DLR-F6/FX2B翼身组合体构型高阶精度数值模拟
收稿日期: 2015-03-10
修回日期: 2015-05-06
网络出版日期: 2015-05-15
基金资助
国家重点基础研究发展计划(2014CB744803)
High-order accuracy numerical simulation of DLR-F6/FX2B wing-body configuration
Received date: 2015-03-10
Revised date: 2015-05-06
Online published: 2015-05-15
Supported by
National Key Basic Research Program of China(2014CB744803)
基于雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)方程和结构网格技术,采用五阶空间离散精度的加权紧致非线性格式(WCNS)和剪切应力输运(SST)两方程湍流模型,开展了DLR-F6和DLR-F6_FX2B 2种翼身组合体构型的高阶精度数值模拟,计算外形来自AIAA第三届阻力预测研讨会。主要目的是确认WCNS模拟跨声速典型运输机构型和预测局部构型变化引起的气动特性变化量的能力。在固定升力系数条件下,采用粗、中、细3套网格开展了网格收敛性研究,从气动力系数、压力系数分布、表面流态等方面研究了网格规模对DLR-F6和DLR-F6_FX2B翼身组合体数值模拟结果的影响;采用中等网格开展了来流迎角对2种翼身组合体气动特性的影响研究。通过与National Transonic Facility(NTF)的试验结果和CFL3D的计算结果对比,表明采用高阶精度计算方法得到了网格收敛的数值模拟结果,较好地模拟了DLR-F6翼身组合体局部修型引起的微小气动特性变化和翼身结合部流动特性的差异。
王运涛 , 孟德虹 , 孙岩 , 张玉伦 , 李伟 . DLR-F6/FX2B翼身组合体构型高阶精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2016 , 37(2) : 484 -490 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0124
Based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS) equations and structured grid technology, the fifth-order weighted compact nonlinear scheme(WCNS) and shear stress transport(SST) turbulence model are adopted to simulate DLR-F6 wing-body and FX2B fairing configuration from the third AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop. The main purpose of the present work is to further validate the ability of WCNS in the simulation of transonic problems and the prediction of aerodynamic characteristic variation due to tiny variation of the configuration. The grid convergence study is performed with coarse, medium and fine grid systems at fixed lift coefficient, and the effects of grid density on the simulation of DLR-F6 with and without FX2B fairing are studied from the aspects of aerodynamic coefficients, pressure distribution and flow pattern on the surface. The variations of aerodynamic characteristics with angles of attack are performed with the medium grid system. Compared to the experimental data from the National Transonic Facility(NTF)and CFL3D numerical results, the numerical simulation indicate that grid convergence results are obtained with the high-order numerical method; the small incremental aerodynamic characteristics and the local flow difference at the wing-body junction with and without FX2B fairing can be predicted reasonably.
Key words： RANS equations; WCNS; flow simulation; grid density; aerodynamic characteristics
[1] SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD vision 2030 study:A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences:NASA/CR-2014-218178[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2014.
[2] TINOCO E N, BOGUE D R, KAO T J, et al. Progress toward CFD for full flight envelope[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2005, 109(1100):451-460.
[3] 徐嘉, 刘秋洪, 蔡晋生, 等. 基于隐式嵌套重叠网格技术的阻力预测[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(2):208-217. XU J, LIU Q H, CAI J S, et al. Drag prediction based on overset grids with implicit hole cutting technique[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(2):208-217(in Chinese).
[4] KROLL N, BIELER H, DECONINCK H, et al. ADIGMA-A European initiative on the development of adaptive higher-order variational methods for aerospace application[C]//Noteson Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 2010.
[5] LEVY D W, ZICKUHR T, VASSBERG J C, et al. Summary of data from the first AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop:AIAA-2002-0841[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2002.
[6] LAFLIN K R, KLAUSMEYER S M, ZICKUHR T, et al. Data summary from the second AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(5):1165-1178.
[7] VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M, et al. Abridged summary of the third AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(3):781-798.
[8] VASSBERG J C, TINOCO E N, MANI M, et al. Summary of the fourth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop:AIAA-2010-4547[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2010.
[9] LEVY D W, LAFLIN K R, TINOCO E N, et al. Summary of data from the fifth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop:AIAA-2013-0046[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[10] RUMSEY C L, LONG M, STUEVER R A. Summary of the first AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop:AIAA-2011-0939[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[11] HEINZ H. Overview about the European high lift research programme EUROLIFT:AIAA-2004-0767[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[12] RUDNIK R, FRHR.V.GEYR H. The European high lift project EUROLIFT Ⅱ-Objectives, approach, and structure:AIAA-2007-4296[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[13] VASSBERG J V, TINOCO E N, MORE M, et al. Comparison of NTF experimental data with CFD predictions from the third AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop:AIAA-2008-6918[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[14] 王运涛, 孙岩, 王光学, 等. DLR-F6翼身组合体的高阶精度数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9):2913-2919. WANG Y T, SUN Y, WANG G X, et al. High-order accuracy numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body configuration[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(9):2913-2919(in Chinese).
[15] 王运涛, 孙岩, 王光学, 等. 高阶精度方法下的湍流生成项对跨声速流动数值模拟的影响研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(1):25-30. WANG Y T, SUN Y, WANG G X, et al. Numerical study of the effect of turbulent production terms on the simulation of transonic flows with high-order numerical method[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(1):25-30(in Chinese).
[16] DENG X G, ZHANG H X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165(1):24-44.
[17] DENG X G, MIN R B, MAO M L, et al. Further studies on geometric conservation law and application to high-order finite difference scheme with stationary grid[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 239:90-111.
[18] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering application[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605.
[19] VASSBERG J C, SCLAFANI A J, DEHAAN M A. A wing-bodyfairing design for the DLR-F6 model:A DPW-Ⅲ case study:AIAA-2005-4730[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[20] GATLIN G M, RIVER S M, GOODLIFF S L, et al. Experimental investigation of the DLR-F6 transport configuration in the National Transonic Facility:AIAA-2008-6917[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[21] TINOCO E N, VENKATAKRISHNAN C, WINKLER C. Structured and unstructured solvers for the third AIAA CFD drag predicition workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(3):738-749.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA