电子电气工程与控制

直流励磁发电系统电容电荷平衡控制策略实现及对比

  • 王宇 ,
  • 卢志远 ,
  • 王锁 ,
  • 陈凯
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学 自动化学院,南京 210016
.E-mail: wanghaohao@nuaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-12-12

  修回日期: 2024-02-07

  录用日期: 2024-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2024-04-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51977107);航空科学基金(2020HKZ0001)

Implementation and comparison of capacitor charge balance control strategies of DC excitation power generation system

  • Yu WANG ,
  • Zhiyuan LU ,
  • Suo WANG ,
  • Kai CHEN
Expand
  • College of Automation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China

Received date: 2023-12-12

  Revised date: 2024-02-07

  Accepted date: 2024-04-23

  Online published: 2024-04-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(51977107);Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(2020HKZ0001)

摘要

全电/多电飞机技术以及军用车辆技术的发展对发电系统提出了高动态性能、低浪涌电压的要求。调磁式直流发电系统通过独立调节励磁维持输出电压稳定,系统输出动态性能取决于控制策略的好坏,传统电压比例积分控制难以兼顾系统动稳态性能。将电容电荷平衡控制方法用于提升直流发电系统动态性能,根据控制目标与控制方式的不同,分为经典电容电荷平衡控制(CBC)和基于电容电荷平衡控制原理的电压闭环最优比例积分控制(OPIC)策略以及电容储能闭环最优单比例控制(OSPC)策略。首先论述了经典电容电荷平衡控制原理,给出电压闭环最优比例积分控制策略以及电容储能闭环最优单比例控制策略的实现过程,并推导出外环系数整定方式。其次给出3种控制策略对比分析,指出经典CBC可实现系统最优瞬态回复过程,但切换过程存在二次调节现象需加以补偿。算法2与算法3通过动态切换外环系数实现系统最优控制,但由于内部励磁环跟踪滞后,只能逼近理想的电容电荷平衡控制效果。最后通过实验验证所提控制策略的正确性,结果表明所提控制策略相较于传统电压比例积分控制更有利于提升系统动态性能,其中,OPIC兼顾动稳态调节性能,OSPC抗负载扰动性好,经过补偿的CBC动态性能最佳。

本文引用格式

王宇 , 卢志远 , 王锁 , 陈凯 . 直流励磁发电系统电容电荷平衡控制策略实现及对比[J]. 航空学报, 2024 , 45(19) : 329967 -329967 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.29967

Abstract

The output voltage stability of the adjustable excitation DC power generation system is maintained by independently regulating the excitation. The output dynamic performance of the system depends on the quality of the control strategy. The traditional voltage Proportional Integral (PI) control is difficult to take into account the dynamic and steady-state performance of the system. In this paper, the capacitor Charge Balance Control (CBC) method is used to improve the dynamic performance of the DC power generation system. According to the different control objectives and control methods, we have classical CBC strategy, voltage closed-loop Optimal PI Control (OPIC) strategy based on the CBC principle, and capacitor energy storage closed-loop Optimal Single Proportional Control (OSPC) strategy. Firstly, the classical CBC principle is discussed, the realization process of OPIC and OSPC is given, and the outer loop coefficient setting method of OPIC and OSPC is derived based on the idea of CBC. Secondly, a comparative analysis of the three control strategies is given. It is pointed out that although the classical CBC can realize the optimal transient recovery process of the system, the secondary adjustment phenomenon in the switching process needs to be compensated. OPIC and OSPC realize the optimal control of the system by dynamically switching the outer loop coefficient; however, due to the tracking lag of the internal excitation loop, OPIC and OSPC can only approach the ideal CBC effect. Finally, the correctness of the proposed control strategy is verified by experiments, and the results show that the proposed control strategy is more beneficial to improve the dynamic performance of the system than the traditional voltage PI control. In addition, OPIC satisfies dynamic and steady-state regulation performance, OSPC has good anti-load disturbance, and the dynamic performance of compensated CBC is the best.

参考文献

1 WHEELER P. Technology for the more and all electric aircraft of the future[C]∥2016 IEEE International Conference on Automatica (ICA-ACCA). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2016: 1-5.
2 张卓然, 许彦武, 姚一鸣, 等. 多电飞机电力系统及其关键技术[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报202254(5): 969-984.
  ZHANG Z R, XU Y W, YAO Y M, et al. Electric power system and key technologies of more electric aircraft[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics202254(5): 969-984 (in Chinese).
3 FRIESKE B, KLOETZKE M, MAUSER F. Trends in vehicle concept and key technology development for hybrid and battery electric vehicles[C]∥2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2013: 1-12.
4 欧阳明高. 我国节能与新能源汽车发展战略与对策[J]. 汽车工程200628(4): 317-321.
  OUYANG M G. Development strategy and countermeasures of energy-saving and new energy vehicles in China[J]. Automotive Engineering200628(4): 317-321 (in Chinese).
5 王鹤, 陈永禄. 电力电子技术在多电及混合动力推进飞机上的应用进展[J]. 西安航空学院学报202341(1): 54-60.
  WANG H, CHEN Y L. Application of power electronic technology on more electric and hybrid electric propulsion aircraft[J]. Journal of Xi’an Aeronautical Institute202341(1): 54-60 (in Chinese).
6 于立. 车载双凸极直流发电系统关键技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2014.
  YU L. Research on key technology of the doubly salient DC generator system for automobile application[D].Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014 (in Chinese).
7 BERNAL-PEREZ S, ANO-VILLALBA S, BLASCO-GIMENEZ R, et al. Efficiency and fault ride-through performance of a diode-rectifier-and VSC-inverter-based HVDC link for offshore wind farms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics201360(6): 2401-2409.
8 夏宇航, 王宇. 独立励磁直流发电系统优化控制方法比较[J]. 航空学报202344(16): 327975.
  XIA Y H, WANG Y. Comparative study on optimal control methods of independent excitation DC power generation system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(16): 327975 (in Chinese).
9 雍静, 徐欣, 曾礼强, 等. 低压直流供电系统研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报201333(7): 42-52, 20.
  YONG J, XU X, ZENG L Q, et al. A review of low voltage DC power distribution system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE201333(7): 42-52, 20 (in Chinese).
10 王莉, 曹小庆, 张卓然, 等. 电励磁双凸极无刷直流发电机非线性PI调压技术的研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报200626(5): 153-158.
  WANG L, CAO X Q, ZHANG Z R, et al. Research of nonlinear PI voltage regulation for doubly salient brushless DC generator[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE200626(5): 153-158 (in Chinese).
11 WANG Y, DENG Z Q. Hybrid excitation topologies and control strategies of stator permanent magnet machines for DC power system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics201259(12): 4601-4616.
12 刘金利, 马伟明, 翟小飞, 等. 带脉冲负载多相储能发电机励磁控制系统设计[J]. 海军工程大学学报201931(3): 32-38.
  LIU J L, MA W M, ZHAI X F, et al. Design of excitation control system for multi-phase energy storage generator with pulse load[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering201931(3): 32-38 (in Chinese).
13 翟小飞, 马伟明, 欧阳斌, 等. 前馈控制在脉冲整流发电机数字励磁控制系统中的应用[J]. 电工技术学报201328(7): 151-156.
  ZHAI X F, MA W M, OUYANG B, et al. Application of feed forward control in the excitation system of pulse rectified generator[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society201328(7): 151-156 (in Chinese).
14 姜卫东, 李王敏, 佘阳阳, 等. 直流电容储能反馈和负载功率前馈的PWM整流器控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报201530(8): 151-158.
  JIANG W D, LI W M, SHE Y Y, et al. Control strategy for PWM rectifier based on feedback of the energy stored in capacitor and load power feed-forward[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society201530(8): 151-158 (in Chinese).
15 赵文祥, 郝亮, 和阳, 等. 双三相永磁同步发电机直流母线无电流传感器稳压控制[J]. 中国电机工程学报202343(10): 3995-4005.
  ZHAO W X, HAO L, HE Y, et al. Voltage stabilization control for dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous generator without DC-bus current sensor[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE202343(10): 3995-4005 (in Chinese).
16 郝亮, 赵文祥, 吉敬华, 等. 交轴电流计算与电容储能反馈的双三相永磁同步发电机系统稳压控制[J]. 电工技术学报202338(2): 353-364.
  HAO L, ZHAO W X, JI J H, et al. Voltage stabilization control for dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous generator system based on quadrature axis current calculation and feedback of the energy stored in capacitor[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society202338(2): 353-364 (in Chinese).
17 XU Y W, ZHANG Z R, BIAN Z M, et al. Capacitor-energy-based control of doubly salient brushless DC generator for dynamic performance optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion202035(4): 1886-1896.
18 MEYER E, ZHANG Z L, LIU Y F. An optimal control method for buck ConvertersUsing a practical capacitor ChargeBalance technique[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics200823(4): 1802-1812.
19 刘晓东, 邱亚杰, 方炜, 等. Boost变换器电容电荷平衡动态最优控制[J]. 电力自动化设备201131(5): 63-67.
  LIU X D, QIU Y J, FANG W, et al. Optimal dynamic control based on capacitor charge balance for Boost converter[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment201131(5): 63-67 (in Chinese).
20 刘晓东, 葛玲, 方炜, 等. Buck-Boost变换器线性与非线性复合控制[J]. 电机与控制学报201418(11): 106-111.
  LIU X D, GE L, FANG W, et al. Linear and nonlinear composite control strategy of the Buck-Boost converter[J]. Electric Machines and Control201418(11): 106-111 (in Chinese).
21 王宇, 肖文妍, 郝雯娟, 等. 永磁磁通切换电机的转矩冲量平衡控制技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报201737(22): 6577-6584, 6769.
  WANG Y, XIAO W Y, HAO W J, et al. Research on torque impulse balance control strategy of flux-switching permanent magnet machine[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE201737(22): 6577-6584, 6769 (in Chinese).
22 张源, 王宇, 肖文妍, 等. 永磁磁通切换电机转矩冲量平衡控制优化切换控制策略[J]. 电工技术学报201934(7): 1404-1412.
  ZHANG Y, WANG Y, XIAO W Y, et al. Optimal switching control strategy for torque impulse balance control of flux switching permanent magnet motor[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society201934(7): 1404-1412 (in Chinese).
23 WANG Y, XU X, FU H W, et al. Charge balance control for DC/DC converter systems: From single-input systems to multiple-input systems[J]. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics20219(1): 206-222.
文章导航

/