流体力学与飞行力学

柔性变形后缘翼型阵风减缓及气动噪声分析

  • 张育鸣 ,
  • 戴玉婷 ,
  • 黄广靖 ,
  • 杨超 ,
  • 蒋树杰
展开
  • 1.北京航空航天大学 航空科学与工程学院,北京 100191
    2.天目山实验室,杭州 310023
    3.中国空气动力研究与发展中心 气动噪声重点实验室,绵阳 621000
.E-mail: yutingDai@buaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-06-26

  修回日期: 2023-07-16

  录用日期: 2023-09-28

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-24

基金资助

气动噪声控制重点实验室开放课题(ANCL20230106)

Gust alleviation and aeroacoustic characteristics of flexible morphing trailing edge airfoil

  • Yuming ZHANG ,
  • Yuting DAI ,
  • Guangjing HUANG ,
  • Chao YANG ,
  • Shujie JIANG
Expand
  • 1.School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100191
    2.Tianmushan Laboratory,Hangzhou 310023
    3.Laboratory of Aerodynamic Noise Control,China Aerodyamics Research and Development Center,Mianyang 621000

Received date: 2023-06-26

  Revised date: 2023-07-16

  Accepted date: 2023-09-28

  Online published: 2023-08-24

Supported by

Open Project of the Laboratory of Aerodynamic Noise Control(ANCL20230106)

摘要

柔性变形后缘以无缝、光滑的气动外形不仅在气动方面相比传统铰链舵面有显著优势,在提升噪声性能方面也具有较大潜力。在大涡模拟模型和基于Lighthill声比拟方法的FW-H方程基础上,利用CFD数值仿真研究了有缝后缘和无缝后缘的气动噪声特性对比。更进一步,在遭遇阵风时,通过无缝后缘柔性动态变形进行载荷减缓,并与无缝后缘刚性偏转进行载荷减缓效率和气动噪声特性对比。研究表明,在4°迎角下,无缝后缘相比有缝后缘纯音噪声峰值降低20.2 dB;在4°~20°等效迎角的正弦阵风下,基于无缝柔性变形后缘的翼型载荷减缓效率均在60%以上,比刚性偏转后缘的载荷减缓效率高出10%~30%;且在12°等效迎角的正弦阵风下,无缝后缘柔性变形纯音噪声峰值相比刚性偏转最高可降低7.2 dB。最后从动态特性和流场演化角度分析了无缝后缘两种偏转方式对阵风载荷减缓效率和气动噪声特性的影响机理。

本文引用格式

张育鸣 , 戴玉婷 , 黄广靖 , 杨超 , 蒋树杰 . 柔性变形后缘翼型阵风减缓及气动噪声分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024 , 45(10) : 129219 -129219 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29219

Abstract

The seamless and smooth aerodynamic shape of the flexible morphing trailing edge not only offers significant improvements over traditional hinged rudders in aerodynamic performance, but also has the potential to enhance noise reduction capabilities. Using the large eddy simulation model and the acoustic analogy method based on the FW-H equation, the aeroacoustic characteristics of the stitched and seamless trailing edges are investigated through CFD numerical simulation. Furthermore, the study explores the aeroacoustic characteristics of the aircraft when it encounters gusts, with a particular focus on the flexible morphing of the seamless trailing edge. The load alleviation efficiency and aeroacoustic characteristics of the flexible morphing of seamless trailing edge are compared with those of rigid deflection of the seamless trailing edge. The results show that at 4° angle of attack, the tonal noise peak of seamless trailing edge decreases by 20.2 dB compared with that of slotted trailing edge With the sine wind gust of 4°-20° equivalent angle of attack, the load alleviation efficiency of flexible morphing trailing edge is more than 60%, which is 10%-30% higher than that in the rigid deflection. In addition, the tonal noise peak value of flexible morphing trailing edge can be reduced by 7.2 dB compared with that of the rigid deflection at 12° equivalent angle sine gust. Finally, the effects of the two deflection modes of the seamless trailing edge on wind load alleviation efficiency and aeroacoustic characteristics are analyzed from the perspective of dynamic characteristics and flow evolution.

参考文献

1 KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H, ALIHAN SHOWKAT ALI S, AZARPEYVAND M, et al. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of high-lift airfoil fitted with slat cove fillers[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration2020479: 115347.
2 乔渭阳, 仝帆, 陈伟杰, 等. 仿生学气动噪声控制研究的历史、现状和进展[J]. 空气动力学学报201836(1): 98-121.
  QIAO W Y, TONG F, CHEN W J, et al. Review on aerodynamic noise reduction with bionic configuration[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica201836(1): 98-121 (in Chinese).
3 朱自强, 兰世隆. 民机机体噪声及其降噪研究[J]. 航空学报201536(2): 406-421.
  ZHU Z Q, LAN S L. Study of airframe noise and its reduction for commercial aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201536(2): 406-421 (in Chinese).
4 DOBRZYNSKI W. Almost 40 years of airframe noise research: What did we achieve?[J]. Journal of Aircraft201047(2): 353-367.
5 RIVERO A E, FOURNIER S, MANOLESOS M, et al. Wind tunnel comparison of flapped and FishBAC camber variation for lift control: AIAA-2020-1300 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
6 VARTIO E, SHAW E, VETTER T. Gust load alleviation flight control system design for a SensorCraft vehicle: AIAA-2008-7192 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
7 WONG A, BIL C, MARINO M. Design and aerodynamic performance of a FishBAC morphing wing: AIAA-2022-1298 [R].Reston: AIAA, 2022.
8 NGUYEN N, LEBOFSKY S, TING E, et al. Development of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap for performance adaptive aeroelastic wing[C]∥ SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition. 2015.
9 NGUYEN N T, CRAMER N B, HASHEMI K E, et al. Progress on gust load alleviation wind tunnel experiment and aeroservoelastic model validation for a flexible wing with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap system: AIAA-2020-0214 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
10 BROOKS T F, POPE D S, MARCOLINI M A. Airfoil self-noise and prediction[R].Washington,D.C.: NASA, 1989.
11 WOLF W R, LELE S K. Trailing-edge noise predictions using compressible large-eddy simulation and acoustic analogy[J]. AIAA Journal201250(11): 2423-2434.
12 IKEDA T, ATOBE T, TAKAGI S. Direct simulations of trailing-edge noise generation from two-dimensional airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration2012331(3): 556-574.
13 JONES L E, SANDBERG R D. Numerical analysis of tonal airfoil self-noise and acoustic feedback-loops[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration2011330(25): 6137-6152.
14 CHONG T P, JOSEPH P F, KINGAN M J. An investigation of airfoil tonal noise at different Reynolds numbers and angles of attack[J]. Applied Acoustics201374(1): 38-48.
15 ARCONDOULIS E, DOOLAN C J, ZANDER A C, et al. An investigation of airfoil dual acoustic feedback mechanisms at low-to-moderate Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration2019460: 114887.
16 游亚飞. 机翼后缘噪声预测研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007.
  YOU Y F. Study on noise prediction of wing trailing edge[D].Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007 (in Chinese).
17 KAN Z, LI D C, ZHAO S W, et al. Aeroacoustic and aerodynamic characteristics of a morphing airfoil[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology202193(5): 888-899.
18 WATKINS J, BOUFERROUK A. The effects of a morphed trailing-edge flap on the aeroacoustic and aerodynamic performance of a 30P30N aerofoil[J]. Acoustics20224(1): 248-267.
19 魏人可,刘宇,李辰昭. 30P30N三段式增升翼型缝翼噪声特征与降噪研究[C]∥第十一届全国流体力学学术会, 2020.
  WEI R K, LIU Y, LI C Z. Study on noise characteristics and noise reduction of 30P30 N three-stage increased lift airfoil slats[C]∥ Abstracts of the 11th National Fluid Mechanics Academic Conference, 2020 (in Chinese).
20 KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H, AZARPEYVAND M, ILáRIO DA SILVA C R. Acoustic and flow characteristics of an airfoil fitted with morphed trailing edges[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science2021123: 110287.
21 KAMLIYA JAWAHAR H, VEMURI S S, AZARPEYVAND M. Aerodynamic noise characteristics of airfoils with morphed trailing edges[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow202293: 108892.
22 CHAWKI A. Dynamic mesh framework for morphing wings CFD[D]. Bristol: University of the West of England, 2019.
23 ABDESSEMED C, BOUFERROUK A, YAO Y F. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of a harmonically morphing airfoil using dynamic meshing[J]. Acoustics20213(1): 177-199.
24 LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences1952211(1107): 564-587.
25 NICOUD F, DUCROS F. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion199962(3): 183-200.
26 PIOMELLI U. Large-eddy simulation: Achievements and challenges[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences199935(4): 335-362.
27 WILLIAMS J E F, HAWKINGS D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences1969264(1151): 321-342.
28 KATO C, IIDA A, TAKANO Y, et al. Numerical prediction of aerodynamic noise radiated from low Mach number turbulent wake[C]∥ 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1993.
文章导航

/