numerical simulation of impact dynamic responses and interlayer failure of CFRMLs under thermal loads［J］. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics， 2016， 37（10）： 1026-1038 （in Chinese）.
26	PANG Y Z， YAN X J， WU L Z， et al. Experiment study of basalt fiber/steel hybrid laminates under high-velocity impact performance by projectiles［J］. Composite Structures， 2022， 280： 114848.
27	REN Z K， FAN W W， HOU J， et al. A numerical study of slip system evolution in ultra-thin stainless steel foil［J］. Materials， 2019， 12（11）： 1819-1831.
28	REYES VILLANUEVA G， CANTWELL W J. The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures［J］. Composites Science and Technology， 2004， 64（1）： 35-54.
29	KHORAMISHAD H， ALIKHANI H， DARIUSHI S. An experimental study on the effect of adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes on high-velocity impact behavior of fiber metal laminates［J］. Composite Structures， 2018， 201： 561-569.
30	李应刚，张雨，朱凌，等. 船用蜂窝金属夹芯板重复冲击实验研究［J］. 船舶力学， 2021， 25（5）： 637-644.
	LI Y G， ZHANG Y， ZHU L， et al. Experimental study on the dynamic behaviours of honeycomb sandwich plates under repeated impacts［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics， 2021， 25（5）： 637-644 （in Chinese）.
31	SHIBUYA Y， ZHANG J W， SATO Y， et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and deformability of metal-based composite sheets made of thin stainless-steel sheets and carbon fiber reinforced plastics［J］. International Journal of Material Forming， 2022， 15（4）： 47.
32	JAKUBCZAK P. The comparison of the veritable response to impact load of conventional and thin-ply types of fibre metal laminates［J］. Composite Structures， 2021， 257： 113151.
33	KONG D W， WANG D F， ZHANG X P. Study on the forming process and shear mechanical behavior of CFRP/Al self-piercing riveting employed 3D modeling［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part L： Journal of Materials： Design and Applications， 2023， 237（8）： 1771-1787.
34	ZHU Q， ZHANG C， CURIEL-SOSAJ L， et al. Finite element simulation of damage in fiber metal laminates under high velocity impact by projectiles with different shapes［J］. Composite Structures， 2019， 214： 73-82.
35	ORIFICI A C， HERSZBERG I， THOMSON R S. Review of methodologies for composite material modelling incorporating failure［J］. Composite Structures， 2008， 86（1-3）： 194-210.
36	JAKUBCZAK P. The impact behaviour of hybrid titanium glass laminates—Experimental and numerical approach［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences， 2019， 159： 58-73.
37	BIENIAS J， JAKUBCZAK P， DADEJ K. Low-velocity impact resistance of aluminium glass laminates—Experimental and numerical investigation［J］. Composite Structures， 2016， 152： 339-348.
38	ZHANG F K， LIN Y， WU J A， et al. Comparison of stacking sequence on the low-velocity impact failure mechanisms and energy dissipation characteristics of CFRP/Al hybrid laminates［J］. Polymer Composites， 2022， 43（8）： 5544-5562.

元素	含量/wt%
C	0.48
Cr	18.25
Ni	8.103
Co	0.06
Si	0.456
Mn	1.060
P	0.030
S	0.004
Fe	其余

参数	数值
密度/（g·m^-2）	200
树脂含量/wt%	40
拉伸强度/MPa	1 860
抗弯强度/MPa	740
压缩强度/MPa	60
剪切强度/MPa	900

参数	数值
密度/（g·m^-2）	3.965
弹性模量/GPa	194.02
泊松比	0.3
拉伸极限强度/MPa	800

类别		铺层结构	MVF	厚度/mm
CUSFML	A类	［90/0/90/0/90/S］₅	0.250	1.0
	B类	［90/0/S/0/90/S］₅	0.455	1.1
	C类	［90/S/0/S/90/S］₅	0.625	1.2
CFRP		［90/0/90/0］₈	0	0.96

A类CUSFML			B类CUSFML			C类CUSFML			CFRP
V_I/ （m·s^-1）	状态	V_R/ （m·s^-1）	V_I/ （m·s^-1）	状态	V_R/ （m·s^-1）	V_I/ （m·s^-1）	状态	V_R/ （m·s^-1）	V_I/ （m·s^-1）	状态	V_R/ （m·s^-1）
45.76	回弹		46.88	回弹		46.90	回弹		46.38	临界穿透
58.62	回弹		57.65	回弹		59.02	回弹		64.27	穿透	41.63
68.57	穿透	27.64	67.28	回弹		67.89	回弹		73.05	穿透	53.23
80.17	穿透	54.81	77.86	回弹		75.67	回弹		80.98	穿透	65.54
87.92	穿透	63.24	86.55	穿透	10.73	83.80	回弹		87.22	穿透	74.11
94.72	穿透	77.04	95.28	穿透	40.94	92.03	回弹		94.51	穿透	81.70
99.44	穿透	82.85	99.68	穿透	50.51	97.36	回弹		98.27	穿透	87.25
104.6	穿透	87.14	104.3	穿透	59.24	104.9	穿透	46.62	104.4	穿透	95.61
						109.8	穿透	62.23
						113.1	穿透	82.45
						118.5	穿透	78.64

High⁃velocity impact performance of thin⁃ply carbon fiber/ ultra⁃thin stainless⁃steel strips fiber metal laminates

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 26

References 38

Related Articles 13

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

材料参数	数值	材料参数	数值
屈服应力A/MPa	269.79	D₁	0.69
应变硬化参数B/MPa	637.34	D₂	0.123
应变率硬化指数n	0.759	D₃	1.57
应变率强化参数C	0.096	D₄	0.054 6
失效能量G_f/（kJ·m^-2）	8.0	参考应变率	1

材料参数	数值	材料参数	数值
X_T/MPa	2 160	模量E₂₂/GPa	5.2
X_C/MPa	1 470	模量E₃₃/GPa	5.2
Y_T/MPa	71	ν₁₂	0.25
Y_C/MPa	1 030	ν₁₃	0.25
S₁₂/MPa	450	ν₂₃	0.38
S₁₃/MPa	325	G₁₂/MPa	3 610
S₂₃/MPa	325	G₁₃/MPa	3 610
模量E₁₁/GPa	134	G₂₃/MPa	3 100

损伤模式	衰减系数
损伤模式	E₁₁	E₂₂	E₃₃	G₁₂	G₁₃	G₂₃	ν₁₂	ν₁₃	ν₂₃
纤维拉伸损伤	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07	0.07
纤维压缩损伤	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14	0.14
基体拉伸损伤	1	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	0.20	1	1	1
基体压缩损伤	1	0.40	0.40	0.40	0.40	1.57	1	1	1
面外剪切损伤	1	1	1	1			1

方向	模量/GPa	强度/MPa	失效能量/（kJ·m²）
法向	3.5	39	0.22
第1剪切方向	3.5	50	0.36
第2剪切方向	3.5	50	0.36

层板类别	d_r/D
层板类别	E_i=12.0 J	E_i=18.5 J	E_i=32.0 J
A类	0.745
B类	0.791	0.804	0.869
C类	0.849	0.903	0.945

E_i/J	能量吸收/J
E_i/J	A类	B类	C类
12.0	10.85	10.73	10.37
18.5	18.35	17.81	17.32
32.0	16.49	30.69	30.53

[1]	Xiaochuan LIU, Xulong XI, Xinyue ZHANG, Chunyu BAI, Yabin YAN, Xiaocheng LI, Rangke MU. Full⁃scale crash experimental study of typical civil aircraft [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(5): 529664-529664.
[2]	ZHANG Xinyue, XI Xulong, LIU Xiaochuan, BAI Chunyu. Experimental study on crash characteristics of typical metal civil aircraft fuselage structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526234-526234.
[3]	WANG Jiaming, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, LIU Wanting, LIAO Jiu, CHEN Fangyu, LI Meng, SHAO Teli. Design, simulation and theoretical study on novel cored octagon honeycomb for helicopter crashworthiness [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225244-225244.
[4]	XIE Jiang, SONG Shanshan, SONG Dongfang, FENG Zhenyu, MU Haolei, ZHANG Xuehan. Stacked shell modeling method for failure analysis of composite C-channels subject to axial compression [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522395-522395.
[5]	FENG Zhenyu, XIE Jiang, LI Henghui, CHENG Kun, MA Congyao, MOU Haolei. Finite element modeling and crashworthiness analysis of large aeroplane sub-cargo structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522394-522394.
[6]	MENG Weiying, XIE Liyang, LIU Jianzhong, BAI Xin, TONG Anshi. Contrast study on fatigue life performance of glass fiber reinforced Al-Li alloy laminates under unimodal overload [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(5): 1536-1543.
[7]	ZHOU Huazhi, WANG Zhijin. Analysis of energy absorption capability of M-type folded core sandwich structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(2): 579-587.
[8]	WANG Haibo, LIU Ruirui, SUN Yuxin, LIU Hua, YANG Jialing. Energy absorption characteristics of series nested circular ring system [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(6): 1839-1847.
[9]	LIU Xiaochuan, ZHOU Sufeng, MA Junfeng, SUN Xiasheng, MU Rangke. Correlation Study of Crash Analysis and Test of Civil Airplane Sub-cabin Energy Absorption Structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2202-2210.
[10]	Ren Yiru;Xiang Jinwu;Luo Zhangping;Zheng Jianqiang. Effect of Cabin-floor Oblique Strut on Crashworthiness of Typical Civil Aircraft Fuselage Section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(2): 271-276.
[11]	GONG Jun-jie;WANG Xin-wei. Numerical Simulation of Energy Absorption Capability of Composite Waved Beams [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2005, 26(3): 298-302.
[12]	CHEN Yong-gang;YI Xiao-su;XU Ya-hong;TANG Bang-ming;ZHANG Zi-long. Static Energy Absorption Characteristics of Carbon-Epoxy Tubes [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2005, 26(2): 246-249.
[13]	LIU Rui-tong;WANG Xin-wei;JIA Shu-ping. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ENERGY ABSORPTION OF CARBON-EPOXY WAVED BEAMS [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2002, 23(1): 59-61.

试件	CUSFML			CFRP
试件	A类	B类	C类	CFRP
质量/kg	0.049 0	0.072 3	0.102 9	0.029 1