基于样本分位数的机载燃油泵故障状态特征提取及实验研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0303

材料工程与机械制造

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于样本分位数的机载燃油泵故障状态特征提取及实验研究

李娟^1,2, 景博¹, 羌晓清¹, 刘晓东^3,4

1. 空军工程大学航空航天工程学院, 西安 710038;
2. 鲁东大学数学与统计科学学院, 烟台 264025;
3. 中航工业金城南京机电液压工程研究中心, 南京 210000;
4. 航空机电系统综合航空科技重点实验室, 南京 210000

收稿日期:2015-08-31 修回日期:2015-11-12 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2015-11-27
通讯作者: 李娟女, 博士研究生, 讲师。主要研究方向: 故障预测与健康管理。 Tel.: 029-84787628 E-mail: daidaiquanquan123@126.com E-mail:daidaiquanquan123@126.com
作者简介:景博女, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 故障预测与健康管理, 可测试性设计, 传感器网络, 数据融合。 E-mail: jingbo_sensor@163.com;羌小清男, 硕士研究生。主要研究方向: 故障预测与健康管理。 E-mail: 928169759@qq.com;刘晓东男, 高级工程师。主要研究方向: 飞机燃油泵及燃油系统设计。 E-mail: bettercc@sohu.com
基金资助:
航空科学基金（20142896022）

Fault states feature extraction and experimental study for airborne fuel pumps based on sample quantile

LI Juan^1,2, JING Bo¹, QIANG Xiaoqing¹, LIU Xiaodong^3,4

1. College of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, China;
2. College of Mathematics and Statistics, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China;
3. Nanjing Engineering Institute of Aircraft Systems, Jincheng, AVIC, Nanjing 210000, China;
4. Aviation Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Aviation Mechanical and Electrical System, Nanjing 210000, China

Received:2015-08-31 Revised:2015-11-12 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2015-11-27
Supported by:
Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20142896022)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

机载燃油泵的健康状态关系着飞行任务的完成和飞行安全，对机载燃油泵的故障状态特征提取及诊断成为亟需解决的问题。通过对机载燃油实验系统的振动与压力信号进行综合分析，提出了一种基于样本分位数的故障状态特征提取方法。首先，根据样本分位数的渐近分布定理，讨论了样本分位数的统计特性，分析了故障状态与样本分位数的对应关系，从理论上保证了该方法的可行性，在实测数据统计分析的基础上，讨论了样本容量对样本分位数稳定性的影响；其次，根据样本分位数渐近分布定理计算各故障状态的置信区间，并与Bootstrap方法得到的置信区间进行对比，结果显示，依据样本分位数渐近分布定理得到的置信区间真实可靠，为在线故障诊断提供了依据；然后，以各故障状态下提取的样本分位数为特征向量构建贝叶斯判别函数，进行故障诊断；最后依据故障诊断的正确率对传感器进行优化，结果表明，同时安装振动传感器与压力传感器可以提高故障诊断的正确率，并且只安装1个压力传感器与1个特定方向的振动传感器即可对机载燃油泵的故障状态进行完全识别。为快速准确的在线判断机载燃油泵的状态提供了理论支撑，并且可以降低工程应用中机载燃油泵监测系统的体积、功耗及复杂性。

关键词: 燃油泵, 样本分位数, 传感器, 故障预测与健康管理, 故障诊断

Abstract:

The health state of airborne fuel pumps is important for the achievement and safety of flight mission, so the fault state feature extraction and diagnosis for the fuel pumps become an urgent problem. Through the analysis of the output signal about the vibration sensors and pressure sensor from the experiment system of airborne fuel pump, a sample quantile based fault state feature extraction method is presented. Firstly, by the asymptotic distribution theorem of the quantile, the statistic character of the sample quantile is discussed; the correspondence between the fault state and the sample quantile is discussed; the feasibility of the presented method is ensured in theory; statistic analysis has been done for the real data, and the stability alone with the sample size is discussed. Secondly, the confidence interval of sample quantile is computed based on the asymptotic distribution theorem, and compared with that obtained by the Bootstrap methods. The results show that the confidence interval of sample quantile obtained according to the asymptotic distribution theorem is credible, providing basis for online fault diagnosis. Then the Bayesian discriminant function is established based on the quantile feature vector extracted under different states, which will be used for the fault diagnosis. Finally, the layout of the sensors is optimized based on the accuracy of fault diagnosis. The results show that the vibration sensors combined with pressure sensor will improve the accuracy of fault diagnosis, and only one vibration sensor combined with one pressure sensor can finish the fault diagnosis completely. This study provides theoretical support for the quick and accurate online decision about the states of the fuel pump, and it can reduce volume, power consumption and complexity of the system in engineering applications.

Key words: fuel pumps, sample quantile, sensors, prognostics and health management, fault diagnosis

中图分类号:

V263.6

李娟, 景博, 羌晓清, 刘晓东. 基于样本分位数的机载燃油泵故障状态特征提取及实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2851-2863.

LI Juan, JING Bo, QIANG Xiaoqing, LIU Xiaodong. Fault states feature extraction and experimental study for airborne fuel pumps based on sample quantile[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(9): 2851-2863.

参考文献

[1] 冯威, 于劲松, 袁海文. 机载燃油系统在线实时健康管理[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(12): 1639-1643. FENG W, YU J S, YUAN H W. Online real-time health management for aerial fuel delivery system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(12): 1639-1643 (in Chinese).
[2] HAYLOCK J A, MECROW B C, JACK A G, et al. Operation of a fault tolerant PM drive for an aerospace fuel pump application[J]. IEE Proceedings-Electric Power, 1998, 145(5): 441-448.
[3] 王少萍. 大型飞机机载系统预测与健康管理关键技术[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(6): 1459-1472. WANG S P. Prognostics and health management key thchnology of aircraft airbrone system[J]. Acta Aeronautic et Astronautic Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 1459-1472 (in Chinese).
[4] MECROW B C, JACK A G, ATKINSON D J, et al. Design and testing of a four-phase fault-tolerant permanent-magnet machine for an engine fuel pump[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2004, 19(4): 671-678.
[5] 胡春燕, 刘新灵, 李莹. 某发动机主燃油泵轴承失效分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2011, 36(9): 64-67. HU C Y, LIU X L, LI Y. Failure analysis on main fuel pump bearing of engine[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2011, 36(9): 64-67 (in Chinese).
[6] WANG X J, CAI Y P, LIN X Z. Diesel engine PT pump fault diagnosis based on the characteristics of its fuel pressure[J]. IERI Procedia, 2014(7): 84-89.
[7] ZHANG X, TANG L, DECASTRO J. Robust fault diagnosis of aircraft engines: A nonlinear adaptive estimation-based approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(3): 861-868.
[8] HANCOKE K M, ZHANG Q. A hybrid approach to hydraulic vane pump condition monitoring and fault detection[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2006, 49(4): 1203-1211.
[9] NIEMANN H. A setup for active fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2006, 51(9): 1572-1578.
[10] MOOSAVI S S, DJERDIR A, AMIRAT Y A, et al. Demagnetization fault diagnosis in permanent magnet synchronous motors: A review of the state-of-the-art[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2015, 391: 203-212.
[11] MURALIDHARAN V, SUGUMARAN V. Rough set based rule learning and fuzzy classification of wavelet features for fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump[J]. Measurement, 2013, 46(9): 3057-3063.
[12] MURALIDHARAN V, SUGUMARAN V, INDIRA V. Fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using SVM[J]. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal, 2014, 17(3): 152-157.
[13] 王杰华. 基于BP神经网络的离心油泵故障诊断研究 [D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2013: 6-11. WANG J H. Fault diagnosis of centrifugal oil pump based on BP neural network[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2013: 6-11 (in Chinese).
[14] 管河山, 王谦, 唐德文. 基于分位数特征提取的时间序列模式分类[J]. 计算机工程, 2015(3): 167-171. GUAN H S, WANG Q, TANG D W. Time sequence pattern classification based on quantile feature extraction[J]. Computer Engineering, 2015(3): 167-171 (in Chinese).
[15] 茆诗松. 高等数理统计[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 46-49. MAO S S. Advanced mathematical statistics[M]. Beijing: China Higher Education Press, 2006: 46-49 (in Chinese).
[16] 王星, 褚挺进. 非参数统计[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014: 94-95. WANG X, CHU T J. Nonparametric statistics[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2014: 94-95 (in Chinese).
[17] 王济川, 郭志刚. Logistic回归模型——方法与应用[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2001: 6-17. WANG J C, GUO Z G. Logistic regression model— method and application[M]. Beijing: China Higher Education Press, 2001: 6-17 (in Chinese).
[18] EFRON B. An introduction to the bootstrap[M]. Chapman & Hall, 1993: 168-176.
[19] TIMMERMAN M E, BRAAK C J F T. Bootstrap confidence intervals for principal response curves[J]. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2008, 52(4): 1837-1849.
[20] 袁修开, 吕震宙, 岳珠峰. 小样本下分位数函数的Bootstrap置信区间估计[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(10): 1842-1849. YUAN X K, LU Z Z, YUE Z F. Bootstrap confidence interval of quantile function estimation for small samples[J]. Acta Aeronautic et Astronautic Sinica, 2012, 33(10): 1842-1849 (in Chinese).
[21] 赵玮. 应用统计学教程(下册)[M]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2003: 8-10. ZHAO W. Applied statistics course (Volume II)[M]. Xi'an:Xidian University Press, 2003: 8-10 (in Chinese).
[22] 张尧庭, 方开泰. 多元统计分析引论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982: 235-246. ZHANG Y T, FANG K T. A introduction to multivariate statistical analysis[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1982: 235-246 (in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于样本分位数的机载燃油泵故障状态特征提取及实验研究

Fault states feature extraction and experimental study for airborne fuel pumps based on sample quantile

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于功也, 蔡伟东, 胡明辉, 刘文才, 马波. 故障机理与领域自适应混合驱动的机械故障智能迁移诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 426800-426800.
[2]	陈博, 岳凯, 王如生, 胡明南. 基于学习策略的多速率多传感器融合定位方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726904-726904.
[3]	曹明, 黄金泉, 周健, 陈雪峰, 鲁峰, 魏芳. 民用航空发动机故障诊断与健康管理现状、挑战与机遇Ⅰ: 气路、机械和FADEC系统故障诊断与预测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625573-625573.
[4]	段发阶, 牛广越, 周琦, 傅骁, 蒋佳佳. 航空发动机叶尖间隙在线测量技术研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 626014-626014.
[5]	张烁, 刘治汶. 航空发动机轴承故障结构化贝叶斯稀疏表示[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625056-625056.
[6]	张忠强, 张新, 王家序, 刘治汶. 基于重加权谱峭度方法的航空发动机故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625445-625445.
[7]	韩淞宇, 邵海东, 姜洪开, 张笑阳. 基于提升卷积神经网络的航空发动机高速轴承智能故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625479-625479.
[8]	孙灿飞, 黄林然, 沈勇. 复杂工况下的直升机行星传动轮系故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625480-625480.
[9]	田晶, 张羽薇, 张凤玲, 艾辛平, 高崇. 基于多尺度量子熵的中介轴承故障诊断方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625485-625485.
[10]	康玉祥, 陈果, 尉询楷, 周磊. 深度残差对冲网络及其在滚动轴承故障诊断中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625201-625201.
[11]	邵怡韦, 陈嘉宇, 林翠颖, 万程, 葛红娟, 石智龙. 小训练样本下齿轮箱故障诊断:一种基于改进深度森林的方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625429-625429.
[12]	王维民, 陈子文, 张旭龙, 陈康. 基于叶端定时的转子碰摩故障诊断方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625031-625031.
[13]	郑帅, 王子涵, 赵浩然, 杨朋涛, 洪军. 基于差分进化算法的飞机油量传感器布局优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125809-125809.
[14]	林京, 张博瑶, 张大义, 陈敏. 航空燃气涡轮发动机故障诊断研究现状与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 626565-626565.
[15]	聂同攀, 曾继炎, 程玉杰, 马梁. 面向飞机电源系统故障诊断的知识图谱构建技术及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625499-625499.