流体力学与飞行力学

叶片式涡流发生器对压缩拐角流动分离的控制

  • 胡万林 ,
  • 于剑 ,
  • 刘宏康 ,
  • 赵渊 ,
  • 阎超
展开
  • 北京航空航天大学 航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期: 2018-01-26

  修回日期: 2018-04-03

  网络出版日期: 2018-04-03

Control of compression ramp flow separation via vane vortex generator

  • HU Wanlin ,
  • YU Jian ,
  • LIU Hongkang ,
  • ZHAO Yuan ,
  • YAN Chao
Expand
  • School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2018-01-26

  Revised date: 2018-04-03

  Online published: 2018-04-03

摘要

采用基于k-ω湍流模型的雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)方程方法,研究了叶片式涡流发生器(VG)对于马赫数Ma=2.9时24°压缩拐角边界层分离的控制作用。计算结果表明:叶片式涡流发生器诱发的流向涡,是控制拐角处边界层分离的主要因素,流向涡强度越大控制效果越好。流向涡增大了主流与边界层内的动量输运,沿壁面法向速度型更加饱满,并使得压缩拐角处的二维分离转变为三维分离,改变了激波边界层干扰的结构,分离区长度减小了39.68%。相比于相向旋转,同向旋转叶片式涡流发生器改善了分离区内的压力分布,分离区总长度减小量相当,但分离点距转折点处的长度更短,且系统阻力增量更小。对于相向旋转叶片式涡流发生器,后缘高度增大,分离区总长度减小,系统阻力增量先减小后增大;相向旋转叶片间距越大,分离区总长度越小,系统阻力增量越大;同向旋转叶片间距越大,分离区总长度越大,系统阻力增量越小。高度对叶片式涡流发生器诱发的流向涡强度起主要作用,异向与同向叶片间距的影响较小。

本文引用格式

胡万林 , 于剑 , 刘宏康 , 赵渊 , 阎超 . 叶片式涡流发生器对压缩拐角流动分离的控制[J]. 航空学报, 2018 , 39(7) : 122049 -122049 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22049

Abstract

The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation method based on the k-ω turbulence model is used to study the control of the boundary layer separation at 24° compression ramp for Ma=2.9 via the vane Vortex Generator (VG). The calculation results show that the streamwise vortex generated by the vortex generator is the main factor that controls the separation of the boundary layer, and the greater the intensity of the streamwise vortex is, the better the control effect will be. The streamwise vortex increases the momentum transport of the mainstream and the boundary layer. The velocity profile along the wall normal is fuller and the two-dimensional separation at the corner is transformed into three-dimensional separation. The structure of the shock wave-boundary layer interaction is changed, with the total length of the separation zone decreasing by 39.68%. Compared with the counter-rotating VG, the co-rotating VG is more beneficial in improving the wall pressure distribution at the corner. The co-rotating VG can reduce a similar amount of total length of the separation zone to the counter-rotating VG, but can result in shorter length between the separation point and turning point and smaller increment of system drag than the counter-rotating VG. In the case of a counter-rotating VG, as the height of the trailing edge increases, the total length of the separation zone decreases and the increment of system drag decreases first and then increases slightly. The larger the distance between the counter-rotating blades is, the smaller the total length of the separation zone will be, the bigger the increment of system drag will be. The larger the distance between the co-rotating blades is, the larger the total length of the separation zone will be, and the smaller the increment of system drag will be. The height of the blade has a main influence on the streamwise vortex induced by the vane VG, and the influence of the space between the blades is negligible.

参考文献

[1] 张庆虎. 超声速流动分离及其控制的试验研究[D]. 长沙:国防科技大学, 2013:1-141. ZHANG Q H. Experimental investigation of supersonic flow separation and its micro-ramp control[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2013:1-141(in Chinese).
[2] DUPONT P, HADDAD C, DEBIÈVE J F. Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 559:255-277.
[3] BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. 激波边界层干扰[M]. 白菡尘, 译. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2015:12. BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions[M]. BAI H C, translated. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2015:12(in Chinese).
[4] LIN J C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(4):389-420.
[5] TAYLOR H D. The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators:R-4012-3[R]. Moscow:United Aircraft Corporation, 1947.
[6] SCHUBAUER G B, SPANGENBER W G. Forced mixing in boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 8:10-32.
[7] BRAGG M B, GREGOREK G M. Experimental study of airfoil performance with vortex generators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(5):305-309.
[8] PEARCEY H H. Introduction to shock induced separation and its prevention by design and boundary layer control[M]//Boundary Layer and Flow Control. 1961:1166-1344.
[9] JENKINS L, GORTON S A, ANDERS S. Flow control device evaluation for an internal flow with an adverse pressure gradient:AIAA-2002-0266[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[10] GAO L Y, ZHANG H, LIU Y Q. Effects of vortex generators on a blunt trailing-edge airfoil for wind turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 76:303-311.
[11] CALARESE W, CRISLER W P, GUSTSFSON G L. Afterbody drag reduction by vortex generators:AIAA-1985-0354[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1985.
[12] BROWN A C, NAWROCKI H F, PALEY P N. Subsonic diffusers designed integrally with vortex generators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1968, 5(3):221-229.
[13] KUETHE A M. Effect of streamwise vortices on wake properties associated with sound generation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1972, 9(10):715-719.
[14] ASHILL P R, FULKER J L, HACKETT K C. Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators:AIAA-2001-0877[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001.
[15] ANDERSON B H, TINAPPLE J A, SURBER L E. Optimal control of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions using micro-array actuation:AIAA-2006-3197[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2006.
[16] SCHREYER A M, BERMEJO-MORENO I, KIM J, et al. Separation control in a hypersonic compression ramp interaction[R]. Stanford, CA:Center for Turbulence Research of Stanford University, 2016.
[17] YAN Y, CHEN L, LI Q, et al. Numerical study of micro-ramp vortex generator for supersonic ramp flow control at Mach 2.5[J]. Shock Waves, 2016, 27(1):1-18.
[18] 褚胡冰, 陈迎春, 张彬乾, 等. 增升装置微型涡流发生器数值模拟方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(1):11-21. CHU H B, CHEN Y C, ZHANG B Q, et al. Investigation of numerical simulation technique for micro vortex generators applied to high lift system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica, 2012, 33(1):11-21(in Chinese).
[19] 赵瑞, 阎超. 超声速复杂流动中湍流模型的性能评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 37(2):202-215. ZHAO R, YAN C. Evaluation of engineering turbulence models for complex supersonic flows[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, 37(2):202-215(in Chinese).
[20] SETTLES G S, FITZPATRICK T J, BOGDONOFF S M. Detailed study of attached and separated compression corner flowfields in high Reynolds number supersonic flow[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(6):579-585.
[21] ASHILL P R, FULKER J L, HACKETT K C. Studies of flows induced by sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs):AIAA-2002-0968[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[22] HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies stream and convergence zones in turbulent flow:N89-24555[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1988.
文章导航

/