柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24157

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化

杨磊¹, 李文博², 刘芳子^1,3, 陈雨童¹, 赵征¹

1. 南京航空航天大学民航学院, 南京 211106;
2. 浙江大学软件学院, 杭州 315100;
3. 中国民用航空局空中交通管理局战略发展部, 北京 100020

收稿日期:2020-04-29 修回日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2020-09-17
通讯作者: 李文博 E-mail:wenboli@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61903187）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20190414）

Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace

YANG Lei¹, LI Wenbo², LIU Fangzi^1,3, CHEN Yutong¹, ZHAO Zheng¹

1. College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China;
2. School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 315100, China;
3. Department of Strategic Development, ATM Bureau, CAAC, Beijing 100020, China

Received:2020-04-29 Revised:2020-06-10 Published:2020-09-17
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61903187);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20190414)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 连续下降运行（CDO）是基于航迹运行（TBO）概念的重要组成，对于减少机场终端区燃油消耗和环境影响具有显著效果。简洁、高效和灵活的进场空域，以及高度自动的无冲突节能轨迹规划，是实现高密度终端区连续下降运行的核心要素。设计了一种融合Point Merge理念的新型倒皇冠形进场空域（ICSAA），规范了新型空域内航空器运行程序，建立了以燃油消耗和飞行时间最小为目标的连续下降进近无冲突四维轨迹优化模型，并选用基于精英保留策略的非支配排序遗传算法（NSGA-Ⅱ）进行高效求解。论证了新型柔性空域下连续下降运行轨迹优化具备复杂高密度场景预战术和战术运行性能，对于飞行效率、经济性和空域容量提升具有显著效果，为促进繁忙机场全时段连续下降运行的推广应用提供新视角和新方法。

关键词: 空中交通管理, 空域设计, 终端区, 连续下降运行, 航迹规划

Abstract: Continuous Descending Operation (CDO), an important part of the concept Trajectory Based Operation (TBO), has a significant effect on reducing fuel consumption and noise impact in the airport terminal airspace. Simple, efficient, flexible airspace structure, and highly automatic conflict-free and energy saving trajectory planning are the core elements for the realization of CDO in high-density terminal airspace. We design a new type of airspace named Inverted Crown-Shaped Arrival Airspace (ICSAA) adapted from Point Merge and its operational procedures. Based on the ICSAA, a conflict-free continuous descending trajectory optimization model is established to minimize both fuel consumption and travel time, which is efficiently solved by the adapted NSGA-Ⅱalgorithm. The results demonstrate strong and reliable performance of the proposed trajectory optimization in the new airspace in supporting pre-tactical and tactical operations in complex traffic scenarios, thereby improving flight efficiency, economy and airspace capacity, and further providing a new perspective and method for promoting the application of CDO to high-density airports.

Key words: air traffic management, airspace design, terminal airspace, Continuous Descending Operation (CDO), trajectory planning

中图分类号:

V355

杨磊, 李文博, 刘芳子, 陈雨童, 赵征. 柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 324157-324157.

YANG Lei, LI Wenbo, LIU Fangzi, CHEN Yutong, ZHAO Zheng. Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 324157-324157.

参考文献

[1] 武喜萍, 杨红雨, 韩松臣. 基于复杂网络的空中交通特征与延误传播分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1):113-119. WU X P, YANG H Y, HAN S C. Analysis of properties and delay propagation of air traffic based on complex network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(S1):113-119(in Chinese).
[2] 张军峰, 隋东, 汤新民. 基于状态相关模态切换混合估计的航迹预测[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(11):2955-2964. ZHANG J F, SUI D, TANG X M. Aircraft trajectory prediction based on SDTHE algorithm[J]. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(11):2955-2964(in Chinese).
[3] 高海超, 羌凌飞. 面向服务的下一代空管系统集成设计[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2016,71(6):13-16. GAO H C, QIANG L F. Service-oriented integration design of next generation air traffic management system[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2016,71(6):13-16(in Chinese).
[4] 明朝辉. PBN技术下的空中交通若干关键问题研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学,2018. MIN Z H. Research on key issues of air traffic system based upon performance-based navigation[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018(in Chinese).
[5] CLARKE J P B, HO N T, REN L, et al. Continuous descent approach:Design and flight test for Louisville International Airport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(5):1054-1066.
[6] SHRESTA S, NESKOVIC D, WILLIAMS S S. Analysis of continuous descent benefits and impacts during daytime operations[C]//8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2009), 2009.
[7] 万莉莉. 面向环境保护的空中交通运行优化方法研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学,2015. WAN L L. Research on the optimization method of air traffic operation for environmental protection[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015(in Chinese).
[8] 黄晋. 评估连续下降在终端区运行所产生的利益和影响[J]. 现代电子技术, 2015(10):106-110. HUANG J. Assessment of influence of continuous descent on operation in terminal area[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2015(10):106-110(in Chinese).
[9] 李东亚, 胡荣, 张军峰. 航空器持续下降进近技术的发展现状与展望[J]. 航空计算技术, 2016, 46(5):131-134. LI D Y, HU R, ZHANG J F, et al. Review and prospects on continuous descent approach technology of aircraft[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2016, 46(5):131-134(in Chinese).
[10] ICAO. Doc I. 9931 Continuous descent operations (CDO) manual[R]. Montréal:International Civil Aviation Organization, 2010.
[11] JIN L, CAO Y, SUN D. Investigation of potential fuel savings due to continuous-descent approach[J]. Journal of aircraft, 2013, 50(3):807-816.
[12] TURGUT E T, USANMAZ O, CAVCAR M, et al. Effects of descent flight-path angle on fuel consumption of commercial aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 56(1):313-323.
[13] FRICKE H, SEIß C, HERRMANN R. Fuel and energy benchmark analysis of continuous descent operations[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2015, 23(1):83-108.
[14] ANDREEVA-MORI A, SUZUKI S, ITOH E. Scheduling of arrival aircraft based on minimum fuel burn descents[J]. ASEAN Engineering Journal, 2011, 1(1):25-38.
[15] ENEA G, BRONSVOORT J, MCDONALD G. Trade-Off between optimal profile descents, runway throughput and net fuel benefit, preliminary discussion and results[C]//17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2017.
[16] PARK S G, CLARKE J P. Optimal control based vertical trajectory determination for continuous descent arrival procedures[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(5):1469-1480.
[17] JIA Y, CAI K. The trade-off between trajectory predictability and potential fuel savings for continuous descent operations[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2018.
[18] SGORCEA R M, RWHIML L A W, MOUNT R E. Integrated time-based management and performance-based navigation design for trajectory-based operations[C]//Thirteenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2019.
[19] SÁEZ R, PRATS X, POLISHCHUK T, et al. Automation for separation with continuous descent operations:Dynamic aircraft arrival routes[J]. Journal of Air Transportation, 2020:1-11.
[20] SOLAK S, CHEN H. Optimal metering point configurations for optimized profile descent based arrival operations at airports[J]. Transportation Science, 2018, 52(1):150-170.
[21] PAWELEK A, LICHOTA P, DALMAU R, et al. Fuel-efficient trajectories traffic synchronization[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(2):481-492.
[22] SÁEZ R, DALMAU R, PRATS X. Optimal assignment of 4D close-loop instructions to enable CDOs in dense TMAs[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2018.
[23] SEENIVASAN D B, OLIVARES A, STAFFETTI E. Multi-aircraft optimal 4D online trajectory planning in the presence of a multi-cell storm in development[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2020, 110:123-142.
[24] KENDALL A P, CLARKE J P. Stochastic optimization of area navigation noise abatement arrival and approach procedures[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2020, 43(4):863-869.
[25] DALMAU R, PRATS X, BAXLEY B. Fast sensitivity-based optimal trajectory updates for descent operations subject to time constraints[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2018.
[26] ALAM S, NGUYEN M H, ABBASS H A, et al. Multi-aircraft dynamic continuous descent approach methodology for low-noise and emission guidance[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(4):1225-1237.
[27] 苑克剑, 赵勇, 许玉斌. 三维动态连续下降进近(CDA)飞行航迹优化研究[J]. 民航学报, 2019, 3(1):10,28-32. YUAN K J, ZHAO Y, XU Y B, et al. Research on three-dimensional dynamic flight trajectory optimization of Continuous Descent Approach (CDA)[J]. Journal of Aviation, 2019, 3(1):10,28-32(in Chinese).
[28] FAVENNEC B, SYMMANS T, HOULIHAN D, et al. Point merge integration of arrival flows enabling extensive RNAV application and continuous descent-operational services and environment definition[R]. Aufl, Brétigny:Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, 2010.
[29] 邹朝忠, 杨波, 黄卫芳. 融合点进近程序和技术浅析[J]. 空中交通管制, 2010(1):13-16,34. ZOU Z Z, YANG B, HUANG W F. Merging point approach procedures and its technical analysis[J]. Air Traffic Management, 2010(1):13-16,34(in Chinese).
[30] LIANG M, DELAHAYE D, MARÉCHAL P. Potential operational benefits of multi-layer point merge system on dense TMA operation hybrid arrival trajectory optimization applied to Beijing capital international airport[C]//ICRAT 2016, 7th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, 2016.
[31] 陈相安. 终端区进近中的融合点技术排序优化研究[D]. 天津:中国民航大学, 2016. CHEN X A. Research, optimization, sequencing of a point merge system in TMA approach[D]. Tianjin:Civil Aviation University of China, 2016(in Chinese).
[32] ERRICO A, DI VITO V. Aircraft operating technique for efficient sequencing arrival enabling environmental benefits through CDO in TMA[C]//AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019.
[33] 晁绵博, 赵向领, 李鹏程, 等. 终端区点融合进近程序设计方法研究[J]. 航空计算技术, 2016, 46(2):10-14. ZHAO M B, ZHAO X L, LI P C, et al. Research on point merge approach procedure design in terminal area[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2016, 46(2):10-14(in Chinese).
[34] 苑克剑. 基于融合点的连续下降进近航迹优化研究[D]. 天津:中国民航大学, 2016. YUAN K J. Research on trajectory optimization of continuous descent approach based on merge point[D]. Tianjin:Civil Aviation University of China, 2016(in Chinese).
[35] 王建忠, 王超, 张宝成. 基于点融合进近的航空器进场4D航迹规划[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(14):333-337. WANG J Z, WANG C, ZHANG B C, et al. 4D trajectory planning method for arrivals based on merging point approach[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(14):333-337(in Chinese).
[36] HONG Y, CHOI B, LEE K, et al. Dynamic robust sequencing and scheduling under uncertainty for the point merge system in terminal airspace[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 19(9):2933-2943.
[37] SOLER M, ZOU B, HANSEN M. Flight trajectory design in the presence of contrails:Application of a multiphase mixed-integer optimal control approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2014, 48:172-194.
[38] GLOVER W, LYGEROS J. A multi-aircraft model for conflict detection and resolution algorithm evaluation[J]. HYBRIDGE Deliverable D, 2004, 1:3.
[39] EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre. User Manual for the base of aircraft data (BADA), Revision 3.11:Report No.13/04/16-01[R].Brussels:EEC, 2013.
[40] FILIPPONE A. Aircraft noise prediction[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2014, 68:27-63.
[41] DANIEL D, J-MARC A, MARC S, et al. Genetic algorithms for air traffic assignment[C]//11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (ECAI 94), 1994.
[42] JONES D F, MIRRAZAVI S K, TAMIZ M. Multi-objective meta-heuristics:An overview of the current state-of-the-art[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137(1):1-9.
[43] ZITZLER E, DEB K, THIELE L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms:Empirical results[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8(2):173-195.
[44] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2):182-197.
[45] YU X, LU Y Q, YU X. Evaluating multi-objective evolutionary algorithms using MCDM methods[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018:1-14.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化

Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭琪磊, 桑为民, 牛俊杰, 袁烨. 复杂气象条件下考虑结冰风险的无人机飞行策略[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627518-627518.
[2]	王飞, 韩翔宇. 基于分形插值的空中交通流量短期预测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325585-325585.
[3]	谢华, 黎子弘, 杨磊, 朱永文, 刘芳子. 容量受限下城市对航班四维航迹优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 325581-325581.
[4]	赵嶷飞, 王梦琦. 空中交通工程学理论内涵与关键科学技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 26537-026537.
[5]	张军峰, 游录宝, 杨春苇, 胡荣. 基于多目标帝国竞争算法的进场排序与调度[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324439-324439.
[6]	李宇辉, 赵敏, 陈奇, 姚敏, 何紫阳. 复杂环境下翼伞系统的组合式航迹规划[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324566-324566.
[7]	陈志杰, 汤锦辉, 王冲, 程季锃, 曹珊, 邵欣. 人工智能赋能空域系统,提升空域分层治理能力[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 525018-525018.
[8]	李宪强, 马戎, 张伸, 侯砚泽, 裴毅飞. 蚁群算法的改进设计及在航迹规划中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S2): 724381-724381.
[9]	陈雨童, 胡明华, 杨磊, 张昊然, 赵征. 受限航路空域自主航迹规划与冲突管理技术[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 324045-324045.
[10]	张洪海, 汤一文, 许炎. TBO模式下终端区进场交通流优化模型与仿真分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323844-323844.
[11]	陈奇, 赵敏, 李宇辉, 何紫阳. 基于梯度下降法的翼伞系统最优分段航迹规划[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 324226-324226.
[12]	叶博嘉, 鲍序, 刘博, 田勇. 基于机器学习的航空器进近飞行时间预测[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 324136-324136.
[13]	刘海涛, 顾新宇, 方晓钰, 李冬霞. 频率选择性衰落信道DS-CDMA无人机中继通信系统航迹规划[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(7): 322633-322633.
[14]	王子安, 龚正, 陈永亮, 史志伟, 徐锦法. 混合动力复合翼应急迫降在线航迹规划与制导[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 323105-323105.
[15]	刘海涛, 赵文强, 李春鸣, 李冬霞. 空时分组编码的无人机中继通信航迹规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9): 321048-321048.