二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25993

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模

程剑锐¹, 施崇广¹, 瞿丽霞², 徐悦², 尤延铖¹, 朱呈祥¹

1. 厦门大学航空航天学院, 厦门 361102;
2. 中国航空研究院, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2021-06-21 修回日期:2021-07-21 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-22
通讯作者: 朱呈祥,E-mail:chengxiang.zhu@xmu.edu.cn E-mail:chengxiang.zhu@xmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
航空科学基金(2018ZB68008)；技术领域基金(2020-JCJQ-JJ-312)；基础加强项目(PZ2020016)；1912项目

Theoretical model of 2D curved shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction

CHENG Jianrui¹, SHI Chongguang¹, QU Lixia², XU Yue², YOU Yancheng¹, ZHU Chengxiang¹

1. School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China;
2. Chinese Aeronautical Establishment, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2021-06-21 Revised:2021-07-21 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2021-09-22
Supported by:
Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2018ZB68008); Technology Field Fund Project of China (2020-JCJQ-JJ-312); Foundation Enhancement Project (PZ2020016); 1912 Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 内外流曲面设计构型的广泛应用对以弯曲激波为特征的激波/边界层干扰机理的认知带来了艰巨挑战, 构建全新的弯曲激波/边界层干扰理论体系意义重大。首先基于弯曲激波理论与自由干扰理论构建了二维弯曲入射激波/平板湍流边界层干扰的无黏流动模型, 通过将流场划分为弯曲激波/膨胀波干扰区、弯曲激波/分离激波干扰区、边界层流动分离区3个典型流动区域, 利用弯曲激波的波后二阶参数实现了对二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰的流场特征描述。随后, 采用数值方法验证了该理论模型的精度, 在5种不同来流马赫数及激波条件下, 分离点、激波交点等各关键坐标最大误差均小于4.5%。在此基础上, 利用该模型着重分析了弯曲入射激波强度、边界层厚度、下游扰动对二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流场的影响规律, 总结了分离区上游影响长度的增长特性。该模型是构建三维弯曲激波/边界层干扰理论体系的基础, 也为未来弯曲激波/边界层干扰研究提供了一种新手段。

关键词: 弯曲激波, 湍流边界层, 激波/边界层干扰, 流场结构, 流动分离

Abstract: With the wide application of curved compression configurations in internal/external flows, it presents a formidable challenge on perceiving shock wave/boundary layer interactions characterized by curvatures. Thus, to create new theories of Curved Shock Wave/turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions (CSWBLI) is of great importance. In this paper, an inviscid model of 2D incident curved shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction on a flat plate is built based on the curved shock theory and the free interaction theory. The flowfield is divided into three regions: the curved shock wave/expansion wave interaction region, the curved shock wave/separation shock interaction region and the boundary layer region, where the second order parameters behind the curved shock wave are used to describe the characteristics of the 2D CSWBLI flowfield. Thereafter, the accuracy of the model is verified by numerical simulations in five models with different Mach numbers and incident shocks, and the maximum error of the key point such as the separation point and the intersection point is less than 4.5%. Finally, the influences of incident shock, local boundary layer and downstream disturbance on the interaction are analyzed, and the rules of upstream influence length of the separation bubble in the 2D CSWBLI are summarized. The developed model is the fundamental of the flowfield structure of 3D CSWBLI, and also provides a new method for the research on CSWBLI in the future.

Key words: curved shock, turbulent boundary layer, shock wave/boundary layer interaction, flowfield structure, flow separation

中图分类号:

V211.1

程剑锐, 施崇广, 瞿丽霞, 徐悦, 尤延铖, 朱呈祥. 二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125993-125993.

CHENG Jianrui, SHI Chongguang, QU Lixia, XU Yue, YOU Yancheng, ZHU Chengxiang. Theoretical model of 2D curved shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 125993-125993.

参考文献

[1] FERRI A. Experimental results with airfoils tested in the high-speed tunnel at Guidonia: NACA-TM-946[R]. Washington, D.C. : NACA, 1940.
[2] FAN X H, TANG Z G, WANG G, et al. Review of low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 625917 (in Chinese). 范孝华, 唐志共, 王刚, 等. 激波/湍流边界层干扰低频非定常性研究评述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625917.
[3] SUN D, LIU P X, TONG F L. Effect of spanwise oscillation on interaction of shock wave and turbulent boundary layer[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 124054 (in Chinese). 孙东, 刘朋欣, 童福林. 展向振荡对激波/湍流边界层干扰的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 124054.
[4] MATHEIS J, HICKEL S. On the transition between regular and irregular shock patterns of shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 776: 200-234.
[5] WU H, WANG J H, HUANG W, et al. Research progress on shock wave/boundary layer interactions and flow controls induced by micro vortex generators[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 025371 (in Chinese). 吴瀚, 王建宏, 黄伟, 等. 激波/边界层干扰及微型涡流发生器控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 025371.
[6] DELERY J, MARVIN J G, RESHOTKO E. Shock-wave boundary layer interactions: AGARD-AG-280[R]. Washington, D.C. : NASA, 1986.
[7] YAO Y, GAO B. Flow structure of incident shock wave boundary layer interaction with separation[J]. ActaAerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 740-747, 769 (in Chinese). 姚瑶, 高波. 入射激波边界层干扰分离流场结构研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(5): 740-747, 769.
[8] TONG F L, SUN D, YUAN X X, et al. Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions in a supersonic expansion corner[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(3): 123328 (in Chinese). 童福林, 孙东, 袁先旭, 等. 超声速膨胀角入射激波/湍流边界层干扰直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123328.
[9] ZUO F Y, MEMMOLO A, HUANG G P, et al. Direct numerical simulation of conical shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 877: 167-195.
[10] ZHANG K Y. Hypersonic curved compression inlet and its inverse design[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2019: 97-116 (in Chinese). 张堃元. 高超声速曲面压缩进气道及其反设计[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2019: 97-116.
[11] NEUMANN R, HAYES J. Prediction techniques for the characteristics of the three dimensional shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction[C]//15th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1977.
[12] CAMBIER L, ESCANDE B. Calculation of a three-dimensional shock wave-turbulent boundary-layer interaction[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(11): 1901-1908.
[13] XUE L S, SCHRIJER FF J, VAN OUDHEUSDEN B W, et al. Theoretical study on regular reflection of shock wave-boundary layer interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 899: A30.
[14] CHAPMAN D R, KUEHN D M, LARSON H K. Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition: NACA-TN-3869[R]. Washington, D.C. : NACA, 1957.
[15] GIEPMAN R H M, SCHRIJER F F J, VAN OUDHEUSDEN B W. A parametric study of laminar and transitional oblique shock wave reflections[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 844: 187-215.
[16] GROSSMAN I J, BRUCE P J K. Confinement effects on regular-irregular transition in shock-wave-boundary-layer interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 853: 171-204.
[17] MÖLDER S. Curved shock theory[J]. Shock Waves, 2016, 26(4): 337-353.
[18] MÖLDER S. Flow behind concave shock waves[J]. Shock Waves, 2017, 27(5): 721-730.
[19] MÖLDER S. Reflection of curved shock waves[J]. Shock Waves, 2017, 27(5): 699-720.
[20] SHI C G, HAN W Q, DEITERDING R, et al. Second-order curved shock theory[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 891: A21.
[21] BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011: 60-61.
[22] ERDOS J, PALLONE A. Shock-boundary layer interaction and flow separation[C]//Proceedings of the 1962 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962: 239-254.
[23] CHEN M Z. Fundamentals ofviscous fluid dynamics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002: 237-372 (in Chinese). 陈懋章. 粘性流体动力学基础[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002: 237-372.
[24] EDNEY B. Anomalous heat transfer and pressure distributions on blunt bodies at hypersonic speeds in the presence of an impinging shock: NSA-22-049015[R]. Washington, D.C. : Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 1968.
[25] YANG J M, LI Z F, ZHU Y J. Shock waves and shock interactions in hypersonic flow[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2019: 51-79 (in Chinese). 杨基明, 李祝飞, 朱雨建. 高超声速流动中的激波及相互作用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2019: 51-79.
[26] COLES D. The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1956, 1(2): 191-226.
[27] NEILAND V Y. Flow behind the boundary layer separation point in a supersonic stream[J]. Fluid Dynamics, 1971, 6(3): 378-384.
[28] RAMESH M D, TANNEHILL J C. Correlations to predict the streamwise influence regions in supersonic turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(2): 274-283.
[29] MILLER J, TANNEHILL J, LAWRENCE S. PNS algorithm for solving supersonic flows with upstream influences[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(10): 1837-1845.
[30] LU X G, YI S H, NIU H B, et al. Experimental study on shock and turbulent boundary layer interactions under different incident shock waves[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 2020, 50(10): 61-72 (in Chinese). 陆小革, 易仕和, 牛海波, 等. 不同入射激波条件下激波与湍流边界层干扰的实验研究[J]. 中国科学: 物理学力学天文学, 2020, 50(10): 61-72.
[31] SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows: AIAA-1992-0439[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1992.
[32] TAO Y, FAN X Q, ZHAO Y L. Viscous effects of shock reflection hysteresis in steady supersonic flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 759: 134-148.
[33] HE G. Investigation on the three-dimensional swept impinging oblique shock/turbulent boundary layer interactions[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018 (in Chinese). 何刚. 三维后掠激波/湍流边界层干扰研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018.
[34] WANG C P, XUE L S, CHENG K M. Application of the minimum entropy production principle to shock reflection induced by separation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 857: 784-805.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

二维弯曲激波/湍流边界层干扰流动理论建模

Theoretical model of 2D curved shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡守超, 庄宇, 李贤, 江涛. 高超声速气动热标模HyHERM-Ⅰ试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[2]	童福林, 董思卫, 段俊亦, 李新亮. 激波/湍流边界层干扰分离泡直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125437-125437.
[3]	张昊元, 孙东, 邱波, 朱言旦, 王安龄. 湍动能在激波/边界层干扰流动中的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[4]	周岩, 罗振兵, 王林, 夏智勋, 高天翔, 谢玮, 邓雄, 彭文强, 程盼. 等离子体合成射流激励器及其流动控制技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 25027-025027.
[5]	魏自言, 李杰, 张恒, 杨钊. 某层流验证机层流翼段气动改进设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526760-526760.
[6]	段俊亦, 童福林, 李新亮, 刘洪伟. 压缩-膨胀湍流边界层平均摩阻分解[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[7]	刘朋欣, 袁先旭, 孙东, 傅亚陆, 李辰. 高温化学非平衡湍流边界层直接数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 124877-124877.
[8]	王宏宇, 杨彦广, 胡伟波, 陈植, 冯黎明, 周游天. 高频微秒脉冲放电控制激波/边界层干扰非定常性的实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625905-625905.
[9]	范孝华, 唐志共, 王刚, 杨彦广. 激波/湍流边界层干扰低频非定常性研究评述[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625917-625917.
[10]	时晓天, 吕蒙, 赵渊, 陶善聪, 郝乐, 袁湘江. 激波/湍流边界层干扰的流动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 625929-625929.
[11]	沈鹏飞, 刘朋欣, 孙东, 袁先旭. 马赫6柱-裙构型激波/湍流边界层干扰摩阻统计特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[12]	刘朋欣, 袁先旭, 梁飞, 李辰, 孙东. 高温化学非平衡湍流边界层脉动量象限分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[13]	吴瀚, 王建宏, 黄伟, 杜兆波, 颜力. 激波/边界层干扰及微型涡流发生器控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 25371-025371.
[14]	孙东, 刘朋欣, 沈鹏飞, 童福林, 郭启龙. 马赫数6柱-裙激波/边界层干扰直接模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 124681-124681.
[15]	童福林, 周桂宇, 孙东, 李新亮. 膨胀效应对激波/湍流边界层干扰的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 123731-123731.