流体力学与飞行力学

基于机翼气动设计准则的超临界机翼气动优化研究

  • 杨昆淼 ,
  • 张卫民 ,
  • 王斌
展开
  • 中国航天空气动力技术研究院 空气动力应用技术研究发展中心, 北京 100074
杨昆淼,男,硕士研究生。主要研究方向:流体力学与飞行力学。Tel:010-68192495,E-mail:arnold_y@sina.com;张卫民,男,硕士,研究员,硕士生导师。主要研究方向:空气动力学。Tel:010-68190739,E-mail:zhwm0631@sina.com;王斌,男,硕士,工程师。主要研究方向:空气动力学。Tel:010-68192495,E-mail:caaawb@163.com

收稿日期: 2012-02-03

  修回日期: 2012-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2012-04-06

Research of Supercritical Wing Optimization Based on Aerodynamic Design Principle of Wing

  • YANG Kunmiao ,
  • ZHANG Weimin ,
  • WANG Bin
Expand
  • Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing 100074, China

Received date: 2012-02-03

  Revised date: 2012-03-13

  Online published: 2012-04-06

摘要

机翼的气动特性决定了一架飞机的经济性、安全性、舒适性以及环保性,而机翼的气动设计问题十分复杂,需要满足合理的机翼气动设计准则,才具有工程实用价值。基于计算机辅助工程(CAE)的机翼优化设计方法需要较少的人力成本,但无法保证气动设计准则得到满足,其结果仍需大量的后续修改工作。因此,当前实际工程应用中,机翼的设计仍然在很大程度上依赖于设计人员的经验,需要大量的人力。为了提高机翼优化设计结果的工程实用价值,进而减少后续人工设计工作量,提高机翼气动设计的效率。首先对机翼表面压力分布进行分析;然后根据机翼气动设计准则,在传统升阻特性目标函数的基础上,构造新的目标函数;最后将这个新的目标函数代入优化过程。研究结果表明:升阻特性难以全面地描述机翼的气动特性,以其为目标函数无法保证设计结果满足气动设计准则,不具工程实用价值;而根据机翼气动设计准则构造的目标函数能够在优化过程中保证设计准则得到满足,有效提高设计结果的工程实用价值;同时,与传统直接以升阻特性为优化目标的优化过程相比,该方法引入的额外计算量可以忽略不计。

本文引用格式

杨昆淼 , 张卫民 , 王斌 . 基于机翼气动设计准则的超临界机翼气动优化研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013 , 34(2) : 263 -272 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0030

Abstract

The aerodynamic characteristics of an wing play a critical role in the economics, safety, comfort and environmental protection of an aeroplane. However, the aerodynamic design processes are highly complicated, which should follow principles of wing aerodynamic design to obtain practical engineering value. Computer-aided engineering (CAE) based wing optimization requires less manpower, yet it may not guarantee that the design principles are observed and its results still call for a great deal of subsequent processing. Thus, in recent engineering applications, the aerodynamic design process adopted still relies highly on the experiences of the designers, which means a large amount of manpower. The purpose of this research is to improve the practical engineering value of the wing optimization results, so as to reduce the amount of subsequent processing and improve the efficiency of the wing design process. It first analyzes the wing surface pressure distribution. And then, according to the wing aerodynamic design principles, a new objective function is constructed based on the traditional objective functions determined from lift and drag characteristics. Finally, the new objective function is substituted into the optimization process. The results of this optimization are in keeping with the principles of aerodynamic design of the wing, and possess practical engineering value. Compared with traditional optimization processes, whose objectives are determined by lift and drag characteristics only, the method introduces hardly any additional time cost. The research results show that the lift and drag characteristics cannot comprehensively describe the aerodynamic characteristicss of the wing. Therefore, the objective functions based on them cannot guarantee the design principles to be followed, which makes them of little value in practical engineering application. On the contrary, the objective function which is constructed according to the wing aerodynamic design principles can guarantee the design principles to be followed in the optimization process, and efficiently improve the practical engineering value of the design results.

参考文献

[1] Harris C D. NASA supercritical airfoils a matrix of family-related airfoils. NASA TP 2969. Hampton, Virginia, USA: Langley Research Center, 1990.
[2] Wang B. Optimization design of aerodynamic distribution for civil aircraft supercritical wing. Beijing: China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, 2010.(in Chinese) 王斌. 大型客机超临界机翼气动力布局优化设计.北京: 中国航天空气动力技术研究院,2010.
[3] Shen K Y, Zhang X H. Aerodynamic design criteria, design procedures and a design example of supercritical wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1993, 14(4):113-117.(in Chinese) 沈克扬,张锡华. 超临界机翼气动设计的准则、流程和设计实例. 航空学报, 1993, 14(4): 113-117.
[4] Hicks R M, Murman E M, Vanderplaats G N. An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization. NASA TM X-3092, Moffette Field. California, USA: Ames Research Center, 1974.
[5] Hicks R M, Henne P A. Wing design by numerical optimization. Seattle, Washington, USA: AIAA Aircraft System & Technology Meeting, 1977.
[6] Nieuwland G Y. Transonic potential flow around a family of quasi-elliptical aerofoil sections. NLR Technical Report T.172. Netherlands: NLR, 1967.
[7] Tranen T L. A rapid computer-aided transonic airfoil design method. AIAA-1974-501, 1974.
[8] Henne P A. Inverse transonic wing design method. Journal of Aircraft, 1981, 18(2): 121-127.
[9] Zhu Z Q, Xia Z X, Wu L Y. An inverse design method of transonic airfoil and wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1992, 13(10): B463-B468.(in Chinese) 朱自强, 夏志勋, 吴礼义. 跨音速翼型和机翼的反设计计算方法.航空学报,1992,13(10): B463-B468.
[10] Jameson A. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory. AIAA-1995-1729, 1995.
[11] Jameson A, Reuther J J, Martinelli L, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory. AIAA-1998-2538, 1998.
[12] Jameson A, Martinelli L, Cliff S, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization of transonic and supersonic aircraft configurations. AIAA-2005-1013, 2005.
[13] Yang X D, Qiao Z D, Zhu B. Aerodynamic design method based on control theory and Navier-Stokes equations. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2005, 23(1): 46-51.(in Chinese) 杨旭东, 乔志德, 朱兵. 基于控制理论和NS方程的气动设计方法研究. 空气动力学报, 2005, 23(1): 46-51.
[14] Cheng B S. 《Aircraft design manual》5th, civil aircraft design. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2005: 110-112, 183-190.(in Chinese) 程不时.《飞机设计手册》第5册, 民用飞机总体设计. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2005: 110-112, 183-190.
[15] Zhang X J. 《Aircraft design manual》 6th, aerodynamic design. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2005: 10-16, 30-32.(in Chinese) 张锡金.《飞机设计手册》第6册, 气动设计. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2005: 10-16, 30-32.
文章导航

/