本文主要采用CO2气体体积分数测量法研究一种带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严结构。同时选取轴向封严结构和叠覆封严结构作为比较基准，重点关注主流雷诺数（0.75×105≤Rew≤9.4×105）、封严流量（流量比FR=0.2%~2.5%）、旋转雷诺数（1.6×105≤Reφ≤8.1×105）等典型工况参数对盘腔内压力分布和封严效率的影响情况；并在此基础上开展了相应的数值研究，获得了封严腔室内详细的流场信息。结果表明：在试验设计工况范围内，主流雷诺数的改变对静叶尾缘和动叶前缘的周向压力分布影响显著。主流雷诺数增加，主流通道内压力升高，主流气体入侵加剧；增加封严流量有利于提高盘腔内压力，从而提升盘腔封严效率，但这对静叶尾缘压力影响较小；增加旋转雷诺数会增大静叶尾缘和动叶叶间通道前缘的静压，加重主流气体入侵，降低盘腔封严效率。相比轴向封严结构，叠覆封严结构由于高半径封严容腔的设置，改变了盘腔流场结构，有效地将主流气体阻隔在封严容腔内，保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在80%以上。新型封严结构的静盘深腔和缘板造型设置，不仅保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在85%以上，还能提高高半径处封严容腔处的封严效率，在低流量比（FR=0.2%）工况下，其封严容腔区域的封严效率提升了10%。
In this study, the composite rim seal with the deep cavity in the static disc and the modified platform（the following abbreviation “C rim seal”）was investigated by measuring the CO2 concentration. Simultaneous-ly, an axial and an overlapping rim seal has been selected as a baseline to compare and analyze the effects of the mainstream Reynolds number (0.75×105≤Rew≤9.4×105), the sealing flow rate (flow rate ratio FR= 0.2%~2.5%), and rotating Reynolds number (1.6×105≤Reφ≤8.1×105) on the distribution of pressure and the sealing efficiency in the disc cavity. Furthermore, a corresponding numerical study was carried out to ob-tain the detailed flow characteristics. The results show that the main flow Reynolds number significantly affects the circumferential pressure distribution in the main flow channel. With the main flow Reynolds number increasing，the pressure in the main flow channel also increased and the gas ingestion intensified. The higher coolant flow rate is beneficial to improve the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity by increasing the pressure in the disc cavity, but it has less effect on the pressure at the trailing edge of the vane. An im-provement in the rotating Reynolds number increases the static pressure in the main flow channel and de-creases the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity. The flow structure of the disc cavity is changed by the set-ting of the high-radius sealing cavity, which effectively blocks the mainstream gas inside the sealing cavity and ensures that the sealing efficiency of the low-radius cavity is above 80%. The C rim seal structure not only guarantees the sealing efficiency of 85% at the low-radius disc cavity, but also improves the sealing efficiency at the high-radius sealing cavity. At a low sealing flow ratio (FR=0.2%), the sealing efficiency of the C rim seal structure is 10% higher than the other two rim seal structures.
[1] BUNKER J A. Gas turbine heat transfer: ten remaining hot gas path challenges[J]. ASME Journal of Tur-bomachinery, 2007, 129(2): 193-201.
[2] SCOBIE L, SANGAN C M, OWEN J M, et al. Review of ingress in gas turbines[J]. ASME Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138: 120801.
[3] KOFF B L. Gas turbine technology evolution: a design-er’s perspective[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(4): 577-595.
[4] PHADKE U P, OWEN J M. An investigation of ingress for an air-cooled shrouded rotating-disk system with radial-clearance seals[J]. ASME Journal of Engineer-ing for Power Transactions, 1983, 105: 178-183.
[5] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, ZHOU K, et al. Ex-perimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part I: externally-induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(2): 021012.
[6] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, ZHOU K, et al. Ex-perimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part II: rotationally-induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(2): 021013.
[7] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part I: rotationally induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3): 031005.
[8] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part II: externally induced and combined in-gress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3): 031006.
[9] 吴康, 任静, 蒋洪德,等. 整级透平中转静轮缘封严问题研究: PartⅠ封严与入侵[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(5):873-877.
WU K, REN J, JIANG H D, et al. Rotor-stator rim seal analysis in one stage gas turbine: PartⅠingestion and seal[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(5):873-877(in Chinese).
[10] 陶加银, 高庆, 宋立明, 等. 基于附加示踪变量法的涡轮轮缘密封非定常封严特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014(11): 2154-2158.
TAO J Y, GAO Q, SONG L M, et al. Numerical inves-tigations on the unsteady mainstream ingestion char-acteristics of turbine rim seals with additional passive tracer method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermo-physics, 2014(11): 2154-2158(in Chinese).
[11] 陶加银，高庆，宋立明，等. 涡轮轮缘密封非定常主流入侵特性的数值研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014, 48(1): 53-59.
TAO J Y, GAO Q, SONG L M, et al. Numerical inves-tigations on unsteady mainstream ingestion charac-teristics of turbine rim seals[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiao-tong University, 2014, 48(1): 53-59(in Chinese).
[12] JIA X Y, ZHANG H, JIANG Y T, et al. Performance of radial-axial clearance rim seal in realistic working conditions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77: 373-387.
[13] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, SCOBIE J A, et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through tur-bine rim seals-part III: single and double seals[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(5): 051011.
[14] POPOVIC I, HODSON H P. Improving turbine stage efficiency and sealing effectiveness through modifica-tions of the rim seal geometry[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135: 061016.
[15] DA SOGHE R, BIANCHINI C, MICIO M, et al. Effect of rim seal configuration on gas turbine cavity sealing in both design and off-design conditions[C]. Oslo: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachin-ery Technical Conference and Exposition, 2018.
[16] SCOBIE J A, TEUBER R, LI Y S, et al. Design of an improved turbine rim seal[J]. ASME Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(2): 022503.
[17] SCHULER P, KURZ W, DULLENKOPF K, et al. The influence of different rim seal geometries on hot-gas ingestion and total pressure loss in a low-pressure tur-bine[R]. ASME Paper GT2010-22205, 2010.
[18] SCHULER P, DULLENKOPF K, BAUER H J. Investi-gation of the influence of different rim seal geometries in a low-pressure purbine[R]. ASME Paper GT2011-45682, 2011.
[19] ERICKSON R D, SIMON T W, ZHANG L, et al. Ex-perimental investigation of disc cavity leakage flow and hub endwall contouring in a linear rotor cas-cade[C]. ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Con-ference and Exposition, 2011.
[20] ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG Y J, DONG X, et al. Flow mechanism between purge flow and mainstream in different turbine rim seal configurations[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(08): 2162-2175.
[21] 罗翔, 康文武, 全永凯, 等. 多齿轮缘封严特性的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(001): 8-13.
LUO X, KANG W W, QUAN Y K, et al. Experiment on multi-tooth rim sealing[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(001): 8-13(in Chinese).
[22] 王鸣, 邬泽宇, 罗翔, 等. 凸起数对各封严结构封严效率影响的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(05): 1165-1172.
WANG M, WU Z Y, LUO X, et al. Experiment on the effect of protrusion amount on sealing efficiency of different rim seals[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(05): 1165-1172(in Chinese).
[23] 邬泽宇, 罗翔, 胡彦文, 等. 凸起迎风面积对不同轮缘封严结构封严效率影响的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(05): 1065-1072.
WU Z Y, LUO X, HU Y W, et al. Experimental study on effects of section area of protrusion on sealing ef-ficiency of different rim seal[J]. Journal of propulsion technology, 2019, 40(05): 1065-1072(in Chinese).
CJA