考虑数值离散误差的湍流模型选择引入的不确定度量化

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25741

国家数值风洞(NNW)进展及应用专栏

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

考虑数值离散误差的湍流模型选择引入的不确定度量化

陈江涛^1,2, 章超^1,2, 吴晓军^1,2, 赵炜²

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心空气动力学国家重点实验室, 绵阳 621000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2021-03-30 修回日期:2021-05-06 发布日期:2021-05-20
通讯作者: 赵炜 E-mail:ethnuaa@163.com
基金资助:
国家数值风洞工程

Quantification of turbulence model-selection uncertainties considering discretization errors

CHEN Jiangtao^1,2, ZHANG Chao^1,2, WU Xiaojun^1,2, ZHAO Wei²

1. State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2021-03-30 Revised:2021-05-06 Published:2021-05-20
Supported by:
National Numerical Windtunnel Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在流体力学数值模拟过程中存在着多种来源的不确定因素，科学、定量地描述这些因素对模拟结果的影响对模型确认、工业产品设计优化和性能评估等过程十分重要。数值离散、模型选择和模型预测偏差是模拟过程中3种重要的不确定性来源，为将这3种不确定性因素对模拟目标量的影响统一考虑，发展了考虑数值离散误差的贝叶斯模型平均方法。首先，通过对数值离散解和网格尺度进行拟合完成数值离散误差估计，得到每个备选模型真实解的置信区间。然后，通过嵌套方法和条件优化算法，结合贝叶斯模型平均方法构建目标量的概率盒，定义目标变量累积分布函数的上、下限，以此分析其置信区间。最后，针对NACA0012低速绕流和CHN-T1跨声速绕流问题，给出了同时考虑上述3种不确定性因素之后升、阻力系数的置信区间分析示例。

关键词: 国家数值风洞工程, 不确定度量化, 贝叶斯模型平均, 数值离散误差, 湍流模型

Abstract: Various sources of uncertainty exist in numerical simulations of fluid mechanics. Characterization of the effects induced by uncertain factors on numerical results scientifically and quantitatively is extremely important for model validation, design, optimization and performance assessment processes of relevant products. Discretization errors, model selection and model prediction bias are three significant sources of uncertainties in numerical simulations. To take the three uncertain factors into account simultaneously, an improved Bayesian model averaging approach is proposed in this paper. The new approach begins with discretization error estimation, using curve fits between numerical predictions and grid scale to obtain the confidence interval of exact solutions to each model in possible model sets. The nested loop and conditional optimization algorithm combined with the traditional Bayesian model averaging approach are then used to construct the probability box for quantity-of-interest. Bounds of cumulative distribution function are then used for confidence interval estimation. The new approach is applied in the simulation of the low speed flow over NACA0012 airfoil and the transonic flow over CHN-T1, and the confidence intervals of the lift and drag coefficients are estimated.

Key words: National Numerical Windtunnel Project, uncertainty quantification, Bayesian model averaging, numerical discretization error, turbulence model

中图分类号:

V211.3

陈江涛, 章超, 吴晓军, 赵炜. 考虑数值离散误差的湍流模型选择引入的不确定度量化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625741-625741.

CHEN Jiangtao, ZHANG Chao, WU Xiaojun, ZHAO Wei. Quantification of turbulence model-selection uncertainties considering discretization errors[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625741-625741.

参考文献

[1] 陈坚强. 国家数值风洞工程(NNW)关键技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中国科学:技术科学, (2021-04-28)[2021-05-09]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5844.TH.202104-28.0914.006.html. CHEN J Q. Advances in the key technologies of Chinese National Numerical Wind Tunnel Project[J/OL]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, (2021-04-28)[2021-05-09]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5844.TH.202104-28.0914.006.html (in Chinese).
[2] SLOTNICK J, KHODADOUST A, ALONSO J, et al. CFD vision 2030 study:A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences:NASA/CR-20414-218178[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2014.
[3] MOSLEH A, APOSTOLAKIS G. The assessment of probability distributions from expert opinions with an application to seismic fragility curves[J]. Risk Analysis, 1986, 6(4):447-461.
[4] RILEY M, GRANDHI R. A method for the quantification of model-form and parametric uncertainties in physics-based simulations[C]//52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[5] REINERT J M, APOSTOLAKIS G E. Including model uncertainty in risk-informed decision making[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2006, 33(4):354-369.
[6] PARK I, AMARCHINTA H K, GRANDHI R V. A Bayesian approach for quantification of model uncertainty[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(7):777-785.
[7] RILEY M E, GRANDHI R V. Quantification of model-form and predictive uncertainty for multi-physics simulation[J]. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(11-12):1206-1213.
[8] PARK I, GRANDHI R V. Quantifying multiple types of uncertainty in physics-based simulation using Bayesian model averaging[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(5):1038-1045.
[9] EÇA L, HOEKSTRA M. A procedure for the estimation of the numerical uncertainty of CFD calculations based on grid refinement studies[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 262:104-130.
[10] ROACHE P J. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering[J]. Computing in Science Engineering, 1998:107-240.
[11] ROY C J. Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 205(1):131-156.
[12] ELDRED M, BICHON B. Second-order reliability formulations in DAKOTA/UQ[C]//47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2006.
[13] SPALART P, ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[C]//30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 1992.
[14] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605.
[15] CHEN J T, ZHANG Y B, ZHOU N C, et al. Numerical investigations of the high-lift configuration with MFlow solver[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(4):1051-1062.
[16] 赵辉, 胡星志, 张健, 等. 湍流模型系数不确定度对翼型绕流模拟的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6):122581. ZHAO H, HU X Z, ZHANG J, et al. Effects of uncertainty in turbulence model coefficients on flow over airfoil simulation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(6):122581(in Chinese).
[17] 陈江涛, 赵娇, 章超, 等. 数值模拟方法对NASA CRM模型阻力预测的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(4):123383. CHEN J T, ZHAO J, ZHANG C, et al. Effects of numerical simulation approaches on drag prediction of NASA CRM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(4):123383(in Chinese).
[18] DISKIN B, THOMAS J L. Comparison of node-centered and cell-centered unstructured finite-volume discretizations:Inviscid fluxes[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(4):836-854.
[19] VENKATAKRISHNAN V. On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions[C]//31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 1993.
[20] LADSON C L. Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section:NASA TM 4074[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1988.
[21] 余永刚, 周铸, 黄江涛, 等. 单通道客机气动标模CHN-T1设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(3):505-513. YU Y G, ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1 for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):505-513(in Chinese).
[22] 李强, 刘大伟, 许新, 等. CHN-T1标模2.4米风洞气动特性试验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2):337-344. LI Q, LIU D W, XU X, et al. Experimental study of aerodynamic characterictics of CHN-T1 standard model in 2.4 m transonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):337-344(in Chinese).
[23] 张耀冰, 唐静, 陈江涛, 等. 基于非结构混合网格的CHN-T1标模气动特性预测[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(2):262-271. ZHANG Y B, TANG J, CHEN J T, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics prediction of CHN-T1 standard model with unstructured grid[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(2):262-271(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

考虑数值离散误差的湍流模型选择引入的不确定度量化

Quantification of turbulence model-selection uncertainties considering discretization errors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田得阳, 平熠, 陈烨斯, 陈伟芳. 物理化学模型对流场电磁波传播特性影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 214-224.
[2]	张昊元, 孙东, 邱波, 朱言旦, 王安龄. 湍动能在激波/边界层干扰流动中的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125504-125504.
[3]	李金晟, 庄凌, 宋加洪, 卢宝刚, 苏伟, 吴乔. 适用于工程数据的飞行器气动特性修正框架[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 125157-125157.
[4]	舒博文, 杜一鸣, 高正红, 夏露, 陈树生. 典型航空分离流动的雷诺应力模型数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526385-526385.
[5]	谢晨月, 王建春, 万敏平, 陈十一. 基于人工神经网络的可压缩湍流大涡模拟模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625723-625723.
[6]	陈呈, 赵丹, 王岳青, 邓亮, 杨超, 苏铖宇, 王昉. NNW-TopViz流场可视分析系统[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625747-625747.
[7]	童自翔, 李明佳, 李冬. 导热-辐射耦合传热的多尺度分析和数值模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625729-625729.
[8]	王萍, 郑晓静. 风沙两相流数值模拟研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625767-625767.
[9]	向星皓, 张毅锋, 袁先旭, 涂国华, 万兵兵, 陈坚强. C-γ-Re_θ高超声速三维边界层转捩预测模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 625711-625711.
[10]	陈江涛, 赵娇, 章超, 刘深深, 张耀冰, 吴晓军. 数值模拟方法对NASA CRM模型阻力预测的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(4): 123383-123383.
[11]	张亦知, 程诚, 范钇彤, 李高华, 李伟鹏. 基于物理知识约束的数据驱动式湍流模型修正及槽道湍流计算验证[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123282-123282.
[12]	赵辉, 胡星志, 张健, 陈江涛, 马明生. 湍流模型系数不确定度对翼型绕流模拟的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 122581-122581.
[13]	王运涛. DPW Ⅳ~DPW Ⅵ数值模拟技术综述特约[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4): 21836-021836.
[14]	闫文辉, 薛然然. NACA4412翼型低速绕流数值计算中湍流模型对比[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721515-721515.
[15]	张露, 李杰. 基于RANS/LES方法的超声速底部流场数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(1): 120102-120102.