基于离散伴随的流场反演在湍流模拟中的应用

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24695

Abstract

Abstract: Accurate simulation of turbulent flow is a common problem in engineering and academic fields. In this paper, the idea of data-driven turbulence modeling is adopted, and a framework of flow field inversion based on discrete adjoint is established. The SA model is modified by multiplying the production term of its eddy viscosity transport equation and a coefficient with non-uniform distribution, which is inferred with limited observation data. To improve the efficiency of discrete adjoint optimization under physical constraints, the constraint-augmented adjoint method is used, and its efficiency is verified in this paper. Two cases of iced airfoil and periodic hill are selected for analysis. The results obtained in both cases are highly consistent with the observed data, and the limited observation information can be generalized to the whole flow field with the help of the correction of the turbulence model. The analysis shows that the correction region deduced from field inversion has a certain physical significance and can guide further development of the turbulence model.

Key words: turbulence modeling, data driven, field inversion, discrete adjoint, constrained optimization

CLC Number:

V211.3

YAN Chongyang, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Haixin. Application of field inversion based on discrete adjoint method in turbulence modeling[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524695-524695.

References

[1] XIAO H, CINNELLA P. Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations:A review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 108:1-31.
[2] DURAISAMY K, IACCARINO G, XIAO H. Turbulence modeling in the age of data[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51:357-377.
[3] PLATTEEUW P D A, LOEVEN G J A, BIJL H. Uncertainty quantification applied to the k-epsilon model of turbulence using the probabilistic collocation method:AIAA-2008-2150[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2008.
[4] DUNN M C, SHOTORBAN B, FRENDI A. Uncertainty quantification of turbulence model coefficients via Latin hypercube sampling method[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(4):041402.
[5] EMORY M, LARSSON J, IACCARINO G. Modeling of structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closures[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(11):110822.
[6] CHEUNG S H, OLIVER T A, PRUDENCIO E E, et al. Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(9):1137-1149.
[7] RAY J, LEFANTZI S, ARUNAJATESAN S, et al. Learning an eddy viscosity model using Shrinkage and Bayesian calibration:A jet-in-crossflow case study[J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B:Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 4(1):011001.
[8] KATO H, OBAYASHI S. Approach for uncertainty of turbulence modeling based on data assimilation technique[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2013, 85:2-7.
[9] XIAO H, WU J L, WANG J X, et al. Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations:A data-driven, physics-informed Bayesian approach[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 324:115-136.
[10] DOW E, WANG Q. Quantification of structural uncertainties in the k-ω turbulence model:AIAA-2011-1762[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[11] SINGH A P, DURAISAMY K. Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(4):045110.
[12] 张亦知, 程诚, 范钇彤, 等. 基于物理知识约束的数据驱动式湍流模型修正及槽道湍流计算验证[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3):123282. ZHANG Y Z, CHENG C, FAN Y T, et al. Data-driven correction of turbulence model with physics-informed constrains in channel flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(3):123282(in Chinese).
[13] TRACEY B D, DURAISAMY K, ALONSO J J. A machine learning strategy to assist turbulence model development:AIAA-2015-1287[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[14] ZHU L Y, ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, et al. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils[J]. Physics of Fulids, 2019, 31(1):015105.
[15] PARISH E J, DURAISAMY K. A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 305:758-774.
[16] SINGH A P, MEDIDA S, DURAISAMY K. Machine-learning-augmented predictive modeling of turbulent separated flows over airfoils[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(7):2215-2227.
[17] DURAISAMY K, ZHANG Z J, SINGH A P. New approaches in turbulence and transition modeling using data-driven techniques:AIAA-2015-1284[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[18] SPALART P R, ALLMARAS S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows:AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1992.
[19] OLIVER T A, MOSER R D. Bayesian uncertainty quantification applied to RANS turbulence models[J]. Journal of Physics Conference, 2011, 318(4):042032.
[20] PIRONNEAU O. On optimum design in fluid mechanics[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1974, 64(1):97-110.
[21] JAMESON A. Aerodynamic design via control theory[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 1988, 3(3):377-401.
[22] GILES M B, DUTA M C, MULLER J,et al. Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(2):198-205.
[23] 刘峰博, 郝海兵, 李典, 等. 离散伴随方法在气动优化设计中的应用[J]. 航空计算技术, 2017, 47(2):33-36, 40. LIU F B,HAO H B,LI D,et al. Application of discrete adjoint method in aerodynamic shape optimization design[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2017, 47(2):33-36, 40(in Chinese).
[24] ELLIOTT J, PERAIRE J. Practical three-dimensional aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured meshes[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(9):1479-1485.
[25] NIELSEN E, ANDERSON W. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes using the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37(11):957-964.
[26] KENWAY G K W, MADER C A, HE P, et al. Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 110:100542.
[27] RASHAD R, ZINGG D W. Aerodynamic shape optimization for natural laminar flow using a discrete-adjoint approach[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(11):3321-3337.
[28] BROEREN A P, BRAGG M B, ADDY H E. Flowfield measurements about an airfoil with leading-edge ice shapes[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(4):1226-1234.
[29] LI H R, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X. Aerodynamic prediction of iced airfoils based on a modified three-equation turbulence model[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(5):3863-3876.

Application of field inversion based on discrete adjoint method in turbulence modeling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Shaobo YAO, Lijian JIANG, Wenwen ZHAO, Zheng LU, Changju WU, Weifang CHEN. Numerical method of data-driven rarefied nonlinear constitutive relations coupled with clustering [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 40-53.
[2]	CHEN Bo, YUE Kai, WANG Rusheng, HU Mingnan. Learning-based multi-rate multi-sensor fusion localization method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726904-726904.
[3]	YANG Tihao, WANG Yiwen, WANG Yutong, SHI Yayun, ZHOU Zhu. Discrete adjoint-based optimization approach for laminar flow wings [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 126132-126132.
[4]	WANG Yiwen, LAN Xiayu, SHI Yayun, HUA Jun, BAI Junqiang, ZHOU Zhu. Gradient optimization design for laminar airfoil considering inspiration effect [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 527323-527323.
[5]	WANG Shaoping, GENG Yixuan, SHI Cun. Life estimation of aircraft hydraulic pump based on failure physics and data driven [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(10): 527347-527347.
[6]	YE Nianhui, LONG Teng, WU Yufei, TANG Yifan, SHI Renhe. Kriging-assisted constrained differential evolution algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 324580-324580.
[7]	ZHANG Weiwei, KOU Jiaqing, LIU Yilang. Prospect of artificial intelligence empowered fluid mechanics [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524689-524689.
[8]	CHEN Zhijie, TANG Jinhui, WANG Chong, CHENG Jizeng, CAO Shan, SHAO Xin. Using artificial intelligence in airspace system to improve airspace hierarchical governance capability [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 525018-525018.
[9]	MENG Songhe, YE Yumei, YANG Qiang, HUANG Zhen, XIE Weihua. Digital twin and its aerospace applications [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(9): 23615-023615.
[10]	LIU Fengbo, JIANG Cheng, MA Tuliang, LIANG Yihua. Aerodynamic optimization design of large civil aircraft using pressure distribution inverse design method based on discrete adjoint [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623372-623372.
[11]	ZHOU Lin, HUANG Jiangtao, GAO Zhenghong. Three dimensional radar cross section geometric sensitivity calculation based on discrete adjoint equation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623361-623361.
[12]	HUANG Jiangtao, ZHANG Yidian, GAO Zhenghong, YU Jing, ZHOU Zhu, YU Lei. Sonic boom optimization of supersonic jet based on flow/sonic boom coupled adjoint equations [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(5): 122505-122505.
[13]	HUANG Jiangtao, GAO Zhenghong, YU Jing, ZHENG Chuanyu, ZHOU Zhu. A typical integrated design method for aerodynamic shape optimization of large civil aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522369-522369.
[14]	LI Li, BAI Junqiang, GUO Tongbiao, CHEN Song. Aerodynamic optimization design for civil aircraft considering relaxed static stability [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(9): 121112-121112.
[15]	CHEN Song, BAI Junqiang, SHI Yayun, QIAO Lei. Aerodynamic shape optimization design of civil jet wing-body-tail configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(10): 3195-3207.