热电偶参数对Gleeble温度测温误差的影响及修正

  • 张悦 ,
  • 于德军 ,
  • 徐东生
展开
  • 1. 鞍山师范学院
    2. 中国科学院金属研究所

收稿日期: 2020-10-16

  修回日期: 2020-12-03

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目;辽宁省自然科学基金指导计划;科学院战略性先导专项;科学院信息化项目

Temperature measurement error caused by thermocouple parameter and its correction

  • ZHANG Yue ,
  • YU De-Jun ,
  • XU Dong-Sheng
Expand

Received date: 2020-10-16

  Revised date: 2020-12-03

  Online published: 2020-12-08

摘要

钛合金及钛铝金属间化合物是航空航天领域的重要材料,高温塑性变形是其部件成形的主要途径之一。为优化成形工艺,实现高精度的制造,近年来越来越多地采用有限元等工艺模拟,获得不同因素对成形过程的影响细节,以避免缺陷的产生并提升产品质量,同时提升加工效率,还可显著降低材料研发和制造过程中的资源和时间消耗。准确测定材料的力学本构关系对材料的制造工艺设计、优化甚至使役行为的预测至关重要。目前的本构关系测量常采用Gleeble热模拟实验机进行,其获得精确本构关系的前提是能够准确测定被测材料的温度。本研究采用有限元方法模拟了柱状钛合金样品的Gleeble热压缩实验过程,重点关注不同的热电偶设计参数,包括热电偶材料、热电偶丝直径等,对Gleeble样品温度测量准确性的影响规律。研究表明,热电偶的引入,由于其散热,会使样品和热电偶接触点的局域温度场发生畸变,导致温度测量结果与实际样品温度存在偏差,且某些条件下偏差较大,将严重影响钛合金等热导率较低材料性能的检测结果。通过多种因素改变的模拟、分析以及与相关热处理实验金相组织结果的对比表明,热电偶材质及线径、样品的热传导系数、样品的实验温度等,都将影响测量偏差。其中样品的热传导系数对测量精度的影响最大。由于这些原因导致的偏差都是系统误差,应想办法消除,特别是对于像钛合金这些热导率较低的材料,在Gleeble高温测试过程中的温度测量误差较大,必须修正。本文在有限元模拟及实验对比的基础上提出了相应的修正方法和修正公式。

本文引用格式

张悦 , 于德军 , 徐东生 . 热电偶参数对Gleeble温度测温误差的影响及修正[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 0 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24886

Abstract

Titanium alloys and Titanium based intermetallic compounds are important materials in aerospace field. High-temperature plastic deformation is one of the main approach for their component fabrication. In order to optimize the forming process, more and more finite element process simulations have been used in recent years to obtain the details of the influence of different factors on the forming process, so as to avoid the occurrence of defects and im-prove product quality, increase the processing efficiency, and reduce the resource and time consumption in the pro-cess of material development and manufacturing. The accurate determination of the mechanical constitutive relation of materials is very important for the design, optimization and even the prediction of the mechanical behavior of mate-rials. Current constitutive relation measurement is usually carried out by Gleeble thermal simulation experiment. The premise of obtaining accurate constitutive relation is to accurately measure the temperature of the material. In this study, finite element simulations were carried out to simulate the Gleeble thermal compression experiment of colum-nar titanium alloy sample, focusing on different thermocouple design parameters, including thermocouple material and thermocouple wire diameter, etc., and in order to obtain their influences on the accuracy of Gleeble sample tempera-ture measurement. The results show that, introduction of thermocouple, due to its heat dissipation, distorts the local temperature field of the contact point between sample and thermocouple, resulting in deviation of the measured tem-perature from the actual sample temperature, and the deviation is large under certain conditions, which will affect sig-nificantly the measurement results for materials with low thermal conductivity, such as titanium alloy. Through FEM simulation and analysis of the changes caused by various factors, and comparison with the metallographic morpholo-gy of titanium alloys samples from relevant heat treatment experiments, it is shown that the material and wire diameter of the thermocouple, the thermal conductivity coefficient of sample and the testing temperature of the sample will all affect the measurement results. The thermal conductivity of sample has the largest influence on the measurement accuracy. Deviations due to these reasons are systematic errors, therefore can be corrected by some means, espe-cially for the materials with low thermal conductivity such as titanium alloy, the temperature measurement error in Gleeble high-temperature test is relatively large, which should be corrected. Based on the finite element simulation and experimental comparison, the corresponding correction method and correction formula are proposed.

参考文献

[1] D. Banerjee, J.C. Williams, Perspectives on Titanium
Science and Technology[J], Acta Mater,
2013,61(3) :844-79.
[2] D.S. Xu, H. Wang, J.H. Zhang, C.G. Bai, R. Yang,
Titanium Alloys: From Properties Prediction to
Performance Optimization, in: W. Andreoni, S. Yip
(Eds.), Handbook of Materials Modeling: Applications:
Current and Emerging Materials, Springer International
Publishing, Cham, 2020: 113-51.
[3] 袁经纬, 李卓, 汤海波,等. 热处理对激光增材制造
TC4 合金耐蚀性及室温压缩蠕变性能的影响[J].航空
学报.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20200907.111
5.008.html
YUAN Jingwei , LI Zhuo, TANG Haibo, et al. Effect of
heat treatment on corrosion resistance and
roomtemperature compression creep of LAMed TC4
alloy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20200907.111
5.008.html (in Chinese).
[4] 陈联国, 王文盛, 朱知寿,等. 大规格损伤容限钛合金
TC4-DT 的研制及应用(战斗机专刊)[J]. 航空学报,
2019. 06:381-389
CHEN Lianguo, WANG Wensheng, ZHU Zhishou, et al.
Development and application of large-scale damage
tolerance titanium alloy TC4-DT[J]. Acta Aeronautica
et Astronautica Sinica, 2019. 06:381-89 (in Chinese).
[5] 朱帅, 杨合, 郭良刚,等. TA15 钛合金环件径轴向辗轧
成形全过程组织演变模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2014,
35(011):3145-55.
ZHU Shuai, YANG He, GUO Lianggang, et al.
Simulation of Microstructure Evolution During the
Whole Process of Radial-axial Rolling of TA15 Titanium
Alloy Ring[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,
2014. 35(011):3145-55 (in Chinese).
[6] 郭良刚, 陈建华, 杨合,等. TC4 钛合金锥形环热辗轧
应变及温度场对轧辊尺寸的响应规律[J]. 航空学报,
2013, 34(6):381-89.
航 空 学 报
XXXXXX-3
GUO Lianggang , CHEN Jianhua, YANG He, et al.
Response Rules of Strain and Temperature Fields to Roll
Sizes During Hot Rolling Process of TC4 Titanium
Alloy Conical Ring[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica
Sinica, 2013, 34(6):381-89 (in Chinese).
[7] 王克鲁, 鲁世强, 董显娟,等. Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr0.3Si 合金绝热剪切和局部流动行为[J]. 航空学报,
2009(10):1967-72.
WANG Kelu, LU Shiqiang, DONG Xianjuan, et al.
Behavior of Adiabatic Shear and Flow Localization of
Alloy Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si[J]. Acta Aeronautica
et Astronautica Sinica, 2009. 10:1967-72 (in Chinese).
[8] 王高潮, 曹春晓, 董洪波,等. TC11 合金最大 m 值超塑
变形机理[J]. 航空学报, 2009(02):357-61.
WANG Gaochao, CAO Chunxiao, DONG Hongbo, et al.
Super plastic Deformation Mechanism of Titanium
Alloy TC11 at Maximum m Value[J]. Acta Aeronautica
et Astronautica Sinica, 2009. 02:357-61(in Chinese).
[9] 朱建宁, 周玉铭, 王妍芃,等. 双热偶加热补偿式高温
气流温度测量方法[J]. 航空学报, 1993:303-30
ZHU Jianning, ZHOU Yuming, WANG Yanpeng, et al. A
compensative method of high gas temperature
measurement with double heating twin thermalcouple[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1993.
303-30 (in Chinese).
[10] Pan Z, Xu F, Mathaudhu SN, Kecskes LJ, Yin WH,
Zhang XY. Microstructural evolution and mechanical
properties of niobium processed by equal channel
angular extrusion up to 24 passes[J]. Acta Mater, 2012,
60:2310-23
[11] Warwick JLW, Jones NG, Rahman KM, Dye D.Lattice
strain evolution during tensile and compressive loading
of CP Ti[J]. Acta Mater, 2012, 60:6720-31
[12] Yapici GG, Tome CN, Beyerlein IJ, Karaman I, Vogel SC,
Liu C. Plastic flow anisotropy of pure zirconium after
severe plastic deformation at room temperature[J]. Acta
Mater, 2009, 57:4855-65
[13] Guo AM, Wang YH, Shen DD, Yuan ZX, Song SH.
Influence of phosphorus on the hot ductility of 2.25
Cr1Mo steel[J]. Mater Sci Tech-Lond, 2003, 19:1553-6
[14] Barnett MR, Keshavarz Z, Beer AG, Atwell D. Influence
of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought
Mg–3Al–1Zn[J].Acta Mate, 2004, 52:5093-103
[15] Chapuis A, Driver JH. Temperature dependency of slip
and twinning in plane strain compressed magnesium
single crystals[J]. Acta Mater, 2011, 59:1986-94
[16] Lu J, Ravichandran G, Johnson WL. Deformation
behavior of the Zr41. 2Ti13. 8Cu12. 5Ni10Be22. 5 bulk
metallic glass over a wide range of strain-rates and
temperatures[J]. Acta Mater, 2003, 51:3429-43
[17] Maass R, Van Petegem S, Ma DC, Zimmermann J,
Grolimund D, Roters F. Smaller is stronger: the effect of
strain hardening[J].Acta Mater, 2009, 57:5996-6005
[18] McClellan KJ, Heuer AH, Kubin LP. Localized yielding
during high temperature deformation of Y2O3
-fullystabilized cubic ZrO2 single crystals[J]. Acta Mater,
1996, 44:2651-62
[19] D.J. Yu, D.S.Xu, H. Wang, Z.B. Zhao, G.Z. Wei, R. Yang.
Refining constitutive relation by integration of finite
element simulations and Gleeble experiments[J]. J
Mater Sci Technol, 2019, 35(6): 1039-43
[20] 于德军,徐东生,杨锐.热电偶焊接对 Gleeble 温度测量
的影响及修正方法.中国科学-技术科学. 2020, 50:doi:
10.1360/SST-2019-0284.(YU Dejun, XU Dongsheng
andYANG Rui. Influence of thermocouple welding on
GLEEBLE temperature measurement error and a scheme
for its correction [J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2020,
50: doi: 10.1360/SST-2019-0284.
[21]Li HP, He L F, Zhang C Z, Cui H Z. Research on the
effect of boundary pressure on the boundary heat
transfer coefficients between hot stamping die and boron
steel[J]. Intern J Heat Mass Transfer, 2015, 91: 401–15
[22]Xu M, Ling R, Zhang Z H, Xie J X. Study on interfacial
heat transfer behavior of TA15 titanium alloy and die
materials[J]. Intern J Heat Mass Transfer, 2017, 108:
1573–8
[23]Bai Q, Lin J, Zhan L, Dean TA, Balint DS, Zhang Z. An
efficient closed-form method for determining interfacial
heat transfer coefficient in metal forming[J]. Intern J
Machine Tools Manufact, 2012, 56: 102–10
[24] Lu BS, Wang LG, Huang Y. Effect of deformation rate on
interfacial heat transfer coefficient in the superalloy
GH4169 hot forging process[J]. Applied Thermal
Engineering , 2016, 108: 516–24
文章导航

/