优化驱动的起落架结构设计方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0163

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

优化驱动的起落架结构设计方法

张明¹, 刘文斌², 李闯², 聂宏¹

1. 南京航空航天大学飞行器先进设计技术国防重点学科实验室, 南京 210016;
2. 上海飞机设计研究院, 上海 201210

收稿日期:2014-04-02 修回日期:2014-07-16 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-03-31
通讯作者: 张明男, 博士, 副教授。主要研究方向: 飞行器起落装置设计。Tel: 025-84892384 E-mail: zhm6196@nuaa.edu.cn E-mail:zhm6196@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:刘文斌男, 硕士, 工程师。主要研究方向: 起落架结构优化设计与分析。E-mail: 87622938@qq.com;李闯男, 硕士, 工程师。主要研究方向: 起落架系统设计与分析。E-mail: 834758784@qq.com聂宏男,博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞行器起落装置设计。E-mail: hnie@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金 (51305198); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20123218120003)

Optimization-driven design method of landing gear structure

ZHANG Ming¹, LIU Wenbin², LI Chuang², NIE Hong¹

1. Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shanghai 201210, China

Received:2014-04-02 Revised:2014-07-16 Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-31
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51305198); Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20123218120003)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

起落架结构是飞机上最复杂最重要的结构之一,传统的设计方法依靠人工经验反复迭代,没有充分利用结构优化技术,具有设计周期长且不能最大限度得到最优设计的缺点。根据结构优化技术的发展,提出了优化驱动的起落架结构设计方法,实现了优化驱动的设计方法在起落架领域的完整工程应用。结构优化技术作为整个设计流程的驱动者,在其中发挥贯穿全程的主体作用,根据不同设计阶段的需求,先后运用拓扑优化、尺寸优化和形状优化技术。以某型飞机前起落架外筒的设计为例可以发现,相比传统设计方法,新方法在相同的设计约束条件下,能更快得到设计方案,结构质量减少了24.1%,实现了起落架结构的快速设计和轻量化设计。

关键词: 起落架设计, 结构设计, 优化驱动, 拓扑优化, 尺寸优化, 形状优化

Abstract:

Landing gear structure is one of the most complex and important structures in aircraft. The traditional method for aircraft landing gear design is an iterative process relied on the experience of human, which does not take advantage of the important structural optimization technology, so the design cycles still seem long and the outcome is seldom the best. In this paper, optimization-driven design method of landing gear structural is proposed based on the development history of structural design process. This is the first application of the optimization-driven method in landing gear structural design. As a driver, optimization technology plays a main role throughout the entire design process. Topology optimization, size optimization and shape optimization are applied to the method according to different demands. Taking a certain type of landing gear cylinder design for example, both the current method and optimization-driven method are used for comparison. The results show that the new method reduces the weight of the strut cylinder by 24.1%, improves the efficiency and performance of the landing gear structural design and also achieves a rapid and lightweight design.

Key words: landing gear design, structural design, optimization-driven, topology optimization, size optimization, shape optimization

中图分类号:

V226

张明, 刘文斌, 李闯, 聂宏. 优化驱动的起落架结构设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3): 857-864.

ZHANG Ming, LIU Wenbin, LI Chuang, NIE Hong. Optimization-driven design method of landing gear structure[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(3): 857-864.

参考文献

[1] Gao Z J, Huang Z W. Aircraft design manual 14th Volume: takeoff and landing system design[J]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2002: 1 (in Chinese). 高泽迥, 黄振威. 飞机设计手册第14分册: 起飞着陆系统设计[J]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2002: 1.

[2] Chai S T, Mason W H. Landing gear integration in aircraft conceptual design[D]. Blacksburg,VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1996.

[3] Nguyen T, Schonning A, Eason P, et al. Methods for analyzing nose gear during landing using structural finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(1): 275-280.

[4] Tao J X, Smith S, Duff A. The effect of overloading sequences on landing gear fatigue damage[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009, 31(11): 1837-1847.

[5] Wu X H, Hong Q Q. Optimization techniques applied to the design of the Boeing 787[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2008(14): 51-52 (in Chinese). 邬旭辉, 洪清泉. 优化技术在波音787设计中的应用[J].航空制造技术, 2008(14): 51-52.

[6] Tylor R M, Thomas J E, Mackaron N G, et al. Detail part optimization on the F-35 joint strike fighter, AIAA-2006-1868[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.

[7] Li L, Xue Z. Internal structure of three-dimensional hollow blade with equal strength[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(10): 2329-2333 (in Chinese). 李琳, 薛铮. 等强度三维空心叶片的内部拓扑结构[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(10): 2329-2333.

[8] Xu S Q, Xia R W. Methods of structural optimization: an overview[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1995, 16(4): 385-396 (in Chinese). 许素强, 夏人伟. 结构优化方法研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 1995, 16(4): 385-396.

[9] Saitou K, Izui K, Nishiwaki S, et al. A survey of structural optimization in mechanical product development[J]. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2005, 5(3): 214-226.

[10] Cervellera P, Zhou M, Schramm U. Optimization driven design of shell structures under stiffness, strength and stability requirements[C]//6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005.

[11] Schuhmacher G, Stettner M, Zotemantel R, et al. Optimization assisted structural design of a new military transport aircraft, AIAA-2004-4641[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.

[12] Tcherniak D. Topology optimization of resonating structures using SIMP method[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 54(11): 1605-1622.

[13] Liang X P, Wang H. Structural optimization design based on FEM: principles and engineering applications[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2010: 9-12 (in Chinese). 梁醒培, 王辉. 基于有限元法的结构优化设计:原理与工程应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 9-12.

[14] Fleury C. CONLIN: an efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts[J]. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(2): 81-89.

[15] Rietz A. Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) method[J]. Structural and Multidiscipline Optimization, 2011, 21(2): 159-163.

[16] Wang W, Yang W, Chang N. Integration shape and sizing optimization of composite wing structure based on response surface method[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2008, 25(2): 94-100.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

优化驱动的起落架结构设计方法

Optimization-driven design method of landing gear structure

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马祥涛, 王法垚, 朱英杰, 郝鹏, 王博, 刘观日. 面向缺陷容忍的加筋筒壳快速优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 226430-226430.
[2]	梁宽, 付莉莉, 张晓鹏, 罗阳军. 基于材料场级数展开的结构动力学拓扑优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 226002-226002.
[3]	韩凯, 董日昌, 邵丰伟, 龚文斌, 常家超. 基于改进遗传算法的导航卫星星间链路网络动态拓扑优化技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 326095-326095.
[4]	闫浩, 吴晓明. 载荷敏度抑制下涡轮盘拓扑优化及结构演化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225295-225295.
[5]	胡嘉欣, 芮姝, 高瑞朝, 苟建军, 龚春林. 飞行器结构布局与尺寸混合优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225363-225363.
[6]	郭文杰, 朱继宏, 罗利龙, 常亮. 考虑组件保形约束的多组件结构系统布局优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225225-225225.
[7]	岳波, 许英杰, 徐宁鑫, 张卫红. 热压罐成型框架式模具结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425141-425141.
[8]	李东, 李平岐. 长征五号火箭技术突破与中国运载火箭未来发展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527269-527269.
[9]	李增聪, 陈燕, 李红庆, 田阔, 王刚, 高峰, 王博. 面向集中力扩散的回转曲面加筋拓扑优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224616-224616.
[10]	郭磊, 高远, 辛会. 热障涂层的激光表面改性参数优化和结构设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 424114-424114.
[11]	常楠, 徐荣欣, 陈先民, 杨军, 李毅. 静强度/耐久性初步结构优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524389-524389.
[12]	倪维宇, 张横, 姚胜卫. 考虑阻尼性能的复合结构多尺度拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 224807-224807.
[13]	龙凯, 陈卓, 谷春璐, 王选. 考虑承载面最大位移约束的结构拓扑优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 223577-223577.
[14]	张永杰, 吴莹莹, 赵书旺, 司江涛, 袁昌盛. 翼身融合布局民机非圆截面机身结构设计研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623054-623054.
[15]	俞燎宏, 荣见华, 唐承铁, 李方义. 基于可行域调整的多相材料结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(9): 222023-222039.