有翼再入高超声速飞行器气动设计难点问题

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0227

Abstract

Abstract: The winged hypersonic reentry vehicle is a hot research topic in recent years. Aerodynamic design is the key of aircraft design. The development,advantages and the overall mission profile of the winged hypersonic reentry vehicle are introducted for understanding the difficulties more clearly. Detail introduction of the difficult prolbems were conducted form five aspects in the aerodynamic design of the aircraft, including multi complex constraints plane symmetry aerodynamic configuration design, effects of the real gas on aerodynamic characteristics, difference conversion method between flight and ground, RCS jet interference effects on aerodynamic characteristics and the uncertainties of aeroydnamic data. This paper expounds the significance of these difficult problems on the overall design and gives the preliminary solution, this can provide some reference to the winged hypersonic reentry vehicles on the aerodynamic design.

Key words: winged teentry, hepersonic, aerodynamic design, real gas effect, RCS jet interference, difference conversion method between flight and ground, uncertainties of aeroydnamic data

CLC Number:

V211.4

References

[1] Brian R. Hollis. Richard A. Thompson. Kelly J. Murphy. et al. X-33 Aerodynamic Computations and Comparisons with Wind-Tunnel Data[J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2001, 38(5): 684-686.
[2] Gary Letchworth. X-33 Reusable Launch Vehicle De-monstrator, Spaceport and Range, AIAA 2011-7314 [R]. California: AIAA. 2011.
[3] Gregory J. Brauckmann. X-34 Vehicle Aerodynamic Characteristics, AIAA-98-2531 [R]. AIAA, 1998.
[4] Henri D. Fuhrmann, John Hildebrand. Tony Lalicata. Aerothermodynamic Overview, X-34[J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1999, 36(2): 153-155.
[5] Carlos A. Paez. The Development of the X-37 Re-Entry Vehicle, AIAA 2004-4186 [R]. Florida: AIAA, 2001.
[6] A. Chaudhary. V. Nguyei. H. Iran. Dynamics and Stabi-lidy and Control Characteristics of The X-37, AIAA-2001-4383 [R]. Canada: AIAA, 2001.
[7] Russell D. Howard. and Zachary C. Krevor. Dream Chaser Commercial Crewed Spacecraft Overview, AIAA 2011-2245 [R]. Canada: AIAA, 2011.
[8] David Woffinden. Leonard Epstein. George Stafford. et al. Dream Chaser On-Orbit Operations:Preliminary Tra-jectory Design and Analysis, AIAA 2011-6654 [R]. Ore-gon.: AIAA, 2011.
[9] Thino Eggers. Robert Dittrich. Richard Varvill. Numerical Analysis of the SKYLON Spaceplane in Hypersonic Flow, AIAA 2011-2298 [R]. California: AIAA, 2011.
[10] R.Parkinson. E.Webb. The Status of Aerospaceplane Research in the UK, AIAA-92-5004 [R]. Washington.DC: AIAA, 1992.
[11] Giuseppe C.Rufolo, Pietro Roncioni, Marco Marini, et al. Post Flight Aerodynamic Analysis of the Experiment Vehicle PRORA USV 1, AIAA 2008-2661 [R]. Dayton: AIAA, 2008.
[12] G. Russo, P.P. De Matteis, Two Flight Mission Exploring Transonic Conditions, AIAA 2008-2660 [R]. Dayton: AIAA, 2008.
[13] E. Zaccagnino, and G. Malucchi, V. Marco, et al. Inter-mediate eXperimental Vehicle (IXV), the ESA Re-entry Demonstrator, AIAA 2011-6340 [R]. AIAA, 2011.
[14] G.E.Lozino-Lozinsky, E.N.Dudar, F.Yu.Chelkis. The MAKS Project and Perpectives of Development, AIAA-96-4493 [R]. Norfolk: AIAA,1996.
[15] Jon C. Harpold, Claude A. Graves Jr. Shuttle Entry Guidance[J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Science, 1979, 27(3): 239-268.
[16] Moore Thomas E. Space Shuttle Entry Terminal Area Enery Management, NASA-TM-104744, 1991.
[17] Bennett, D. E. Space Shuttle Entry Flight Control Over-view, AAS83-082[R], AAS, 1983.
[18] Huang Z C. Real Gas Effects For Aerospace Plane[J]. Aerodynamic Experiment And Measurement and Control, 1994, 8(2): 2. (in chinese)
黄志澄. 空天飞机的真实气体效应[J]. 气体实验与测量试验, 1994, 8(2): 2.
[19] Kirsten P.W, Richardson F.D, Wilson C.M. Shuttle Per-formance: Lessons Learned, NASA CP-2283 Pt.1, 1983: 513-521.

The Difficult Aerodynamic Design Problems of the Winged Hypersonic Reentry Vehicle

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Zhengzhou, GAO Chang, XIAO Tianhang, MA Zicheng, XIAO Jiliang, ZHU Jianhui. Extremely efficient prediction technique of dynamic derivatives for super/hypersonic flight vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 123545-123545.
[2]	CONG Rongfei, YE Youda, ZHAO Zhongliang. Characteristics of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle in force-pitch and free-roll coupling motion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 123588-123588.
[3]	ZHANG Wenhao, LIU Jun, DING Feng. Integrated design method of inward turning inlet/Von Karman waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 123502-123513.
[4]	ZHU Hongxu, LIU Yanbin, CAO Rui, LU Yuping, TANG Jiajun, YI Chunlun. Feasibility analysis for underlying indictors in control performance evaluation of hypersonic vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 323259-323272.
[5]	MA Dongli, ZHANG Liang, YANG Muqing, XIA Xinglu, WANG Shaoqi. Review of key technologies of ultra-long-endurance solar powered unmanned aerial vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 623418-623447.
[6]	DING Mingsong, LIU Qingzong, JIANG Tao, GAO Tiesuo, DONG Weizhong, FU Yang'aoxiao. Impact of high temperature gas effect on hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(2): 123278-123278.
[7]	YI Miaorong, ZHAO Huiyong, LE Jialing, XIAO Baoguo, ZHENG Zhonghua. γ-Re_θ transition model based on IDDES frame [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(8): 122726-122726.
[8]	CHEN Erkang, JING Wuxing, GAO Changsheng. State/parameter joint estimation for flexible hypersonic glide vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(8): 322992-322992.
[9]	LI Qiang, JIANG Tao, CHEN Suyu, CHANG Yu, ZHAO Lei, ZHANG Kouli. Measurement technique and application of boundary layer transition in shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(8): 122740-122740.
[10]	YONG Enmi, LIU Shenshen, CHENG Yanqing, QIAN Weiqi. Mode stability analysis of hypersonic reentry vehicle for trajectory optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(7): 122666-122666.
[11]	HE Lei, YAN Xiaodong, TANG Shuo. Guidance law design for spiral-diving maneuver penetration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(5): 322457-322457.
[12]	LI Jin, GENG Xiangren, CHEN Jianqiang, JIANG Dingwu, LI Hongzhe. Numerical simulation on DSMC quantum kinetic chemical reaction model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(4): 122176-122176.
[13]	WU Dafang, LIN Lujin, REN Haoyuan, ZHU Fanghui. Fracture performance test of wave transparent brittle materials of hypersonic vehicle under high-heat-flow thermal shock [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(4): 222594-222594.
[14]	WANG Xiao, GUO Jie, TANG Shengjing, QI Shuai. Time-cooperative entry guidance based on analytical profile [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(3): 322565-322565.
[15]	LI Jiawei, WANG Jiangfeng, YANG Tianpeng, LI Longfei, WANG Ding. Integrated numerical analysis of fluid-thermal-structural problems in “Type Ⅳ” shock wave interference [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 123190-123190.