翼上螺旋桨构型耦合气动特性及翼型优化设计

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22777

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

翼上螺旋桨构型耦合气动特性及翼型优化设计

范中允^1,2, 周洲^1,2, 祝小平², 郭佳豪^1,2

1. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072;
2. 西北工业大学无人机特种技术重点实验室, 西安 710065

收稿日期:2018-11-09 修回日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2019-08-15 发布日期:2018-12-24
通讯作者: 周洲 E-mail:zhouzhou@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
民机专项（MJ-2015-F-009）；装备预研项目（41411020401）；陕西省重点研发计划（2018ZDCXL-GY-03-04）；大院大所创新计划（TC2018DYDS24）

Coupled aerodynamic analysis and airfoil optimization design for over-wing propeller configuration

FAN Zhongyun^1,2, ZHOU Zhou^1,2, ZHU Xiaoping², GUO Jiahao^1,2

1. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
2. Science and Technology on UAV Laboratory, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710065, China

Received:2018-11-09 Revised:2018-12-05 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2018-12-24
Supported by:
Civil Aircraft Special Project(MJ-2015-F-009);Equipment Pre-research Project(41411020401);Shaanxi Key Research and Development Program(2018ZDCXL-GY-03-04);Innovation Program of Research Institutions(TC2018DYDS24)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对半环形式翼上螺旋桨构型，研究了螺旋桨-机翼耦合流场特性，并以短距起降（STOL）状态最优升阻特性为目标对机翼翼型进行全局优化。首先，针对螺旋桨-气动面耦合构型，通过动量源法与真实桨叶模型CFD的计算对比，分析动量源法用于该构型设计分析的可行性。其次，为得到有利于桨-翼耦合特征的新翼型，建立了翼上螺旋桨构型自由型面变形（FFD）参数化模型，采用遗传算法对翼上螺旋桨构型机翼翼型进行全局寻优设计，分析了优化翼型参数及流场变化规律。最后，将优化翼型用于三维半环形机翼，分析其流场特性与二维计算结果的异同，验证二维翼型优化的有效性。结果表明：真实桨叶多重参考系（MRF）方法不能准确计算翼上螺旋桨构型下的流场结构，而动量源法计算结果与真实桨叶滑移网格非定常方法较为吻合；采用二维动量源CFD方法进行翼型的遗传算法优化是有效的，受半涵道的保护，二维优化翼型的优势在三维构型中得到了有效继承；翼上螺旋桨构型的翼型优化应当着重关注翼面曲率变化，在本文计算状态下，通过增加桨盘附近翼面曲率、保持附着流动来加强Coanda效应，有效实现了气动增升，优化后机翼升力提高了22.51%，显著减弱桨盘后高压区并产生二次吸力峰值，同时保持了机翼负阻力特性。

关键词: 螺旋桨, 机翼, 翼型, 垂直/短距起降, 空气动力学, 半涵道机翼

Abstract: This paper studies the characteristics of the propeller-wing coupled flow field of the channel wing configuration. It also carries out an airfoil optimization with the aim to improve the lift efficiency at Short Takeoff and Landing (STOL) condition. By adopting the momentum source method and carrying out the real blade model CFD analysis of the propeller-wing interaction flow field, this paper first analyzes the feasibility of the momentum source method for the design. Then, to obtain a new airfoil with coupled aerodynamic features, an parameterized model with Free-Form Deformation (FFD) method is established to optimize the airfoil of the channel wing, and the changes of optimal airfoil parameters and the flow field are analyzed. In the end, the CFD analysis for three dimensional channel wing is carried out to compare and verify the two-dimensional airfoil optimization results. The results show that the Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) method cannot correctly analyze the flow field of over-the-wing propeller, while the momentum source method is more consistent with the unsteady sliding mesh method. The genetic algorithm optimization using the two-dimensional momentum source CFD method is effective. With the protection of the half-duct, the advantages of two-dimensional optimization airfoil have been effectively inherited in the three-dimensional configuration. The airfoil design for channel wing configuration should focus on the curvature variation of the wing surface. In this paper, the Coanda effect is enhanced by increasing the curvature of the airfoil near the propeller and maintaining the attached flow, which achieved aerodynamic lift-increase. The lift of the optimal channel wing increases by 22.51%, and the high pressure area is significantly reduced behind the propeller and second peaks of suction appears, while drag is still negative.

Key words: propellers, wings, airfoils, vertical/short takeoff and landing, aerodynamics, channel wing

中图分类号:

V211

范中允, 周洲, 祝小平, 郭佳豪. 翼上螺旋桨构型耦合气动特性及翼型优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 122777-122777.

FAN Zhongyun, ZHOU Zhou, ZHU Xiaoping, GUO Jiahao. Coupled aerodynamic analysis and airfoil optimization design for over-wing propeller configuration[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(8): 122777-122777.

参考文献 32

[14]	HARRISON N A, VASSBERG J C, DEHAAN M A, et al. The design and test of a swept wing upper surface blowing concept[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2013.
[1]	PASAMANICK J. Langley full-scale-tunnel tests of the custer channel wing airplane:NACA RM-L53A09[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1953.
[15]	DRǍGAN V. A study of conventional upper surface blown wing configurations[J]. Review of the Air Force Academy, 2012.
[2]	JOHNSON J L, WHITE E R. Exploratory low-speed wind-tunnel investigation of advanced commuter configurations including an over-the-wing propeller design:AIAA-1983-2531[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1983.
[16]	PFINGSTEN R C, KAMRUZZAMAN M. Use of upper surface blowing and circulation control for gapless high-lift configurations[C]//Ceas/katnet Conference on Key Aerodynamics Technologies, 2005.
[3]	JOHNSON J L, WHITE E R. Over-the-wing propeller:U.S. Patent No. 4629147[P]. 1986.
[17]	KEEN E. A conceptual design methodology for predicting the aerodynamics of upper surface blowing on airfoils and wings[D]. Blacksburg, VA:Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 2004.
[4]	GUNTHER C, MARCHMAN J, VANBLARCOM R. Comparison of channel wing theoretical and experimental performance:AIAA-2000-0257[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2000.
[18]	HILL G A, KANDIL O A, HAHN A S. Aerodynamic investigations of an advanced over-the-wing nacelle transport aircraft configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(1):25-35.
[19]	RAJAGOPALAN R G, LIM C K. Laminar flow analysis of a rotor in hover[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1991, 36(1):12-23.
[5]	ENGLAR R J, CAMPBELL B A. Pneumatic channel wing powered lift advanced super-stol aircraft:AIAA-2002-3275[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[20]	CHAFFIN M S, BERRY J D. Navier-Stokes simulation of a rotor using a distributed pressure disk method[C]//Proceedings of 51st Annual Forum of American Helicopter Society, 1995.
[21]	夏贞锋. 螺旋桨滑流数值模拟方法及气动干扰研究[D]. 西安:西北工业大学, 2015. XIA Z F. Numerical approaches of propeller slipstream simulations and aerodynamic interference analysis[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015(in Chinese).
[6]	ENGLAR R J, CAMPBELL B A. Development of pneumatic channel wing powered-lift advanced SuperSTOL aircraft:AIAA-2002-2929[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[22]	LE CHUITON F. Actuator disc modelling for helicopter rotors[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2004, 8(4):285-297.
[7]	MÜLLER L, HEINZE W, KOŽULOVIĆD, et al. Aerodynamic installation effects of an over-the-wing propeller on a high-lift configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2014, 51(1):249-258.
[23]	KHIER W. Time-accurate versus actuator disk simulations of complete helicopters[C]//High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, 2006:209-220.
[24]	童自立, 孙茂. 共轴式双旋翼流动的N-S方程模拟[J]. 航空学报, 1998, 19(1):1-5. TONG Z L, SUN M. Navier-Stokes calculations of coaxial rotor aerodynamics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1998, 19(1):1-5(in Chinese).
[25]	宋长虹, 林永峰,陈文轩,等. 基于动量源方法的涵道尾桨CFD分析[J]. 直升机技术, 2009(1):6-11. SONG C H, LIN Y F, CHEN W X, et al. CFD Analysis for the ducted tail rotor based on momentum-source method[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2009(1):6-11(in Chinese).
[8]	MÜLLER L, FRIEDRICHS J, KOZULOVIC D. Unsteady flow simulations of an over-the-wing propeller configuration[C]//AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014:28-30.
[9]	BECK S C, MÜLLER L, LANGER S C. Numerical assessment of the vibration control effects of porous liners on an over-the-wing propeller configuration[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2016, 7(2):1-12.
[26]	GRUNWALD K J, GOODSON K W. Aerodynamic loads on an isolated shrouded-propeller configuration for angels of attack from -10° to 110°[R].Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1962.
[10]	WANG H B, ZHU X, ZHOU Z. Numerical simula-tion of the propeller/wing interactions at low Reynolds number[C]//International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2016.
[11]	王红波, 祝小平,周洲,等. 垂直起降飞机新型气动布局设计分析[J].西北工业大学学报, 2017, 35(2):189-196. WANG H B, ZHU X P, ZHOU Z,et al. New configuration design and analysis for a vertical take-off/hovering solar powered aircraft[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(2):189-196(in Chinese).
[27]	DORFLING J, ROKHSAZ K. Non-linear aerodynamic modeling of airfoils for accurate blade element propeller performance predictions[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamic Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
[12]	MARCUS E A, VRIES R D, KULKARNI A R, et al. Aerodynamic investigation of an over-the-wing propeller for distributed propulsion[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2018.
[28]	UHLIG D V, SELIG M S. Post stall propeller behavior at low reynolds numbers[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2008.
[29]	许和勇, 叶正寅. 涵道螺旋桨与孤立螺旋桨气动特性的数值模拟对比[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(12):2820-2825. XU H Y, YE Z Y. Numerical simulation and comparison of aerodynamic characteristics between ducted and isolated propellers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(12):2820-2825(in Chinese).
[30]	苏运德, 叶正寅,许和勇. 桨尖间隙和双桨间距对涵道螺旋桨气动性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(6):1468-1475. SU Y D, YE Z Y, XU H H. Influence of tip clearance and propeller separation space on aerodynamic performance of ducted propeller[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(6):1468-1475(in Chinese).
[31]	李晓华, 郭正,陈清阳. 涵道螺旋桨气动特性数值模拟[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2015(4):31-35. LI X H, GUO Z, CHEN Q Y. Numerical simulation of ducted rotor's aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2015(4):31-35(in Chinese).
[13]	COCHRANE J A, CARROS R J. Hybrid upper surface blown flap propulsive-lift concept for the QSRLP[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1976, 13(11):855-860.
[32]	KOSHAKJI A, QUARTERONI A, ROZZA G. Free form deformation techniques applied to 3D shape optimization problems[J]. Communications in Applied & Industrial Mathematics, 2013, 4.
[14]	HARRISON N A, VASSBERG J C, DEHAAN M A, et al. The design and test of a swept wing upper surface blowing concept[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2013.
[15]	DRǍGAN V. A study of conventional upper surface blown wing configurations[J]. Review of the Air Force Academy, 2012.
[16]	PFINGSTEN R C, KAMRUZZAMAN M. Use of upper surface blowing and circulation control for gapless high-lift configurations[C]//Ceas/katnet Conference on Key Aerodynamics Technologies, 2005.
[17]	KEEN E. A conceptual design methodology for predicting the aerodynamics of upper surface blowing on airfoils and wings[D]. Blacksburg, VA:Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 2004.
[18]	HILL G A, KANDIL O A, HAHN A S. Aerodynamic investigations of an advanced over-the-wing nacelle transport aircraft configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(1):25-35.
[19]	RAJAGOPALAN R G, LIM C K. Laminar flow analysis of a rotor in hover[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1991, 36(1):12-23.
[20]	CHAFFIN M S, BERRY J D. Navier-Stokes simulation of a rotor using a distributed pressure disk method[C]//Proceedings of 51st Annual Forum of American Helicopter Society, 1995.
[21]	夏贞锋. 螺旋桨滑流数值模拟方法及气动干扰研究[D]. 西安:西北工业大学, 2015. XIA Z F. Numerical approaches of propeller slipstream simulations and aerodynamic interference analysis[D]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015(in Chinese).
[22]	LE CHUITON F. Actuator disc modelling for helicopter rotors[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2004, 8(4):285-297.
[23]	KHIER W. Time-accurate versus actuator disk simulations of complete helicopters[C]//High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, 2006:209-220.
[24]	童自立, 孙茂. 共轴式双旋翼流动的N-S方程模拟[J]. 航空学报, 1998, 19(1):1-5. TONG Z L, SUN M. Navier-Stokes calculations of coaxial rotor aerodynamics[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1998, 19(1):1-5(in Chinese).
[25]	宋长虹, 林永峰,陈文轩,等. 基于动量源方法的涵道尾桨CFD分析[J]. 直升机技术, 2009(1):6-11. SONG C H, LIN Y F, CHEN W X, et al. CFD Analysis for the ducted tail rotor based on momentum-source method[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2009(1):6-11(in Chinese).
[26]	GRUNWALD K J, GOODSON K W. Aerodynamic loads on an isolated shrouded-propeller configuration for angels of attack from -10° to 110°[R].Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1962.
[27]	DORFLING J, ROKHSAZ K. Non-linear aerodynamic modeling of airfoils for accurate blade element propeller performance predictions[C]//32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamic Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
[28]	UHLIG D V, SELIG M S. Post stall propeller behavior at low reynolds numbers[C]//AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2008.
[29]	许和勇, 叶正寅. 涵道螺旋桨与孤立螺旋桨气动特性的数值模拟对比[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(12):2820-2825. XU H Y, YE Z Y. Numerical simulation and comparison of aerodynamic characteristics between ducted and isolated propellers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(12):2820-2825(in Chinese).
[30]	苏运德, 叶正寅,许和勇. 桨尖间隙和双桨间距对涵道螺旋桨气动性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(6):1468-1475. SU Y D, YE Z Y, XU H H. Influence of tip clearance and propeller separation space on aerodynamic performance of ducted propeller[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(6):1468-1475(in Chinese).
[31]	李晓华, 郭正,陈清阳. 涵道螺旋桨气动特性数值模拟[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2015(4):31-35. LI X H, GUO Z, CHEN Q Y. Numerical simulation of ducted rotor's aerodynamic characteristics[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2015(4):31-35(in Chinese).
[32]	KOSHAKJI A, QUARTERONI A, ROZZA G. Free form deformation techniques applied to 3D shape optimization problems[J]. Communications in Applied & Industrial Mathematics, 2013, 4.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

翼上螺旋桨构型耦合气动特性及翼型优化设计

Coupled aerodynamic analysis and airfoil optimization design for over-wing propeller configuration

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张恒, 李杰, 赵宾宾. 结冰翼型前缘下垂变弯度容冰特性改善机制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627114-627114.
[2]	束珺, 徐东光, 韩志熔, 李斯, 黄雄. 结冰风洞过冷大水滴试验中混合翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[3]	赵宾宾, 张恒, 李杰. 翼型结冰状态复杂分离流动数值模拟综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[4]	宋威, 艾邦成. 多体分离动力学研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 25950-025950.
[5]	罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[6]	韩凯, 白俊强, 邱亚松, 昌敏. 涵道螺旋桨设计变量的影响及其流动机理[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125466-125466.
[7]	郭佳豪, 周洲, 李旭. 一种涵道螺旋桨桨叶高效设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125253-125253.
[8]	刘振东, 郑锡涛, 范雯静, 张东健. 固化残余应力对无人机复合材料机翼强度的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526117-526117.
[9]	张盛, 杨宇, 王志刚, 石欣桐. 变弯度机翼后缘偏心梁设计与验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 525892-525892.
[10]	杨钊, 李杰, 牛笑天. 层流机翼飞行验证平台雷诺数效应分析及修正[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527287-527287.
[11]	耿延升, 艾梦琪, 王伟, 耿建中, 赵彦. 高效层流翼型设计及试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526798-526798.
[12]	赵彦, 段卓毅, 丁兴志, 杨体浩, 王猛. 面向飞行试验的混合层流机翼优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527539-527539.
[13]	邓一菊, 段卓毅, 艾梦琪. 层流机翼设计技术现状与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526778-526778.
[14]	牛笑天, 李杰, 周智鹏, 杨钊, 昌陌尘. 某层流机翼验证机跨声速层流特性敏感性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526771-526771.
[15]	唐松祥, 李杰, 张恒, 牛笑天. 某层流验证机中央翼段高速巡航气动性能优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526766-526766.