流体力学与飞行力学

共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性

  • 卢丛玲 ,
  • 祁浩天 ,
  • 徐国华 ,
  • 史勇杰
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学 直升机旋翼动力学国家级重点实验室, 南京 210016

收稿日期: 2019-04-03

  修回日期: 2019-04-12

  网络出版日期: 2019-05-07

基金资助

江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotor in ground effect

  • LU Congling ,
  • QI Haotian ,
  • XU Guohua ,
  • SHI Yongjie
Expand
  • National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2019-04-03

  Revised date: 2019-04-12

  Online published: 2019-05-07

Supported by

A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要

为了研究地面效应下共轴刚性旋翼的气动特性,建立了一套基于非定常雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程的气动干扰数值方法,采用运动嵌套网格模拟双旋翼的反转运动。地面采用无滑移边界条件,并对旋翼和地面附近的网格进行加密,以更好地捕捉旋翼的流场细节和尾迹特征。计算结果与Lynx尾桨试验结果进行对比,验证了所建立方法的有效性。对地面效应下共轴刚性旋翼的气动性能和流场进行分析,结果发现:相对于单独的上下旋翼而言,共轴旋翼地面效应下的拉力增益更大,这是由于上下旋翼桨叶表面的压强干扰受地面高压的影响而减弱;地面的干扰主要影响双旋翼尾迹的径向位置,对其轴向位置影响不大,上下旋翼尾迹在地面附近相互融合、分裂,形成复杂的桨尖涡尾迹;双旋翼在地效下的尾迹径向扩张半径比单旋翼大,这是由于双旋翼的径向射流速度更大;随着旋翼距地面高度的增加,双旋翼间的气动干扰强度逐渐恢复,因此下旋翼拉力增益的下降速度比上旋翼更大;共轴旋翼桨尖涡相对卷起高度和扩张半径均随离地高度增加而减小。

本文引用格式

卢丛玲 , 祁浩天 , 徐国华 , 史勇杰 . 共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态地面效应气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2019 , 40(12) : 123055 -123055 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23055

Abstract

In order to analyze the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect, a numerical method based on unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations is established. Moving overset grid is applied to simulate the reversal motion of the coaxial rotors. The non-slip boundary condition is adopted on the ground, and the grid around the rotors and the ground are refined to better capture the details of the flow field and the wake of the rotors. The comparison between the calculations and the experimental results of Lynx tail rotor verifies the effectiveness of the established method. The analyses of aerodynamic characteristics and the flow field of coaxial rigid rotors in ground effect show that the thrust increment of coaxial rotors in ground effect is larger than that of single upper and lower rotors. The increment is caused by the weakening of the interference between the surface of upper and lower blades due to high ground pressure. The ground interference mainly affects the radial position of the wake of the coaxial rotors, but it has little effect on its axial position. Upper and lower rotor wakes fuse and split with each other near the ground, forming complex tip vortex. The radius of the coaxial rotors wake in ground effect is larger than that of single rotor, because the radial jet velocity of the coaxial rotors is larger. With the increase of the height of the rotor from the ground, the aerodynamic interference intensity between the coaxial rotors gradually recovers, making the descending speed of the thrust increment of the lower rotor larger than that of the upper rotor. The relative roll height and the expansion radius of the coaxial rotors tip vortex decrease with the increase of off-ground height.

参考文献

[1] SHERIDAN P F, WEISNER W. Aerodynamics of helicopter flight near ground[C]//Proceedings of 33rd Annual Forum of American Helicopter Society, 1977.
[2] CURTISS H C, SUN M, PUTNAM W F, et al. Rotor aerodynamics in ground effect at low advance ratios[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1984, 29(1):48-55.
[3] LIGHT J S. Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1993, 38(2):34-42.
[4] GANESH B, KOMERATH N. Study of ground vortex structure of rotorcraft in ground effect at low advance ratios[C]//24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[5] 何承健, 高正. 贴地飞行的旋翼尾迹研究[J]. 航空学报, 1986, 7(4):325-331. HE C J, GAO Z. A study of the rotor wake in nap-of-the-earth[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1986, 7(4):325-331(in Chinese).
[6] 孙茂, CURTISS H C. 近地低速飞行时旋翼尾涡系的畸变及其诱导速度[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1989, 7(1):35-42. SUN M, CURTISS H C. Rotor vortex wake distortion and its induced velocity in ground effect at low speed[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1989, 7(1):35-42(in Chinese).
[7] BHATTACHARYYA S, CONLISK A T. The structure of the rotor wake in ground effect[C]//41th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2003.
[8] HWANG J Y, CHOI J H, KWON O J. Assessment of S-76 rotor hover performance in ground effect using an unstructured mixed mesh method[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2016.
[9] LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, KALRA T S, BAEDER J D. Detailed computational investigation of a hovering microscale rotor in ground effect[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(4):893-909.
[10] CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Numerical study of helicopter rotors in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(6):1813-1832.
[11] SUGIURA M, TANABE Y, SUGAWARA H, et al. Numerical simulations and measurements of the helicopter wake in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 54(1):209-219.
[12] KUTZ B M, BENSING F, KEßLER M, et al. CFD calculation of a helicopter rotor hovering in ground effect[C]//DILLMANN A, HELLER G, KREPLIN H P, et al. New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics VIII:Contributions to the 17th STAB/DGLR Symposium Berlin, Germany 2010. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2013:297-304.
[13] 叶靓, 招启军, 徐国华. 基于非结构嵌套网格方法的旋翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5):780-786. YE L, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical simulation on flowfield of rotor in ground effect based on unstructured embedded grid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(5):780-786(in Chinese).
[14] 朱明勇, 招启军, 王博. 基于CFD和混合配平算法的直升机旋翼地面效应模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551. ZHU M Y, ZHAO Q J, WANG B. Simulation of helicopter rotor in ground effect based on CFD method and hybrid trim algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8):2539-2551(in Chinese).
[15] 康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼近地飞行时诱导速度的N-S方程计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1998, 16(2):221-225. KANG N, SUN M. Navier-Stokes calculations of induced velocity of a rotor in forward flight with ground effects[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 1998, 16(2):221-225(in Chinese).
[16] 康宁, 孙茂. 旋翼尾流与地面干扰时地面涡现象的研究[J]. 力学学报, 1998, 30(5):615-620. KANG N, SUN M. Investigation of the ground vortex phenomenon due to the interaction between rotor's wake and the ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1998, 30(5):615-620(in Chinese).
[17] KANG N, SUN M. Simulated flowfields in near-ground operation of single-and twin-rotor configurations[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000, 37(2):214-220.
[18] 覃燕华, 朱清华, 邵松. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应气动特性分析[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(2):266-274. QIN Y H, ZHU Q H, SHAO S. Aerodynamic characteristics analysis for hovering coaxial rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 47(2):266-274(in Chinese).
[19] 陆陶冶, 陈仁良, 吉洪蕾, 等. 共轴双旋翼悬停地面效应分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(10):45-52. LU T Y, CHEN R L, JI H L, et al. Performance analysis of coaxial-rotorfor hovering in ground effect[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(10):45-52(in Chinese).
[20] TAN J F, SUN Y M, BARAKOS G N. Vortex approach for downwash and outwash of tandem rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55(6):2491-2509.
[21] ROE P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43:357-372.
[22] LUO H, BAUM J D, LÃHNER R. A fast, matrix-free implicit method for computing low Mach number flows on unstructured grids[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2000, 14(2):133-157.
[23] SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1992.
[24] 祁浩天, 史勇杰, 徐国华, 等. 共轴刚性旋翼气动干扰及操纵特性分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012. QI H T, SHI Y J, XU G H, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic interaction andtrim characteristics of rigid coaxial rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(12):3004-3012(in Chinese).
[25] LAKSHMINARAYAN V K, BAEDER J D. High-resolution computational investigation of trimmed coaxial rotor aerodynamics in hover[C]//63rd American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, 2007.
文章导航

/