CCAR33.27超转适航要求，分析和试验确定的超转转速，必须基于温度和温度梯度的最不利组合。因此，研究温度和温度梯度对超转破裂的影响有非常重要的意义。以某型航空发动机低压6级涡轮转子为例，采用极限应变方法开展了转子部件的超转破裂分析，对比了常温和高温（红线转速对应的温度分布）下转子关键轮盘应变分布趋势和应变增长规律、预测的超转破裂的起始位置和破裂转速等轮盘超转特性；针对超转破裂分析，提出了在高温条件下，经过常温超转破裂试验验证的方法应用的有效性条件。低压涡轮转子的分析结果也显示，红线转速对应的温度状态下，轮盘超转破裂转速比常温下显著降低，而高温下材料屈服强度的大幅降低则是破裂转速下降的主要原因。
As required in CCAR33.27 airworthiness regulation, the determination of rotor burst rotating speeds using tests and analysis methods should consider the most adverse combination of temperature and temperature gradients. Therefore, to meet the requirements of CCAR 33.27, the impacts of temperature fields to rotor over-speed strength have to be evaluated accurately in aircraft engine design. As an example, this paper analyzes a low pressure turbine rotor with six stages of disks using the ultimate strain method. The results of temperature distribution related to the redline speed and room temperature conditions are compared in terms of deformation patterns and stain growth characters in the most critical disk, as well as predicted burst rotating speed and failure initiation location. Based on these comparisons, the validity criteria are proposed for rotor over-speed analysis methods applied to high temperature applications, which are validated by room temperature tests. The analyses show that at high temperature conditions related to the redline speed, the burst speed of the rotor is significantly lower than that under room temperature, and the lower burst speed at high temperature is mainly due to the substantially reduced yield strength of the materials.
[1] 中国民用航空局. 航空发动机适航规定:33R2[S].北京:中国民用航空局, 2011. Civil Aviation Administration of China. China civil aviation regulations:33R2[S]. Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011(in Chinese).
[2] Federal Aviation Administration. Aviation regulations:Part33 airworthiness of aircraft engine[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2012.
[3] European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines CS-E amendment 5[S]. Cologne:EASA,2018.
[4] 冯引利, 何云, 陈伟, 等.轮盘径向破裂转速计算方法分析及修正[J].航空动力学报, 2014, 29(11):2729-2734. FENG Y L, HE Y, CHEN W, et al. Analysis and correction of computational methods on disk radial burst speed[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(11):2729-2734(in Chinese).
[5] 王屏, 刘思永. 用大变形解析法和小变形解析法计算轮盘破裂转速的比较[J]. 机械强度, 1998, 20(2):95-98. WANG P,LIU S Y. A comparison of disk burst speeds calculated by analytical large deformation method and analytical mini-deformation method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 1998, 20(2):95-98(in Chinese).
[6] 古爱军, 张学仁, 王屏,等. 轴流式轮盘破裂转速的数值计算方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2001, 16(2):287-290. GU A J, ZHANG X R, WANG P, et al. Numerical method for calculating the burst speed of axial-flow-type discs[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2001, 16(2):287-290(in Chinese).
[7] KARIMBAEV K D, SERVETNIK A N. Numerical simulation of spin tests of turbo machine disks[J]. Engine Building Herald, Scientific-Technical Journal, 2008(3):130-134.
[8] MAZIÈRE M, BESSON J, FORESTA S. Overspeed burst of elastic-viscoelastic rotating disks-part I:Analytical and numerical stability analyses[J]. European Journal of Mechanics and Solids, 2009(28):36-44.
[9] MAZIÈRE M, BESSON J, FORESTA S. Overspeed burst of elastic-viscoelastic rotating disks-part II:Burst of a superalloy turbine disk[J]. European Journal of Mechanics and Solids, 2009(28):428-432.
[10] YU A N. Numerical simulation of spin testing for turbo machine disk using energy-based fracture criteria:GT2012-68953[R]. New York:ASME,2012.
[11] SERVETNIK A N.Energy-based method for gas turbine engine disc burst speed calculation[C]//28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. Bonn:ICAS,2012:2443-2448.
[12] YU A, NOZHNITSKY A N. Servetnik prevention of hazardousfailure of the turbine rotor due to its overspeed[C]//28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.Bonn:ICAS,2012:2443-2448.
[13] KARIMBAEV K D, SERVETNIK A N. Numerical simulation of spin tests of turbo machine disks[J]. Engine Building Herald, Scientific-Technical Journal, 2008, 3:130-134.
[14] SERVETNIK A N. 2012 Energy-based method for gas turbine engine disc burst speed calculation[C]//28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.Bonn:ICAS,2012:2443-2448.
[15] KUZMIN E P, SERVETNIK A N. Yield surface investigation of alloys during model disc spin tests:GTINDIA2014-8119[R]. New York:ASME,2014.
[16] BIRFELD A A, VOLGIN A V. Verification of engineering technique for computer modeling of GTE compressor disk spin tests[J]. Engine,2011,5:26-27.
[17] 万江艳,周柏卓. 轮盘弹塑性盘破裂准则的建立及变厚度轮盘破裂转速预测[J]. 航空发动机, 2011,37(5):4-6,10. WAN J Y, ZHOU B Z. Elastic-plastic disc burst criteria establishment and variable thickness disk burst rotational speed prediction[J]. Aeroengine,2011,37(5):4-6,10(in Chinese).
[18] 邵帅, 刘秀芝, 魏峰, 等. 某低压涡轮盘破裂转速分析与试验验证[J]. 航空发动机, 2019, 45(2):19-22. SHAO S, LIU X Z,WEI F, et al. Analysis and test verification of burst speed of a low-pressure turbine disk[J].Aeroengine, 2019, 45(2):19-22(in Chinese).
[19] 洪其麟, 王屏.计算轮盘破裂转速大变形解析法[J]. 航空动力学报, 1990, 5(4):321-324. HONG Q L,WANG P. A large analytical deformation method for prediction of disk burst speed[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,1990,5(4):321-324(in Chinese).
[20] NOZHNITSKY Y A, FEDINA Y A, SHADRIN D V, et al. New possibilities of using spinrigs to provide gas turbine engine strength reliability[J]. Vestnik of the Samara State Aerospace University,2015,14(3-1):71-87.
[21] Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. Turbine rotor strength requirements of 14 CFR 33.27:AC No.33.27-1[R]. Washington, D.C.:FAA, 2004.
[22] 郑祺选.轮盘破裂转速试验研究[J].航空动力学报, 1990,5(4):318-320. ZHENG Q X. An experimental study on disc bursting speed[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 1990, 5(4):318-320(in Chinese).
CJA