预冷式超声速引射器启动和负载特性
收稿日期: 2024-05-17
修回日期: 2024-06-14
录用日期: 2024-07-31
网络出版日期: 2024-08-05
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(12002372);中国科协青年人才托举工程(2022QNRC001)
Starting and operating characteristics of precooled supersonic ejector
Received date: 2024-05-17
Revised date: 2024-06-14
Accepted date: 2024-07-31
Online published: 2024-08-05
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(12002372);Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by
超声速引射器在航空航天领域具有广泛应用,一般用于抽吸被动流和产生低压环境。为提升超声速引射器性能,设计了一种新型预冷式超声速引射器。该引射器采用支板结构的双喷管,并引入预冷器来预冷温度超过1 100 K的被动流。基于试验和数值模拟相结合的方法,对预冷式超声速引射器的启动特性、负载特性以及预冷被动流对其性能的影响进行了分析。研究结果表明,当主动流总压超过3.0 MPa时,预冷式超声速引射器能够完全启动,盲腔压力稳定在3.46 kPa。而当引射器处于临界启动状态时,引射流道未达到超声速满流,激波串会影响盲腔压力。在完全启动状态下,两股射流自喷管加速流出后会相互撞击,喷管出口附近的静压呈现先上升再下降的趋势。而当引射器处于负载状态时,喷管出口附近的静压呈现先下降再上升的趋势。同时,无论是启动还是负载状态,引射流道均存在激波的交汇和反射,形成菱形激波区域,但随着被动流流量的增加和温度的提升,这些菱形区域逐渐消失。在低引射系数条件下,预冷被动流有效提升主被动流的混合效率,但在高引射系数下该优势不再凸显。此外,预冷被动流能有效提升引射器的增压比,提升幅度超过33.3%。
梁涛 , 徐万武 , 李智严 , 张赛强 , 李刚 , 张冬冬 . 预冷式超声速引射器启动和负载特性[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(2) : 130701 -130701 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30701
In the field of aerospace engineering, supersonic ejectors find extensive applications, typically for suctioning secondary flows and generating low-pressure environments. To enhance the performance of supersonic ejectors, this paper proposes a novel design of a precooled supersonic ejector. The ejector adopts a dual-nozzle structure with strut and uses a precooler to precool the secondary flows with temperatures exceeding 1 100 K. Through a combined approach of experimental and numerical methods, the starting characteristics, operating characteristics, and the influence of precooling secondary flows on the performance of the precooled supersonic ejector are analyzed. The research findings indicate that when the total pressure of the primary flow exceeds 3.0 MPa, the precooled supersonic ejector can start completely, with the suction chamber pressure becoming stabilized at 3.46 kPa. However, in the critical starting state, the ejector flow channels do not achieve full supersonic flow, and shock trains affect the suction chamber. In the fully started state, the two jets collide after accelerating out of the nozzles, leading to an initial rise followed by a decrease in static pressure near the nozzle exit. Conversely, when the ejector is in the operating mode, there is an initial decrease followed by an increase in static pressure near the nozzle exit. Additionally, regardless of starting or operating conditions, shockwave intersections and reflections exist in the ejector flow channels, forming diamond-shaped regions. These regions gradually disappear with an increase in the secondary flow rate and temperature of the regions. Under the condition of low entrainment ratio, precooling secondary flows effectively enhance the mixing efficiency of the primary and secondary flows, but this advantage diminishes at high ejector coefficients. Furthermore, precooled passive flows can effectively increase the compression ratio of the ejector, with the enhancement exceeding 33.3%.
1 | KUMARAN R M, SUNDARARAJAN T, MANOHAR D R. Performance evaluation of second-throat diffuser for high-altitude-test facility[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26(2): 248-258. |
2 | KUMARAN R M, VIVEKANAND P K, SUNDARARAJAN T, et al. Optimization of second throat ejectors for high-altitude test facility[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2009, 25(3): 697-706. |
3 | SINGHAL G, MAINUDDIN, TYAGI R K, et al. Pressure recovery studies on a supersonic COIL with central ejector configuration[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2010, 42(7): 1145-1153. |
4 | MALKOV V M, KISELEV I A, SHATALOV I V, et al. Ejectors for pressure recovery systems of supersonic cheical lasers [J]. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2017, 24:431-447. |
5 | GU R, SUN M B, CAI Z, et al. Experimental study on the rocket-ejector system with a throat in the secondary stream[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 113: 106697. |
6 | KOUPRIYANOV M, ETELE J. Equivalence ratio and constriction effects on RBCC thrust augmentation[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 68(11-12): 1839-1846. |
7 | BAI T, YAN G, YU J L. Influence of internal heat exchanger position on the performance of ejector-enhanced auto-cascade refrigeration cycle for the low-temperature freezer[J]. Energy, 2022, 238: 121803. |
8 | TASHTOUSH B M, AL-NIMR M A, KHASAWNEH M A. A comprehensive review of ejector design, performance, and applications[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 240: 138-172. |
9 | YE W, XU W W, LI P, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of a multi-strut mixing-enhancement ejector[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 154: 650-656. |
10 | YE W, ZHANG J Q, XU W W, et al. Numerical investigation on the flow structures of the multi-strut mixing enhancement ejector[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 179: 115653. |
11 | CORDI A J, LURIE H, CALLAHAN D W, et al. Alpha high-power chemical laser program[C]∥ Proceedings Volume 1871. Intense Laser Beams and Applications. Bellingham: SPIE, 1993:1-13. |
12 | QUEBERT L, GARCIA Y. Theoretical and experimental design of an exhaust diffuser for an upper stage engine of a ballistic missile[C]∥ Proceedings of the 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2001. |
13 | 王翼. 高超声速进气道启动问题研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2008. |
WANG Y. Study on start-up of hypersonic inlet[D].Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2008 (in Chinese). | |
14 | GENC O, TOROS S, TIMURKUTLUK B. Determination of optimum ejector operating pressures for anodic recirculation in SOFC systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(31): 20249-20259. |
15 | KUMARAN R M, SUNDARARAJAN T, MANOHAR D R, et al. Modeling of two-stage ejector for high-altitude testing of satellite thrusters[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(6): 1398-1408. |
16 | 王海锋, 徐大川, 赵芳, 等. 基于高温燃气引射的引射器设计与实验研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(5): 50-56. |
WANG H F, XU D C, ZHAO F, et al. Design and experimental investigation of ejector based on high temperature gas ejection[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34(5): 50-56 (in Chinese). | |
17 | PING Z C, CHEN B, WANG C, et al. High performance ejector enhanced by heat exchanger in solid oxide fuel cell anode recirculation system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 221: 119856. |
18 | BOREYSHO A S, DRUZHININ S L, MALKOV V M, et al. Pressure recovery system for a high-power HF/DF laser: Implementation practice[J]. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2007, 14(4): 561-576. |
19 | ELSAYED M L, MESALHY O, KIZITO J P, et al. Performance of a guided plate heat sink at high altitude[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 147: 118926. |
20 | ZHANG H C, LIU J H, XU X J, et al. Effect of vacuum environment on air side heat and mass transfer characters of plain fin-tube heat exchangers[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 188: 122596. |
21 | ZHANG J W, LIU J H, ZHANG L, et al. Air-side heat transfer characteristics under wet conditions at lower ambient pressure of fin-and-tube heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 142: 118439. |
22 | WAN R, LIU Z, WU H W, et al. Air-side flow and heat transfer characteristics research and empirical correlations of wavy fins in negative gauge pressure environment[J]. Experimental Heat Transfer, 2023, 36(3): 404-420. |
23 | ZHANG J W, LIU J H, ZHANG L, et al. Effect of ambient pressure on air side heat transfer and flow characteristics of plain finned tube heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 158: 120010. |
24 | ZHANG L, WANG J W, LIU R, et al. Numerical study of fin-and-tube heat exchanger in low-pressure environment: air-side heat transfer and frictional performance, entropy generation analysis, and model development[J]. Entropy, 2022, 24(7): 887. |
25 | RAO S M V, JAGADEESH G. Observations on the non-mixed length and unsteady shock motion in a two dimensional supersonic ejector[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2014, 26(3): 036103. |
26 | KARTHICK S K, RAO S M V, JAGADEESH G, et al. Parametric experimental studies on mixing characteristics within a low area ratio rectangular supersonic gaseous ejector[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(7): 076101. |
27 | ZHU Y H, JIANG P X. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of shock wave characteristics on the ejector performance[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 40: 31-42. |
28 | TANG Y Z, LIU Z L, LI Y X, et al. Mixing process of two streams within a steam ejector from the perspectives of mass, momentum and energy transfer[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 185: 116358. |
29 | JING Q, XU W W, YE W, et al. The relationship between contraction of the ejector mixing chamber and supersonic jet mixing layer development[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(9): 469. |
30 | LI Z Y, XU W W, LIANG T, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the performance of supersonic multi-nozzle ejector[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 242: 122409. |
31 | ZHAO Z C, ZHANG X, ZHAO K, et al. Numerical investigation on heat transfer and flow characteristics of supercritical nitrogen in a straight channel of printed circuit heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 126: 717-729. |
32 | TAO Z, CHENG Z Y, ZHU J Q, et al. Effect of turbulence models on predicting convective heat transfer to hydrocarbon fuel at supercritical pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(5): 1247-1261. |
33 | ZHANG D D, TAN J G, HOU J W. Structural and mixing characteristics influenced by streamwise vortices in supersonic flow[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 110(12): 124101. |
34 | ZHANG D D, TAN J G, LV L, et al. Characterization of flow mixing and structural topology in supersonic planar mixing layer[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 156: 33-43. |
35 | TAN J G, ZHANG D D, LV L. A review on enhanced mixing methods in supersonic mixing layer flows[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 152: 310-324. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |