制空权是当代战争一切空中行动的前提条件,而承担空中优势重任的战斗机的研发工作长期以来为各军事大国所重视。数十年来,美军在空战理论、战斗机研发和空战实践等方面具有领先优势,已率先完成由能量机动制胜向信息机动制胜的空战能力转变。随着自主、人工智能、无人、通信、计算等技术的快速进步,美军正在塑造以下一代战斗机为核心,以复杂空战系统为基本空战单元的新空战形态,认知机动制胜将是未来空中对抗的制胜机理。本文将系统梳理空战制胜机理的演变历程,结合当前技术发展与布局,研判未来战斗机发展趋势。
Air superiority is the prerequisite of all air operations in modern wars, and the research and development of fighters have long been attached great importance to by all military powers. The U.S. has been leading in air combat theory, fighter research and development, and air combat practice for decades, and has already completed the air combat capability transition from energy maneuverability to information maneuverability. As the technologies of autonomy, artificial intelligence, UAV, communication, and computing are rapidly progressing, the U.S. is now shaping the new air combat form by speeding up the development of the complex air combat system, in which the next generation fighter is the core node. Cognitive maneuverability will then be the winning mechanism in the future air combat. In this paper, a systemic review of evolution of the winning mechanism in air combat is conducted, and the development trend of future fighter is given based on an analysis of the current technological layout.
[1] TIRPAK J A. Roper reveals NGAD has flown, but doesn't share details[EB/OL].(2020-09-15)[2021-04-18]. https://airforcemag.com/roper-reveals-ngad-has-flown-but-doesn-share-details/.
[2] SHELBOURNE M. Navy quietly starts development of next-generation carrier fighter; plans call for manned, long-range aircraft.[EB/OL]. (2020-08-19)[2021-04-18]. https://news.usni/2020/08/18/navy-quietly-starts-development-of-next-generation-carrier-fighter-plans-call-for-manned-long-range-Aircraft.
[3] MATTIS J. Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of the United States of America:sharpening the American Military's competitive edge[R]. 2018.
[4] GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, JACOB C. An air force for an era of great power competition[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2019.
[5] CLARK B, LEMON A, HAYNES P. Regainning the high ground at sea:transforming the U.S. Navy's carrier air wing for great power competition[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2018.
[6] 杨伟. 关于未来战斗机发展的若干讨论[J]. 航空学报,2020,41(6):524377. YANG W. Development of future fighters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(6):524377(in Chinese).
[7] GRYNKEWICH A. The Future of air superiority, Part Ⅰ:The imperative[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18]. https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-i-the-imperative/.
[8] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅱ:The 2030 problem[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-ii-the-2030-problem/.
[9] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅲ:Defeating A2/AD[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-iii-defeating-a2ad/.
[10] GRYNKEWICH A. The future of air superiority, Part Ⅳ:Autonomy,survivability, and getting to 2030[EB/OL]. (2017-05-23)[2021-04-18].https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/the-future-of-air-superiority-part-iv-the-autonomy-survivability-and-getting-to-2030/.
[11] STILLION J. Trends in air-to-air combat implications for future air superiority[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2015.
[12] BENNETT L. Gunning for the red baron[M]. Texas:Texas A&M University Press, 2006:22-46.
[13] 纪德东. 航炮作战效能对比研究[J]. 飞机设计,2019, 39(3):69-74 JI D D. Comparative Study on combat effectiveness of air cannon[J]. Aircraft Design, 2019, 39(3):69-74(in Chinese).
[14] 肖邦振. 张积慧:击落戴维斯[J]. 环球飞行, 2008(10):70-77. XIAO B Z,ZHANG Jihui:Shot down Davis[J]. World Flight, 2008(10):70-77(in Chinese).
[15] MARSHALL L, MICHEL III. CLASHES:Air combat over North Vietnam[M]. Annapolis:Naval Institute Press,1997:150.
[16] DAVIES P. USAF F-4 Phantom II MiG Killers 1965-68.[M]. Oxford:Osprey Publishing, 2004:19.
[17] CRAIG C H. Striving for air superiority:The tactical air command in Vietnam[M]. Texas:Texas A & M University Press, 2002:95.
[18] MOMYER W W. Airpower in three wars[M]. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978:156.
[19] FINO S A. All missiles work:Technological dislocations and military innovation[D]. Alabama:Air University Press,2015:76.
[20] HOLLWAY D. Fox two![EB/OL]. (2013-03)[2020-04-16].http://www.donhollway.com/foxtwo/.
[21] KAPLAN F. General credits air force with Iraqi army's defeat[N]. Boston Globe,1991-03-16.
[22] SCHMITT E. Stealth technology:Elusive in more ways than one[N]. New York Times, 1991-10-13.
[23] 高劲松,陈哨东. 国外隐身战斗机超视距空战问题[J]. 电光与控制, 2011, 18(8):17-20. GAO J S, CHEN S D. Beyond-visual-range air combat of foreign stealth fighters[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2011, 18(8):17-20(in Chinese).
[24] TAMRAT B F. The X-31:A post-stall technology (PST) fighter close-in-combat results assessment, and a look at new CIC performance evaluation metrics:AIAA-2004-5173[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[25] 张曙光, 高浩.X-31A飞机的设计特点和试飞情况[J]. 飞行力学, 1996, 14(3):9-13. ZHANG S G, GAO H. On Design characteristics and flight test achievements of the X-31A aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1996, 14(3):9-13(in Chinese).
[26] KISH B A, MITTLESTEADT D R, WUNDERLICH G, et al. Practical limits of supermaneuverability and full envelope agility:AIAA-1996-3493-CP[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1996.
[27] FRANCIS M S. The role of unmanned air vehicles in advancing system-of-systems (SoS) technologies and capabilities:AIAA-2003-2739[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2003.
[28] United States Air Force. Air superiority 2030(AS 2030) enterprise capability collaboration team (ECCT). Air Superiority 2030 Flight Plan[R]. 2016.
[29] U.S. Department of Defense. DARPA-BAA-14-40, Systems of systems integration technology and experimentation (SoSITE)[EB/OL]. (2014-04-30)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/1a9dd72e75d33f1122c924163b15210e/view.
[30] U.S. Department of Defense. Autonomy for loyal wingman[EB/OL]. (2015-06-15)[2021-04-18].https://beta.sam.gov/opp/fa87323841777b53ba42c2fcc51b/view.
[31] U.S. Department of Defense. LongShot[EB/OL]. (2021-02-12)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/59f9642f1b4f48d0af2d0096261a50fb/view.
[32] U.S. Department of Defense. Collaborative operations in denied environment (CODE)[EB/OL]. (2015-01-21)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/0db5a2ebace9cdac0c6c12d56dab686d/view.
[33] U.S. Department of Defense. DARPA-BAA-14-17, Distributed battle management program[EB/OL]. (2014-02-21)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/3639054acc4cb20f5e979c11106075807/view.
[34] U.S. Department of Defense. Defense experimentation using the commercial space internet[EB/OL]. (2018-09-13)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/0e77b27e97a534ad45dfa4679720b673/view.
[35] U.S. Department of Defense. Dynamic network adaptation for mission optimization (DyNAMO).[EB/OL]. (2015-10-14)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/f0f64964cb4c89f86f9c596948ce21fb/view.
[36] U.S. Department of Defense. Resilient networked distributed mosaic communications (RN DMC)[EB/OL]. (2020-06-05)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/4a71282a1e0b44c59c57544365371438/view.
[37] TINGLEY B. The Navy's secretive and revolutionary program to project false fleets from drone swarms[EB/OL]. (2019-11-07)[2021-04-18]. https://www.com/roper-reveals-ngad-has-flown-but-doesn-share-details/.
[38] U.S. Department of Defense. Air combat evolution (ACE)[EB/OL]. (2020-05-26)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/dabab43869ac46b2aa7ce66c22d0f748/view.
[39] HITCHENS T. DARPA's mosaic warfare-multi domain ops, but faster[EB/OL]. (2019-09-10)[2021-04-18]. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/09/darpas-mosaic-warfare-multi-domain-ops-but-faster/.
[40] U.S. Department of Defense. Broad agency announcement for advanced battle management systems (ABMS)[EB/OL]. (2021-01-07)[2021-04-18]. https://beta.sam.gov/opp/7e9 d89aa78a4431fac20e5178ce03480/view.
[41] DEPTULA D A, PENNEY H R, STUTZRIEM L A. Restoring America's military competitiveness:mosaic warfare[R]. Arlington:The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2019.
[42] GUNZINGER M, REHBERG C, AUTENRIED L. Five priorities for the air force's future combat air force[R]. Washington, D.C.:Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2020.
[43] GUNZINGER M, AUTENRIED L. Understanding the promise of Skyborg and low-cost attritable unmanned aerial vehicles[R]. Arlington:The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2020.
[44] HAMILTON T, OCHMANEK D. Operating low-cost, reusable unmanned aerial vehicles in contested environments:preliminary evaluation of operational concepts[R]. Santa Monica:RAND Corporation, 2020.
[45] Fisher D A. An emergent perspective on interoperation in systems of systems[R]. Pittsburgh:Software Engineering Institute, 2006.
[46] TRAN H T, DOMERCANT J C, MARVIS D N. A system-of-systems approach for assessing the resilience of reconfigurable command and control networks:AIAA-2015-0640[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[47] SINDIY O V. Model-based system-of-systems engineering for space-based command, control, communication, and information architecture design[D]. West Lafayette:Purdue University, 2010.
[48] MITCHELL W M. Complexity:The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos[M]. New York:Simon & Schuster Paperbacks,1992, 22-35.
[49] RAZ A K,KENLEY C R, DELAURENTIS D A. A system-of-systems perspective for information fusion system design and evaluation[J]. Information Fusion, 2016, 35:148-165.
[50] THURNER S, HANEL R and KLIMEK P. Introduction to the theory of complex systems[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2018.
[51] REINBURG J H. Air-to-air combat in world war II:A quantitative history[R]. Arlington:Institute for Defense Analyses, Economic and Political Studies Division, 1966.
[52] LOCKE J W. Air superiority at red flag:Mass, technology, and winning the next war[D]. Alabama:Air University Press, 2009:55-57.
[53] HEGINBOTHAM E, NIXON M, MORGAN F E, et al. The U.S.-China military scorecard:Forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power 1996-2017[R]. 2015.
[54] U.S. Government. Advantage at sea:Prevailing with integrated all-domain naval power[R]. 2020.
[55] U.S. Department of Defense. The department of defense announces its digital engineering strategy[EB/OL]. (2018-07-05)[2021-04-18]. https://www.dfense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/1567723/the-department-of-defense-announces-its-digital-engineering-strategy/.
[56] TIRPAK J A. Air force creates new PEO for NGAD, applying "Digital Century Series" idea[EB/OL]. (2019-10-14)[2021-04-16]. http://airforcemag.com/Features/Pages/2019/October%202019/Air-Force-Creates-New-PEO-for-NGAD-Applying-Digital-Century-Series-Idea.aspx.
[57] PIETRUCHA M. Finding the way (Again):Building the air force's new century series[EB/OL]. (2019-06-11)[2021-04-16]. http://www.warontherocks.com//2019/06/finding-the-way-again-building-the-air-forces-new-cen-tury-series/.
[58] TEGLER E. This is not a T-A RedHawk. It's now the eT-7A RedHawk. It's a digital thing, air force says[EB/OL]. (2020-09-15)[2021-04-16]. http://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2020/09/15/this-is-not-a-t-7a-redhawk-its-now-the-et-7a-redhawk-its-a-digital-thing-the-air-force-says/?sh=3b0b633f632c.
[59] U.S. Department of Defense. DoD Instruction 5000.02[EB/OL] (2020-01-23)[2021-04-18]. https://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/dodi-5000.