固体火箭超燃冲压发动机理论性能分析
收稿日期: 2022-01-19
修回日期: 2022-02-10
录用日期: 2022-02-24
网络出版日期: 2022-03-22
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(52006240);湖南省自然科学基金(2020JJ4665)
Theoretical analysis of performance of solid rocket scramjet
Received date: 2022-01-19
Revised date: 2022-02-10
Accepted date: 2022-02-24
Online published: 2022-03-22
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52006240);Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province(2020JJ4665)
基于布雷顿循环,考虑燃烧产物的离解,针对固体火箭超燃冲压发动机工作过程进行了建模研究,开展了发动机理论性能分析,研究了飞行参数、燃料种类对发动机性能的影响,探究了超燃冲压发动机的工作极限。结果表明:固体火箭超燃冲压发动机的性能随着飞行马赫数的增大和飞行高度的升高而下降;当工作当量比增大时,质量比冲和体积比冲均下降,但比推力逐步上升;当工作空燃比增大时,比推力下降,但质量比冲和体积比冲均逐步升高。燃料种类对发动机性能有显著影响,在空燃比5~27的范围内,固体推进剂的体积比冲存在明显优势,但比推力和质量比冲不及氢气和煤油。相比于氢气和煤油,采用硼基固体推进剂作为燃料的超燃冲压发动机可以在更宽的飞行马赫数范围内工作,预示着固体火箭超燃冲压发动机宽包络飞行的潜力。
关键词: 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机; 高马赫数; 离解; 发动机性能; 固体推进剂
赵翔 , 夏智勋 , 方传波 , 马立坤 , 李潮隆 , 段一凡 . 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机理论性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023 , 44(5) : 126971 -126971 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26971
Considering the dissociation of combustion products, this paper conducts research on modeling of the working process of the solid rocket scramjet using the Brayton cycle method. Then, the theoretical performance of the engine is analyzed, and the effects of flight parameters and fuel types on engine performance are studied. The flight envelope of scramjet engine is also discussed. The main conclusions are as follows. The performance of solid rocket scramjet decreases with the increase of flight Mach number and flight altitude. When the working equivalent ratio increases, the gravimetric impulse and volumetric impulse decrease, but the specific thrust increases gradually. When the working air-fuel ratio increases, the specific thrust decreases, but the gravimetric impulse and volumetric impulse increase gradually. In the range of air-fuel ratio from 5 to 27, the volumetric impulse of the engine fueled with solid propellant has obvious advantages, but the specific thrust and gravimetric impulse are inferior to the engine fueled with hydrogen and kerosene. Compared with that fueled with hydrogen and kerosene, the boron-based solid propellant scramjet can work in a wider range of Mach numbers, which indicates that the solid rocket scramjet has a potential of wide flight envelope.
1 | ZHAO X, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Research progress on solid-fueled scramjet[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(1): 398-415. |
2 | 李潮隆, 夏智勋, 马立坤, 等. 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机性能试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 126075. |
LI C L, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Experiment on performance of solid rocket scramjet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 126075 (in Chinese). | |
3 | 赵翔, 夏智勋, 马立坤, 等. 固体火箭超燃冲压发动机地面直连试验[J]. 航空兵器, 2018, 25(4): 57-61. |
ZHAO X, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Direct-connected ground test of solid-fuel rocket scramjet[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2018, 25(4): 57-61 (in Chinese). | |
4 | LI C L, ZHAO X, XIA Z X, et al. Influence of the vortex generator on the performance of solid rocket scramjet combustor[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 164: 174-183. |
5 | YANG P N, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Experimental study on the influence of the injection structure on solid scramjet performance[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 188: 229-238. |
6 | LV Z, XIA Z X, LIU B, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of a solid-fuel rocket scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 32(2): 273-278. |
7 | LI C L, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Performance evaluation for scramjet based on ground direct-connected test: A method investigation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 117: 106895. |
8 | LIU J, WANG N f, WANG J, et al. Optimizing combustion performance in a solid rocket scramjet engine[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 99: 105560. |
9 | LI C L, XIA Z X, MA L K, et al. Numerical study on the solid fuel rocket scramjet combustor with cavity[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(7): 1235. |
10 | HEISER W, PRATT D, DALEY D, et al. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion[M]. Reston: AIAA, 1994. |
11 | 王超. 超燃冲压发动机总体方案设计与优化研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2011. |
WANG C. Design and optimization research on scramjet system scheme[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2011 (in Chinese). | |
12 | ROUX J A. Optimum freestream Mach number for maximum thrust flux for ideal ramjet/scramjet[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2012, 26(2): 390-392. |
13 | ROUX J A. Parametric ideal scramjet cycle analysis[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2011, 25(4): 581-585. |
14 | ROUX J A, SHAKYA N, CHOI J. Revised parametric ideal scramjet cycle analysis[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 2013, 27(1): 178-183. |
15 | YANG Q C, CHANG J T, BAO W. Thermodynamic analysis on specific thrust of the hydrocarbon fueled scramjet[J]. Energy, 2014, 76: 552-558. |
16 | ZHANG D, YANG S B, ZHANG S L, et al. Thermodynamic analysis on optimum performance of scramjet engine at high Mach numbers[J]. Energy, 2015, 90: 1046-1054. |
17 | ROUDAKOV A S, SEMENOV V L, HICKS J W. Recent flight test results of the joint CIAM-NASA Mach 6.5 scramjet flight program: AIAA-1998-1643[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1998. |
18 | SMART M K, HASS N E, PAULL A. Flight data analysis of the HyShot 2 scramjet flight experiment[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(10): 2366-2375. |
19 | RONDEAU C M, JORRIS T R. X-51A scramjet demonstrator program: Waverider ground and flight test[R]. 2013. |
20 | PECNIK R, TERRAPON V E, HAM F, et al. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of the HyShot II scramjet[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(8): 1717-1732. |
21 | CHAPUIS M, FEDINA E, FUREBY C, et al. A computational study of the HyShot II combustor performance[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 2101-2109. |
22 | FRY R S. A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(1): 27-58. |
23 | 曾明, 刘伟, 邹建军. 空气动力学基础[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016. |
ZENG M, LIU W, ZOU J J. Aerodynamics fundamentals[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016 (in Chinese). | |
24 | WALTRUP P J, BILLIG F S. Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts[J]. AIAA Journal, 1973, 11(10): 1404-1408. |
25 | SCHLICHTING H. Boundary-layer theory[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1979. |
26 | ZHAO X, XIA Z X, LIU B, et al. Numerical study on solid-fuel scramjet combustor with fuel-rich hot gas[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77: 25-33. |
27 | OU M, YAN L, TANG J f, et al. Thermodynamic performance analysis of ramjet engine at wide working conditions[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 132: 1-12. |
28 | SULAIMAN A N B. Thermodynamic analysis of gas turbine[D]. Tronoh: University Teknologi Petronas, 2012. |
29 | LARSSON J, LAURENCE S, BERMEJO-MORENO I, et al. Incipient thermal choking and stable shock-train formation in the heat-release region of a scramjet combustor. Part II: Large eddy simulations[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(4): 907-920. |
30 | LAURENCE S J, LIEBER D, SCHRAMM J M, et al. Incipient thermal choking and stable shock-train formation in the heat-release region of a scramjet combustor. Part I: Shock-tunnel experiments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(4): 921-931. |
31 | BOLENDER M A, DOMAN D B. Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2007, 44(2): 374-387. |
32 | Cantera. Cantera is an open-source suite of tools for problems involving chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes[EB/OL].[2022-02-24]. . |
33 | SCHRAMM J M, KARL S, HANNEMANN K, et al. Ground testing of the HyShot II scramjet configuration in HEG: AIAA-2008-2547[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008. |
34 | NORDIN-BATES K, FUREBY C, KARL S, et al. Understanding scramjet combustion using LES of the HyShot II combustor[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 2893-2900. |
35 | MCCLENDON S E, MILLER W H, HERTY C H. Fuel selection criteria for ducted rocket application: AIAA-1980-1120[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1980. |
36 | KUBOTA N, MIYATA K, KUWAHARA T, et al. Energetic solid fuels for ducted rockets (III)[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 1992, 17(6): 303-306. |
37 | 陈斌斌. 含硼固冲补燃室燃烧过程与燃烧组织技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018. |
CHEN B B. Research on the combustion process and combustion technology of boron-based solid ducted rockets[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018 (in Chinese). |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |