基于相似构型决策的舰载机驾驶员建模与评估

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26329

Abstract

Abstract:

Complicated sea conditions such as carrier motion and air wake are the core factors that affect the difficulty and accuracy of carrier-based aircraft landing. Establishing a pilot landing control behavior model and constructing a pilot-aircraft closed-loop system are to evaluate the load of the pilot in handling complex sea conditions. Furthermore， there exist usually several different configurations for the new generation carrier aircraft. Even for the same aircraft， it may be of different mass property or aerodynamic configuration when it is prepared to land. Therefore， it is essential to consider the configuration variation of the aircraft in building pilot behavior models. In this paper， to evaluate the load of controlling the carrier-based aircraft， a Hess structure pilot model for longitudinal pitch tracking is established based on the flight experiment method and the frequency domain calculation method. Then， considering the variations of aircraft landing configurations， a configuration library for the typical and control-augmented carrier aircraft is developed based on the Control Anticipation Parameter （CAP） criteria， and pilot-in-the-loop simulation experiments are used to establish a pilot model matching each aircraft type to establish a pilot member model library. On this basis， similar configuration decision-making criteria and method are given， and the pilot behavior model prediction method for the designated aircraft type in the application is proposed. Simulation analysis is carried out on the landing mission of a carrier-based aircraft in complex sea conditions. The results show that the method proposed in this paper can facilitate the study on the influence of the load of pilots in handling different types of ship-borne mechanisms.

Key words: carrier landing, pilot modeling, human in the loop experiment, configuration library, maneuvering load assessment

CLC Number:

V249.11

Xiaoyu LIU, Liguo SUN, Wenqian TAN, Jinpeng WEI, Weijun WANG, Junkai JIAO. Modeling and evaluation of carrier aircraft pilots based on similar configuration decisions[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126329-126329.

Figures/Tables 31

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 1

Model-related parameters and CAP values of 25 configurations

构型	模型参数				CAP	飞行品质等级
构型	$K α$	$K q$	$ω s p$	$ξ s p$	CAP	飞行品质等级
1	-105.86	0.20	11.19	0.30	6.00	2
2	-105.61	-2.66	11.19	0.45	6.00	2
3	-105.26	-7.55	11.20	0.71	6.00	2
4	-104.84	-13.18	11.20	1.00	6.00	2
5	-103.83	-24.55	11.20	1.60	6.00	2
6	-35.83	-1.12	6.46	0.30	2.00	2
7	-35.68	-2.77	6.46	0.45	2.00	1
8	-35.45	-5.60	6.46	0.71	2.00	1
9	-35.18	-8.82	6.46	1.00	2.00	1
10	-34.60	-15.41	6.46	1.60	2.00	2
11	-11.13	-0.93	3.50	0.30	0.59	2
12	-11.05	-1.82	3.50	0.45	0.59	1
13	-10.92	-3.35	3.50	0.71	0.59	1
14	-10.77	-5.09	3.50	1.00	0.59	1
15	-10.45	-8.66	3.50	1.60	0.59	2
16	-5.79	-0.66	2.42	0.30	0.28	2
17	-5.73	-1.28	2.42	0.45	0.28	1
18	-5.64	-2.33	2.42	0.71	0.28	1
19	-5.54	-3.54	2.42	1.00	0.28	1
20	-5.32	-6.01	2.42	1.60	0.28	2
21	-2.49	-0.30	1.37	0.30	0.09	2
22	-2.46	-0.65	1.37	0.45	0.09	2
23	-2.41	-1.25	1.37	0.71	0.09	2
24	-2.35	-1.94	1.37	1.00	0.09	2
25	-2.25	-3.34	1.37	1.60	0.09	2

Table 1

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Table 2

Fixed parameters of pilot model for simplified structure

模型参数	建议值
神经肌肉系统的固有频率 $ω n / (r a d ⋅ s - 1)$	10
神经肌肉系统的阻尼比 $ξ n$	0.707
神经肌肉系统的速率反馈系数 $K 1$	1.0

Table 2

Table 3

Determination method of k

$W c$ 在 $ω c$ 附近的斜率/dB	相位延迟/（°）	$k$
-20	<90	1
-20	>90	2
-40		2
0		0

Table 3

Table 4

Pilot model library corresponding to aircraft type

构型	$k$	$K e$	$K 2$	$T 2$	$T 1$	$A R 2$
1	0	41.385	0.001	11.711	1.070	0.992 7
2	0	42.876	0.001	19.338	1.576	0.992 7
3	0	41.566	0.001	10.194	25.000	0.992 5
4	0	38.432	0.001	8.072	0.979	0.991 7
5	0	37.128	0.001	12.455	1.890	0.991 9
6	0	22.705	0.001	23.510	0.832	0.990 7
7	0	46.395	0.001	0.001	0.602	0.992 0
8	0	32.934	0.001	14.404	25.000	0.992 5
9	0	31.830	0.001	12.956	2.441	0.992 6
10	1	496.197	25.000		25.000	0.992 9
11	0	15.293	0.002	0.001	25.000	0.988 6
12	0	16.943	0.002	0.001	25.000	0.988 8
13	0	20.553	0.002	0.001	25.000	0.989 3
14	1	13.614	1.378		25.000	0.985 9
15	1	26.520	1.629		25.000	0.989 7
16	1	4.687	1.818		25.000	0.964 0
17	1	3.441	1.234		25.000	0.956 3
18	1	11.026	1.419		25.000	0.984 5
19	1	12.843	2.214		25.000	0.986 3
20	1	18.158	1.328		25.000	0.987 0
21	2	9.469	25.000	0.429	25.000	0.990 8
22	2	10.739	25.000	0.466	24.999	0.989 2
23	2	-11.250	25.000	0.540	25.000	0.988 2
24	2	19.540	25.000	25.000	0.452	0.992 2
25	1	9.783	1.492		25.000	0.980 7

Table 4

Fig. 17

Table 5

Values of configuration parameters to be predicted

序号	$K α$	$K q$	短周期频率/（rad·s^-1）	短周期阻尼比	CAP
$a$	-16.262 9	-4.062 8	4.325 2	0.708 4	0.895 3
$b$	-8.076 2	-2.066 4	2.954 1	0.550 9	0.417 7
$c$	-7.941 9	-3.577 9	2.953 6	0.852 0	0.417 5
$d$	-51.817 7	-15.745 2	7.896 9	1.403 3	2.984 6
$e$	-3.854 4	-0.553 8	1.878 9	0.320 1	0.169 0
$f$	-21.562 6	-3.253 1	4.995 4	0.550 8	1.194 3
$g$	-21.335 4	-5.808 1	4.994 3	0.851 8	1.193 8
$h$	-3.546 6	-4.015 8	1.877 0	1.405 1	0.168 6
$i$	-53.110 7	-1.201 9	7.901 4	0.320 3	2.988 0

Table 5

Table 6

Results of matching decision results

序号	相似构型	对应驾驶员模型	$A R 2$
$a$	13	$W P 13$	0.982 3
$b$	13	$W P 13$	0.978 7
$c$	14	$W P 14$	0.986 8
$d$	9	$W P 9$	0.990 0
$e$	17	$W P 17$	0.945 8
$f$	8	$W P 8$	0.984 0
$g$	9	$W P 9$	0.985 9
$h$	20	$W P 20$	0.991 9
$i$	6	$W P 6$	0.984 1

Table 6

Fig. 18

Table 7

Parameters of pilot model of McRuer

参数	$K H$	$T L$	$T l$	$τ d$
取值	0.8	0.2	4	0.1

Table 7

Fig. 19

Fig. 20

Table 8

Results of unified theory

构型	c	h
$u m$ 的均方根	0.023 9	0.028 8

Table 8

Fig. 21

Table 9

Fig. 22

References 31

1	YU Y， WANG H L， LI N， et al. Automatic carrier landing system based on active disturbance rejection control with a novel parameters optimizer［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2017， 69： 149-160.
2	ZHEN Z Y， YU C J， JIANG S Y， et al. Adaptive super-twisting control for automatic carrier landing of aircraft［J］. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems， 2020， 56（2）： 984-997.
3	张志冰，张秀林，王家兴，等. 一种基于多操纵面控制分配的IDLC人工着舰精确控制方法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（8）： 525840.
	ZHANG Z B， ZHANG X L， WANG J X， et al. An IDLC landing control method of carrier-based aircraft based on control allocation of multiple control surfaces［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（8）： 525840 （in Chinese）.
4	石明，屈香菊，王萌辉. 甲板运动对舰载机人工着舰的影响和补偿［J］. 飞行力学， 2006， 24（1）： 5-8.
	SHI M， QU X J， WANG M H. The influence and compensation of deck motion in carrier landing approach［J］. Flight Dynamics， 2006， 24（1）： 5-8 （in Chinese）.
5	张永花. 舰载机着舰过程甲板运动建模及补偿技术研究［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2012.
	ZHANG Y H. Research on deck motion modeling and deck motion compensation for carrier landing［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2012 （in Chinese）.
6	梁磊，肖静，詹光，等. 考虑杆臂效应与挠曲变形的全自动着舰技术［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（8）： 525841.
	LIANG L， XIAO J， ZHAN G， et al. Automatic landing technology considering lever arm effect and flexural deformation［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（8）： 525841 （in Chinese）.
7	CHERRY B E， CONSTANTINO M M. The burble effect： Superstructure and flight deck effects on carrier air wake： AD-A527798［R］. Annapolis： United States Naval Academy， 2010.
8	KELLY M F， WHITE M D， OWEN I， et al. The queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers： Airwake modelling and validation for ASTOVL flight simulation［C］∥Launch and Recovery Symposium， American Society of Naval Engineers. Baltimore：American Society of Naval Engineers， 2016： 1-13.
9	罗飞，张军红，王博，等. 基于直接升力与动态逆的舰尾流抑制方法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（12）： 124770.
	LUO F， ZHANG J H， WANG B， et al. Air wake suppression method based on direct lift and nonlinear dynamic inversion control［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（12）： 124770 （in Chinese）.
10	EFREMOV A， EFREMOV E， TIAGLIK M. Advancements in predictions of flying qualities， pilot-induced oscillation tendencies， and flight safety［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 2020， 43（1）： 4-14.
11	DREWIACKI D， SILVESTRE F J， GUIMARÃES A B. A new handling qualities criterion for pilot-augmented oscillations： AIAA-2020-0282［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2020.
12	JONES M， BARNETT M. Analysis of rotorcraft pilot-induced oscillations triggered by active inceptor failures： AIAA-2019-0104［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2019.
13	DREWIACKI D， SILVESTRE F J， GUIMARÃES NETO A B. Influence of airframe flexibility on pilot-induced oscillations［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 2019， 42（7）： 1537-1550.
14	王永庆，罗云宝，王奇涛，等. 面向机舰适配的舰载飞机起降特性分析［J］. 航空学报， 2016， 37（1）： 269-277.
	WANG Y Q， LUO Y B， WANG Q T， et al. Carrier suitability-oriented launch and recovery characteristics of piloted carrier-based aircraft［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2016， 37（1）： 269-277 （in Chinese）.
15	MULDER M， POOL D M， ABBINK D A， et al. Manual control cybernetics： State-of-the-art and current trends［J］. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems， 2018， 48（5）： 468-485.
16	HOSMAN R， VAN DER GEEST P， VAN DER ZEE J. Development of a pilot model for the manual balked landing maneuver： AIAA-2009-5818［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2009.
17	LONE M， COOKE A. Review of pilot models used in aircraft flight dynamics［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2014， 34： 55-74.
18	王淼，肖刚，王国庆. 单一飞行员驾驶模式技术［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（4）： 323541.
	WANG M， XIAO G， WANG G Q. Single pilot operation mode technology［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（4）： 323541 （in Chinese）.
19	许舒婷，谭文倩，屈香菊. 飞机力提示智能侧杆控制器设计方法［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（8）： 525775.
	XU S T， TAN W Q， QU X J. Design method of aircraft smart side-stick controller with force cue［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（8）： 525775 （in Chinese）.
20	HESS R A. Structural model of the adaptive human pilot［J］. Journal of Guidance and Control， 1980， 3（5）： 416-423.
21	HESS R A， WATSON D C. Cross coupling in pilot-vehicle systems［J］. Journal of Guidance and Control， 1986， 9（6）： 614-620.
22	HESS R A， KALTEIS R M. Technique for predicting longitudinal pilot-induced oscillations［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 1991， 14（1）： 198-204.
23	HESS R A. Unified theory for aircraft handling qualities and adverse aircraft-pilot coupling［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 1997， 20（6）： 1141-1148.
24	BACHELDER E N， HESS R A， GODFROY-COOPER M， et al. Linking the pilot structural model and pilot workload： AIAA-2018-0533［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2018.
25	HESS R A. Analysis of the aircraft carrier landing task， pilot + augmentation/automation［J］. IFAC-PapersOnLine， 2019， 51（34）： 359-365.
26	CHEN C， TAN W Q， QU X J， et al. A fuzzy human pilot model of longitudinal control for a carrier landing task［J］. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems， 2018， 54（1）： 453-466.
27	刘嘉，向锦武，张颖，等. 舰载机着舰下滑段飞行员操纵策略研究［J］. 动力学与控制学报， 2018， 16（1）： 87-96.
	LIU J， XIANG J W， ZHANG Y， et al. Research on piloting principle in carrier landing［J］. Journal of Dynamics and Control， 2018， 16（1）： 87-96 （in Chinese）.
28	谭文倩， EFREMOV A V，屈香菊. 一种预测驾驶员操纵行为的建模方法［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报， 2010， 36（10）： 1140-1144.
	TAN W Q， EFREMOV A V， QU X J. Approach of pilot modeling for predicting pilot control behavior［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2010， 36（10）： 1140-1144 （in Chinese）.
29	MCRUER D T， KRENDEL E S. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior［R］. Neuilly sur Seine： North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development，1974．
30	Defense Quality and Standardization Office. Flying qualities of piloted aircraft： MIL-H ［S］. Washington， D. C.： Department of Defense， 1997.
31	ANDERSON M. Inner and outer loop manual control of carrier aircraft landing： AIAA-1996-3877［R］. Reston： AIAA， 1996.

构型	c	h
着舰偏差平均值/m	-12.046 1	-14.492 9
最大允许着舰次数	212	189
着舰成功率/%	42.4	37.8
理想着舰次数	114	99
理想着舰率/%	22.8	19.8
高度偏差均方根/m	1.481 1	1.470 4

[1]	HU Wei, WAN Wenzhang, CHEN Mou. Neural network and disturbance observer based control for automatic carrier landing of UAV [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726963-726963.
[2]	LUO Fei, ZHANG Junhong, WANG Bo, TANG Ruilin, TANG Wei. Air wake suppression method based on direct lift and nonlinear dynamic inversion control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 124770-124770.
[3]	ZUO Xianshuai, WANG Lixin, LIU Hailiang, WANG Yun, ZHANG Yu. Similarity for simulating automatic carrier landing process of full-scale aircraft with scaled-model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 123005-123005.
[4]	LI Xu, ZHU Xiaoping, ZHOU Zhou, GUO Jiahao. Numerical simulation of flow field during landing for carrier-based aircraft near a moving base [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(12): 122131-122131.
[5]	ZHEN Ziyang, WANG Xinhua, JIANG Ju, YANG Yidong. Research progress in guidance and control of automatic carrier landing of carrier-based aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(2): 20435-020435.
[6]	LIU Jia, XIANG Jinwu, ZHANG Ying, SUN Yang, XIAO Chuwan. Research and application of adaptive optimal control pilot model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(4): 1127-1138.
[7]	ZHOU Xin, PENG Rongkun, YUAN Suozhong. Prediction and Compensation for Vertical Motion of Ideal Touchdown Point in Carrier Landing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(7): 1663-1669.

Modeling and evaluation of carrier aircraft pilots based on similar configuration decisions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 31

References 31

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments