DFR法在结构疲劳优化设计中的应用

陈滨琦; 曾建江; 王一丁; 童明波

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0201

航空学报 >

2013 , Vol. 34 >Issue 5: 1122 - 1128

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0201

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

DFR法在结构疲劳优化设计中的应用

陈滨琦 ,
曾建江 ,
王一丁 ,
童明波

展开

南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 江苏南京 210016

陈滨琦女, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 飞机结构设计与强度分析。 Tel: 025-84892791 E-mail: binqi.chen@hotmail.com;曾建江男, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞机结构设计与强度分析。 Tel: 025-84891445 E-mail: zengjj@nuaa.edu.cn;王一丁男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 飞机总体设计。 Tel: 025-84892791 E-mail: wyding@yahoo.cn;童明波男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞机结构设计与强度分析。 Tel: 025-84896031 E-mail: tongw@nuaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2012-06-19

修回日期: 2012-08-21

网络出版日期: 2012-09-18

收起

Application of DFR Method to Optimal Fatigue Design of Structures

CHEN Binqi ,
ZENG Jianjiang ,
WANG Yiding ,
TONG Mingbo

Expand

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2012-06-19

Revised date: 2012-08-21

Online published: 2012-09-18

Fold

摘要

提出了基于有限元分析的细节疲劳额定值(DFR)疲劳可靠性分析方法,将有限元分析与疲劳分析进行关联,编写基于有限元分析的DFR法分析软件(FEM-DFR),对试验件进行疲劳寿命分析,与试验对比吻合较好,验证了方法的准确性。在此基础上,针对疲劳优化周期长和效率低的问题,开发了集成Patran/Nastran、FEM-DFR和iSIGHT的疲劳优化平台,在此平台上完成了某型飞机作动筒支座细节的优化,该平台数据传输流畅、操作效率高、优化质量好,具有一定的工程应用价值。

关键词： 有限元分析; 疲劳可靠性; 疲劳优化; 细节疲劳额定值; 集成; 平台

本文引用格式

陈滨琦 , 曾建江 , 王一丁 , 童明波 . DFR法在结构疲劳优化设计中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2013 , 34(5) : 1122 -1128 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0201

Abstract

A new method to analyze fatigue reliability based on detail fatigue rating (DFR) is presented which integrates finite element analysis and fatigue analysis. Fatigue reliability calculating software (FEM-DFR) is written with the help of finite element analysis. The agreement between the simulation results calculated by FEM-DFR and the experimental data proves the effectiveness of the method. On this basis, a general platform which integrates Patran/Nastran, FEM-DFR and iSIGHT is developed to overcome the shortcomings of long time-consumption and low efficiency of structure fatigue optimization. A detailed bracket of an actuator cylinder is optimized on the platform. The results show that the platform is stable, data transmission is smooth, operational efficiency is high, and the optimized quality is good.

Key words： finite element analysis; fatigue reliability; fatigue optimization; detail fatigue rating(DFR); integration; platform

参考文献

[1] Venter G, Haftka R T, Chirehdast M. Response surface approximations for fatigue life prediction. AIAA-1997-1331,1997.
[2] Shim H J, Kim J K. Consideration of fatigue life optimization of pulley in power-steering system. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2008,483-484: 452-455.
[3] Tang Y C, Zhou X H, Chen J. Preform tool shape optimization and redesign based on neural network response surface methodology. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2008, 44(8): 462-471.
[4] Xue C J, Tan W, Xu F J, et al. Structural fatigue life optimization method based on response surface model. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2011, 35(6): 843-846. (in Chinese) 薛彩军, 谭伟, 徐奋进, 等. 基于响应面模型的结构疲劳寿命优化方法. 南京理工大学学报, 2011, 35(6): 843-846.
[5] Zhang C C, Yao W X. Anti-fatigue optimal design based on response surface model. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2007, 39(1): 37-40. (in Chinese) 张成成, 姚卫星. 基于响应面的结构抗疲劳优化设计方法. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2007, 39(1): 37-40.
[6] Liu G L, Shen H J, Ren L. Response surface model applicable to the fatigue optimal design of structures. Mechanical Engineering & Automation, 2009, 10(5): 61-63. (in Chinese) 刘根林, 沈海军, 任亮. 响应面模型在结构疲劳优化设计中的应用. 机械工程与自动化, 2009, 10(5): 61-63.
[7] Mrzyglod M, Zielinski A P. Parametric structural optimization with respect to the multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(2): 161-171.
[8] Liu Y S, Liu J, Shao X J, et al. Effect of roughness on fatigue life of open holes. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 348-349: 757-760.
[9] Goranson U G. Fatigue issues in aircraft maintenance and repairs. International Journal of Fatigue, 1997, 19(93): 3-21.
[10] Mohaghegh M. Evolution of structures design philosophy and criteria. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(4): 814-831.
[11] Liu Y S, Yuan X K, Liu J, et al. Research on structure detail fatigue rating DFR and testing method. Experimental Technology and Management, 2008, 25(1): 27-29. (in Chinese) 刘永寿, 袁修开, 刘军, 等. 结构细节疲劳额定值DFR及其试验方法的研究. 实验技术与管理, 2008, 25(1): 27-29.
[12] Dong Y M, Liu W T, Yang C. Military aircraft durability design method based on detail fatigue rating. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31(12): 2357-2364. (in Chinese) 董彦民, 刘文珽, 杨超. 军用飞机结构耐久性设计的细节疲劳额定值方法. 航空学报, 2010, 31(12): 2357-2364.
[13] Huang X, Liu J Z, Ma S J, et al. Sensitivity analysis of the parameters in detail fatigue rating equation. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(5): 863-870. (in Chinese) 黄啸, 刘建中, 马少俊,等. 细节疲劳额定强度计算参量取值敏感性研究. 航空学报, 2012, 33(5): 863-870.
[14] Yuan H S, Xu Z N. Analysis of internal force for joints by PATRAN/NASTRAN software. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2003(2): 15-18. (in Chinese) 袁华生, 徐仲年. 使用PATRAN/NASTRAN软件进行连接件内力分析. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2003(2): 15-18.
[15] Zhang C C, Yao W X, Ye B. Equivalent stress severity factor approach for fatigue of multi-fastener plate. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(2): 271-275. (in Chinese) 张成成, 姚卫星, 叶彬. 连接件疲劳寿命分析的等效SSF法. 航空学报, 2009, 30(2): 271-275.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献