考虑交接班误差的RLV进场着陆轨迹和安全交接区设计

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0030

Abstract

Abstract:

The trajectory planning for reusable launch vehicle (RLV) approach and landing with initial interface error is researched. The automatic approach and landing trajectory is divided into three sections: interface section, nominal glideslope section and nominal flare section. The last two sections are designed firstly, based on the nominal interface states and the desire touch down states. Then, an online three dimensional trajectory generation method for interface section by which the vertical, horizontal and velocity errors are concerned simultaneously is raised, together with a piecewise linear speed brake adjustment strategy. According to the Interface trajectory, the concept of "safe interface area (SIA)" in the Interface height plane is proposed and the method is also included. Finally, the simulations show the reference value of the SIA and trajectory generation method for the trajectory planning of unpowered vehicle approach and landing with initial interface errors.

Key words: reusable launch vehicle, aircraft landing, interface error, safe interface area, landing trajectory planning, trajectory propagation

CLC Number:

WANG Honglun, SU Zikang, PEI Yunfeng. Design of Landing Trajectory and Safe Interface Area for RLV with Initial Interface Errors[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(11): 3092-3105.

References

[1] Gregg H B, Steven G T. Automatic trajectory design for the X-34, AIAA-1999-4161 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 1999.

[2] Yoshikazu M, Toshikazu M. Longitudinal landing control law for an autonomous reentry vehicle[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1999, 20(6): 791-800.

[3] Craig A K. Unpowered approach and landing guidance using trajectory planning[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2004, 27(6): 967-974.

[4] Craig A K, Kenneth R H, John D S. Rapid terminal trajectory planner for an unpowered reusable launch vehicle, AIAA-2009-5766[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2009.

[5] Sun C Z. Research on terminal area energy management and auto-landing technology for reusable launch vehicle[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008.(in Chinese) 孙春贞. 重复使用运载器末端区域能量管理与自动着陆技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2008.

[6] Wu J W. Research on guidance and control technology of unpowered auto-landing for reusable launch vehicle[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012.(in Chinese) 吴健伟. 重复使用运载器无动力着陆制导与控制技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2012.

[7] Zhang J. Research of trajectory technologies for reusable launch vehicle's ascent flight and abort return flight[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011. (in Chinese) 张军. 可重复使用运载器无上升段及应急返回段归集设计技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2011.

[8] John M H, Robert E J. Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: test results, AIAA-2002-4561[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2002.

[9] Ander R G. Onboard trajectory generation for unpowered landing of autonomous reusable launch vehicles[D]. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.

[10] Wang H L, Pei Y F, Ni S B, et al. Design of emergency landing region and landing trajectory for unpowered aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(5): 1404-1415.(in Chinese) 王宏伦, 裴云峰, 倪少波, 等. 飞行器无动力应急着陆域和着陆轨迹设计[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(5): 1404-1415.

[11] Christopher L D, William W H, Anil V R. A preliminary analysis of a variable-order approach to solving optimal control problems using pseudo-spectral methods, AIAA-2010-8272[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2010.

[12] Zhou W Y,Yang D. Solution of reentry trajectory with maximum cross range by using Gauss pseudo-spectral method[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 1038-1042.(in Chinese) 周文雅, 杨涤. 利用高斯伪谱法求解具有最大航程的再入轨迹[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(5):1038-1042.

[13] Liang Y, Zhang Y A, Lei J W. New method of online fast path planning based dubins path[J].Journal of System Simulation, 2013, 25(8): 291-296.(in Chinese) 梁勇, 张友安, 雷军委.一种基于Dubins路径的在线快速航路规划方法[J].系统仿真学报, 2013, 25(8): 291-296.

[14] Atkins E M, Portillo I A, Strube M J. Emergency flight planning applied to total loss of thrust[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(4): 155-170.

[15] Zhao H Y. Reentry vehicle dynamics and guidance[M]. Changsha: National Defense Technology University Press, 1997: 91-296.(in Chinese) 赵汉元. 飞行器再入动力学和制导[M].长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 1997: 91-296.

[16] Huang J, Teng P, Yu L, et al. Algorithm of overloading verification for some fighter's trajectory[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2008, 26(3): 22-25.(in Chinese) 黄俊, 腾鹏, 于雷, 等. 战斗机航迹可飞性过载检验算法[J]. 飞行力学, 2008, 26(3): 22-25.

[17] Xu M Y, Ding S B. Flight dynamics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003: 20-196.(in Chinese) 徐明友,丁松滨.飞行动力学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003: 20-196.

Design of Landing Trajectory and Safe Interface Area for RLV with Initial Interface Errors

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DING Mingsong, LIU Qingzong, JIANG Tao, DONG Weizhong, GAO Tiesuo, FU Yang'aoxiao. Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic heat shield system on reusable launch vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 124501-124501.
[2]	LUO Shibin, WU Xia, WEI Caisheng. A novel attitude tracking control with guaranteed performance for reusable launch vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(11): 524660-524660.
[3]	SONG Zhengyu, CAI Qiaoyan, HAN Pengxin, WANG Cong, PAN Hao, ZHANG Guangchun, LI Xujin. Review of guidance and control technologies for reusable launch vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(11): 525050-525050.
[4]	HUANG Hongyan, SU Lijun, LEI Chaoshuai, LI Jian, ZHANG Enshuang, LI Wenjing, YANG Jieying, ZHAO Yingmin, PEI Yuchen, ZHANG Hao. Reusable thermal protective materials: application and research progress [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 23716-023716.
[5]	TIAN Bailing, LI Zhiyu, WU Siyuan, ZONG Qun. Reentry trajectory optimization, guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: Review [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(11): 624072-624072.
[6]	ZHANG Rouhe, FAN Yazhuo, SHE Zhiyong, CUI Naigang. TSTO vehicle first-stage return trajectory: Optimization and onboard generation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(11): 623856-623856.
[7]	ZHOU Xiang, ZHANG Hongbo, HE Ruizhi, TANG Guojian, BAO Weimin. Entry trajectory planning method based on 3D profile via convex optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(11): 623842-623842.
[8]	FAN Pengfei, LIU Jiaolong, FAN Yonghua, YAN Jie. In-flight TAEM guidance based on parameterized trajectory [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(12): 322382-322382.
[9]	CHEN Qi, CHEN Jianqiang, ZHANG Yifeng, YUAN Xianxu. Numerical simulation of influence of RCS on control characteristics of aerodynamic surfaces [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(11): 122141-122149.
[10]	ZANG Xiheng, HU Yongtai. Trajectory design for terminal area energy management of suborbital reusable launch vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(S1): 99-105.
[11]	WANG Wenhu, HAN Bing. Trim capacity analysis of suborbital reusable launch vehicle with engine failure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(12): 3646-3656.