基于CFD技术的高效叶栅耦合颤振分析方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.077

Abstract

Abstract:

As direct numerical simulation of fluid/structure interaction of entire blade row is computation-intensive and time-consuming, this paper presents a reduced order model (ROM)-based coupling method which takes fluid/structure coupling effect into account and provides a significant increase in efficiency of flutter analysis of turbomachinery. This method computes unsteady aerodynamic forces of several blades in time domain by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique, and then constructs the reduced order aerodynamic model of entire vibrating cascade with system identification and several assumptions. And finally, this method establishes the aeroelastic model of entire cascade by coupling the reduced order aerodynamic mode with cascade structural dynamic equation in state-space form. Flutter characteristics of STCF4 (Standard Test Configuration 4) and NASA Rotor67 cascade are analyzed by solving eigenvalues of the aeroelastic model. The accuracy of this method is validated by comparing the results of direct computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics (CFD/CSD) coupling method and uncoupled method. The ROM-based coupling method improves computational efficiency by nearly two orders of magnitude compared to direct CFD/CSD coupling method. Besides, this method provides an effective and reliable approach for parameter analysis, mistuning and multi-mode coupling calculation of turbomachinery.

Key words: cascade, aeroelasticity, flutter, reduced ordered model, computational fluid dynamics, coupled method

CLC Number:

V211.47

SU Dan, ZHANG Weiwei, QUAN Jinlou, MA Mingsheng, YE Zhengyin. An Efficient Coupled Method of Cascade Flutter Analysis by Using CFD Technique[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(12): 3232-3243.

References

[1] Whitehead D S. Force and moment coefficients for vibrating aerofoils in cascade, ARC R. & M. 3254[R]. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1962.

[2] He L. An Euler solution for unsteady flows around oscillating blades[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(4): 714-722.

[3] Ji S, Liu F. Flutter computation of turbomachinery cascades using a parallel unsteady Navier-Stokes code[J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37(3): 320-327.

[4] Zhang Z, Hou A P, Tuo W, et al. A review of numerical research on aeroelastic dynamical response of aero-engine blades[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2012, 42(5): 572-582. (in Chinese) 张章, 侯安平, 脱伟, 等. 航空发动机叶片气动弹性动力响应的数值方法研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2012, 42(5): 572-582.

[5] Marshall J G, Imregun M. A review of aeroelasticity methods with emphasis on turbomachinery applications[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1996, 10(3): 237-267.

[6] Carta F O. Coupled blade-disc-shroud flutter instabilities in turbojet engine rotors[J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1967, 89(3): 419-426.

[7] Zhen Y, Yang H. Full assembly fluid/structured flutter analysis of a transonic fan[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(5): 626-630. (in Chinese) 郑赟, 杨慧. 跨音速风扇全环叶片颤振特性的流固耦合分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(5): 626-630.

[8] Lane F. System mode shapes in the flutter of compressor blade rows[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1956, 23: 54-66.

[9] Bendiksen O, Friedmann P. Coupled bending-torsion flutter in cascades[J]. AIAA Journal, 1980, 18(2): 194-201.

[10] Tao H L, Zhu Y L, Guo B T, et al. Numerical simulation of aeroelastic response in compressor based on fluid-structure coupling[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(5): 1054-1060. (in Chinese) 陶海亮, 朱阳历, 郭宝亭, 等. 压气机叶片流固耦合数值计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(5): 1054-1060.

[11] Rzadkowski R, Gnesin V. 3-D inviscid self-excited vibrations of a blade row in the last stage turbine[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2007, 23(6): 858-873.

[12] Im H, Chen X Y, Zha G. Detached eddy simulation of transonic rotor stall flutter using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ASME, 2011.

[13] Vahdati M, Simpson G, Imregun M. Mechanisms for wide-chord fan blade flutter[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(1): 1-7.

[14] Sadeghi M, Liu F. Computation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled metheds[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19(8): 559-569.

[15] Vahdati M, Sayma A I, Imregun M, et al. Multibladerow forced response modeling in axial-flow core compressors[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(2): 412-420.

[16] Lai K L, Tsai H M. Flutter simulation and prediction with CFD-based reduced-order model, AIAA-2007-0731[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2007.

[17] Zhang W W, Wang B, Ye Z, et al. Efficient method for limit cycle flutter analysis by nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(5): 1019-1028.

[18] Gennaretti M, Muro D. Multiblade reduced-order aerodynamics for state-space aeroelastic modeling of rotors[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(2): 495-502.

[19] Willcox K, Peraire J, White J. An arnoldi approach for generation of reduced-order models for turbomachinery[J]. Computer & Fluid, 2002, 31: 369-389.

[20] Tran D M. Multi-parameter aerodynamic modeling for aeroelastic coupling in turbomachinery[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2009, 25(3): 519-534.

[21] Raveh D E. Identification of computational-fluid-dynamics based unsteady aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(3): 620-632.

[22] Zhang W, Ye Z. Effect of control surface on airfoil flutter in transonic flow[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 66 (7-8): 999-1007.

[23] Su D, Zhang W W, Zhang C A, et al. An unsteady aerodynamic modeling for torbomachinery based on system identification[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronaautica Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 242-248. (in Chinese) 苏丹, 张伟伟, 张陈安, 等. 基于系统辨识技术的叶轮机非定常气动力建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(2): 242-248.

[24] Kim T. System identification for coupled fluid-structures: Aerodynamics is aeroelasticity minus structure[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(3): 503-511.

[25] Hizir N B, Phan M Q, Betti R. Identification of discrete-time bilinear systems through equivalent linear models[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2012, 69(4): 2065-2078.

[26] Moore B C. Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability, and model reduction[J]. Transactions on Automatic Control, 1981, 26(1): 17-32.

[27] Tran D M. Component mode synthesis method using partial interface modes. Application to tuned and mistuned bladed disk with local non-linearity, DETC2009-87353[R]. San Diego, California, USA: ASME, 2009

[28] Bai B, Bai G C, Tong X C, et al. Research on vibration problem of integral mistuned bladed disk assemblies at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(1): 91-103. (in Chinese) 白斌, 白广忱, 童晓晨, 等. 整体叶盘结构失谐振动的国内外研究状况[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014,29(1): 91-103.

[29] Zhang W, Jiang Y, Ye Z. Two better loosely coupled solution algorithms of CFD based aeroelastic simulation[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 1(4): 253-262.

[30] Bōlcs A, Fransson T H. Aeroelasticity in turbomachines—comparison of theoretical and experimental cascade results[M]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Communication du Laboratoire de Thermique Appliquée et de Turbomachines N°13 l'Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1986: 1-221.

[31] Quan J L, Zhang W W, Su D, et al. Flutter analysis of turbomachery cascades based on coupled CFD/CSD method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(9): 2019-2028. (in Chinese) 全金楼, 张伟伟, 苏丹, 等. 基于CFD/CSD时域耦合方法的多通道叶栅颤振分析[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(19): 2019-2028.

[32] Strazisar A J, Wood J R, Hathaway M D, et al. Laser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial-flow fan rotor, NASA Technical Paper 2879[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1989.

An Efficient Coupled Method of Cascade Flutter Analysis by Using CFD Technique

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Jianling QIAO, Zhonghua HAN, Yulin DING, Wenping SONG, Bifeng SONG. Effects of stratified atmospheric turbulence on farfield sonic boom propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626350-626350.
[2]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[3]	ZHOU Yitao, YANG Yang, WU Zhigang, YANG Chao. Flight test for gust alleviation on a high aspect ratio UAV platform [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526126-526126.
[4]	CHEN Guangqiang, DOU Guohui, WEI Haogong, ZOU Xin, LI Qi, LIU Zhou, ZHOU Weijiang. Air data sensing technology of Mars probe [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626619-626619.
[5]	YI Jianmiao, DENG Feng, QIN Ning, LIU Xueqiang. Fast prediction of transonic flow field using deep learning method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[6]	YANG Chao, QIU Qisheng, ZHOU Yitao, WU Zhigang. Review of aircraft gust alleviation technology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(10): 527350-527350.
[7]	WANG Xinjiang, LIU Ziqiang, GUO Li, FU Zhichao, LYU Jinan. Analysis method for flutter mode indicator based on principle of work and power [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 224920-224920.
[8]	WANG Di, QIAN Zhansen, LENG Yan. High-order scheme discretization of sonic boom propagation model based on augmented Burgers equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 124916-124916.
[9]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[10]	SUN Yan, WANG Hao, JIANG Meng, YUE Hao, MENG Dehong. Design and implementation of coupling acceleration strategy in static aeroelastic module of NNW-FSI software [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625738-625738.
[11]	CHEN Jianqiang, WU Xiaojun, ZHANG Jian, LI Bin, JIA Hongyin, ZHOU Naichun. FlowStar: General unstructured-grid CFD software for National Numerical Windtunnel (NNW) Project [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625739-625739.
[12]	SHEN Ennan, GUO Tongqing, WU Jiangpeng, HU Jialiang, ZHANG Guijiang. Full-time coupling method and application of a hypersonic all-movable wing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525773-525773.
[13]	CHEN Zhiqiang, LIU Zhanhe, MIAO Nan, FENG Wei. Parametric reduced-order model of unsteady aerodynamics based on incremental learning algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 125103-125103.
[14]	LEI Pengxuan, YU Li, CHEN Dehua, LYU Binbin. Influence of flight control law on body freedom flutter characteristics: Experimental study [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.
[15]	LI Zuobiao, WEN Fengbo, TANG Xiaolei, SU Liangjun, WANG Songtao. Prediction of single-row hole film cooling performance based on deep learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524331-524331.