系统工程在大型客机运行支持系统研制中的应用综述

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22376

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

系统工程在大型客机运行支持系统研制中的应用综述

马小骏¹, 彭焕春²

1. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司, 上海 200126;
2. 上海飞机客户服务有限公司, 上海 200241

收稿日期:2018-05-29 修回日期:2018-07-09 出版日期:2019-01-15 发布日期:2018-10-17
通讯作者: 马小骏 E-mail:maxiaojun@comac.cc

Review on development of commercial aircraft operation support system based on system engineering approach

MA Xiaojun¹, PENG Huanchun²

1. Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Ltd., Shanghai 200126, China;
2. Shanghai Aircraft Customer Service Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200241, China

Received:2018-05-29 Revised:2018-07-09 Online:2019-01-15 Published:2018-10-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将商用飞机系统思想应用于产品运行支持系统研制过程中，从利益攸关方需要定义、功能分析、需求定义和适航约束限制、系统架构定义、接口定义、设计综合、验证确认到运行评审，完整地分析了产品运行支持系统研制的全过程，并给出产品运行支持系统全生命周期过程的模型与定义。该方法可以有效地将大型客机产品运行顶层需求分解至产品研制和运行支持系统研制需求中，并且通过过程集成以及技术集成将运行支持系统研制与飞机研制相结合，从而保证大型客机在满足适航型号合格审定（TC）和航空器评审（AEG）要求的同时，能够满足客户实际运行安全性和经济性需求。

关键词: 系统工程, 运行支持系统, 功能分析, 性能需求与约束, 设计综合, 验证确认

Abstract: Applying up-to-date system engineering approach to the development of commercial aircraft operation support system, this paper analyzes the complete process of operation support system development from stakeholder needs definition, function analysis, requirement definition and airworthiness constraints, system architecture definition, interface definition, design integration, verification & validation, and airworthiness operation review. A commercial aircraft operation support lifecycle process model is defined and illustrated. This approach effectively divides the top level aircraft operation requirements into the aircraft requirements and operation support system requirements. By combining the aircraft development process with the operation support system development process through process integration and technical integration, this approach ensures the commercial aircraft meets not only the requirements of Type Certificate (TC) and Aircraft Evaluation Group (AEG), but also the airlines' requirements of safety and economical operation.

Key words: system engineering, operation support system, function analysis, performance requirements & constraints, design integration, verification & validation

中图分类号:

马小骏, 彭焕春. 系统工程在大型客机运行支持系统研制中的应用综述[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522376-522376.

MA Xiaojun, PENG Huanchun. Review on development of commercial aircraft operation support system based on system engineering approach[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(1): 522376-522376.

参考文献

[1] SAE Aerospace. Guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems:SAE ARP 4754A[S]. Warrendale, PA:SAE International, 2010.
[2] ISO/IEC/IEEE. Systems and software engineering-System life cycle processes:ISO 15288[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2008.
[3] Federal Aviation Administration. FAA system engineering handbook[M]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2006.
[4] JACKSON S. Systems engineering for commercial aircraft:A domain-specification adaptation[M]. 2nd ed. London:Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2015:9-14.
[5] 汉斯-亨利奇·阿尔特菲尔德. 商用飞机项目——复杂高端产品的研发管理[M]. 唐长红, 等, 译, 北京:航空工业出版社, 2013:1-20. ALTFELD H H. Commercial aircraft projects-Managing the development of highly complex products[M]. TANG C H, et al., translated. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2013:1-20(in Chinese).
[6] 贺东风, 赵越让, 钱仲焱, 等. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司系统工程手册[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2017:1-16. HE D F, ZHAO Y R, QIAN Z Y, et al. COMAC systems engineering manual[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2017:1-16(in Chinese).
[7] SANDERS A, KLEIN J. Systems engineering framework for integrated product and industrial design including trade study optimization[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2012, (2):413-419.
[8] INCOSE. System engineering handbook-A guide for system life cycle processes and activities[M]. 3rd ed. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006:1-60.
[9] ATA. Operator/manufacturer scheduled maintenance development:ATA MSG-3[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2011.
[10] ATA. Aviation industry standards for digital information security:ATA Specification 42(Spec 42)[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2010.
[11] ATA. Ground equipment technical data:ATA Specification 101(Spec 101)[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 1986.
[12] ATA. E-business specification materiel's management:ATA Specification 2000(Spec 2000)[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2009.
[13] ATA. Information standards for aviation maintenance:ATA Specification 2200(Spec 2200)[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2000.
[14] ATA. Data exchange standard for flight operations:ATA Specification 2300(Spec 2300)[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 1999.
[15] ATA. World airlines and suppliers guide[S]. Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2015.
[16] ASD, AIA, ATA. International specification for technical publications utilizing a common source database (Issue 4.2):S1000D[S]. Brussel:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe; Arlington:Aerospace Industries Association; Washington, D.C.:Air Transport Association of America Inc., 2016.
[17] ASD. International specification for material management (Issue 6.0):S2000M[S]. Brussel:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe, 2015.
[18] ASD, AIA. International procedure specification for logistic support analysis (Issue 1.1):S3000L[S]. Brussel:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe; Arlington:Aerospace Industries Association, 2014.
[19] ASD, AIA. International specification for developing and continuously improving preventive maintenance (Issue 1.0):S4000P[S]. Brussel:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe; Arlington:Aerospace Industries Association, 2014.
[20] ASD, AIA. International specification for in-service data feedback (Issue 1.0):S5000F[S]. Brussel:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe; Arlington:Aerospace Industries Association, 2016.
[21] IATA. Flight simulation training device design & performance data requirements[S]. 7th ed. Montreal:The International Air Transport Association, 2009.
[22] ARINC. Guidance for design of aircraft equipment and software for use in training device:ARINIC 610C[S]. Annapolis:Aeronautical Radio Inc., 2009.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

系统工程在大型客机运行支持系统研制中的应用综述

Review on development of commercial aircraft operation support system based on system engineering approach

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毕文豪, 范秋岑, 李德林, 张安. 基于多视角的民机正向设计建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(10): 227536-227536.
[2]	裴照宇, 康焱, 马继楠, 赵晨, 马晓珊. 基于模型的国际月球科研站协同论证方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 226066-226066.
[3]	康锐, 王自力. 可靠性系统工程理论研究回顾与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527505-527505.
[4]	孙霄剑, 罗明强, 张驰, 关若曦, 刘虎. 民用飞机预研论证权威真相源构建技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 224222-224222.
[5]	张柏楠, 戚发轫, 邢涛, 刘洋, 王为. 基于模型的载人航天器研制方法研究与实践[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 23967-023967.
[6]	包晓宁, 赵培林, 张保中, 胡志文, 兰于清, 薛飞. 先进战斗机生命保障系统[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523464-523464.
[7]	胡晓义, 王如平, 王鑫, 付永涛. 基于模型的复杂系统安全性和可靠性分析技术发展综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523436-523436.
[8]	倪先平, 朱清华. 直升机总体设计思路和方法发展分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 17-29.
[9]	沈作军, 柳青, 肖佳平. 高超声速飞行器研制系统工程风险概率分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 317-323.
[10]	周天然, 熊华钢. 航空电子系统混合实时任务的双层调度[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6): 1067-1074.
[11]	田瑾;赵廷弟;刘铮. 备件供应保障系统的动力学原理及动态性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(5): 1104-1109.
[12]	朱力立;李庄生;许宗泽. 飞机综合航电系统总体设计综合评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(3): 685-689.
[13]	熊华钢;周贵荣;李峭. 机载总线网络及其发展[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(6): 1135-1144.
[14]	孙尧;朱林;徐兴杰;张晓囡. 基于数据融合树的C³I信息融合系统体系结构设计[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(2): 305-309.
[15]	康锐;王自力. 可靠性系统工程的理论与技术框架[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(5): 633-636.