HyTRV流场特征与边界层稳定性特征分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24317

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

HyTRV流场特征与边界层稳定性特征分析

陈坚强^1,2, 涂国华¹, 万兵兵¹, 袁先旭¹, 杨强¹, 庄宇³, 向星皓¹

1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心空气动力学国家重点实验室, 绵阳 621000;
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000;
3. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2020-05-29 修回日期:2020-07-27 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:1900-01-01
通讯作者: 万兵兵 E-mail:bbwan@skla.cardc.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2016YFA0401200）；国家自然科学基金（11772350）；国家数值风洞工程

Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV

CHEN Jianqiang^1,2, TU Guohua¹, WAN Bingbing¹, YUAN Xianxu¹, YANG Qiang¹, ZHUANG Yu³, XIANG Xinghao¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
2. Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China;
3. Hypervelocity Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2020-05-29 Revised:2020-07-27 Online:2021-06-15 Published:1900-01-01
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0401200); National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772350); National Numerical Wind Tunnel Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高超声速转捩研究飞行器（HyTRV）是为研究三维复杂外形的边界层转捩问题而设计的一款具备真实飞行器典型特征的升力体标模。为支撑更加全面系统的理论分析、数值模拟、风洞试验和飞行试验研究，采用高精度数值模拟方法、线性稳定性理论（LST）和e^N方法对HyTRV标模的典型流动特征和边界层失稳特征进行了分析。研究表明，HyTRV展现出多个相对独立的横流区域和多个流向涡结构；HyTRV的边界层存在横流失稳模态、第二模态、附着线失稳模态等常见模态。横流失稳模态出现在周向高低压区之间的横流区域，能够主导转捩发生；横流区域同时也存在第二模态，其N值普遍比横流失稳模态小；附着线失稳模态呈现出第二模态特性，且频率非常高。还研究了攻角和单位雷诺数的影响。结果表明，随着攻角增加，标模下表面中心线的流向涡结构逐渐消失，横流雷诺数逐渐减小；上表面流向涡结构逐渐从腰部移向顶端，并出现新的流向涡结构。增加攻角，所有失稳模态的N值总体上逐渐减小；增加单位雷诺数，N值显著增加。基于研究结果，针对流向涡失稳、横流失稳、第二模态和附着线失稳等给出了研究建议。

关键词: 升力体, e^N方法, 横流失稳, 附着线失稳, 流向涡

Abstract: The Hypersonic Transition Research Vehicle (HyTRV) is a lifting body model with typical characteristics of a real aircraft designed for the study of boundary-layer transition on three-dimensional complex geometries. To support a more comprehensive and systematic study of hypersonic transition by means of theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, wind tunnel experiments and flight tests, the typical characteristics of the flow and the boundary-layer instability of the HyTRV model are analyzed with high-order numerical simulation, the Linear Stability Theory (LST) and the e^N method. Results show that the HyTRV exhibits several relatively independent crossflow regions and streamwise vortices. The boundary layer of the HyTRV has common typical instability modes such as the crossflow mode, the second mode and the attachment line mode. The crossflow instability mode, which can lead to transition, appears in the crossflow region between the high- and low-pressure zones in the circumferential direction. Meanwhile, the second mode is also found in the crossflow region, though its N factor is generally smaller than that of the crossflow instability mode. The attachment line instability mode essentially belongs to the second mode, with a high frequency. The effects of the angle of attack and the unit Reynolds number on the boundary layer transition are also studied. The results show that with the increase of the angle of attack, the streamwise vortex structure along the centerline on the lower surface gradually disappears, and the crossflow Reynolds number gradually decreases; the original streamwise vortices on the upper surface gradually move from the side to the top and new streamwise vortices also appear. The N factors of all instability modes in general decrease gradually with the increase of the angle of attack, and increase significantly with the increase of the unit Reynolds number. Based on these results, advice on the typical instabilities including the streamwise vortex instability, the crossflow instability, the second mode and the attachment line instability are given.

Key words: lifting body, e^N method, crossflow instability, attachment line instability, streamwise vortex

中图分类号:

陈坚强, 涂国华, 万兵兵, 袁先旭, 杨强, 庄宇, 向星皓. HyTRV流场特征与边界层稳定性特征分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124317-124317.

CHEN Jianqiang, TU Guohua, WAN Bingbing, YUAN Xianxu, YANG Qiang, ZHUANG Yu, XIANG Xinghao. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 124317-124317.

参考文献

[1] Defense Science Board. Final report of the second defense science board task on the national aero-space plane (NASP):AD-A274530, 1994-00052[R]. 1994.
[2] 陈坚强, 涂国华, 张毅锋, 等. 高超声速边界层转捩研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(3):311-337. CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition:What we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35:311-337(in Chinese).
[3] 罗纪生. 高超声速边界层的转捩及预测[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(1):357-372. LUO J S. Transition and prediction for hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(1):357-372(in Chinese).
[4] 解少飞, 杨武兵, 沈清. 高超声速边界层转捩机理及应用的若干进展回顾[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3):714-723. XIE S F, YANG W B, SHEN Q. Review of progresses in hypersonic boundary layer transition mechanism and its applications[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3):714-723(in Chinese).
[5] MACK L M. Boundary layer linear stability theory:AGARD 709[R]. Paris:AGARD, 1984.
[6] STETSON K F, THOMPSON E R, DONALDSON J C, et al. Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. Part 2:Blunt cone:AIAA-1984-0006[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1984.
[7] FEDOROV A. Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43:79-95.
[8] ZHONG X, WANG X. Direct numerical simulation on the receptivity, instability, and transition of hypersonic boundary layers[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 44:527-561.
[9] BALAKUMAR P. Receptivity of hypersonic boundary layers to acoustic and vortical disturbances:AIAA-2015-2473[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[10] 李强, 江涛, 陈苏宇, 等. 激波风洞边界层转捩测量技术及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8):122740. LI Q, JIANG T, CHEN S Y, et al. Measurement technique and application of boundary layer transition in shock tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8):122740(in Chinese).
[11] 徐家宽, 白俊强, 乔磊, 等. 横流不稳定性转捩预测模型[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(6):1814-1822. XU J K, BAI J Q, QIAO L, et al. Transition model for predicting crossflow instabilities[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(6):1814-1822(in Chinese).
[12] 赵磊. 高超声速后掠钝板边界层横流定常涡失稳的研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2016. ZHAO L. Study on instability of stationary crossflow vortices in hypersonic swept blunt plate boundary layer[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2016(in Chinese).
[13] JOEL E G, HEATH B J, GRAHAM V C. Hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition on a cone at angle of attack:AIAA-2011-3561[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[14] DUAN L, CHOUDHARI M M, LI F. Direct numerical simulation of transition in a swept-wing boundary layer:AIAA-2013-2617[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[15] XU G L, LIU G, JIANG X. The nonlinear instability of the supersonic crossflow vortex:AIAA-2014-2637[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2014.
[16] PARADES P, THEOFILIS V. Spatial linear global instability analysis of the HIFiRE-5 elliptic cone mode flow:AIAA-2013-2880[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[17] 李晓虎, 张绍龙, 刘建新, 等.高超声速椭圆锥短轴流向涡的二维全局稳定性分析[J].空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(2):265-272. LI X H, ZHANG S L, LIU J X, et al.Bi-Global instability of streamwise vortices near minor-axis of hypersonic elliptic cone[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):265-272(in Chinese).
[18] REN J, FU S. Secondary instabilities of Görtler vortices in high-speed boundary layer flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 781:388-421.
[19] XU D, ZHANG Y, WU X. Nonlinear evolution and secondary instability of steady and unsteady Görtler vortices induced by free-stream vertical disturbances[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 829:681-730.
[20] CHEN X, HUANG G L, LEE C B. Hypersonic boundary layer transition on a concave wall:stationary Gortler vortices[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 865:1-40.
[21] MACK C J, SCHMID P J. Direct numerical study of hypersonic flow about a swept parabolic body[J]. Computer and Fluid, 2010, 39:1932-1943.
[22] BORG M P, KIMMEL R L, STANFIELD S. HIFiRE-5 attachment-line and crossflow instability in a quiet hypersonic wind tunnel:AIAA-2011-3247[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2011.
[23] DOLVIN D J. Hypersonic international flight research and experimentation:AIAA-2009-7228[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2009.
[24] WHEATON B M, BERRIDGE D C, WOLF T D, et al. Boundary layer transition (BOLT) flight experiment overview:AIAA-2018-2892[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2018.
[25] 袁先旭, 何琨, 陈坚强, 等. MF-1模型飞行试验转捩结果初步分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(2):286-293. YUAN X X, HE K, CHEN J Q, et al. Preliminary transition research analysis of MF-1[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):286-293(in Chinese).
[26] 陈坚强, 袁先旭, 涂国华, 等. 高超声速边界层转捩的几点认识[J]. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2019, 49:114701. CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, TU G H, et al. Recent progresses on hypersonic boundary-layer transition[J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2019, 49:114701(in Chinese).
[27] 涂国华, 万兵兵, 陈坚强, 等. MF-1钝锥边界层稳定性及转捩天地相关性研究[J]. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2019, 49:124701. TU G H, WAN B B, CHEN J Q, et al. Investigation on correlation between wind tunnel and flight for boundary layer stability and transition of MF-1 blunt cone[J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2019, 49:124701. (in Chinese).
[28] DENG X G, ZHANG H X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 165:24-44.
[29] DENG X G, MAO M L, TU G H, et al. High-order and high accurate CFD methods and their applications for complex grid problems[J]. Communication in Computational Physics, 2012,11(4):1081-1102.
[30] 涂国华, 邓小刚, 毛枚良. 消除粘性项高阶离散数值振荡的半结点-结点交错方法[J].空气动力学学报, 2011, 29(1):10-15. TU G H, DENG X G, MAO M L. A staggered non-oscillatory finite difference method for high-order discretization of viscous terms[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2011, 29(1):10-15(in Chinese).
[31] YOON S, JAMESON A. Lower-upper Symmetric-Gauss-Seidel method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(9):1025-1026.
[32] KERVIK A, BRANDT E, HENNINGSON L, et al. Steady solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations by selective frequency damping[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18(6):068102.
[33] 周恒, 赵耕夫. 流动稳定性[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2004. ZHOU H, ZHAO G F. Hydrodynamic stability[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2004(in Chinese).
[34] 张绍龙, 黄章峰, 罗纪生. 三维边界层中考虑等效展向波数的线性稳定性方法[C]//中国力学大会, 2015. ZHANG S L, HUANG Z F, LUO J S.A linear stability method considering thee quivalent spread wavenumber in the three dimensional boundary layer[C]//China Mechanics Conference, 2015(in Chinese).
[35] 黄章峰, 肖凌晨, 罗纪生. 超声速边界层转捩预测e^N方法及其软件开发[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(2):279-285. HUANG Z F, XIAO L C, LUO J S. Transition prediction e^N method and its software development for supersonic boundary layers[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(2):279-285(in Chinese).
[36] FEDOROV A V. Receptivity of high speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 491(491):101-129.
[37] GAO J, LUO J S, WU X S. Receptivity of hypersonic boundary layer due to fast-slow acoustics interaction[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2015, 31(6):899-909.
[38] PEREDES P, GOSSE R, THEOFILIS V, et al. Linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over an elliptic cone[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 804:442-466.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

HyTRV流场特征与边界层稳定性特征分析

Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李昊歌, 杨华, 杨雨欣, 陈伟芳. 高超声速升力体迎风面精细化降热优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[2]	聂晗, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 陈坚强, 段茂昌, 万兵兵. 面向超声速民机层流机翼设计的转捩预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526342-526342.
[3]	徐家宽, 王玉轩, 张扬, 乔磊, 刘建新, 白俊强. 亚跨声速边界层增长因子输运模式研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526734-526734.
[4]	陈艺夫, 王一雯, 邓一菊, 王波, 白俊强, 卢磊. 自然层流机翼的翼套试验及数值方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526793-526793.
[5]	王卫星, 朱婷, 张仁涛, 李宥晨. 高超声速内转式进气道型面流场重构[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 123493-123493.
[6]	孟晓轩, 白俊强, 张美红, 王美黎, 何小龙, 汪辉. 基于双e^N方法的短舱层流转捩影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 123040-123040.
[7]	胡万林, 于剑, 刘宏康, 赵渊, 阎超. 叶片式涡流发生器对压缩拐角流动分离的控制[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(7): 122049-122049.
[8]	朱震, 宋文萍, 韩忠华. 基于双e^N方法的翼身组合体流动转捩自动判断[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 121707-121707.
[9]	杨一雄, 杨体浩, 白俊强, 史亚云, 卢磊. HLFC后掠翼优化设计的若干问题[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(1): 121448-121448.
[10]	李一鸣, 李祝飞, 杨基明, 吴颖川, 余安远. 典型高超声速内转式进气道激光散射流场显示[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 121414-121414.
[11]	徐向南, 张华, 胡波. DBD涡流发生器及其在角区流动控制中的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1743-1752.
[12]	董祥瑞, 陈耀慧, 董刚, 刘怡昕. 基于DES方法的高超声速激波/边界层干扰的双微楔控制数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1771-1780.
[13]	王卫星, 郭荣伟. 圆形出口内转式进气道流动特征[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2): 533-544.
[14]	赵忠良, 杨晓娟, 蒋卫民, 陈建中, 王俊兰. 高超声速飞行器通流模拟方法与风洞验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(11): 2932-2938.
[15]	杨占宇, 单鹏, 赵吕顺, 介克, 郭德三, 刘建, 黄勇. 预燃/流向涡掺混超声速燃烧室的稳焰火炬实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, (3): 390-401.