低韦伯数非牛顿射流撞击破碎直接数值模拟
收稿日期: 2016-09-08
修回日期: 2016-11-21
网络出版日期: 2017-03-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金（51606161，91441128）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（20720170055）；福建省自然科学基金
Direct numerical simulation of impinging jet breakup with non-Newtonian properties at low Weber number
Received date: 2016-09-08
Revised date: 2016-11-21
Online published: 2017-03-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51606161,91441128);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720170055);Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
非牛顿射流的撞击破碎在液体火箭推进系统中被广泛用于燃料的喷注雾化，然而人们对其破碎物理机制却知之甚少。本文将采用基于液体体积法的直接数值模拟（DNS）工具，研究夹角为90° 的2个等直径低韦伯数射流撞击现象，并分析二者形成的单一对角射流特征及其破碎机理。研究结果表明，撞击形成的单一对角射流直径较原射流直径大1.66倍，并在头部形成液滴诱导破碎的发生。除了头部破碎，在对角射流的发展过程中还观察到一类液柱破碎，表现为射流表面不稳定波不断发展形成新的弯曲波破碎，并产生卫星液滴及液滴的融合。伴随两股射流撞击的发生，气液两相交界面的面积也不断减小，同时，射流内部的黏性也不断变化，在本文的低雷诺数和低韦伯数条件下，流体内部黏性系数变化超过10%。
朱呈祥 , 陈荣钱 , 尤延铖 . 低韦伯数非牛顿射流撞击破碎直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2017 , 38(8) : 120764 -120764 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.120764
Impinging jet breakup with non-Newtonian properties has been widely applied in the liquid rocket propulsion system for fuel atomization. However, the basic breakup mechanism of the phenomena still remains unsolved up to now. In the present work, a direct numerical simulation (DNS) based on the volume of fluid method is carried out to investigate the impinging phenomena of two orthogonal identical liquid jets, and to analyze the characteristics and the breakup of the resulted diagonal jet. The results indicate that the diameter of the diagonal jet is 1.66 times larger than that of the original jet. The head breakup can be observed near the jet tip, and the column breakup can be also observed. Due to surface wave development, wavy breakup is generated with the formation of satellite droplets and droplet collision. During the impinging process, the total surface area of the liquid decreases. The local viscosity of the shear thinning liquid decreases as well. Under the condition of low Reynolds and Weber numbers in the present work, the local viscosity varies over 10% spatially.
[1] LIN S P, REITZ R D. Drop and spray formation from a liquid jet[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30(1):85-105.
[2] EGGERS J, VILLERMAUX E. Physics of liquid jets[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2008, 71(3):036601.
[3] GOROKOVSKI M, HERRMANN M. Modeling primary atomization[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 40(1):343-366.
[4] CIEZKI H K, NEGRI M, HURTTLEN J, et al. Overview of the German Gel Propulsion Technology Program:AIAA-2014-3794[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
[5] RAMASUBRAMANIAN C, NOTAR V, LEE J G. Characterization of near-field spray of nongelled-and gelled impinging doublets at high pressure[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(6):1642-1652.
[6] YANG L J, FU Q F, QU Y Y, et al. Breakup of a power-law liquid sheet formed by an impinging jet injector[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 39:37-44.
[7] 杨伟东, 张蒙正. 凝胶推进剂流变及雾化特性研究与进展[J]. 火箭推进, 2005, 31(5):37-42. YANG W D, ZHANG M Z. Research and development of rheological and atomization characteristics of gelled propellants[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2005, 31(5):37-42(in Chinese).
[8] 夏振炎, 李珍妮, 李建军, 等. 撞击式射流破碎特性的实验研究[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2016, 49(7):770-776. XIA Z Y, LI Z N, LI J J, et al. An experimental study on breakup characteristics of impinging jets[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2016, 49(7):770-776(in Chinese).
[9] XIAO H, SHI Y, XU Z, et al. Atomization characteristics of gelled hypergolic propellant simulants[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2015, 16(4):743-747.
[10] 邓寒玉, 封锋, 武晓松, 等. 基于扩展TAB模型的凝胶液滴二次雾化特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(11):1734-1740. DENG H Y, FENG F, WU X S, et al. Characteristics of second atomization for gelled droplet based on extended TAB model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(11):1734-1740(in Chinese).
[11] MA D J, CHEN X D, KHARE P. Atomization patterns and breakup characteristics of liquid sheets formed by two impinging jets:AIAA-2011-0097[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[12] 刘虎, 强洪夫, 韩亚伟, 等. 幂律型凝胶推进剂射流撞击雾化SPH模拟[J]. 推进技术, 2015, 36(9):1416-1425. LIU H, QIANG H F, HAN Y W, et al. SPH simulation of atomization characteristics of power-law gelled propellant formed by two impinging jets[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(9):1416-1425(in Chinese).
[13] HIRT C W, NICHOLOS B D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39(1):201-225.
[14] RIDER W J, KOTHE D B. Reconstructing volume tracking[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 141(2):112-152.
[15] SCHLOTTKE J, WEIGAND B. Direct numerical simulation of evaporating droplets[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(10):5215-5237.
[16] GOMMA H, KUMAR S, HUBER C, et al. Numerical comparison of 3D jet breakup using a compression scheme and an interface reconstruction based VOF-code[C]//24th ILASS Europe, 2011.
[17] MOTZIGEMBA M, ROTH N, BOTHE D, et al. The effect of non-Newtonian flow behavior on binary droplet collisions:VOF-simulation and experimental analysis[C]//Proceedings of ILASS-Europe, 2002.
[18] FOCKE C, BOTHE D. Computational analysis of binary collisions of shear thinning droplets[J]. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 166(14):799-810.
[19] ZHU C, ERTL M, WEIGNAD B. Numerical investigation on the primary breakup of an inelastic non-Newtonian liquid jet with inflow turbulence[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25:083102.
[20] SCHRÖDER J, LEDERER M L, GAUKEL V, et al. Effect of atomizer geometry and rheological properties on effervescent atomization of aqueous polyvinylphrrolidone solution[C]//24th ILASS Europe, 2011.
[21] BATCHELOR G K. The theory of homogeneous turbu-lence[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1953.
[22] BREMOND N, CLANET C, VILLERMAUX E. Atomization of undulating liquid sheets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 585:421-456.
[23] QIAN J, LAW C K. Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 331:59-80.
[24] MIESSE C C. Correlation of experimental data on the disintegration of liquid jets[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1955, 47(9):1690-1701.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA