带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严试验
收稿日期: 2021-11-29
修回日期: 2021-12-17
录用日期: 2021-12-28
网络出版日期: 2022-01-05
基金资助
国家科技重大专项（2017-Ⅲ-0001-0025）
Experiment on composite rim seal with deep cavity in static disc and modified platform
Received date: 2021-11-29
Revised date: 2021-12-17
Accepted date: 2021-12-28
Online published: 2022-01-05
Supported by
National Science and Technology Major Project（2017-Ⅲ-0001-0025）
采用CO2气体体积分数测量法研究一种带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严结构。同时选取轴向封严结构和叠覆封严结构作为比较基准，重点关注主流雷诺数（0.75×105~9.4×105）、封严流量（流量比0.2%~2.5%）、旋转雷诺数（1.6×105~8.1×105）等典型工况参数对盘腔内压力分布和封严效率的影响情况；并在此基础上开展了相应的数值研究，获得了封严腔室内详细的流场信息。结果表明：在试验设计工况范围内，主流雷诺数的改变对静叶尾缘和动叶前缘的周向压力分布影响显著。主流雷诺数增加，主流通道内压力升高，主流气体入侵加剧；增加封严流量有利于提高盘腔内压力，从而提升盘腔封严效率，但这对静叶尾缘压力影响较小；增加旋转雷诺数会增大静叶尾缘和动叶叶间通道前缘的静压，加重主流气体入侵，降低盘腔封严效率。相比轴向封严结构，叠覆封严结构由于高半径封严容腔的设置，改变了盘腔流场结构，有效地将主流气体阻隔在封严容腔内，保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在80%以上。新型封严结构的静盘深腔和缘板造型设置，不仅保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在85%以上，还能提高高半径处封严容腔的封严效率，在低流量比（0.2%）工况下，其封严容腔区域的封严效率提升了10%。
张庆才 , 刘松 , 王钦钦 , 谭晓茗 , 张靖周 , 郭文 . 带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严试验[J]. 航空学报, 2023 , 44(5) : 126719 -126719 . DOI: 10.7527/S10006893.2021.26719
In this study， the composite rim seal with the deep cavity in the static disc and the modified platform was investigated by measuring the CO2 concentration. An axial and an overlapping rim seal were used as the baseline to compare and analyze the effects of the mainstream Reynolds number （0.75×105-9.4×105）， the sealing flow rate （flow rate ratio 0.2%-2.5%）， and rotating Reynolds number （1.6×105-8.1×105） on the distribution of pressure and the sealing efficiency in the disc cavity. A corresponding numerical study was also carried out to obtain detailed flow characteristics. The results show that the main flow Reynolds number significantly affected the circumferential pressure distribution in the main flow channel. With the increase of the main flow Reynolds number， the pressure in the main flow channel also increased and the gas ingestion intensified. The higher coolant flow rate was beneficial to improvement of the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity by increasing the pressure in the disc cavity， but had less effect on the pressure at the trailing edge of the vane. An improvement in the rotating Reynolds number increased the static pressure in the main flow channel and decreased the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity. Compared with the axial rim seal， the flow structure of the overlapping rim seal cavity was changed by the setting of the high-radius sealing cavity， which effectively blocks the mainstream gas inside the sealing cavity and ensures that the sealing efficiency of the low-radius cavity is above 80%. The composite rim seal structure not only guarantees the sealing efficiency of 85% at the low-radius disc cavity， but also improves the sealing efficiency at the high-radius sealing cavity. At a low sealing flow ratio （0.2%）， the sealing efficiency of the composite rim seal structure is 10% higher than the other two rim seal structures.
| 1 | BUNKER R S. Gas turbine heat transfer： Ten remaining hot gas path challenges［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2007， 129（2）： 193-201. |
| 2 | SCOBIE J A， SANGAN C M， MICHAEL OWEN J， et al. Review of ingress in gas turbines［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2016， 138（12）： 120801. |
| 3 | KOFF B L. Gas turbine technology evolution： A designers perspective［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2004， 20（4）： 577-595. |
| 4 | PHADKE U P， OWEN J M. An investigation of ingress for an “air-cooled” shrouded rotating disk system with radial-clearance seals［J］. Journal of Engineering for Power， 1983， 105（1）： 178-182. |
| 5 | SANGAN C M， POUNTNEY O J， ZHOU K Y， et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals—Part Ⅰ： Externally induced ingress［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2013， 135（2）： 021012. |
| 6 | SANGAN C M， POUNTNEY O J， ZHOU K Y， et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals—Part Ⅱ： Rotationally induced ingress［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2013， 135（2）： 021013. |
| 7 | OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals—Part I： Rotationally induced ingress［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2011， 133（3）： 031005. |
| 8 | OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals—Part II： Externally induced and combined ingress［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2011， 133（3）： 031006. |
| 9 | 吴康， 任静， 蒋洪德， 等. 整级透平中转静轮缘封严问题研究PartⅠ： 封严与入侵［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2014， 35（5）： 873-877. |
| WU K， REN J， JIANG H D， et al. Rotor-stator rim seal analysis in one stage gas turbine Part I： Ingestion and seal［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2014， 35（5）： 873-877 （in Chinese）. | |
| 10 | 陶加银， 高庆， 宋立明， 等. 基于附加示踪变量法的涡轮轮缘密封非定常封严特性研究［J］. 工程热物理学报， 2014， 35（11）： 2154-2158. |
| TAO J Y， GAO Q， SONG L M， et al. Numerical investigations on the unsteady mainstream ingestion characteristics of turbine rim seals with additional passive tracer method［J］. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics， 2014， 35（11）： 2154-2158 （in Chinese）. | |
| 11 | 陶加银， 高庆， 宋立明， 等. 涡轮轮缘密封非定常主流入侵特性的数值研究［J］. 西安交通大学学报， 2014， 48（1）： 53-59. |
| TAO J Y， GAO Q， SONG L M， et al. Numerical investigations on unsteady mainstream ingestion characteristics of turbine rim seals［J］. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University， 2014， 48（1）： 53-59 （in Chinese）. | |
| 12 | JIA X Y， ZHANG H， JIANG Y T. Performance of radial-axial clearance rim seal in realistic working conditions［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2018， 77： 373-387. |
| 13 | SANGAN C M， POUNTNEY O J， SCOBIE J A， et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals—Part Ⅲ： Single and double seals［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2013， 135（5）： 051011. |
| 14 | POPOVíC I， HODSON H P. Improving turbine stage efficiency and sealing effectiveness through modifications of the rim seal geometry［J］. Journal of Turbomachinery， 2013， 135（6）： 061016. |
| 15 | SOGHE R DA， BIANCHINI C， MICIO M， et al. Effect of rim seal configuration on gas turbine cavity sealing in both design and off-design conditions： GT2018-75712 ［R］. New York： ASME， 2018. |
| 16 | SCOBIE J A， TEUBER R， LI Y S， et al. Design of an improved turbine rim-seal［J］. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2016， 138（2）： 022503. |
| 17 | SCHULER P， KURZ W， DULLENKOPF K， et al. The influence of different rim seal geometries on hot-gas ingestion and total pressure loss in a low-pressure turbine： GT2010-22205 ［R］. New York： ASME， 2010. |
| 18 | SCHULER P， DULLENKOPF K， BAUER H J. Investigation of the influence of different rim seal geometries in a low-pressure turbine： GT2011-45682［R］. New York： ASME， 2011. |
| 19 | ERICKSON R D， SIMON T W， ZHANG L Z， et al. Experimental investigation of disc cavity leakage flow and hub endwall contouring in a linear rotor cascade GT2011-46700［R］. New York： ASME， 2011. |
| 20 | ZHANG Z Q， ZHANG Y J， DONG X， et al. Flow mechanism between purge flow and mainstream in different turbine rim seal configurations［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2020， 33（8）： 2162-2175. |
| 21 | 罗翔， 康文武， 全永凯， 等. 多齿轮缘封严特性的实验［J］. 航空动力学报， 2017， 32（1）： 8-13. |
| LUO X， KANG W W， QUAN Y K， et al. Experiment on multi-tooth rim sealing［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2017， 32（1）： 8-13 （in Chinese）. | |
| 22 | 吴衡， 刘高文， 冯青， 等. 盖板式预旋系统的压比和熵增特性［J］. 推进技术， 2019， 40（10）： 2252-2261. |
| WU H， LIU G W， FENG Q， et al. Pressure ratio and entropy increment in a cover-plate pre-swirl system［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2019， 40（10）： 2252-2261 （in Chinese）. | |
| 23 | 王鸣， 邬泽宇， 罗翔， 等. 凸起数对各封严结构封严效率影响的实验［J］. 航空动力学报， 2018， 33（5）： 1165-1172. |
| WANG M， WU Z Y， LUO X， et al. Experiment on the effect of protrusion amount on sealing efficiency of different rim seals［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2018， 33（5）： 1165-1172 （in Chinese）. | |
| 24 | 邬泽宇， 罗翔， 胡彦文， 等. 凸起迎风面积对不同轮缘封严结构封严效率影响的实验研究［J］. 推进技术， 2019， 40（5）： 1065-1072. |
| WU Z Y， LUO X， HU Y W， et al. Experimental study on effects of section area of protrusion on sealing efficiency of different rim seal［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2019， 40（5）： 1065-1072 （in Chinese）. | |
| 25 | 吴康. 燃气轮机高温透平转静轮缘封严与入侵的流动传热机理［D］. 北京： 清华大学， 2014： 65-66. |
| WU K. Research on the mechanism of sealing and ingestion in gas turbine rotor-stator rim［D］. Beijing： Tsinghua University， 2014： 65-66 （in Chinese）. | |
| 26 | 黄镜玮， 付维亮， 马国骏， 等. 受轮缘密封结构影响的1.5级涡轮封严流与主流的相互作用以及轮缘密封间流动干扰［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（7）： 124549. |
| HUANG J W， FU W L， MA G J， et al. Interaction between 1.5-stage turbine rim seal purge flow and mainstream and flow interference between rim seals affected by rim seal structure［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（7）： 124549 （in Chinese）. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA