临近空间技术

亚轨道飞行器再入轨迹高精度自适应凸规划

  • 刘哲 ,
  • 张羲格 ,
  • 韦常柱 ,
  • 崔乃刚
展开
  • 1.哈尔滨工业大学 航天学院,哈尔滨  150001
    2.北京宇航系统工程研究所,北京  100076
.E-mail: weichangzhu@hit.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-08-10

  修回日期: 2023-08-11

  录用日期: 2023-09-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52232014);1912项目

High-precision adaptive convex programming for reentry trajectories of suborbital vehicles

  • Zhe LIU ,
  • Xige ZHANG ,
  • Changzhu WEI ,
  • Naigang CUI
Expand
  • 1.School of Aerospace,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin  150001,China
    2.Beijing Institute of Space System Engineering,Beijing  100076,China

Received date: 2023-08-10

  Revised date: 2023-08-11

  Accepted date: 2023-09-13

  Online published: 2023-09-27

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52232014);1912 Project

摘要

针对全要素终端状态约束下的亚轨道可重复使用飞行器再入滑翔轨迹规划精度不足、难收敛问题,提出了一种结合序列凸优化与自适应网格更新约束同伦模型预测凸规划的高精度求解算法,实现弱初值依赖条件下再入轨迹规划过程的高精度可靠收敛。首先,对部分终端约束进行松弛处理,并在凸优化求解过程中将信赖域作为软约束,定义反映线性化误差及约束违反程度的增广指标函数,采取多维参数搜索方式分别更新状态量及控制量,避免传统一维线搜索出现无解情况;进一步选取约束松弛项作为同伦参数,基于模型预测误差评估自适应调整离散网格,并构建考虑多约束的静态凸规划问题模型,同伦优化求取全程控制调整量,以实现全要素轨迹状态量高精度校正,提升算法收敛性。最终,通过数值仿真验证了本文方法的有效性。

本文引用格式

刘哲 , 张羲格 , 韦常柱 , 崔乃刚 . 亚轨道飞行器再入轨迹高精度自适应凸规划[J]. 航空学报, 2023 , 44(S2) : 729430 -729430 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29430

Abstract

Under complete terminal state constraints, the reentry gliding trajectory planning of suborbital reusable aircraft is short of convergence and accuracy. A high-precision solution algorithm combining sequential convex optimization and adaptive mesh refinement based homotopic constrained model predictive convex programming is proposed to achieve high-precision and reliable convergence in the reentry trajectory planning process under the conditions of weak initial value dependency. Firstly, several terminal constraints are relaxed, and the trust region is utilized as a soft constraint during the convex optimization process. An augmented index function is defined to reflect the linearization error and the degree of constraint violation. A multi-dimensional parameter search method is proposed to update the state and control variables separately, avoiding the situation of no solution in the basic line search. Further, constraint relaxation terms are selected as homotopy parameters, the discrete mesh is adjusted adaptively based on evaluation of model prediction deviation, and a static convex programming problem model is constructed considering multi-constraints. Then, the control adjustment quantity in the entire process is homotopically optimized to achieve high-precision correction of all-element trajectory state variables and improve algorithm convergence. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through numerical simulation.

参考文献

1 SIPPEL M, STAPPERT S, KOCH A. Assessment of multiple mission reusable launch vehicles[J]. Journal of Space Safety Engineering20196(3): 165-180.
2 包为民, 汪小卫. 航班化航天运输系统发展展望[J]. 宇航总体技术20215(3): 1-6.
  BAO W M, WANG X W. Prospect of airline-flight-mode aerospace transportation system[J]. Astronautical Systems Engineering Technology20215(3): 1-6 (in Chinese).
3 PAN L, PENG S C, XIE Y, et al. 3D guidance for hypersonic reentry gliders based on analytical prediction[J]. Acta Astronautica2020167: 42-51.
4 张柔和, 樊雅卓, 佘智勇, 等. TSTO运载器一级返场轨迹优化设计与在线生成[J]. 航空学报202041(11): 623856.
  ZHANG R H, FAN Y Z, SHE Z Y, et al. TSTO vehicle first-stage return trajectory: Optimization and onboard generation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202041(11): 623856 (in Chinese).
5 MALL K, TAHERI E. Three-degree-of-freedom hypersonic reentry trajectory optimization using an advanced indirect method[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets202259(5): 1463-1474.
6 SU Y, DAI Y, LIU Y. A hybrid hyper-heuristic whale optimization algorithm for reusable launch vehicle reentry trajectory optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2021119: 107200.
7 LI Z T, TANG X J, ZHANG H B, et al. A fast matrix generation method for solving entry trajectory optimization problems under the pseudospectral method[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2022236(12): 2565-2579.
8 LIU X F, SHEN Z J, LU P. Solving the maximum-crossrange problem via successive second-order cone programming with a line search[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201547: 10-20.
9 WANG Z B, MCDONALD S T. Convex relaxation for optimal rendezvous of unmanned aerial and ground vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology202099: 105756.
10 WANG Z B. Optimal trajectories and normal load analysis of hypersonic glide vehicles via convex optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201987: 357-368.
11 WANG Z B, LU Y. Improved sequential convex programming algorithms for entry trajectory optimization[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets202057(6): 1373-1386.
12 GAO Y, SHAO Z J, SONG Z Y. Enhanced successive convexification based on error-feedback index and line search filter[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics202245(12): 2243-2257.
13 LU P. Convex-concave decomposition of nonlinear equality constraints in optimal control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics202144(1): 4-14.
14 REYNOLDS T P, MESBAHI M. The crawling phenomenon in sequential convex programming[C]∥ 2020 American Control Conference (ACC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 3613-3618.
15 XIE L, HE R Z, ZHANG H B, et al. Oscillation phenomenon in trust-region-based sequential convex programming for the nonlinear trajectory planning problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems202258(4): 3337-3352.
16 VUTUKURI S, PADHI R. An impulsive model predictive static programming based station-keeping guidance for quasi-halo orbits[J]. Acta Astronautica2021188: 518-530.
17 ZHOU C, HE L, YAN X D, et al. Active-set pseudospectral model predictive static programming for midcourse guidance[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2023134: 108137.
18 LIU X, LI S, XIN M. Pseudospectral convex optimization based model predictive static programming for constrained guidance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems202359(3): 2232-2244.
19 MONDAL S, PADHI R. Angle-constrained terminal guidance using quasi-spectral model predictive static programming[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201841(3): 783-791.
20 ZHOU C, YAN X D, TANG S. Generalized quasi-spectral model predictive static programming method using Gaussian quadrature collocation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2020106: 106134.
21 SHARMA P, KUMAR P, PADHI R. Pseudo-spectral MPSP-based unified midcourse and terminal guidance for reentry targets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems202359(4): 3982-3994.
22 HONG H C, MAITY A, HOLZAPFEL F, et al. Model predictive convex programming for constrained vehicle guidance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems201955(5): 2487-2500.
23 周聪, 闫晓东, 唐硕, 等. 大气层内模型预测静态规划拦截中制导[J]. 航空学报202142(11): 524912.
  ZHOU C, YAN X D, TANG S, et al. Midcourse guidance for endo-atmospheric interception based on model predictive static programming[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202142(11): 524912 (in Chinese).
24 PASHUPATHY P, MAITY A, HONG H C, et al. Unspecified final-time nonlinear suboptimal guidance of aerobatic aircraft in air race[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2021116: 106817.
25 MONDAL S, PADHI R. Constrained quasi-spectral MPSP with application to high-precision missile guidance with path constraints[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control2021143(3): 031001.
文章导航

/