基于随机森林的风洞马赫数预测模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0229

Abstract

Abstract:

In the measurements of wind tunnel, the stability and the rapidity of the Mach number produce an important effect on quality of the flow field. To realize precisely controlling of the Mach number, it is required that the Mach number prediction should be speed forecasting and accurate. Large-scale data ste are accumulated from measurements. Although large-scale data set contain more useful information to improve the accuracy on the Mach number prediction, it increases the complexity for modeling. In general, high complexity models also increase the computational burden at the phase of active use. To deal with the large-scale set issue, the random forest method is applied to predicting the Mach number in the wind tunnel. Suitable for large-scale problem, random forest reduces the complexity in the following three aspects:generating training subset and decreasing the size of training samples; with the parallel ensemble structure, running sub-models on different CPUs and saving the running time; selecting a simple base learner, thus reducing the complexity of sub-models. The test demonstrate that the random forest-based Mach number prediction model can successful utilize the large-scale data accumulated from measurements and meet the requirements of the forecasting speed and the accuracy.

Key words: wind tunnel test, Mach number, large-scale data set, random forest, regression tree

CLC Number:

V217⁺.21

WANG Xiaojun, YUAN Ping, MAO Zhizhong, DU Ning. Wind tunnel Mach number prediction model based on random forest[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(5): 1494-1505.

References

[1] 孙智伟, 白俊强, 高正红, 等. 现代超临界翼型设计及其风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3):804-818. SUN Z W, BAI J Q, GAO Z H, et al. Design and wind tunnel test investigation of the modern supercritical arifoil[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3):804-818(in Chinese).
[2] 路波, 吕彬彬, 罗建国, 等. 跨声速风洞全模颤振试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1086-1092. LU B, LYU B B, LUO J G, et al. Wind tunnel technique for transonic full-model flutter test[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1086-1092(in Chinese).
[3] SOETERBOEK R A M, PELS A F, VERBRUGGEN H B, et al. A predictive controller for the Mach number in a transonic wind tunnel[J]. IEEE Control Systems, 1991, 11(1):63-72.
[4] YAN Y, XI Z, ZHANG S. Numerical simulation and transonic wind-tunnel test for elastic thin-shell structure considering fluid-structure interaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1):141-151.
[5] LIU W, MA X, LI X, et al. High-precision pose measurement method in wind tunnels based on laser-aided vision technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015,28(4):1121-1130.
[6] GREEN J, QUEST J. A short history of the European transonic wind tunnel ETW[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(5):319-368.
[7] 钱卫, 张桂江, 刘钟坤.飞机全动平尾颤振特性风洞试验[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1093-1102. QIAN W, ZHANG G J, LIU Z K. Flutter characteristics for aircraft all-movable horizontal tail through wind tunnel test[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1093-1102(in Chinese).
[8] 张贵军. 风洞过程建模与控制问题的研究[D]. 沈阳:东北大学, 1998. ZHANG G J. Research on model and control of wind tunnel process[D]. Shenyang:Northeastern University, 1998(in Chinese).
[9] LEONTARITIS J, BILLINGS S A. Input-output parametric models for nonlinear systems, Part I:Deterministic nonlinear systems; Part II:Stochastic nonlinear system[J]. International Journal of Control, 1985, 41(1):303-344.
[10] DANDOIS J, PAMART P Y. NARX modeling and extremum-seeking control of a separation[J]. Journal of Aerospace Lab, 2013(6):1-12.
[11] BOUBEZOUL A, PARIS S. Application of global optimization methods to model and feature selection[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2012, 45(10):3676-3686.
[12] CEPERIC V, GIELEN G, BARIC A. Recurrent sparse support vector regression machines trained by active learning in the time-domain[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(12):10933-10942.
[13] SU Y, GAO X, LI X, et al. Multivariate multilinear regression[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B:Cybernetics, 2012, 42(6):1560-1573.
[14] SPEYBRIECK N. Classification and regression trees[J], Hints & Kinks International Journal of Public Health, 2012, 57(1):243-246.
[15] BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1):5-32.
[16] BREIMAN L. Bagging predictors[J]. Machine Learning, 1996, 24(2):123-140.
[17] NORGAARD M. Neural network based system identification toolbox, Version 2, For use with MATLAB, Department of Automation, Department of Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark[EB/OL]. (2000-01-23)[2015-06-17]. http://www.iau.dtu.dk/research/control/nnsysid.html.
[18] 郭昌辉, 刘贵全, 张磊. 基于回归树与K-最近邻交互模型的存储设备性能预测[J]. 南京大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 48(2):123-132. GUO C H, LIU G Q, ZHANG L. An interactive model based on regression tree and K-nearest neighbor for storage device performance prediction[J]. Journal of Nanjing University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2012, 48(2):123-132(in Chinese).
[19] 陈湘芳, 陈明, 冯国富, 等. 多变量时序回归树的黄瓜产量预测模型[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2012, 33(1):407-411. CHEN X F, CHEN M, FENG G F, et al. Yield prediction model of cucumber based on multivariate time series regression tree[J]. Computer Engineering and Design 2012, 33(1):407-411(in Chinese).
[20] PERRONE M P, COOPER L N. When networks disagree:Ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks[M]. In:MAMMONE R J, editor. Artificial neural networks for speech and vision. London:Chapman & Hall, 2001:126-142.

Wind tunnel Mach number prediction model based on random forest

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Shanjie XU, Hongqiang LYU, Zhongchen LIU, Yan LENG, Xuejun LIU. Data analysis of sonic boom test based on probability model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[2]	Zhongchen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Xuefei LI, Yan LENG, Dapeng GUO. Wind tunnel test techniques for exhaust nozzle plume effects on near-field sonic boom [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[3]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[4]	LIU Chuanzhen, MENG Xufei, LIU Rongjian, BAI Peng. Experimental and numerical investigation of hypersonic performance of double swept waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[5]	LIU Jun, LUO Xinfu, WANG Xiansheng. Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[6]	LI Haiquan, CHEN Xiaoqian, ZUO Linxuan, ZHAO Zhuolin. Surrogate model for flight load analysis based on random forest [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 225640-225640.
[7]	HOU Yingyu, LI Qi, JI Chen, LIU Ziqiang. Experimental design of aeroelastic load with supersonic low frequency and large buffeting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[8]	ZHANG Zhenkai, JIA Sijia, SONG Chen, YANG Chao. Optimum design of wind tunnel test model for compliant morphing trailing edge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[9]	ZENG Kaichun, KOU Xiping, YANG Xinghua, YU Li, ZHA Jun. Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.
[10]	YI Bingli, LIU Boyu, WANG Zhengqu, ZHANG Tiejun, LU Dan, ZHAO Yan. Test technology of twin-sting supports in 1.2 m high speed wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526794-526794.
[11]	YANG Zhao, LI Jie, NIU Xiaotian. Analysis and correction of Reynolds number effect of a flight verification platform with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[12]	GENG Yansheng, AI Mengqi, WANG Wei, GENG Jianzhong, ZHAO Yan. Efficient design and experimental verification of laminar airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.
[13]	ZHAO Yan, DUAN Zhuoyi, DING Xingzhi, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng. Optimization design of hybrid laminar flow control wing for flight test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527539-527539.
[14]	DENG Yiju, DUAN Zhuoyi, AI Mengqi. Status and development of laminar flow wing design technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526778-526778.
[15]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.