带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严的实验研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26719

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

| 后一篇

带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严的实验研究

张庆才¹,刘松²,王钦钦³,谭晓茗⁴,张靖周¹,郭文⁵

1. 南京航空航天大学
2.
3. 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院
4. 南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院
5. 中国燃气涡轮研究院

收稿日期:2021-11-29 修回日期:2021-12-30 出版日期:2022-01-04 发布日期:2022-01-04
通讯作者: 谭晓茗
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项

Experimental study on composite rim seal with deep cavity in the static disc and modified platform

Received:2021-11-29 Revised:2021-12-30 Online:2022-01-04 Published:2022-01-04
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文主要采用CO2气体体积分数测量法研究一种带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严结构。同时选取轴向封严结构和叠覆封严结构作为比较基准，重点关注主流雷诺数（0.75×105≤Rew≤9.4×105）、封严流量（流量比FR=0.2%~2.5%）、旋转雷诺数（1.6×105≤Reφ≤8.1×105）等典型工况参数对盘腔内压力分布和封严效率的影响情况；并在此基础上开展了相应的数值研究，获得了封严腔室内详细的流场信息。结果表明：在试验设计工况范围内，主流雷诺数的改变对静叶尾缘和动叶前缘的周向压力分布影响显著。主流雷诺数增加，主流通道内压力升高，主流气体入侵加剧；增加封严流量有利于提高盘腔内压力，从而提升盘腔封严效率，但这对静叶尾缘压力影响较小；增加旋转雷诺数会增大静叶尾缘和动叶叶间通道前缘的静压，加重主流气体入侵，降低盘腔封严效率。相比轴向封严结构，叠覆封严结构由于高半径封严容腔的设置，改变了盘腔流场结构，有效地将主流气体阻隔在封严容腔内，保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在80%以上。新型封严结构的静盘深腔和缘板造型设置，不仅保证了低半径盘腔的封严效率在85%以上，还能提高高半径处封严容腔处的封严效率，在低流量比（FR=0.2%）工况下，其封严容腔区域的封严效率提升了10%。

关键词: 复合封严, 封严效率, 主流雷诺数, 旋转雷诺数, 燃气入侵

Abstract: In this study, the composite rim seal with the deep cavity in the static disc and the modified platform（the following abbreviation “C rim seal”）was investigated by measuring the CO2 concentration. Simultaneous-ly, an axial and an overlapping rim seal has been selected as a baseline to compare and analyze the effects of the mainstream Reynolds number (0.75×105≤Rew≤9.4×105), the sealing flow rate (flow rate ratio FR= 0.2%~2.5%), and rotating Reynolds number (1.6×105≤Reφ≤8.1×105) on the distribution of pressure and the sealing efficiency in the disc cavity. Furthermore, a corresponding numerical study was carried out to ob-tain the detailed flow characteristics. The results show that the main flow Reynolds number significantly affects the circumferential pressure distribution in the main flow channel. With the main flow Reynolds number increasing，the pressure in the main flow channel also increased and the gas ingestion intensified. The higher coolant flow rate is beneficial to improve the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity by increasing the pressure in the disc cavity, but it has less effect on the pressure at the trailing edge of the vane. An im-provement in the rotating Reynolds number increases the static pressure in the main flow channel and de-creases the sealing efficiency of the disc cavity. The flow structure of the disc cavity is changed by the set-ting of the high-radius sealing cavity, which effectively blocks the mainstream gas inside the sealing cavity and ensures that the sealing efficiency of the low-radius cavity is above 80%. The C rim seal structure not only guarantees the sealing efficiency of 85% at the low-radius disc cavity, but also improves the sealing efficiency at the high-radius sealing cavity. At a low sealing flow ratio (FR=0.2%), the sealing efficiency of the C rim seal structure is 10% higher than the other two rim seal structures.

Key words: composite rim seal, sealing efficiency, mainstream Reynolds number, rotating Reynolds number, gas ingestion

中图分类号:

V231.3

张庆才刘松王钦钦谭晓茗张靖周郭文. 带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严的实验研究[J]. 航空学报, doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.26719.

参考文献

[1] BUNKER J A. Gas turbine heat transfer: ten remaining hot gas path challenges[J]. ASME Journal of Tur-bomachinery, 2007, 129(2): 193-201.
[2] SCOBIE L, SANGAN C M, OWEN J M, et al. Review of ingress in gas turbines[J]. ASME Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138: 120801.
[3] KOFF B L. Gas turbine technology evolution: a design-er’s perspective[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(4): 577-595.
[4] PHADKE U P, OWEN J M. An investigation of ingress for an air-cooled shrouded rotating-disk system with radial-clearance seals[J]. ASME Journal of Engineer-ing for Power Transactions, 1983, 105: 178-183.
[5] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, ZHOU K, et al. Ex-perimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part I: externally-induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(2): 021012.
[6] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, ZHOU K, et al. Ex-perimental measurements of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part II: rotationally-induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(2): 021013.
[7] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part I: rotationally induced ingress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3): 031005.
[8] OWEN J M. Prediction of ingestion through turbine rim seals-part II: externally induced and combined in-gress[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(3): 031006.
[9] 吴康, 任静, 蒋洪德,等. 整级透平中转静轮缘封严问题研究: PartⅠ封严与入侵[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(5):873-877.
WU K, REN J, JIANG H D, et al. Rotor-stator rim seal analysis in one stage gas turbine: PartⅠingestion and seal[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(5):873-877(in Chinese).
[10] 陶加银, 高庆, 宋立明, 等. 基于附加示踪变量法的涡轮轮缘密封非定常封严特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014(11): 2154-2158.
TAO J Y, GAO Q, SONG L M, et al. Numerical inves-tigations on the unsteady mainstream ingestion char-acteristics of turbine rim seals with additional passive tracer method[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermo-physics, 2014(11): 2154-2158(in Chinese).
[11] 陶加银，高庆，宋立明，等. 涡轮轮缘密封非定常主流入侵特性的数值研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014, 48(1): 53-59.
TAO J Y, GAO Q, SONG L M, et al. Numerical inves-tigations on unsteady mainstream ingestion charac-teristics of turbine rim seals[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiao-tong University, 2014, 48(1): 53-59(in Chinese).
[12] JIA X Y, ZHANG H, JIANG Y T, et al. Performance of radial-axial clearance rim seal in realistic working conditions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77: 373-387.
[13] SANGAN C M, POUNTNEY O J, SCOBIE J A, et al. Experimental measurements of ingestion through tur-bine rim seals-part III: single and double seals[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(5): 051011.
[14] POPOVIC I, HODSON H P. Improving turbine stage efficiency and sealing effectiveness through modifica-tions of the rim seal geometry[J]. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135: 061016.
[15] DA SOGHE R, BIANCHINI C, MICIO M, et al. Effect of rim seal configuration on gas turbine cavity sealing in both design and off-design conditions[C]. Oslo: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachin-ery Technical Conference and Exposition, 2018.
[16] SCOBIE J A, TEUBER R, LI Y S, et al. Design of an improved turbine rim seal[J]. ASME Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(2): 022503.
[17] SCHULER P, KURZ W, DULLENKOPF K, et al. The influence of different rim seal geometries on hot-gas ingestion and total pressure loss in a low-pressure tur-bine[R]. ASME Paper GT2010-22205, 2010.
[18] SCHULER P, DULLENKOPF K, BAUER H J. Investi-gation of the influence of different rim seal geometries in a low-pressure purbine[R]. ASME Paper GT2011-45682, 2011.
[19] ERICKSON R D, SIMON T W, ZHANG L, et al. Ex-perimental investigation of disc cavity leakage flow and hub endwall contouring in a linear rotor cas-cade[C]. ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Con-ference and Exposition, 2011.
[20] ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG Y J, DONG X, et al. Flow mechanism between purge flow and mainstream in different turbine rim seal configurations[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(08): 2162-2175.
[21] 罗翔, 康文武, 全永凯, 等. 多齿轮缘封严特性的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(001): 8-13.
LUO X, KANG W W, QUAN Y K, et al. Experiment on multi-tooth rim sealing[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(001): 8-13(in Chinese).
[22] 王鸣, 邬泽宇, 罗翔, 等. 凸起数对各封严结构封严效率影响的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(05): 1165-1172.
WANG M, WU Z Y, LUO X, et al. Experiment on the effect of protrusion amount on sealing efficiency of different rim seals[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(05): 1165-1172(in Chinese).
[23] 邬泽宇, 罗翔, 胡彦文, 等. 凸起迎风面积对不同轮缘封严结构封严效率影响的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(05): 1065-1072.
WU Z Y, LUO X, HU Y W, et al. Experimental study on effects of section area of protrusion on sealing ef-ficiency of different rim seal[J]. Journal of propulsion technology, 2019, 40(05): 1065-1072(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

带缘板修型的静盘深腔型复合封严的实验研究

Experimental study on composite rim seal with deep cavity in the static disc and modified platform

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	安利平王掩刚王昊朱自环. 跨声速压气机湿压缩性能及流动特性研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[2]	林阿强吴衡刘高文畅然冯青. 燃气涡轮发动机预旋系统压比和熵增的作用机制与理论分析[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[3]	杜建建潘贤德刘天一. 航空发动机角接触球轴承轴向力间接测量方法（“航空发动机运行安全”专栏）[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[4]	郑覃杨小贺叶俊冯锦璋. 内涵工况对风扇增压级双涵匹配的影响研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[5]	陈以勒, 俞凯凯, 徐惊雷. 几何尺寸约束的超燃冲压发动机推力喷管设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124259-124259.
[6]	王昊薛飞岳少原王掩刚. 对转压气机变转速比失速类型试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[7]	王博, 吴艳辉. 扩压叶栅叶尖非定常流动的涡动力学机理[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123881-123881.
[8]	蔡伊雯, 金志光, 周建兴, 周航. 一种多热力循环组合发动机进气道设计方案[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123745-123745.
[9]	史磊, 杨光, 丁光华, 林文俊. 风扇转子叶片前缘精细维修方案及流动特性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 423446-423446.
[10]	罗佳奇, 杨婧. 基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.
[11]	程超, 吴宝海, 郑海, 高丽敏. 叶片加工误差对压气机性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(2): 623237-623237.
[12]	刘晓恒, 周成华, 宋满祥, 金东海, 桂幸民. 基于通流方法的某涡喷发动机整机数值仿真[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 123199-123199.
[13]	史磊, 杨光, 林文俊. 前缘侵蚀对风扇转子叶片气动特性的影响机理[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 123007-123007.
[14]	昌皓, 金东海, 桂幸民. 掠叶片进口流动的流线曲率通流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(3): 121616-121616.
[15]	向宏辉, 葛宁, 高杰, 唐凯, 杨荣菲. 周向非均匀叶尖间隙对轴流压气机性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 121491-121491.