共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23055

Abstract

Abstract: In order to analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect, a numerical method based on unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations is established. Moving overset grid is applied to simulate the reversal motion of the coaxial rotors. The non-slip boundary condition is adopted on the ground, and the grid around the rotors and the ground are refined to better capture the details of the flow field and the wake of the rotors. The comparison between the calculations and the experimental results of Lynx tail rotor verifies the effectiveness of the established method. The analyses of aerodynamic characteristics and the flow field of coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect show that the thrust increment of coaxial rotors in ground effect is larger than that of single upper and lower rotors. The increment is caused by the weakening of the interference between the surface of upper and lower blades due to high ground pressure. The ground interference mainly affects the radial position of the wake of the coaxial rotors, but it has little effect on its axial position. Upper and lower rotor wakes fuse and split with each other near the ground, forming complex tip vortex. The radius of the coaxial rotors wake in ground effect is larger than that of single rotor, because the radial jet velocity of the coaxial rotors is larger. With the increase of the height of the rotor from the ground, the aerodynamic interference intensity between the coaxial rotors gradually recovers, making the descending speed of the thrust increment of the lower rotor larger than that of the upper rotor. The relative roll height and the expansion radius of the coaxial rotors tip vortex decrease with the increase of off-ground height.

Key words: coaxial rigid rotor, ground effect, aerodynamic interaction, rotor wake, CFD, overset grid

CLC Number:

V211.52

LU Congling, QI Haotian, XU Guohua, SHI Yongjie. Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 123055-123055.

References 25

[1]	SHERIDAN P F, WEISNER W. Aerodynamics of helicopter flight near ground[C]//Proceedings of 33rd Annual Forum of American Helicopter Society, 1977.
[2]	CURTISS H C, SUN M, PUTNAM W F, et al. Rotor aerodynamics in ground effect at low advance ratios[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1984, 29(1):48-55.
[3]	LIGHT J S. Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1993, 38(2):34-42.
[4]	GANESH B, KOMERATH N. Study of ground vortex structure of rotorcraft in ground effect at low advance ratios[C]//24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[5]	何承健, 高正. 贴地飞行的旋翼尾迹研究[J]. 航空学报, 1986, 7(4):325-331. HE C J, GAO Z. A study of the rotor wake in nap-of-the-earth[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1986, 7(4):325-331(in Chinese).
[6]	孙茂, CURTISS H C. 近地低速飞行时旋翼尾涡系的畸变及其诱导速度[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1989, 7(1):35-42. SUN M, CURTISS H C. Rotor vortex wake distortion and its induced velocity in ground effect at low speed[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1989, 7(1):35-42(in Chinese).
[7]	BHATTACHARYYA S, CONLISK A T. The structure of the rotor wake in ground effect[C]//41th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2003.
[8]	HWANG J Y, CHOI J H, KWON O J. Assessment of S-76 rotor hover performance in ground effect using an unstructured mixed mesh method[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2016.
[9]	LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, KALRA T S, BAEDER J D. Detailed computational investigation of a hovering microscale rotor in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(4):893-909.
[10]	CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6):1813-1832.
[11]	SUGIURA M, TANABE Y, SUGAWARA H, et al. Numerical simulations and measurements of the helicopter wake in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 54(1):209-219.
[12]	KUTZ B M, BENSING F, KEßLER M, et al. CFD calculation of a helicopter rotor hovering in ground effect[C]//DILLMANN A, HELLER G, KREPLIN H P, et al. New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics VIII:Contributions to the 17th STAB/DGLR Symposium Berlin, Germany 2010. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2013:297-304.
[13]	叶靓, 招启军, 徐国华. 基于非结构嵌套网格方法的旋翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5):780-786. YE L, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical simulation on flowfield of rotor in ground effect based on unstructured embedded grid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(5):780-786(in Chinese).
[14]	朱明勇, 招启军, 王博. 基于CFD和混合配平算法的直升机旋翼地面效应模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551. ZHU M Y, ZHAO Q J, WANG B. Simulation of helicopter rotor in ground effect based on CFD method and hybrid trim algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551(in Chinese).
[15]	康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼近地飞行时诱导速度的N-S方程计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1998, 16(2):221-225. KANG N, SUN M. Navier-Stokes calculations of induced velocity of a rotor in forward flight with ground effects[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1998, 16(2):221-225(in Chinese).
[16]	康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼尾流与地面干扰时地面涡现象的研究[J]. 力学学报, 1998, 30(5):615-620. KANG N, SUN M. Investigation of the ground vortex phenomenon due to the interaction between rotor's wake and the ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1998, 30(5):615-620(in Chinese).
[17]	KANG N, SUN M. Simulated flowfields in near-ground operation of single-and twin-rotor configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000, 37(2):214-220.
[18]	覃燕华, 朱清华, 邵松. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应气动特性分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(2):266-274. QIN Y H, ZHU Q H, SHAO S. Aerodynamic characteristics analysis for hovering coaxial rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 47(2):266-274(in Chinese).
[19]	陆陶冶, 陈仁良, 吉洪蕾, 等. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(10):45-52. LU T Y, CHEN R L, JI H L, et al. Performance analysis of coaxial-rotorfor hovering in ground effect[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(10):45-52(in Chinese).
[20]	TAN J F, SUN Y M, BARAKOS G N. Vortex approach for downwash and outwash of tandem rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55(6):2491-2509.
[21]	ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43:357-372.
[22]	LUO H, BAUM J D, LÃHNER R. A fast, matrix-free implicit method for computing low Mach number flows on unstructured grids[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2000, 14(2):133-157.
[23]	SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1992.
[24]	祁浩天, 史勇杰, 徐国华, 等. 共轴刚性旋翼气动干扰及操纵特性分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012. QI H T, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic interaction andtrim characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012(in Chinese).
[25]	LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, BAEDER J D. High-resolution computational investigation of trimmed coaxial rotor aerodynamics in hover[C]//63rd American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, 2007.

Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin. Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[2]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[3]	CHEN Xian, CHEN Cheng, HUANG Jiangtao, CHEN Qisheng, YU Longzhou, ZHONG Shidong. Effects of belly flap on take-off and landing characteristics of a flying-wing vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 125028-125028.
[4]	LUO Jiong, LI Zhihong, CHEN Ke, XIANG Huan. Unsteady numerical simulation of variable geometry axisymmetric inlet based on overset grid [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 627028-627028.
[5]	WANG Haifeng, DENG Feng, LIU Xueqiang, QIN Ning. Gust load alleviation control based on jets for natural laminar airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526767-526767.
[6]	YAN Chao. Achievements and predicaments of CFD in aeronautics in past forty years [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(10): 526490-526490.
[7]	WANG Zihang, LYU Hongqiang. Research on lightning electromagnetic field based on CFD high-precision algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726366-726366.
[8]	LI Peng, CHEN Jianqiang, DING Mingsong, HE Xianyao, ZHAO Zhong, DONG Weizhong. Framework design of NNW-HyFLOW hypersonic flow simulation software [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625718-625718.
[9]	YUAN Xianxu, CHEN Jianqiang, DU Yanxia, GUO Qilong, XIAO Guangming, FU Yalu, LIANG Fei, TU Guohua. Research progress on fundamental CFD issues in National Numerical Windtunnel Project [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625733-625733.
[10]	CHEN Jianqiang, WU Xiaojun, ZHANG Jian, LI Bin, JIA Hongyin, ZHOU Naichun. FlowStar: General unstructured-grid CFD software for National Numerical Windtunnel (NNW) Project [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[11]	GUO Yongheng, JIANG Xiong, XIAO Zhongyun, WANG Ziwei, LU Fengshun. An automatic parallel and implicit assembly method for overset grid [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124369-124369.
[12]	LI Zuobiao, WEN Fengbo, TANG Xiaolei, SU Liangjun, WANG Songtao. Prediction of single-row hole film cooling performance based on deep learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.
[13]	ZHOU Zhu, YU Yonggang, LIU Gang, CHEN Zuobin, HE Kaifeng. Comprehensive study on yaw control characteristic of combined control surfaces of flying wing configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(6): 523422-523422.
[14]	XIANG Huan, YANG Yingkai, XIE Jinrui, WU Yongsheng. Inlet aerodynamic characteristics of fighter under high angle of attack and post-stall maneuver [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(6): 523460-523460.
[15]	HU Jianping, XU Guohua, SHI Yongjie, WU Linbo. Formation mechanism of brownout in full-scale helicopter based on CFD-DEM couplings numerical simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 123363-123363.