流体力学与飞行力学

减阻杆与环形喷流组合构型钝头降热数值模拟

  • 曾品棚 ,
  • 陈树生 ,
  • 李金平 ,
  • 贾苜梁 ,
  • 高正红
展开
  • 1.西北工业大学 航空学院,西安 710072
    2.空军工程大学 航空工程学院,西安 710038
.E-mail: sshengchen@nwpu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2022-12-19

  修回日期: 2023-01-27

  录用日期: 2023-02-21

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-03

基金资助

中国科协青年人才托举工程(2022QNRC001)

Numerical simulation of heat reduction on blunt-headed bodies by combined scheme of drag reduction spike and annular jets

  • Pinpeng ZENG ,
  • Shusheng CHEN ,
  • Jinping LI ,
  • Muliang JIA ,
  • Zhenghong GAO
Expand
  • 1.School of Aeronautics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072,China
    2.College of Aeronautical Engineering,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710038,China

Received date: 2022-12-19

  Revised date: 2023-01-27

  Accepted date: 2023-02-21

  Online published: 2023-03-03

Supported by

Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST(2022QNRC001)

摘要

针对单一减阻杆构型在有迎角来流条件下降热效果急剧下降的问题,提出了减阻杆和环形喷流组合构型的降热方案,对减阻杆和环形喷流组合构型进行不同来流和喷流条件下的数值模拟,得到了模型流场和壁面热流分布。研究结果表明:在组合构型的流场中,喷流受减阻杆后低压区的影响,未直接与自由来流作用,喷流压比从0.05至0.40,组合构型流场未出现长穿透模态和短传透模态转变,流场结构更为稳定;喷流包覆了减阻杆和钝头体壁面,再附激波和分离激波被推离壁面。0°迎角来流条件下,小喷流压比也有好的降热效果,喷流压比为0.05可以使减阻杆构型钝头体的壁面热流峰值降低到原来的一半以下;单一减阻杆构型在有迎角来流条件下,分离激波和再附激波直接作用在钝头体壁面上,钝头体壁面热流急剧上升。组合构型在有迎角来流条件下有明显的降热效果;随着迎角的增加,喷口处的背压升高,喷流对流场的干扰效应减弱,达到相同的降热效果需要更大的喷流压比;相同的喷流压比下,在再附着点前喷流,喷流膨胀更完全,降热效果更好;减阻杆和环形喷流组合构型相对于单一减阻杆构型,在小喷流压比下减阻效果增强。

本文引用格式

曾品棚 , 陈树生 , 李金平 , 贾苜梁 , 高正红 . 减阻杆与环形喷流组合构型钝头降热数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2023 , 44(22) : 128407 -128407 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28407

Abstract

Drag reduction spikes can reduce the heat flow of the supersonic aircraft head at 0-degree angle of attack. However, the heat reduction effect sharply drops with the increasing angle of attack. To solve this problem, we propose the heat reduction scheme of the combination of annular jet and drag-reduction spike. Numerical simulations of this scheme under different inflow and jet conditions are carried out to obtain the flow filed and the wall heat flow distribution. The conclusions are as follows: in the flow field of the combined scheme, affected by the low-pressure area behind the drag-reduction spike, the jet does not directly interact with the free stream, and there is no transition between the long and short penetration modes, with the jet pressure ratios ranging from 0.05 to 0.40. Thus, the flow field structure of the reverse jet is more stable. Furthermore, the drag-reduction spike and the blunt body are coated by the reverse jet. The attached shock wave and separated shock wave are pushed away from the wall. The numerical results show that under the condition of 0° angle of attack, a small jet pressure ratio also has a good heat reduction effect. When the jet pressure ratio is 0.05, the peak heat flow on the blunt body wall can be reduced to smaller than half of the original value. The attached shock wave and separated shock wave generated by a single drag reduction spike at an angle of attack act directly on the blunt head wall, resulting in a sharp rise in the heat flow through the wall. The combined scheme has clear heat reduction effect with an angle of attack. With the increase of the angle of attack, the back pressure at the nozzle increases, while the interference effect of the jet on the flow field decreases. To achieve the same heat reduction effect, a larger jet pressure ratio is required. At the same jet pressure ratio, the jet flow before the reattachment point can make the jet flow expand more completely and reduce heat more effectively. At small jet pressure ratios, the drag reduction effect of the combined configuration of the drag reducing rod and the annular jet is enhanced compared to the single drag reducing rod.

参考文献

1 ALBERTI A, MUNAFò A, PANTANO C, et al. Self-consistent computational fluid dynamics of supersonic drag reduction via upstream-focused laser-energy deposition[J]. AIAA Journal202059(10): 1-11.
2 JOHNSON R. Instability in hypersonic flow about blunt bodies[J]. The Physics of Fluids19592(5): 526-532.
3 HUANG W, QUAN L, YAN L, et al. Drag and heat flux reduction mechanism of blunted cone with aerodisks[J]. Acta Astronautica2017138: 168-175.
4 YAMAUCHI M, FUJII K, HIGASHINO F. Numerical investigation of supersonic flows around a spiked blunt body[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets199532(1): 32-42.
5 MOTOYAMA N, MIHARA K, MIYAJIMA R, et al. Thermal protection and drag reduction with use of spike in hypersonic flow[C]∥ 10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2001.
6 SCHNEPF C, WYSOCKI O, SCHüLEIN E. Wave drag reduction due to a self aligning aerodisk[J]. Progress in Flight Physics20157: 475-488.
7 HAYASHI K, ASO S, TANI Y. Numerical study of thermal protection system by opposing jet[C]∥ 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2005.
8 HUANG J, YAO W X, JIANG Z P. Penetration mode effect on thermal protection system by opposing jet[J]. Acta Astronautica2019160(1): 206-215.
9 周超英, 纪文英, 张兴伟, 等. 球头体逆向喷流减阻的数值模拟研究[J]. 工程力学201330(1): 441-447.
  ZHOU C Y, JI W Y, ZHANG X W, et al. Numerical investigation on counter-flow jet drag reduction of a spherical body[J]. Engineering Mechanics201330(1): 441-447 (in Chinese).
10 张道毅, 周超英. 环形及其组合体喷流的减阻防热机理[J]. 航空学报202243(12): 168-181.
  ZHANG D Y, ZHOU C Y. Drag reduction and heat protection mechanism of annular jet and combined jet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(12): 168-181 (in Chinese).
11 张旭东, 李铮, 董昊, 等. 高超声速流场等离子体逆向喷流减阻特性[J]. 航空学报202243(): 118-126.
  ZHANG X D, LI Z, DONG H, et al. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(S2): 118-126 (in Chinese).
12 马正雪, 罗振兵, 赵爱红, 等. 高超声速流场等离子体合成射流逆向喷流特性[J]. 航空学报202243(): 195-206.
  MA Z X, LUO Z B, ZHAO A H, et al. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(S2): 195-206 (in Chinese).
13 吴忧, 徐旭, 陈兵, 等. 高马赫数下横/逆向喷流干扰流场数值研究[J]. 航空学报202142(): 28-41.
  WU Y, XU X, CHEN B, et al. Numerical study on transverse/opposing jet interaction flowfield under high Mach number[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202142(S1): 28-41 (in Chinese).
14 ZHU L, CHEN X, LI Y K, et al. Investigation of drag and heat reduction induced by a novel combinational lateral jet and spike concept in supersonic flows based on conjugate heat transfer approach[J]. Acta Astronautica2018142: 300-313.
15 ZHU L, LI Y K, CHEN X, et al. Hypersonic flow characteristics and relevant structure thermal response induced by the novel combined spike-aerodome and lateral jet strategy[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201995(1): 105459.
16 刘衍旭, 陈树生, 冯聪, 等. 高超声速滑翔飞行器锐边化气动隐身一体化设计[J]. 航空学报202344(20): 128093.
  LIU Y X, CHEN S S, FENG C, et al. Sharp edge integrated aerodynamic-stealth design for hypersonic glide vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(20): 128093 (in Chinese).
17 CHEN S S, LI J P, LI Z . et al. Anti-dissipation pressure correction under low Mach numbers for Godunov-type schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics2022456: 111027.
18 SPALART P R. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow200021(3): 252-263.
19 王圣业, 王光学, 董义道, 等. 基于雷诺应力模型的高精度分离涡模拟方法[J]. 物理学报201766(18): 113-129.
  WANG S Y, WANG G X, DONG Y D, et al. High-order detached-eddy simulation method based on a Reynolds-stress background model[J]. Acta Physica Sinica201766(18): 113-129 (in Chinese).
20 ZHU L, LI Y K, CHEN X, et al. Novel cominational aerodisk and lateral jet concept for drag and heat reduction in hypersonic flows[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering201932(1): 1-14.
21 曾品棚, 陈树生, 冯聪, 等. 侧向喷流对导弹方向舵局部气动热特性的影响[J]. 空气动力学学报202341(9): 70-81.
  ZENG P P, CHEN S S, FENG C, et al. Effect of lateral jet on local aerodynamic heating characteristics of missile rudders[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica202341(9): 70-81 (in Chinese).
22 PACIORRI R, DIEUDONN W, DEGREZ G, et al. Validation of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for application in hypersonic flows[C]∥ 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1997.
文章导航

/