基于深度学习的ADS-B异常数据检测模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23220

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于深度学习的ADS-B异常数据检测模型

丁建立^1,2, 邹云开², 王静¹, 王怀超¹

1. 中国民航大学计算机学院, 天津 300300;
2. 中国民航大学中欧航空工程师学院, 天津 300300

收稿日期:2019-06-14 修回日期:2019-08-11 出版日期:2019-12-15 发布日期:2019-08-29
通讯作者: 邹云开 E-mail:zouyunkaicauc@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金民航联合基金（U1833114）；民航安全能力项目（AADSA0018）

ADS-B anomaly data detection model based on deep learning

DING Jianli^1,2, ZOU Yunkai², WANG Jing¹, WANG Huaichao¹

1. College of Computer Science and Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2019-06-14 Revised:2019-08-11 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-08-29
Supported by:
National Natural Science Civil Aviation Joint Foundation of China (U1833114); Civil Aviation Safety Ability Program(AADSA0018)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 广播式自动相关监视（ADS-B）是下一代空中交通运输系统的重要组成部分，是新航行系统中非常重要的通信和监视技术，但其协议没有提供相关的信息认证和数据加密，因此极其容易受到欺骗干扰的影响。针对ADS-B报文数据特点，采用深度学习的seq2seq模型对ADS-B报文数据进行重构，通过重构误差来检测异常，并对数据进行特征扩展，使模型能更好的捕捉数据的时间依赖性。实验结果表明，所采用的方法优于传统的机器学习方法，且在数据特征扩展后，模型检测效果提升。相比于现有的欺骗干扰检测方法，该方法不需要改变ADS-B系统的协议，也不需要额外的节点或传感器参与，具有一定的适应性和灵活性。

Abstract: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) is an important part of the next generation air transportation system. It is a critical communication and monitoring technology in the new navigation system, but its protocol does not provide relevant authentication and data encryption, so it is extremely vulnerable to various spoofing attack. Based on the data characteristics, this paper uses the deep learning seq2seq model to reconstruct the ADS-B time series, and the reconstruction error can detect the anomalous ADS-B messages. Extending the feature space of time series enables the model to better capture the time dependence to further improve the effect of anomaly detection. The experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to traditional machine learning methods and time series enrichment can improve detection results. Compared with the existing spoofing attack detection method, the proposed method does not need to change the ADS-B protocol and does not require additional participating nodes or sensors, and has certain adaptability and flexibility.

Key words: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), security, anomaly detection, deep learning, seq2seq model

中图分类号:

V243
TP277

丁建立, 邹云开, 王静, 王怀超. 基于深度学习的ADS-B异常数据检测模型[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 323220-323220.

DING Jianli, ZOU Yunkai, WANG Jing, WANG Huaichao. ADS-B anomaly data detection model based on deep learning[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(12): 323220-323220.

参考文献 28

[1]	SCHÄFER M, LENDERS V, MARTINOVIC I. Experimental analysis of attacks on next generation air traffic communication[C]//International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security. Berlin:Heidelberg, 2013:253-271.
[2]	YANG H, HUANG R, WANG X, et al. EBAA:An efficient broadcast authentication scheme for ADS-B communication based on IBS-MR[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(3):688-696.
[3]	BAEK J, HABLEEL E, BYON Y J, et al. How to protect ADS-B:Confidentiality framework and efficient realization based on staged identity-based encryption[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 18(3):690-700.
[4]	STROHMEIER M, MARTINOVIC I. On passive data link layer fingerprinting of aircraft transponders[C]//Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems-Security and/or PrivaCy. New York:ACM, 2015:1-9.
[5]	JOHNSON J, NEUFELDT H, BEYER J. Wide area multilateration and ADS-B proves resilient in Afghanistan[C]//2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:A6-1-A6-8.
[6]	颜可壹, 吕泽均, 时宏伟,等. 基于TDOA/TSOA的ADS-B系统防欺骗技术[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2015, 32(8):2272-2275. YAN K Y, LV Z J, SHI H W, et al. ADS-B system anti cheat technology based on TDOA/TSOA[J]. Application research of Computers, 2015, 32(8):2272-2275(in Chinese).
[7]	KAUNE R, STEFFES C, RAU S, et al. Wide area multilateration using ADS-B transponder signals[C]//2012 15th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:727-734.
[8]	KACEM T, WIJESEKERA D, COSTA P, et al. An ADS-B intrusion detection system[C]//2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2016:544-551.
[9]	STROHMEIER M, MARTINOVIC I, LENDERS V. A k-NN-based localization approach for crowdsourced air traffic communication networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54(3):1519-1529.
[10]	侯明正, 冯子亮, 潘卫军, 等. 一种检测ADS-B虚假目标的方法.中国:CN102323567A[P].2012. HOU M Z, FENG Z L, PAN W J, et al. A method for detecting ADS-B false targets. China:CN102323567A[P]. 2012(in Chinese)
[11]	陈蕾, 吴仁彪, 卢丹. 利用多普勒效应的ADS3B欺骗式干扰检测方法[J]. 信号处理, 2018, 34(6):722-728. CHEN L, WU R B, LU D. ADS-B spoofing detection method using doppler effect[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2018, 34(6):722-728(in Chinese).
[12]	WANG W, CHEN G, WU R, et al. A low-complexity spoofing detection and suppression approach for ADS-B[C]//2015 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2015:K2-1-K2-8.
[13]	AHMAD S, LAVIN A, PURDY S, et al. Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 262:134-147.
[14]	TERZI D S, TERZI R, SAGIROGLU S. Big data analytics for network anomaly detection from netflow data[C]//2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2017:592-597.
[15]	XU H, CHEN W, ZHAO N, et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection via variational auto-encoder for seasonal kpis in web applications[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 2018:187-196.
[16]	LAPTEV N, AMIZADEH S, FLINT I. Generic and scalable framework for automated time-series anomaly detection[C]//Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York:ACM, 2015:1939-1947.
[17]	LIU D, ZHAO Y, XU H, et al. Opprentice:Towards practical and automatic anomaly detection through machine learning[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference. New York:ACM, 2015:211-224.
[18]	GÖRNITZ N, KLOFT M, RIECK K, et al. Toward supervised anomaly detection[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2013, 46:235-262.
[19]	PENG H K, MARCULESCU R. Multi-scale compositionality:Identifying the compositional structures of social dynamics using deep learning[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(4):e0118309.
[20]	JAVAID A, NIYAZ Q, SUN W, et al. A deep learning approach for network intrusion detection system[C]//Proceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Bio-inspired Information and Communications Technologies, 2016:21-26.
[21]	CHO K, VAN MERRIËNBOER B, GULCEHRE C, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014.
[22]	STROHMEIER M, LENDERS V, MARTINOVIC I. On the security of the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast protocol[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2014, 17(2):1066-1087.
[23]	MANESH M R, KAABOUCH N. Analysis of vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures and overall risk of the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) system[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2017, 19:16-31.
[24]	CHAN-TIN E, HEORHIADI V, HOPPER N, et al. The frog-boiling attack:Limitations of secure network coordinate systems[J]. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2011, 14(3):27.
[25]	DONG W, YUAN T, YANG K, et al. Autoencoder regularized network for driving style representation learning[EB/OL]. (2017-01-05)[2019-06-14].https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01272.
[26]	KIEU T, YANG B, JENSEN C S. Outlier detection for multidimensional time series using deep neural networks[C]//2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2018:125-134.
[27]	HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural computation, 1997, 9(8):1735-1780.
[28]	GRAVES A, SCHMIDHUBER J. Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures[J]. Neural Networks, 2005, 18(5-6):602-610.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于深度学习的ADS-B异常数据检测模型

ADS-B anomaly data detection model based on deep learning

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏翎菲, 化永朝, 董希旺, 任章. 人与无人机集群多模态智能交互方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 727001-727001.
[2]	曹明, 王鹏, 左洪福, 曾海军, 孙见忠, 杨卫东, 魏芳, 陈雪峰. 民用航空发动机故障诊断与健康管理现状、挑战与机遇Ⅱ: 地面综合诊断、寿命管理和智能维护维修决策[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625574-625574.
[3]	刘佳奇, 冯蕴雯, 路成, 薛小锋, 潘维煌. 基于智能神经网络的航空发动机运行安全分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625375-625375.
[4]	赵良玉, 李丹, 赵辰悦, 蒋飞. 无人机自主降落标识检测方法若干研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 25882-025882.
[5]	康玉祥, 陈果, 尉询楷, 周磊. 深度残差对冲网络及其在滚动轴承故障诊断中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625201-625201.
[6]	刘子超, 王江, 何绍溟, 李宇飞. 基于预测校正的落角约束计算制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 325433-325433.
[7]	孙灿飞, 黄林然, 沈勇. 复杂工况下的直升机行星传动轮系故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625480-625480.
[8]	邵怡韦, 陈嘉宇, 林翠颖, 万程, 葛红娟, 石智龙. 小训练样本下齿轮箱故障诊断:一种基于改进深度森林的方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625429-625429.
[9]	吕帅帅, 杨宇, 王彬文, 殷晨飞. 基于改进FaceNet的飞行器结构裂纹识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 525463-525463.
[10]	刘天元, 郑杭彬, 杨长祺, 鲍劲松, 汪俊亮, 顾俊. 面向激光焊接缺陷识别的可解释性深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 524961-524961.
[11]	康硕, 柯臻铮, 王璇, 朱伟东. 基于红外和可见光图像融合的铺丝缺陷检测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425187-425187.
[12]	战庆亮, 白春锦, 张宁, 葛耀君. 基于时程卷积自编码的机翼绕流特征识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526531-526531.
[13]	奕建苗, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 快速预测跨声速流场的深度学习方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526747-526747.
[14]	蔡国飙, 张百一, 贺碧蛟, 翁惠焱, 刘立辉. 真空羽流智能化计算[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527352-527352.
[15]	李红光, 王菲, 丁文锐. 面向目标分类识别的多任务学习算法综述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 24889-024889.