反推状态下大涵道比涡扇发动机气动稳定性预测与评估

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0143

Abstract

Abstract:

Three-dimensional CFD numerical simulation, engine stability calculation and bench test of engine inlet distortion are combined to predict and assess the influence of re-ingestion of the reverser flow on the aerodynamic stability of the high bypass ratio turbofan engine when the thrust reverser is deployed. By means of three-dimensional CFD numerical simulation, the distortion degree of the engine inlet flow field is acquired. On this basis, the aerodynamic stability of the engine is predicted by the stability calculation program, and the prediction results are verified by the engine bench test. The CFD calculation results show that, with the decrease of the relative flow Mach number, the possibility of re-ingestion of the reverser flow is increased, and the inlet flow field distortion of the outboard engine is the most serious when the relative flow Maher number decreases to 0.05. The results of stability calculation analysis and engine bench test in the inlet distortion situation show that, in the assessment of the target state, if the inlet distortion is only caused by the re-ingestion of the reverser flow, the engine will not be unstable.

Key words: high bypass ratio turbofan engine, thrust reverser, reverser flow re-ingestion, flow field distortion, aerodynamic stability, numerical simulation, experimental verification

CLC Number:

V235.15

WANG Zhiqiang, SHEN Xigang, HU Jun. Prediction and evaluation of aerodynamic stability of high bypass ratio turbofan engine deployed with thrust reverser[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(2): 120192-120202.

References

[1] 方昌德. 大涵道比涡扇发动机关键技术[J]. 国际航空, 2008(1):38-40. FANG C D. Key technologies for high bypass turbofan engines[J]. International Aviation, 2008(1):38-40(in Chinese).
[2] 沈锡钢, 齐晓雪, 郝勇. 大涵道比涡扇发动机发展研究[J]. 航空发动机, 2013, 39(6):1-5. SHEN X G, QI X X, HAO Y. Investigation of high bypass ratio turbofan engine development[J]. Aeroengine, 2013, 39(6):1-5(in Chinese).
[3] TRAPP L G, OLIVEIRA G L. Aircraft thrust reverser cascade configuration evaluation through CFD:AIAA-2003-0723[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2003.
[4] LORINCZ D, CHIARELLI C,HUNT B. Effect of in-flight thrust reverser deployment on tactical aircraft stability and control:AIAA-1981-1446[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1981.
[5] CHIARELLI C, LORINCZ D, HUNT B. Thrust reverser induced flow interference on tactical aircraft stability and control:AIAA-1982-1133[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1982.
[6] 赖安卿, 胡骏, 赵运生, 等. 大涵道比涡扇发动机整机稳定边界预测方法[J]. 航空计算技术, 2013, 43(1):81-84. LAI A Q, HU J, ZHAO Y S, et al. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic stability limit of high bypass turbofan engine[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2013, 43(1):81-84(in Chinese).
[7] 邵万仁, 叶留增, 沈锡钢, 等. 反推力装置关键技术及技术途径初步探讨[C]//大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年年会论文集. 北京:中国航空学会, 2007. SHAO W R, YE L Z, SHEN X G, et al. Preliminary discussion on key techniques and technical approaches of thrust reverser[C]//Proceedings of High-level Forum on Key Technology of Large Aircraft and 2007 Annual Conference of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Beijing:Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007(in Chinese).
[8] CHUCK C. Computational procedures for complex three-dimensional geometries including thrust reverser effluxes and APUs:AIAA-2001-3747[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2001.
[9] STRASH D J, SUMMA J M, FRANK J H, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of an installed thrust reverser[J]. Journal of Propulsion & Power, 2000, 16(1):10-15.
[10] DE ANDRADE F O, FERREIRA S B, DA SILVA L F F, et al. Study of the influence of aircraft geometry on the computed flow field during thrust reversers operation:AIAA-2006-3673[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[11] QIAN R Z, ZHU Z Q, DUAN Z Y. Thrust reverser optimization for safety with CFD[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011(17):595-602.
[12] 刘大响, 叶培梁, 胡骏, 等. 航空燃气涡轮发动机稳定性设计与评定技术[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2004. LIU D X, YE P L, HU J, et al. Stability design and evaluation technology of aero gas turbine engine[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2004(in Chinese).
[13] NAKANO T, BREEZE A. A method for evaluating the effect of circumferential inlet distortion on the aerodynamic stability of multi-stage axial-flow compressors[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010:Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New York:ASME, 2010:2671-2683.
[14] 胡骏, 赵运生, 丁宁, 等. 进气畸变对大涵道比涡扇发动机稳定性的影响[J]. 航空发动机, 2013, 39(6):6-12. HU J, ZHAO Y S, DING N, et al. Investigation of influence of inlet distortion on high bypass ratio turbofan engine stability[J]. Aeroengine, 2013, 39(6):6-12(in Chinese).
[15] 王玉新. 飞机发动机反推力装置的创新设计[C]//大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年年会论文集. 北京:中国航空学会, 2007. WNAG Y X. Innovative design of thrust reverser for aircraft engine[C]//Proceedings of High-level Forum on Key Technology of Large Aircraft and 2007 Annual Conference of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Beijing:Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007(in Chinese).
[16] 杨权, 叶巍, 陆德雨, 等. 航空发动机稳定性评定试验装置的选择[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2001, 14(4):16-21. YANG Q, YE W, LU D Y, et al. A selection of testers for aero-engine stability assessment[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment & Research, 2001, 14(4):16-21(in Chinese).
[17] 叶巍, 陆德雨, 李丹, 等. 畸变模拟板的设计与试验研究[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2001, 14(2):1-8. YE W, LU D Y, LI D, et al. Design and experimental investigation of simulating plates[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment & Research, 2001, 14(2):1-8(in Chinese).
[18] 陆德雨, 叶巍, 李丹, 等. 缩尺模拟板相关性研究[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2002, 15(2):12-16. LU D Y, YE W, LI D, et al. Investigation of correlation between sub-scale and full-scale models of simulating plates[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment & Research, 2002, 15(2):12-16(in Chinese).

Prediction and evaluation of aerodynamic stability of high bypass ratio turbofan engine deployed with thrust reverser

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[2]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[3]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[4]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[5]	DUAN Junyi, TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, LIU Hongwei. Decomposition of mean friction drag in compression-expansion turbulent boundary layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[6]	SHEN Pengfei, LIU Pengxin, SUN Dong, YUAN Xianxu. Statistical characteristics of skin friction of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[7]	LIU Pengxin, YUAN Xianxu, LIANG Fei, LI Chen, SUN Dong. Quadrant decomposition analysis of fluctuations in high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical non-equilibrium [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[8]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[9]	CHEN Chongpei, LIANG Jianhan, GUAN Qingdi, GAO Tianyun. Conservative compressible one-dimensional turbulence method and its application in supersonic scalar mixing layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726364-726364.
[10]	LI Qing, TU Guohua, YU Zhaosheng, LIN Zhaowu, LI Tingting, YUAN Xianxu. Inertial particle transport in non-uniform accelerated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726390-726390.
[11]	LI Chengcheng, LI Fang, YANG Bin, WANG Ying. Numerical investigation of nozzle flow separation control using plasma actuation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 124547-124547.
[12]	HE Chuangxin, DENG Zhiwen, LIU Yingzheng. Turbulent flow data assimilation and its applications [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524704-524704.
[13]	LIU Zongxing, LIU Jun, LI Weina. Dynamic response and failure of typical fuselage structure under blast impact load [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 224252-224252.
[14]	SUN Dong, LIU Pengxin, SHEN Pengfei, TONG Fulin, GUO Qilong. Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach number 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 124681-124681.
[15]	WANG Fang, WANG Yudong, JIANG Shengli, CHEN Jun, TANG Jun, XU Huasheng, LI Xiangyuan, XING Jingwen, GAO Dongshuo, JIN Jie. Development and testing of AECSC-JASMIN turbulent combustion simulation software [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 625003-625003.