基于贝叶斯LS-SVR的锂电池剩余寿命概率性预测

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0223

Abstract

Abstract:

An online probabilistic prediction approach for the residual life of a lithium-ion battery is proposed by using the Bayesian least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR). First, historical degradation data of the lithium-ion battery are selected through a sliding window. Then the selected data are formed into training samples by the phase space reconstruction theory, with the minimum embedding dimension calculated by Cao's method. Secondly, a predicting model based on least squares support vector regression is trained by a three level Bayesian inference framework. Then in the iterative prediction stage, Monte Carlo method is applied to manage the uncertainty and its propagation in the multi-step prediction, which is achieved by approximating the continuous distribution with a group of discrete particles and predicting the future health status of the battery based on the principle of "non intersecting degradation trajectories" and the Gaussian process assumption. Finally, by counting the number of particles which pass through the predetermined failure threshold, the probability distribution of the battery residual life can therefore be estimated. Comparative experiments are conducted between Bayesian LS-SVR and Gaussian process regression (GPR) using the public battery data sets provided by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center. The results demonstrate that the Bayesian LS-SVR method has higher prediction accuracy and confidence.

Key words: lithium-ion battery, residual life, probabilistic prediction, least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR), uncertainty management

CLC Number:

CHEN Xiongzi, YU Jinsong, TANG Diyin, WANG Yingxun. Probabilistic Residual Life Prediction for Lithium-ion Batteries Based on Bayesian LS-SVR[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(9): 2219-2229.

References

[1] Goebel K, Saha B, Saxena A, et al. Prognostics in battery health management. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine, 2008, 11(4): 33-40.

[2] Zeng S K, Pecht M G, Wu J. Status and perspective of prognostics and health management technologies. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(5): 626-632. (in Chinese) 曾声奎, Pecht M G, 吴际. 故障预测与健康管理(PHM) 技术的现状与发展. 航空学报, 2005, 26(5): 626-632.

[3] Zhang J L, Lee J. A review on prognostics and health monitoring of Li-ion battery. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(15): 6007-6014.

[4] Sun B, Kang R, Zhang S N. An approach to diagnostics and prognostics based on evolutionary feature parameters. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(2): 393-398. (in Chinese) 孙博, 康锐, 张叔农. 基于特征参数趋势进化的故障诊断和预测方法. 航空学报, 2008, 29(2): 393-398.

[5] Saha B, Goebel K, Poll S, et al. Prognostics methods for battery health monitoring using a Bayesian framework. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 58(2): 291-296.

[6] He W, Williard N, Osterman M, et al. Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster-Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(23): 10314-10321.

[7] Liu J, Saxena A, Goebel K, et al. An adaptive recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries. Proceedings of Annual Conference of Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2010: 1-9.

[8] Liu D T, Luo Y, Peng Y, et al. Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life estimation based on nonlinear AR model combined with degradation feature. Proceedings of Annual Conference of Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2012: 1-7.

[9] Liu D T, Pang J Y, Zhou J B, et al. Data-driven prognostics for lithium-ion battery based on Gaussian process regression. Proceedings of Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, 2012: 1-5.

[10] Engel S J, Gilmartin B J, Bongort K, et al. Prognostics, the real issues involved with predicting life remaining. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2000, 6: 457-469.

[11] Chen X Z, Yu J S, Tang D Y, et al. A novel PF-LSSVR-based framework for failure prognosis of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(5): 715-724.

[12] Suykens J A K, van Gestel T, De Brabanter J, et al. Least squares support vector machines. Singapore: Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2002.

[13] van Gestel T, Suykens J A K, Bart D M, et al. Automatic relevance determination for least squares support vector machine regression. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2001: 2416-2421.

[14] van Gestel T, Suykens J A K, Baestaens D E, et al. Financial time series prediction using least squares support vector machines with the evidence framework. IEEE Transactions on Neural Network, 2001, 12(4): 809-821.

[15] Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, 1981: 366-381.

[16] Cao L Y. Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1997, 110(1): 43-50.

[17] Fishman G S. Monte Carlo concepts, algorithms, and applications. New York: Springer, 1996.

[18] Saha B, Goebel K. Battery data set. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository. http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic-data-repository, 2007.

[19] Saxena A, Celaya J, Saha B, et al. On applying the prognostic performance metrics. Annual Conference of Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2009: 1-16.

Probabilistic Residual Life Prediction for Lithium-ion Batteries Based on Bayesian LS-SVR

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Juan YANG, Jianghao NIU, Qingsong ZHANG. In⁃situ explosion limit of thermal runaway gas explosion in cyclic aging lithium⁃ion batteries: Experimental analysis [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(23): 428529-428529.
[2]	FENG Lei, WANG Hongli, SI Xiaosheng, YANG Xiaojun, WANG Biaobiao. Real-time residual life prediction based on semi-stochastic filter and expectation maximization algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(2): 555-563.
[3]	LIU Junqiang, XIE Jiwei, ZUO Hongfu, ZHANG Malan. Residual lifetime prediction for aeroengines based on Wiener process with random effects [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(2): 564-574.
[4]	BAI Xin, XIE Liyang. Fatigue Crack Growth Law Prediction Based on Steady Random Load [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(9): 2500-2505.
[5]	WANG Haowei, XU Tingxue, ZHAO Jianzhong. Residual Life Prediction Method Fusing Accelerated Degradation and Field Degradation Data [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(12): 3350-3357.
[6]	XING Yalan, WANG Shengbin, ZHANG Shichao, WANG Wenxu. Research on New Three-dimensional Nanostructured Anode Materials for Lithium-ion Batteries [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(10): 2776-2783.
[7]	FAN Geng, MA Dengwu. Probabilistic Prediction Method for Aeroengine Performance Parameters Based on Combined Optimum Relevance Vector Machine [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(9): 2110-2121.
[8]	Li Xinlei;Ren Jilin;Ren Shangkun;Chen Xi;Fu Renzhen. Residual Life Assessment of Ferromagnetic Components [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(10): 2109-2114.
[9]	LIN Wen-qiang;XIE Li-yang. State Analysis Approach of Random Fatigue Reliability Prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2003, 24(6): 534-536.
[10]	Lu Fumei;Wang Bin;Liu Diqing. THE APPLICATION OF THE ENGINEERING APPROACH FOR ANALYZING CRACK TOLERANCE OF FUSELAGE PANELS TO A TRANSPORT AIRPLANE [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1989, 10(12): 653-658.