某中央翼盒对飞行载荷实测的影响
收稿日期: 2016-01-20
修回日期: 2016-03-29
网络出版日期: 2016-04-21
Effect of central wing on root flight load measurement of certain airfoil
Received date: 2016-01-20
Revised date: 2016-03-29
Online published: 2016-04-21
使用应变法测量某具有中央翼盒平尾的飞行载荷时，在地面校准试验中发现：左翼面载荷可使右翼面根部应变计有较大的响应，反之亦然。该现象可使根部载荷测量精度下降。分析了中央翼盒对根部载荷测量影响的机理，给出了一种考虑异侧载荷影响的载荷方程建立方法，讨论了不同类型剪力载荷方程对异侧载荷影响的敏感性，并将修正前后的方程应用于飞行载荷实测。结果发现：本文方法一定程度上可提高根部载荷方程的精度；对上述平尾结构，由两个剪力一个弯矩组建的载荷方程对异侧载荷影响不敏感，修正前后实测的飞行载荷差异在5.7%之内，由两个剪力和两个弯矩组建的载荷方程对异侧载荷影响敏感，修正前后实测的飞行载荷差异达到78.6%。
关键词： 飞行试验; 翼根载荷测量; 应变电桥; 中央翼; 应变电桥的异侧载荷响应
赵燕 , 周占廷 . 某中央翼盒对飞行载荷实测的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016 , 37(12) : 3713 -3720 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0105
For flight load measurement using strain gage of certain horizontal stabilizer with central wing, it has been found that right root strain response is large when loading left airfoil in ground calibration test, and vice versa, which could lower flight load measurement accuracy. The mechanism of central wing effects on root flight load measurement was analyzed. Also a method of eliminating opposite load effects on flight load measurement was proposed. Further, the sensitivity of different type load equations to opposite load effects was discussed. Moreover, the corrected load equations were used to measure flight loads. The results show that for above horizontal tail with central wing,the proposed method in this paper could improve root load equation accuracy. The built shear load equation using 2 shear and 1 bending-moment strain bridges is not sensitive to opposite load effects where the measured flight shears through load equations before and after correction have differences under 5.7%, while the built shear load equation using 2 shear and 2 bending-moment strain bridges is sensitive to opposite load effects where the measured flight shear using load equations before and after correction have large differences of 78.6%.
[1] 中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空规章:CCAR-25-R4[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局, 2011. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Chinese civil aviation regulations:CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011(in Chinese).
[2] 总装备部. 军用飞机强度和刚度规范, 第十部分:飞行试验:GJB67.10A-2008[S]. 北京:总装备部军标出版发行部, 2008:1-10. General Equipment Department. Military airplane structural strength specification Part 10:Flight tests:GJB67.10A-2008[S]. Beijing:General Equipment Department Military Standard Press, 2008:1-10(in Chinese).
[3] 阎楚良, 高镇同. 飞机高置信度中值随机疲劳载荷谱的编制原理[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21(2):118-123. YAN C L, GAO Z T. Compilation theory of median stochastic fatigue load spectrum with high confidence level for airplane[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautics Sinica, 2000, 21(2):118-123(in Chinese).
[4] LESKI A, REYMER P, KURDELSKI M. Development of load spectrum for full scale fatigue test of a trainer aircraft[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Symposium of International Commitlee on aeronautical Fatigue. Netherland:Springer, 2011.
[5] PIOTR R, ANDRZEJ L. Flight loads acquisition for Pzl-130 OrLik TCII full scale fatigue test[J]. Fatigue of Aircraft Structures, 2011(1):78-85.
[6] LIZOTTE A M, LOKOS W A. Deflection-based aircraft structural loads estimation with comparation to flight[C]//46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[7] BAKALYAR J. Validation tests of fiber optic strain-based operational shape and load measurements[C]//20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2012.
[8] 郭正旺, 李昭广, 王仲燕, 等. 用内式六分量应变天平实测导弹挂飞载荷[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(7):1403-1409. GUO Z W, LI Z G, WANG Z Y, et al. Measuring missile's suspension flight loads using built-in six-compoment strain-gage balance[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautics Sinica, 2010, 31(7):1403-1409(in Chinese).
[9] SKPOINSKI T H, AIKEN W S, HUSTON W B. Calibration of strain-gage installations in aircraft structures for measurement of flight loads:NACA-TR-1178[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1954.
[10] KWAK D Y, YOSHIDA K. Flight test measurements of surface pressure on unmanned scaled supersonic experimental airplane[C]//24th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[11] JENKINS J M, DEANGELIS V M. A summary of numerous strain-gage load calibrations on aircraft wings and tails in a technology format:NASA-TM-4804[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1997.
[12] WILLIAM A, STAUF L R. Strain-gage loads calibration parametric study:NASA/TM-2004-212853[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2004.
[13] CAO X, SUGIYAMAC Y, MITSUIi Y. Application of artificial neural networks to load identification[J]. Computer & Structures, 1998, 69:63-78.
[14] HALLE M, THIELECKE F. Flight loads estimation using local model networks[C]//29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. BONN:ICAS, 2014
[15] NELSON S A. Strain gage selection in loads equations using a genetic alogrithm:NASA Contractor Report 4597[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1994.
[16] 赵燕. 基于遗传算法与评估模型的飞行载荷实测研究[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(9):2506-2512. ZHAO Y. Flight load measurement based on genetic algorithm and evaluating method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(9):2506-2512(in Chinese).
[17] PADMANABHAN M A, NAGESH K Y, Elattuvalappil H. A statistcs based method for mapping flight strains to loads[C]//47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[18] JASON D B, JOAO C M. Hybrid load calibrations of a strain gage instrumented horizontal empennage[C]//VI National Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Compina:CONEM, 2010.
[19] JEBACKE I, HORAK M. Possibilities and methods of in-flight loading measurement[J]. Aviation, 2012, 16(2):47-50.
[20] GONZALEZ M, GOGU C, BINAUD N, et al. Uncertainty quantification in aircraft load calibration[C]//10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. East Lansing:WCSMO, 2013.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA