双三角翼及其翼身组合的滚转运动特性比较研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0246

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper establishes a coupled computation system which solves the Navier-Stokes equations and the rolling motion equation alternatively to obtain the rolling motion characteristics of two double delta wing models with different sweep angles and a wing-body configuration. It reveals the effect of the leading edge sweep angle and the slender body on the unsteady rolling moment, the dynamic flowfield and the transient surface pressure distribution. The results show conclusively that the energy dissipation of the merged vortex upon the windward side of the 80°/60° double delta wing is much slighter than that upon the 76°/40° model. The merged vortex energy determines the time lag effect of the dynamic flowfield and the rolling moment. The presence of a slender body dramatically enhances the amplitude of the linear component of the rolling moment. Furthermore, the upwash airstreams around the slender body enhances the suction of the strake, the merged vortex suction and its hysteresis effect. The block of the cross flow caused by the slender body enlarges the time lag of the pressure distribution on the leeward side of the main wing. In general, these results may benefit the understanding for the mechanism of the effect of the sweep angle and slender body on rolling characteristics

Key words: double delta wing, wing-body configuration, rolling characteristics, numerical simulation, hysteresis

CLC Number:

HAN Bing, XU Min, LI Guangning, AN Xiaomin. Comparative Research on the Dynamic Rolling Characteristics of Double Delta Wing and Wing-body Configuration[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(2): 417-426.

References

[1] Ericsson L E. The fluid mechanics of slender wing rock[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1984, 21(5): 322-328.

[2] Ericsson L E. Wing rock of nonslender delta wings[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(1): 36-41.

[3] Atashbaz G, Ommian M. Experimental investigation of vortex flow over an 80 degree/60 degree double delta wing at sideslip[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(3): 840-842.

[4] Liu W, Yang X L, Zhang H X, et al. A review on investigations of wing rock problems under high angle of attack[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2008, 38(2): 214-228. (in Chinese) 刘伟, 杨小亮, 张涵信, 等.大攻角运动时的机翼摇滚问题研究综述[J].力学进展, 2008, 38(2): 214-228.

[5] Liu X, Lin J Z, Chen L Z, et al. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow around double-delta wing during pitching motion[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 984-993. (in Chinese) 刘昕, 林敬周, 陈亮中, 等.双三角翼俯仰振荡运动的流场特性数值模拟[J].航空学报, 2012, 33(6): 984-993.

[6] Sohn M H, Chang J W. Effect of a centerbody on the vortex flow of a double-delta wing with leading edge extension[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14: 11-18.

[7] Li G N. Numerical simulations of Navier-Stokes flows about full aircraft configuration and the developing of CFD program[D]. Xi'an: College of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2010. (in Chinese) 李广宁.全机实用外形绕流Navier-Stokes方程数值模拟及其软件开发研究[D].西安: 西北工业大学航空学院, 2010.

[8] Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1992.

[9] Roe P. Approximate riemann solvers, parametric vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43: 357-372.

[10] Rizzi A, Eliasson P, Lindblad I, et al. The engineering of multiblock/multigrid software for navier-stokes flows on structured meshes[J]. Computers & Fluids, 1993, 22: 341-367.

[11] Lesoinne M, Farhat C. Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 134: 71-90.

[12] Landon R H. NACA0012 oscillatory and transient pitching, AGARD Report 702[R]. France: NATO Research and Technology Organization BP 25, F92201 Neuilly Sur Seine, 1982.

[13] den Boer R G, Cunningham Jr A M. Low-speed unsteady aerodynamics of a pitching straked wing at high incidence—part I: test program[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1990, 27(1): 23-30.

[14] Li F W, E Q, Li J, et al. Mesh generation technique for complex aerodynamic configurations[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 1998, 16(1): 89-96. (in Chinese) 李凤蔚, 鄂秦, 李杰, 等.复杂外形网格生成技术[J].空气动力学学报, 1998, 16(1): 89-96.

[15] Shigeru A, Yasuhiro T, Shigeki T, et al. A study on aerodynamic characteristics of lifting body and wing body configurations for fully reusable launch vehicles, AIAA-2004-2536[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.

Comparative Research on the Dynamic Rolling Characteristics of Double Delta Wing and Wing-body Configuration

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[2]	WANG Hao, XUE Fei, YUE Shaoyuan, WANG Yangang. Test on stall types of contra-rotating compressor with variable speed ratios [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125596-125596.
[3]	WANG Qiuyi, WU Yanzeng, BAO Rui. Analysis on CTOD corresponding parameters during fatigue crack growth [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526632-526632.
[4]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[5]	LI Qian, WANG Yankui, JIA Yuhong. Roll oscillations over wing-body configuration with strake wings: Experiment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526008-526008.
[6]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[7]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[8]	DUAN Junyi, TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, LIU Hongwei. Decomposition of mean friction drag in compression-expansion turbulent boundary layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[9]	SHEN Pengfei, LIU Pengxin, SUN Dong, YUAN Xianxu. Statistical characteristics of skin friction of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[10]	LIU Pengxin, YUAN Xianxu, LIANG Fei, LI Chen, SUN Dong. Quadrant decomposition analysis of fluctuations in high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical non-equilibrium [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[11]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[12]	CHEN Chongpei, LIANG Jianhan, GUAN Qingdi, GAO Tianyun. Conservative compressible one-dimensional turbulence method and its application in supersonic scalar mixing layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726364-726364.
[13]	LI Qing, TU Guohua, YU Zhaosheng, LIN Zhaowu, LI Tingting, YUAN Xianxu. Inertial particle transport in non-uniform accelerated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726390-726390.
[14]	CHEN Xuliang, ZHANG Chen, JI Hongli, QIU Jinhao. SMA bump hysteresis modeling and control strategy [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224652-224652.
[15]	LI Chengcheng, LI Fang, YANG Bin, WANG Ying. Numerical investigation of nozzle flow separation control using plasma actuation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 124547-124547.